Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Visceral Surgery

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Proctology and Colorectal Surgery Volume IIView all 17 articles

Fluorescence-Guided Ureter Mapping in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Intraureteral ICG and Emerging Renal Fluorophores

Provisionally accepted
Alexis  LitchinkoAlexis Litchinko1,2,3*Quentin  DenostQuentin Denost4Barbara  NoiretBarbara Noiret4Frederic  RisFrederic Ris1Michel  AdaminaMichel Adamina5,6
  • 1Division of Digestive Surgery University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 2HFR Fribourg Hopital cantonal, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
  • 3Universite de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
  • 4Bordeaux Colorectal Institute, Bordeaux, France
  • 5Universite de Fribourg Section de medecine, Fribourg, Switzerland
  • 6Universitat Basel Medizinische Fakultat, Basel, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTRACT Background Ureteral injury is a severe complication in colorectal surgery, with an incidence up to 2.5%. Despite meticulous surgical technique, intraoperative ureter identification can be challenging, particularly in cases involving prior operations or extensive inflammation. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has emerged as a promising adjunct to enhance ureter visualization. In parallel, novel fluorophores with renal excretion properties (e.g., CW800-CA, ZW800-1) are undergoing investigation to avoid routine ureteral catheterization. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical impact of ICG-based and emerging fluorescence approaches for ureter identification in colorectal surgery. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase, up to March 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies assessing intraoperative ureter identification via ICG fluorescence or other near-infrared fluorophores during adult colorectal surgery were included. Exclusion criteria comprised pediatric populations, non-colorectal procedures, reviews, editorials, and animal experiments. Primary outcomes were ureter visualization rate and intraoperative ureteral injury rate, while secondary outcomes included procedure-related complications, operative time, adverse effects, and preliminary cost data. Results Ten studies comprising 716 patients undergoing colorectal surgery with ICG fluorescence imaging were analyzed. Ureter visualization rates ranged from 95.3% to 100%, with most studies reporting a rate of 100%. No ICG-related complications were documented. ICG administration was primarily via cystoscopy with intra-ureteral injection or ureteral catheterization, predominantly in laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures. Mean duration of the cystoscopy varied from 7 to 29 minutes. Improved intraoperative ureter identification compared with conventional visualization was reported in available comparative studies. Conclusion ICG fluorescence imaging safely and effectively enhances intraoperative ureter visualization during colorectal surgery, potentially reducing the risk of ureteral injuries. However, the need for routine ureteral catheterization prolongs procedure duration. Emerging renally excreted fluorophores may eliminate the need for catheterization and should be prioritized in future clinical trials.

Keywords: Colorectal Surgery, CW800-CA, Fluorescence Imaging, Indocyanine green (ICG), minimally invasive surgery, near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores, ureter mapping, Ureteral injury

Received: 29 Oct 2025; Accepted: 27 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Litchinko, Denost, Noiret, Ris and Adamina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Alexis Litchinko

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.