SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Colorectal and Proctological Surgery
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Abdomino-Pelvic SurgeryView all 3 articles
Comparison of 4DryField PH vs Seprafilm in Reducing Incidence of Adhesion and Preventing ASBO Following Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
ABSTRACT Background: Adhesions form between tissue surfaces due to inflammation and trauma to tissue. Adhesions are a common postoperative complication of abdominopelvic surgery, often leading to chronic pain, adhesive small bowel obstruction, and increased healthcare costs. Anti-adhesive agents such as Seprafilm and 4DryField PH are employed to mitigate these risks, but direct comparisons between these barriers are lacking, creating a need to evaluate their relative efficacy. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of 4DryField PH and Seprafilm in preventing postoperative adhesion formation and associated complications such as ASBO in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and trial registries identified 7 studies, including RCTs and cohort studies. Inclusion criteria were studies involving patients aged 18 and above who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and received either 4DryField PH or Seprafilm. Studies that included patients with extensive pre-existing abdominal conditions and malignancies were excluded. Data was extracted on adhesion incidence, severity, extent, chronic pain, and ASBO. Results: 4DryField PH consistently reduced adhesion burden in second-look studies and showed no recurrent ASBO in one cohort. Seprafilm demonstrated modest benefit in one colorectal study but not in another. Due to non-overlapping populations, direct comparison was not possible. Exploratory trends favoured both agents over no barrier. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that 4DryField PH may reduce adhesion burden in settings where second-look laparoscopy is performed, while Seprafilm may offer modest clinical benefit in selected colorectal surgery contexts. Because no head-to-head trials exist and the study populations differ, these findings remain hypothesis-generating. Further multicentre trials with standardised outcomes are needed to define their comparative roles.
Keywords: 4DryField PH, abdominopelvic surgery, adhesiolysis, adhesions, Adhesive small bowel obstruction, Anti-adhesive barriers, ASBO, Chronic Pain
Received: 21 Oct 2025; Accepted: 22 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Haji Cassim and KARIM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shagufa Haji Cassim
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.