Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Emerging Imaging Modalities in Surgical Planning and RehabilitationView all articles

Body surface area–adjusted median nerve cross-sectional area and multimodal ultrasound improve diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Provisionally accepted
Boyi  YuBoyi YuJie  DuJie DuYansong  LiuYansong LiuLili  ZhangLili ZhangLirong  ZhaoLirong Zhao*HongYu  LiHongYu LiFangfang  SunFangfang SunLifang  LiuLifang LiuChao  ZhangChao ZhangXinyue  LiuXinyue LiuFeng  HuFeng HuLinlin  ShaoLinlin ShaoMengqin  SunMengqin Sun
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of high-frequency ultrasound combined with Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and to develop an individualized diagnostic approach using a body surface area (BSA)–adjusted median nerve CSA at the pisiform level. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 47 wrists with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and 94 control wrists. Median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured at four anatomical sites. Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) were used to assess intraneural vascularity and stiffness, respectively. A linear regression model was developed to estimate the expected CSA at the pisiform level based on body surface area (BSA), and a BSA-based Z-score was calculated accordingly. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of (i) a fixed CSA cutoff at the pisiform level, (ii) the BSA-based Z-score, and (iii) a combined SMI+SWE logistic regression model. Results: Ultrasound parameters differed significantly between the CTS and control groups (P<0.05). The BSA-based Z-score derived from the CSA at the pisiform level yielded an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI 0.879–0.969) and improved specificity (83%; 95% CI 0.738–0.899) compared with the fixed CSA cutoff (75%; 95% CI 0.644–0.829). In multivariable analysis, SMI- and SWE-derived parameters remained independent predictors of CTS (P<0.001). The combined SMI+SWE logistic regression model demonstrated the best diagnostic performance (AUC 0.944; 95% CI 0.906–0.982), with 83% sensitivity (95% CI 0.692–0.924) and 90% specificity (95% CI 0.826–0.955). Conclusion: High-frequency ultrasound combined with Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) enables accurate, noninvasive evaluation of CTS. A BSA-based CSA Z-score improves specificity in CSA-based diagnosis, and integrating SMI and SWE further enhances overall diagnostic performance.

Keywords: Body Surface Area, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, High-frequency ultrasound, Median nerve cross-sectional area, Shear wave elastography, Superb Microvascular Imaging, Z-score

Received: 24 Dec 2025; Accepted: 29 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Yu, Du, Liu, Zhang, Zhao, Li, Sun, Liu, Zhang, Liu, Hu, Shao and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lirong Zhao

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.