ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
This article is part of the Research TopicEndoscopy, Navigation, Robotics, Current Trends and Newer Technologies in the Management of Spinal Disorders. Towards a Paradigm Change in the Clinical Practice.View all 21 articles
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Provisionally accepted
- XinJiang 474 hospital, Urumqi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To compare the early clinical efficacy, perioperative parameters, and safety profiles of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy in treating single-level far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH). Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 81 patients with FLLDH treated between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients were allocated to the PTED group (n=38) or the UBE group (n=43) based on the surgical technique received. Perioperative indicators (operative time, incision length, blood loss, hospital stay) and clinical outcomes—assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back/leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively—were compared. Statistical analyses included independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: All patients completed 12-month follow-up. The two groups were comparable at baseline (P>0.05). The PTED group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time (62.4±8.7 vs. 105.3±14.1 min, P<0.001), smaller incision length (7.8±0.9 vs. 24.6±4.2 mm, P<0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (18.5±4.3 vs. 68.2±10.5 mL, P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (4.8±1.1 vs. 5.9±1.7 days, P=0.002). Both groups showed significant and sustained improvement in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively (P<0.05). At 1 month, PTED was associated with lower back pain VAS but slightly higher leg pain VAS and ODI compared to UBE (P<0.05). From 3 months onward, no significant inter-group differences were observed in any clinical scores (P>0.05). Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated a different improvement trajectory for back pain between the groups (interaction P=0.024). Conclusion: Both PTED and UBE are effective minimally invasive techniques for FLLDH, offering comparable and excellent mid-term clinical outcomes. PTED offers advantages in reduced surgical trauma and faster early recovery, whereas UBE provides superior endoscopic visualization. The choice of technique can be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgical expertise.
Keywords: comparative study, Far lateral lumbar disc herniation, minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, Unilateral biportal endoscopy
Received: 17 Jan 2026; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Lu, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jianyuan Wang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.