ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Vascular Surgery
This article is part of the Research TopicEnhanced Recovery After Vascular Surgery: State of the Art and Future PerspectivesView all 5 articles
Effects of Rhythmic Dumbbell Upper Limb Rehabilitation Training Based on the Multi-Process Action Control Framework on Vascular Access Function and Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients
Provisionally accepted
- 1Department of Blood Purification Room, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
- 2Department of President's Office, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
- 3Department of Nursing Department, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Methods A total of 72 patients who underwent autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) angioplasty and had stable and regular dialysis in the hemodialysis center of Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2025 to April 2025 were selected as the research subjects, and were randomly divided into control group (n=36) and intervention group (n=36). Both groups were given routine rehabilitation management. The control group was given routine ball-holding rehabilitation exercise on the upper limb of the AVF side, and the intervention group was given rhythmic dumbbell rehabilitation exercise based on M-PAC theory. The intervention began 2 weeks after the operation, and the total intervention lasted for 3 months. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the physiological maturation of AVF in both intervention and control groups, including cephalic venous blood flow, venous diameter, and skin-to-thickness distance. Clinical maturation outcomes were recorded and observed, including pump-controlled blood flow compliance rate, target values of pump-controlled blood flow, and single-needle puncture success rate. The Chinese version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (KDQOL-SFTM) was employed to evaluate patients' quality of life before and after the intervention. Results Prior to the intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups in general patient data, venous diameter, skin-to-thickness ratio, and various dimensions of quality of life, indicating balanced comparability (χ2/|t| ≤1.900, P ≥0.062). Regarding cephalic venous blood flow metrics, as preoperative values were extremely low and unstable, making measurement challenging, this study only compared post-intervention cephalic venous blood flow. For pump-controlled blood flow measurements, since patients lacked access to arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) prior to intervention, this study only analyzed post-intervention pump-controlled blood flow values. Post-intervention analysis revealed that the intervention group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in all metrics compared to the control group: superior cephalic venous blood flow, venous diameter, skin-to-vessel distance (STED), pump-controlled blood flow rate, single-needle puncture success rate, and quality of life dimensions (χ2/|t| ≥2.574, P≤0.012). However, no significant difference was observed in the pump-controlled blood flow rate qualification rate (χ2=3.486, P=0.507).
Keywords: Arteriovenous Fistula, Dumbbell, hemodialysis, M-PAC theory, Rhythm
Received: 03 Nov 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Hu, Cao, Jia, Pan and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ming-Cong Cao
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.