ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Effect of beach chair position on hemodynamics and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff injury combined with shoulder adhesion
Yuxin Zhang 1
Ling Zhao 1
Jidong Lv 1
Jie Lei 2
1. Jiashan First People's Hospital, jiashan, China
2. Jiashan County Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiashan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of beach chair position on hemodynamics and cardiovascular events in patients with rotator cuff injury combined with shoulder adhesion who underwent shoulder arthroscopy, and to provide a theoretical basis for rational placement of surgical position in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 148 patients (BC group: n=78; LD group: n=70) who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between February 2021 and December 2024. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Baseline characteristics including operator experience and duration of position maintenance were collected. Surgical parameters (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine output, fluid administration), hemodynamic changes measured at baseline, 5 minutes after positioning, and every 15 minutes thereafter (differences in systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate before/after positioning), shoulder function recovery (UCLA and ASES scores), range of motion (forward flexion, external rotation, abduction), and cardiovascular complications (arrhythmias requiring intervention defined as episodes lasting >5 minutes with hemodynamic compromise, myocardial infarction, angina, hypotension) were compared between groups. Results: Comparison of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative urine output, intraoperative fluid administration, pre- and post-operative UCLA scores, ASES scores, anterior flexion mobility, external rotation mobility, and abduction mobility between patients in the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The difference in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate before and after surgical position placement of patients in the beach chair position group was higher than that of patients in the lateral decubitus position group, and the incidence of cardiovascular events such as cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, hypotension and postural hypotension was higher than that of patients in the lateral decubitus position group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The beach chair position for shoulder arthroscopy in patients with rotator cuff injury combined with shoulder adhesion is comparable to the lateral decubitus position in terms of surgical efficiency and surgical trauma, and similar to the lateral decubitus position in terms of improving shoulder function and mobility, but it may cause hemodynamic fluctuations and increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
Summary
Keywords
Beach chair position, cardiovascular events, Hemodynamics, Rotator cuff injury, shoulder adhesion, Shoulder arthroscopy
Received
18 August 2025
Accepted
18 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Zhang, Zhao, Lv and Lei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jie Lei
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.