Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 06 January 2026

Sec. Visceral Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1692371

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Surgical Outcomes for Retroperitoneal TumorsView all 14 articles

Intravenous leiomyomatosis involving the inferior vena cava and right atrium with postoperative pulmonary embolism: a case report


Yukai Chen,Yukai Chen1,2Wangwei ZhangWangwei Zhang3Aobo Zhuang,Aobo Zhuang1,2Jiaqing LiuJiaqing Liu4Qinlei WangQinlei Wang1Xiaogang Xia,
Xiaogang Xia1,2*Wen&#x;gang Li,

Wen'gang Li1,2*
  • 1Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • 2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • 3Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare subtype of benign smooth muscle tumor that can exhibit malignant-like biological behavior. Originating in the uterus, IVL grows in mass-like formations within small veins and can extend into the inferior vena cava (IVC), right atrium, and pulmonary arteries. Due to the potential for life-threatening consequences when IVL invades the heart and pulmonary arteries, early diagnosis and radical resection through a multidisciplinary approach are crucial. This report presents a case of uterine intravenous leiomyomatosis involving the IVC and right atrium, complicated by massive pulmonary embolism after surgery, and includes a literature review to discuss the clinical implications.

1 Introduction

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare form of smooth muscle tumor characterized by benign histopathology, yet it may exhibit malignant biological behavior. There is no exact data on the prevalence of IVL, while studies have reported that 30% to 80% of fibroids cases are accompanied by extrauterine involvement, and 10% to 30% can spread to the heart (1). When it invades the right ventricle, it can lead to symptoms such as palpitations and dyspnea. In severe cases, it may obstruct the tricuspid valve, the right ventricular outflow tract, or the pulmonary artery, potentially resulting in heart failure or sudden death. Due to the lack of distinctive clinical manifestations and the atypical imaging characteristics associated with IVL, misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses are common. Therefore, the early identification of this condition and accurate assessment are especially critical. This paper reviews a case of IVL that invaded the inferior vena cava and right atrium, culminating in the successful surgical excision of the entire tumor through a multidisciplinary approach, alongside a review of relevant literature.

2 Case description

The patient is a 52-year-old woman who was admitted in October 2024, presenting with the finding of a mass in the major cardiac vessels one month prior. A month before admission, an echocardiogram conducted at a local hospital in Shanxi revealed a space-occupying lesion in the right atrium and inferior vena cava, exhibiting motion in accordance with blood flow. At the time, the patient reported no significant discomfort and sought surgical intervention at Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University. The patient had no notable medical history and occasionally consumed alcohol. She experienced menopause at the age of 50. No obvious family history was provided. Gynecological examination indicated that the patient's uterus was consistent with a three-month pregnancy. Doppler ultrasound of the inferior vena cava revealed a band-like structure in the right heart and inferior vena cava, moving with blood flow. Echocardiography showed a band-like echogenic region within the right atrium (Figure 1). The ejection fraction (EF) was measured at 62%, while E/A ratio was 0.9; and pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 53 mmHg, indicating near-normal cardiac diastolic and systolic function. Gynecological B-ultrasound suggested possible adenomyosis, with multiple intramural fibroids in the uterus, and a low echogenicity band-like structure on the right side. Enhanced chest and abdominal CT scans demonstrated a low-density, thread-like lesion extending from the inferior vena cava to the right atrium, not connected to the venous wall, with no enhancement during the venous phase (Figure 2). A MRI scan indicated an occupying lesion within the uterus, possibly representing uterine fibroids. Laboratory tests and electrocardiograms did not reveal any significant abnormalities.

Figure 1
Echocardiogram displaying heart activity. The top image shows a two-dimensional view of the heart chambers. Below, a Doppler waveform depicts blood flow velocity with peaks and measurements indicating velocities of 98.8 cm/s and 81.9 cm/s. Text annotations in Chinese and English provide additional data such as heart rate (75 mm/s).

Figure 1. The echocardiographic image of the patient reveals a linear mass within the right atrium.

Figure 2
CT scans of the abdomen show two images. Image A is a coronal view highlighting the kidney and surrounding structures with red arrows indicating specific areas. Image B is an axial view, also with a red arrow pointing to a notable area near the kidney.

Figure 2. (A) the chest enhanced CT imaging in the arterial phase shows a low-density, linear mass indicated by the red arrow, which is not connected to the wall of the vein. (B) The red triangle illustrates an intravascular mass within the inferior vena cava that does not enhance in the venous phase.

Upon admission, thorough preoperative examinations were conducted, and a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach was initiated. In terms of the surgical plan, the Urologist took the lead in performing bilateral ureteral stenting, while General Surgery focused on addressing the inferior vena cava thrombus. Gynecology would incise the uterus and adnexa, and Cardiothoracic Surgeons ensured readiness for thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The Blood Transfusion and Nutrition departments provided perioperative support. On the 13th day of admission, the patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy involving inferior vena cava thrombectomy, bilateral ureteral stent placement, and radical hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy. Intraoperatively, no uterine fibroid lesions or ascites were found in the abdominal and pelvic cavities. After appropriately occluding the iliac and lumbar veins, the inferior vena cava wall was opened below the renal vein, and under esophageal ultrasound monitoring, the thrombus in the IVC and right atrium was successfully extracted. A radical resection of the uterus and bilateral adnexa followed to eradicate the uterine fibroid lesions. The surgery lasted 240 min, with a total blood loss of 500 mL and no blood transfusion required.

Postoperative histopathological examination (Figure 3) revealed that the mass from the IVC and right atrium was leiomyomatous tissue (Figure 3B), while multiple intramural and subserosal leiomyomas with angiomyoma were found in the uterus (Figure 3A). Immunohistochemistry (IHC): SMA (+), Caldesmon (focally+), Ki-67 (approximately 2% +).

Figure 3
Panel A shows a bisected anatomical structure with marked lesions and a ruler for scale. Panel B displays elongated tissue samples placed on a gauze surface. Panel C features a histological slide with cellular structures and patterns, stained for better visibility. Panel D presents another stained histological image showing varied cellular features and textures.

Figure 3. (A) The gross specimen of the patient's uterus (with the blue triangle indicating a fibroid); (B) The gross specimen of the thrombus in the inferior vena cava; (C) The histological specimen of the thrombus in the inferior vena cava; (D) The histological specimen of the uterine fibroid.

On the second postoperative day, at around 18:40, the patient experienced dizziness after ambulating, with a drop in oxygen saturation to 60%–70%, while other vital signs remained stable. An urgent pulmonary CTA indicated multiple pulmonary emboli, and a bedside Doppler ultrasound of the lower extremities revealed thrombosis from the right femoral vein to the external iliac vein. The on-call physician rapidly activated the Venous Thromboembolism Multidisciplinary Team (VTE-MDT) protocol, consulting with the Pulmonary Medicine, ICU, and Ultrasound departments. The patient was administered subcutaneous bemiparin for anticoagulation and underwent urokinase thrombolysis. By 19:20, the patient's oxygen saturation improved to 90%–95%.

The patient subsequently made a good recovery and was discharged on the 19th postoperative day without the use of anti-estrogen medications. A follow-up examination six months later indicated that the patient was in good general health, with no signs of tumor recurrence detected.

3 Discussion

The pathogenesis of IVL remains uncertain, with two prevailing theories acknowledged by most scholars: 1) IVL originates from uterine smooth muscle tumors and infiltrates the venous lumen; 2) IVL originates from smooth muscle cells within the venous wall. A retrospective study by Peng et al. (2) indicated that 87.3% of IVL patients had clear evidence of intramural origin within the uterine muscle wall, and 46.5% had a history of uterine myomectomy or cesarean section. Immunohistochemical research has demonstrated that IVL cells often exhibit positive staining for Desmin, SMA, estrogen, and progesterone receptors (3), while these factors are often negative or weakly positive in the smooth muscle cells of the vascular wall. These findings support the first theory.

IVL can be classified into four stages based on the extent of involvement and tumor morphology: Stage 1 involves thrombosis limited to the veins within the uterine muscle layer, extending to the iliac vein or ovarian vein/renal vein, but not entering the inferior vena cava; Stage 2 involves the tumor extending to the inferior vena cava but not affecting the heart; Stage 3 involves further extension of the tumor to the right atrium but not reaching the pulmonary artery; Stage 4 involves invasion of the pulmonary artery and/or metastasis to the lungs. For Stage 2 and above, IVL is further classified into three types based on tumor morphology: Type I entails continuous thrombus, with the intravenous lesions not adhering to the vascular wall; Type II involves thrombus adhering to the vascular wall or cardiac structures; and Type III consists of pedunculated lesions attached to the vascular intima or endocardium (4). Based on preoperative imaging and ultrasound examinations, the IVL thrombus in this case extended upwards to the right atrium, exhibiting mobility with the bloodstream, and there was no evidence of adherence to the vascular wall or cardiac tissue. Therefore, this case can be categorized as Stage 3, Type I.

Largely depending on the extent of the lesions, Clinical manifestations of IVL is hardly specific. In the early stages, it often presents common symptoms of uterine fibroids, such as abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic masses, abdominal pain, and bloating (5). When the lesions involve the IVC, lower limb edema and Budd-Chiari syndrome may occur. Invasion into the heart and pulmonary artery can lead to chest tightness, dyspnea, syncope, heart failure, or even sudden death (6). Moreover, 12%–36% of IVL patients are asymptomatic (4), seeking medications simply due to uterine fibroids or cardiac vascular occupancy. In the present case, the patient visited the hospital due to the discovery of occupying lesions in the right atrium and IVC during a routine physical examination without any discomfort. On admission, gynecological consultation and ultrasound examination ultimately confirmed the diagnosis of uterine fibroids, delineated the nature of the cardiovascular occupancy, and ultimately, it was pathologically confirmed after surgery. Therefore, enhancing clinical awareness of IVL is crucial. When patients with lower vena cava or cardiac lesions accompanied by a history of uterine occupancy or uterine fibroids, or when uterine fibroid patients present with chest tightness, dyspnea, or lower limb swelling, clinicians in relevant departments should be vigilant to the possibility of IVL and promptly involve the gynecologists to establish a diagnosis and treatment plan.

Surgical removal remains the preferred treatment for IVL patients without contraindications. Bilateral oophorectomy is considered to reduce tumor recurrence. For patients with tumor extension to the inferior vena cava and heart, the recommended surgical approach is radical excision of the uterus, bilateral ovaries, and all tumors (7). However, some studies suggest that the recurrence and progression of IVL are not related to oophorectomy and advocate for preserving the ovaries whenever possible (4, 8). As the tumor spreads along the venous system to the right heart and even the pulmonary artery, over 60% of Stage 3 and almost all Stage 4 IVL cases historically required surgical intervention via open-chest or thoracoabdominal approaches under cardiopulmonary bypass (4). Nevertheless, with advancements in surgical techniques, the likelihood of avoiding open-chest procedures and cardiopulmonary bypass has been increasing for Type I IVL patients ranked Stage 2 and above. In this case, the patient falls under Stage 3 Type I IVL. Preoperative examinations did not confirm any evidence of the thrombus adhering to the vascular wall or cardiac tissue, leading to a smooth surgical procedure without the utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass.

IVL patients should take precautions to prevent perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The main causes include hemodynamic disturbances due to major vessel incisions during surgery, prolonged bed rest before and after surgery, and the surgery itself increases the risk of postoperative bleeding. Therefore, perioperative VTE prevention for such patients should primarily focus on mechanical prevention, such as the use of elastic stockings before and after surgery and the placement of an IVC filter during surgery. Additionally, in rare cases, IVL thrombi entering the pulmonary circulation can also act as emboli causing pulmonary embolism. We retrieved two case reports (9, 10) of IVL-related NTPE from the past 10 years and found that both cases were admitted to the hospital due to exertional dyspnea lasting for several weeks. They had no previous risk factors for DVT and were ultimately diagnosed due to ineffective anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy. It should be noted that since acute PE is life-threatening and typically responds to thrombolysis or anticoagulation, a diagnosis of IVL-related NTPE is often one of exclusion, made only after the failure of emergency anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy. In our case, the patient responded well to anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy. Taking into account other examination results, we tend to believe that the cause of the patient's PE was the migration of a lower limb venous thrombus.

Currently, there is still debate regarding whether IVL requires anti-estrogen therapy. Presently, anti-estrogen therapy is mostly used as an adjuvant treatment during the perioperative period to prevent the progression and recurrence of IVL, and to increase the progression-free survival period for patients with incomplete removal of IVL tumors. Optional medications include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), aromatase inhibitors, and tamoxifen (11). However, studies have also indicated that there is no significant benefit from anti-estrogen treatment for patients with complete removal of IVL tumors, and aromatase inhibitors may even promote recurrence in patients who have completely removed the tumors (4). In this case, the patient underwent bilateral oophorectomy and radical excision of all tumor lesions during surgery, thus obviating the need for anti-estrogen medication.

Research indicates a recurrence rate of 9.7% for Stage 1 IVL patients with complete lesion excision, while 39% of those who were unable to completely remove the lesion experienced residual lesion progression after surgery. The factors influencing IVL recurrence and progression exhibit significant variations among different studies, involving age, surgical approach, tumor size, and drug therapy (3, 4, 11, 12). Therefore, long-term follow-up is recommended for IVL patients, with a follow-up interval of every 3–6 months within 2 years after surgery, followed by semi-annual to annual follow-ups thereafter (7). Imaging examinations are the primary method for follow-up.

4 Conclusion

Intravascular leiomyomatosis is a rare benign tumor predominantly observed in women of reproductive age and those in the perimenopausal stage. Early detection and prompt intervention are crucial for accurate diagnosis, successful surgical outcomes, and the prevention of recurrence. Throughout the patient care procedures, multidisciplinary collaboration is essential. Comprehensive assessments, considering factors such as the patient's age, fertility desires, and the extent of the lesions, should guide the formulation of personalized surgical plans. This approach aims to achieve radical tumor resection while maximizing the patient's quality of life.

Data availability statement

Due to privacy and ethical restrictions, the raw data supporting this case report (e.g., patient medical records, original imaging files) are not publicly available. De-identified data may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to compliance with ethical approval and the scope of the patient's informed consent.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation. WZ: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Resources. AZ: Writing – review & editing, Resources. JL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. QW: Writing – original draft. XX: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. WL: Project administration, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The Natural Science Foundation of the Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (Grant No. 3502Z202372093), and the Basic Scientific Research Project for Provincial Public Welfare Research Institutes of the Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2023R1037), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82272935), Joint Laboratory of School of Medicine, Xiamen University-Shanghai Jiangxia Blood Technology Co., Ltd. (Grant No.: XDHT2020010C), and Joint Research Center of School of Medicine, Xiamen University-Jiangsu Charity Biotech Co., Ltd. (Grant No.: 20233160C0002).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Liu B, Liu C, Guan H, Li Y, Song X, Shen K, et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis with inferior vena cava and heart extension. J Vasc Surg. (2009) 50(4):897–902. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Peng J, Zhong F, Zhu Y, Zhang M, Zhang M, Lu C, et al. Clinical analysis of uterine intravenous leiomyomatosis: a retrospective study of 260 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. (2021) 47(12):4357–64. doi: 10.1111/jog.15013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yu X, Fu J, Cao T, Huang L, Qie M, Ouyang Y. Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus: a case series. Medicine (Baltimore). (2021) 100(1):e24228. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wen Y, Ma G, Miao Q, Shao J, Lu W, Liu X, et al. The largest single-center report on intravenous leiomyomatosis and development of a classification to guide surgical management. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. (2025) 13(1):101989. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101989

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Baxter BL, Hur HC, Guido RS. Emerging treatment options for fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. (2022) 49(2):299–314. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2022.03.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li B, Chen X, Chu YD, Li RY, Li WD, Ni YM. Intracardiac leiomyomatosis: a comprehensive analysis of 194 cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2013) 17(1):132–8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Li H, Xu J, Lin Q, Zhao Y, Tong H, Tu R, et al. Surgical treatment strategies for extrapelvic intravenous leiomyomatosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2020) 15(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01394-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yu X, Zhang G, Lang J, Liu B, Zhao D. Factors associated with recurrence after surgical resection in women with intravenous leiomyomatosis. Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 128(5):1018–24. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001718

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kloska M, Patel P, Soliman A, Musco K, Rovella J. Intravenous leiomyomatosis: an uncommon cause of pulmonary embolism. Am J Case Rep. (2021) 22:e931386. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.931386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wu YH, Lee YT, Lee CI, Tzeng YH, Wei J. Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism caused by intravenous leiomyomatosis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). (2019) 98(3):e14118. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ma G, Miao Q, Liu X, Zhang C, Liu J, Zheng Y, et al. Different surgical strategies of patients with intravenous leiomyomatosis. Medicine (Baltimore). (2016) 95(37):e4902. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004902

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Low HY, Zhao Y, Huang KS, Shen HP, Wu PJ, Tseng CJ. Intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus: a clinicopathological analysis of nine cases and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 56:362–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL), inferior vena cava (IVC), right atrium, pulmonary embolism, multidisciplinary approach

Citation: Chen Y, Zhang W, Zhuang A, Liu J, Wang Q, Xia X and Li W (2026) Intravenous leiomyomatosis involving the inferior vena cava and right atrium with postoperative pulmonary embolism: a case report. Front. Surg. 12:1692371. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1692371

Received: 25 August 2025; Revised: 17 October 2025;
Accepted: 2 December 2025;
Published: 6 January 2026.

Edited by:

Şahhan Kiliç, TC Saglik Bakanligi Tekirdag Corlu Ilce Devlet Hastanesi, Türkiye

Reviewed by:

Fahri Çakan, Corlu State Hospital, Türkiye
Serkan Dilmen, Izmir City Hospital, Türkiye
Süha Asal, TC Saglik Bakanligi Tekirdag Corlu Ilce Devlet Hastanesi, Türkiye
Tuğba Çetin, TC Saglik Bakanligi Tekirdag Corlu Ilce Devlet Hastanesi, Türkiye

Copyright: © 2026 Chen, Zhang, Zhuang, Liu, Wang, Xia and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wen'gang Li, bHdnYW5nQHhtdS5lZHUuY24=; Xiaogang Xia, MzcyODE0MDc0QHFxLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.