ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Cities
Sec. Innovation and Governance
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1649194
This article is part of the Research TopicBarriers and Enablers to Effective Climate Governance in CitiesView all 9 articles
Addressing climate-action implementation gaps in cities: planning for meaningful and consistent implementation through the 5-UP Framework
Provisionally accepted- 1Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany
- 2Resilience Cities Network, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 3Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- 4Universitat Stuttgart Institut fur Arbeitswissenschaft und Technologiemanagement, Stuttgart, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Achieving climate objectives in cities requires a significant acceleration of current efforts and deep structural changes in how policies, programs, and projects are implemented. Despite commitments to climate action at the local level, cities continue to face challenges in delivering tangible outcomes, as implementation is project-led, output oriented, and siloed. Climate policy and planning frameworks often articulate ambitious cities visions and agendas, sometimes supported by funding schemes, yet falling short in translating these objectives into consistent implementation pathways. This study proposes the 5-UP Framework, a new methodological approach to respond to implementation gaps in climate action, fostering consistent and systemic action in cities. The framework has been built after assessing existing literature, climate plans, and implementation barriers across ten European cities using structured surveys, workshops, and focus groups. The findings revealed that these gaps can occur before, during, and after action is carried out. To address this, the 5-UP Framework links implementation to five dimensions: UPDATING city needs aligned with actions, UPSKILLING knowledge and agents of change, UPGRADING through piloting, embedding UPSCALING of actions, and UPTAKING key mechanisms and knowledge. With cities' growing awareness of climate change impacts and persistent implementation gaps, this paper shows that support should extend beyond financing and project outputs. It should also guide capacity building, human agency, prototyping, and upscaling to mainstream climate action systemically.
Keywords: climate action implementation, climate systemic approaches, urban planning, Climate governance, Socio-technical transitions, Technical capacity
Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Diaz, Tajuddin, Deshayes, Chelleri, Vera, Aili and Kapetas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Catalina Diaz, catalina.diaz@iao.fraunhofer.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.