BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Sustain. Cities
Sec. Solar Energy in Urban Development
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1655812
This article is part of the Research TopicAddressing Climate-Related System Disruptions: Public Health Vulnerabilities and Adaptation StrategiesView all 5 articles
Trends in Cool Roof Solar Reflectivity Degradation in New York City (2014-2020): An Important Consideration for Health-Based Evaluations of High Albedo Urban Roofing Interventions
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States
- 2New York University Department of Medicine, New York, United States
- 3Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States
- 4Department of Urban Policy and Planning, Hunter College, New York, United States
- 5Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, New York, United States
- 6New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Growing remote sensing and machine learning capabilities offer opportunities to understand the spatiotemporal performance of reflective cool roofs, a widely implemented urban heat mitigation tool, in relation to health. We evaluated cool roof solar reflectivity trends across NYC and in heat-vulnerable communities. Methods: In this retrospective, longitudinal study, we used satellite-derived cool roof data aggregated to census blocks over 2014-2020. Roofs with a solar reflectivity value ≥ 65 in 2014 were defined as cool roofs with sufficient albedo. Cool roofs with subsequent reflectivity < 65 were considered degraded. We descriptively calculated the cumulative proportion of census blocks that experienced degradation across NYC and in low vs high heat-vulnerable areas defined by the NYC heat vulnerability index. Results: Of 18565 census blocks with at least one building with a cool roof installed and an average cool roof reflectivity ≥ 65 in 2014, 24.56% experienced degradation by 2020. A greater proportion of census blocks experienced degradation by 2020 in low (27.03%) vs high (21.20%) heat-vulnerable areas. The largest proportion of total, census block-level cool roof degradation occurred between 2014-2016 (57.39%). Discussion: We found strong evidence of cool roof degradation across NYC, which has important implications for future health-based evaluations. Interestingly, a larger proportion of census blocks experienced cool roof degradation in low compared to high-heat vulnerable areas, potentially highlighting the effectiveness of community-led environmental justice initiatives. Municipal maintenance initiatives are needed to ensure the urban heat mitigation potential of cool roofs is sustained.
Keywords: Cool Roofs., Urban Heat Island mitigation, Heat health, Urban Health, Climate mitigation and adaptation, Extreme Heat, Urban built environment
Received: 03 Jul 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bonanni, Bershteyn, Heris, Titus, Wei, Babayode, Rom and Azan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alexander Azan, alexander.azan@nyulangone.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.