ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Colorectal and Proctological Surgery
Managing Recurrent Rectal Prolapse in Women: A Single-Center Study
Provisionally accepted
- 1John Paul II Western Hospital, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
- 2Warsaw Proctology Centre, St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP) presents a significant clinical challenge due to the absence of standardized treatment guidelines and its impact on patients' quality of life. This retrospective study evaluates the outcomes of surgical management for RRP in a single-center cohort. We analyzed female patients (median age of 73) who underwent surgical treatment for RRP between 2014 and 2022. A total of 30 patients received either abdominal (n=12) or perineal (n=18) procedures, including ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR), resection rectopexy, Altemeier or Delorme techniques. Re-recurrence was more common following perineal procedures (39%) than abdominal approaches (25%). VMR and resection rectopexy demonstrated comparable success rates of 75%, while Altemeier and Delorme procedures showed 60% and 67% success, respectively. Functional outcomes improved significantly postoperatively, with the EQ-VAS quality of life score increasing from a median of 50 preoperatively to 75 at three years. Fecal incontinence and constipation scores (Wexner and CCCS) also showed marked improvement. Complications were minor and managed conservatively, with no cases of mesh erosion or anastomotic dehiscence reported. These findings support abdominal procedures, especially VMR and resection rectopexy, as the preferred treatment for medically fit patients with RRP. Perineal approaches remain viable for high-risk patients but are associated with higher recurrence. Although limited by its retrospective design, small sample size, and non-randomized treatment allocation, this study contributes valuable data to inform surgical decision-making in the management of RRP.
Keywords: Rectal Prolapse, Altemeier, Delorme, Quality of Life, Ventral mesh rectopexy, Resection rectopexy
Received: 12 Aug 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rzadkowski, Ciesielski and Kolodziejczak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Stanislaw Rzadkowski
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.