Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Cities

Sec. Urban Greening

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1623650

Scoping the emerging role of urban biodiversity in social impact assessment, a systematic review of regulating ecosystem services indicator types

Provisionally accepted
  • Laboratorio di Simulazione Urbana Fausto Curti, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Polytechnic University of Milan, Milan, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The relationship between humans and nature in urban areas is complex, with dynamic interdependencies that require in-depth evaluation to aid planners in decision-making. While knowledge of social values and impacts of nature-based solutions (NbS) is progressing, a notable gap exists in integrating urban biodiversity (UB) and ecosystem services (ES) into evaluations. The increasing recognition of UB values raises questions about how biodiversity emerges as a new primary parameter in assessment. What are the leading indicators of ES in assessing the social impacts of NbS in cities? How can we integrate ES and UB into social impact assessment (SIA) as the primary framework for identifying, monitoring, and evaluating the social consequences of NbS in urban areas? This contribution undertakes a non-systematic exploratory investigation combined with a systematic literature review on regulating ES indicators to address these questions. Focusing on regulating ES, we screened 696 and analyzed 65 publications to identify and extract 85 indicators for SIA procedures. By elaborating on attributes, measurement methods, and approaches of indicators, we introduce six categories of classifications, revealing biodiversity-related indicators as an emerging trend in literature with considerable flexibility for measurement in urban areas. We conclude with emphasis on existing limits of scientific references on regulating ES indicators for social impact, as well as minor attention paid by scholars to the role of UB. Further research requires the comprehensive integration of UB and ES in SIA.

Keywords: social impact assessment1, urban biodiversity2, ecosystem services3, indicators4, Systematic Review5

Received: 06 May 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ayatollahi and Morello. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Asef Ayatollahi, Laboratorio di Simulazione Urbana Fausto Curti, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Polytechnic University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.