Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 06 September 2024
Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism
This article is part of the Research Topic Functional Nutritional Strategies as Alternatives to Antimicrobials View all 18 articles

Evaluation of dietary supplementation of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithothamnium calcareum as functional algae in F4+ Escherichia coli challenged piglets

Matteo Dell&#x;Anno&#x;Matteo Dell’Anno1Sara Frazzini&#x;Sara Frazzini1Serena Reggi&#x;Serena Reggi1Irene Ferri&#x;Irene Ferri1Elena Scaglia,&#x;Elena Scaglia1,2Linda Schiasselloni&#x;Linda Schiasselloni1Alessia Inglesi&#x;Alessia Inglesi1Federica Riva&#x;Federica Riva1Nicole Verdile&#x;Nicole Verdile1Rolando Pasquariello&#x;Rolando Pasquariello3Luciana Rossi
&#x;Luciana Rossi1*
  • 1Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences—DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy
  • 2Department Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics—DICATAM, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • 3Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences—Production, Landscape, Agroenergy–DISAA, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Introduction: Despite progress in reducing antimicrobial use in the veterinary field, it is crucial to find alternatives to preserve effectiveness and limit antimicrobial resistance. In pig farming, pathogenic strains of E. coli are the main cause of gastrointestinal disorders and antibiotic use. In this field, algae represent an innovation in animal nutrition that aligns with livestock sustainability principles and provide a high content of functional molecules.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an innovative dietary combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithothamnium calcareum, on growth, duodenum gene expression, jejunum intestinal morphology, and serum oxidative status in F4+ Escherichia coli challenged piglets.

Materials and methods: Forty-eight weaned pigs, aged 28 ± 2 days, were divided into two groups (n = 24 pigs/group): the control group was fed a commercial diet (CTRL), while the seaweeds group was fed a commercial diet supplemented with 1.5% A. nodosum and 0.5% L. calcareum for 27 days (ALGAE). After 13 days, 50% of animals in each group were challenged with a single dose of 108 CFU/dose of E. coli F4+, resulting in two infected groups (CTRL+ and ALGAE+, n = 12 pigs/group). Growth performance was assessed by measuring the individual body weight. At day 27, from six animals/group duodenum and jejunum sections were sampled for gene expression analysis via qRT-PCR and histological evaluation.

Results and discussion: The results indicated a significantly higher body weight in the ALGAE+ group compared to CTRL+ after 7 days post-challenge (p < 0.0001). Jejunum morphology revealed lower villus height, villus width and villus height/crypt depth ratio in CTRL+ compared to ALGAE+ (p < 0.05) suggesting a protective effect of seaweeds on gut health.

Conclusion: In conclusion, algae mixture exerted a protective effect against intestinal damage from E. coli F4+ infection proposing A. nodosum and L. calcareum supplementation as interesting strategy to support animal growth, enhance health and reduce antibiotic treatments in weaned piglets.

1 Introduction

In swine farming, weaning is one of the most critical phases in the productive life of a pig. During this period, piglets, with immature immune and digestive system, undergo several stressors such as mother’s separation, new environment and groups, and the gradual loss of passive immunity (1). This condition can lead to a significant activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, resulting in the release of glucocorticoids that increase the susceptibility to pathogenic invasion (2). Thus, gastrointestinal disorders are frequently registered during this period leading farmers and veterinarians resort to antibiotic treatments to limit their detrimental effect on animal health (3). Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) is mainly caused by pathogenic Escherichia coli serotypes, causing high morbidity and mortality rates posing substantial concerns for farm profitability (4). Among pathogenic E. coli, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) are a group of bacteria characterized by important virulence factors involved in enterocyte adhesion, such as F4 fimbria, and toxins production causing enterotoxaemia (5). These pathogens are one the most prevalent causes of severe and watery diarrhea in piglets (6).

The overuse and misuse of antibiotics during the last 30 years has fostered the development of antibiotic resistance in several gut-associated E. coli, thereby posing therapeutic challenges and raising global concerns regarding antibiotic resistance (7). Consequently, there is an imperative demand for alternatives to antimicrobials that not only support animal health but also align with European policies encouraging the reduction of antibiotic use in food-producing animals (8). Although the relationship between the reduction in antibiotic use in food-producing animals and the circulation of resistant bacteria in humans is not yet well-defined (9), the scientific community generally agrees on the need to address the issue through a One Health approach following the principles of “reduce, replace, and re-think” (1012).

The identification of holistic strategies, alternatives to antibiotics, aimed at improving intestinal health, has become a focus not only for farmers but also for the entire livestock system (13). Specifically, intensive farms have proposed and adopted multi-level solutions that collectively contribute to improve animal health and reduce reliance on antimicrobials. There has been increased attention to hygiene and health aspects, including targeted sanitation interventions, reduced animal density, more specific and timely therapies, as well as targeted vaccination prophylaxis and the use of functional nutritional strategies. Feed, in close contact with the gastrointestinal tract, is the primary entry point for pathogens into the host, and constantly in a state of immune stimulation, which significantly influence the animal’s health (14). Moreover, there has been a shift in the perception of nutrition that should not only meet nutrient requirements but also promote animal welfare, prevent diseases, and respect the environment (15). In this regard, functional ingredients are gaining raising attention in the zootechnical sector, not only for their nutritional effects but also because they are relevant to animal health, reducing the risk of disease onset (16). In this scenario, algae represent as a natural source of novel compounds with interesting bioactivities as functional ingredients in pig’s diets (17, 18).

Marine algae are gradually gaining interest in the European agri-food system for both human and animal nutrition, with positive reflects on health, and environmental protection. Macroalgae, also known as seaweeds, cultivation is a low-cost technology that does not require agricultural soil (19). Considering the agro-zootechnical scenario in the coming years, feed formulations including novel resources with innovative raw materials or new additives will be a decisive step toward sustainable animal production (2022). A. nodosum is a brown macroalga typically from Europe and North East Atlantic Ocean, particularly common along sheltered, intertidal, rocky shores throughout Norway, Iceland, Arctic Canada, Greenland, and Portugal (23). A. nodosum has been one of the most studied seaweeds in recent years for animal nutrition. It is rich in minerals such as potassium and iodine (24) and contains polyphenols and phlorotannins, counted among bioactive compounds (17). Phymatolithon calcareum, commonly known as L. calcareum is a calcareous marine alga belonging to Rhodophyta typically abundant in the Mediterranean Sea, the Gulf of California, the Atlantic coast from northeastern Canada to the eastern Caribbean, and from Norway to the Canary Islands (25). L. calcareum is mainly composed of calcium carbonate, with recognized buffer ability for stabilizing rumen pH, milk yield, and feed efficiency compared to sodium bicarbonate (26). In addition, the sulfated polysaccharides form Lithothamnium could reduce the inflammation in humans and mice (27). Recent studies have shown promising results regarding the use of seaweeds in pig feeding, ranging from performance improvement to enhanced health status and the inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms (28). Building upon promising results observed in a previous study where the several algae have been evaluated for their functional characteristics in vitro, the combination of A. nodosum and L. calcareum revealed possible synergistic effect for antioxidant activity (29). In addition, the combination of these algae species showed a prebiotic effect in vitro when added to the medium of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Limosilactobacillus reuteri cultures as probiotic species isolated from swine (30).

In light of these findings, we hypothesize that the dietary supplementation of the combination of A. nodosum and L. calcareum could positively impact animal health preventing the infection by pathogenic E. coli improving animal performance and gut health. Thus, this paper targets to unravel the combined effect of this innovative blend as functional ingredients in weaned piglets. Specifically, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an innovative dietary combination of A. nodosum and L. calcareum, on growth performance, challenger strain shedding, protein digestibility, duodenum gene expression, jejunum morphology, and serum oxidative status in F4+ E. coli challenged piglets.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Algae characterization

A. nodosum and L. calcareum samples were analyzed in duplicate for the content of principal nutrients according to the Official Methods of Analysis (22). In particular, freeze-dried algae meals were analyzed for their content of dry matter (DM) drying samples in a forced air oven at 65°C until reaching stable weight (AOAC method 930.15). Crude protein (CP) using the Kjeldahl method (with a nitrogen conversion factor of 6.25; AOAC method 2001.11). Ether extract (EE) was quantified using a Soxtec extractor (SER 148, VELP Scientifica Srl, Italy) by samples submersion and boiling in petroleum ether (Randall method; AOAC 2003.05). Crude fiber (CF) was obtained according to the Weende method using the filtering bags technique (AOCS Ba 6a-05). Ashes were obtained by incinerating algae meals at 550°C in a muffle furnace (AOAC method 942.05).

2.2 Animals, experimental design, and treatments

All experimental procedures have been approved from the Animal Welfare Organization of University of Milan and the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n° 884/2021-PR). Forty-eight crossbred (Landrace × Large White) weaned piglets (28 ± 2 day-old; 6.89 ± 0.81 kg) were housed at the Experimental Zootechnical Center of the University of Milan. Animals were identified by ear tags and housed in individual pens under controlled conditions (29–27°C; 50–60% of relative humidity). Piglets had free access to water, feed, and environmental chewable enrichments according to Italian and European regulations (31) (D.lgs 122/2011).

Experimental diets were formulated with Plurimix Software to satisfy the nutritional requirements of weaned piglets, provided by Ferraroni S.p.A. (Bonemerse, Italy) (Table 1). At housing, animals were fed commercial diets for an adaptation period of 7 days. After the adaptation period, animals were divided into two experimental groups balanced per weight and sex: control group (CTRL, 24 piglets) fed with the same commercial diet for the entire trial, and treatment group (ALGAE, 24 piglets) fed with the same commercial diet supplemented with 2% of algae mixture (1.5% of A. nodosum and 0.5% of L. calcareum) for 27 days of trial. The treatment diet was manufactured by mixing 2 kg of seaweeds blend with 100 kg of feed in a horizontal mixer for 20 min in order to ensure the correct dispersion of agal meals. Seaweeds were purchased by Italfeed Srl (Milan, Italy) as feed ingredients for experimental diet’s preparation. Sub-samples from CTRL and ALGAE produced batches were collected for the analysis of DM, CP, EE, CF, and ashes in duplicate according to the aforementioned methodology.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Experimental diet formula of control (CTRL) and treatment supplemented with A. nodosum and L. calcareum (ALGAE).

2.3 Experimental challenge

Thirteen days after feeding experimental diets (day 13), 24 piglets (12 animals/group) were orally challenged with enterotoxigenic F4+ Escherichia coli streptomycin resistant, from the strain collection of the Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences of University of Milan. The challenge procedures were performed according to the translational model developed by Rossi et al. (32). Briefly, piglets were injected with azaperone (2 mL/pig, Stresnil™, Janssen Cilag SpA, Milan, Italy) and 30 mL of 10% bicarbonate solution was orally administered to increase the challenger strain survival rate in the gastric environment. After 10–15 min, a single dose of 5 mL of 1 × 108 CFU of an overnight culture in Luria Bertani (LB) medium of F4+ E. coli was orally delivered for the infected groups. Uninfected groups were orally delivered with sterile LB culture media. Infected piglets were physically separated from uninfected animals and biosafety protocols have been adopted to avoid the pathogenic transfer among groups. The experimental challenge generated two sub-groups: infected control (CTRL+) and infected algae (ALGAE+) group. Uninfected piglets were identified with CTRL− and ALGAE−, according to the provided diet.

2.4 Zootechnical performance and sample collection

Figure 1 resumes the experimental design and sample collection. In detail, piglets were individually weighted at day 0, 7, 13, 20, and 27 and feed refuse was measured three times per week to evaluate the average body weight gain, average feed intake, and calculate the feed conversion ratio. Fecal samples were collected at 0, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 27 days for the evaluation of challenger strain shedding and fecal plate counting by microbiological and molecular analysis. Blood samples were collected at 0, 13, and 27 days of trial with vacuum tubes without anticoagulants. After 27 days from the administration of experimental diets 50% of animals (six pig/group) were slaughtered and intestinal section of duodenum and jejunum were collected for histological and gene expression analysis. Daily, health conditions were checked, and fecal consistency was evaluated using the fecal score according to a four-levels scale following Rossi et al. (32), considering moderate diarrhea for a score = 2 and severe diarrhea = 3. Fecal color was evaluated with a three-level scale: 0 = yellowish color; 1 = greenish color; 2 = brown color considering pathological a score < 2.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Experimental design and sample collection.

2.5 Escherichia coli F4+ shedding

The shedding of the challenger strain was assessed using the plate counting technique. Specifically, 1 g of fresh feces was diluted 1:10 (w/v) in physiological solution (0.9% NaCl, Sigma Adrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) and plated in triplicate on Petri dishes containing a selective medium, Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar (VRBG agar, Liofilchem Srl, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Teramo, Italy), supplemented with streptomycin (50 μg/mL) for each dilution. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, coliforms appeared as red colonies. The number of colony-forming units per gram of feces was then measured.

The abundance of F4+ E. coli within the fecal samples from day 14 to day 20 was also estimated using qPCR. Genomic DNA of E. coli was extracted (33) and used to create a standard curve by linear correlation between the log of the number of copies and CT values. The qPCR curve was obtained by amplifying serial dilutions of genomic DNA (1:10) in triplicate (R2 = 0.99). The qPCR was performed using the CFXOPUS 96 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, United States) and SsoAdvanced Universal Syber Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, United States) with primers designed for the amplification of FaeG gene (Acc. N°: AY437806; FW: GGTTCTGAACTCTCGGCTG and RV: AGAACCTGCGACGTCAACAA; amplicon size 135 base pairs). The specificity of the primers at the species level was confirmed by performing BLAST searches of the Gene Bank Database (NCBI BLAST). The thermal cycling condition consisted of an initial step at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s. The specificity of the primers was confirmed by melting curve analysis under the following thermal conditions: 95°C for 10 s, with an increment of 0.5°C per 5 s from 65 to 95°C. Genomic DNA was extracted from feces using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the qPCR, we used 50 ng of genomic DNA and amplified it under the same conditions as the calibration curve.

2.6 Microbiological analysis of fecal samples

Fecal samples from 0, 13, and 27 days were analyzed for the enumeration of total, lactic acid and coliform bacteria through specific culture agar media (Plate Count Agar—PCA, De Man Rogosa and Sharpe Agar—MRS, Violet Red Bile Broth Agar—VRBA, respectively; Liofilchem Srl, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Teramo, Italy) (34). 1 g of fecal samples was diluted and homogenized 1:10 (w/v) in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution and centrifuged (3,000 rpm, 10 min at room temperature). 1 mL of the supernatant was serially diluted tenfold and plated using the inclusion method for PCA, MRS, and VRBA media. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, visible colonies were counted for VRBA and 48 h for PCA and MRS. The lactic acid bacteria:coliform ratio was calculated. The results were expressed as log10 of colony forming units per gram of fresh feces (log10 CFU/g).

2.7 Antioxidant barrier and oxidative status of serum samples

Blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature to obtain serum (35). Each sample was then assessed for antioxidant barrier status through the Oxy-Adsorbent test (Diacron Srl, Grosseto, Italy) and oxidative status using the dROMs test (Diacron Srl, Grosseto, Italy), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Endpoint absorbances were measured at 546 and 505, respectively, using a UV–Vis spectrometer (V630, UV–Vis, Jasco GmBH, Pfungstadt, Germany).

2.8 RNA extraction from duodenum samples

Total RNA was isolated from duodenum samples using the TRIzol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) method following the manufacturer’s instructions (36). Briefly, the tissues were homogenized in 1 mL of TRIzol using a rotor-stator system (Ultra Turrax, IKA WERKE, Staufen, Germany). The RNA concentration and purity (1.6–2.06) was established by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm wavelength with a spectrophotometer (BioPhotometer, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The samples were stored at −20°C until use. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, 1 μg of total RNA from all the samples was reverse transcribed using iScript™ cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States). The reverse transcription was performed in a 20 μL reaction mixture according to the following program: step 1, incubation at 25°C for 5 min; step 2 at 46°C for 20 min; and step 3 at 95°C for 1 min.

2.9 Primers design

Pig messenger sequences and genomic sequences were obtained by GenBank, the NIH genetic sequence database and the accession numbers of all the sequences are listed in Table 2 (35). Messenger sequences were aligned with genomic DNA sequences using the BLAST software of Gene Bank Database to identify exon/intron boundaries (NCBI BLAST). Our primer pairs were designed using Primer3, a free software, with the support of the Primer-BLAST on the mRNA sequences of target genes and selected to produce amplicons spanning two exons. The suggested primers were checked to achieve the following criteria: amplicon length (50–180 bp), melting temperature (Tm), primer length (between 18 and 24 bp), %GC content, self-complementary, primer-dimer and hairpin formation, degree of degeneracy, 5′ end stability, and 3′ end specificity. Primers were purchased from Eurofins (Eurofins Genomics, Germany). Then, each primer pair was tested with qualitative PCR on cDNA extracted from intestinal tissue. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. Only PCR products of the expected size were cut, purified by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit using a Microcentrifuge (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and sequenced for appropriate amplicon size and high-quality sequence.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Oligonucleotides sequences used for the qRT-PCR assay of duodenum samples.

2.10 Real-time qRT-PCR

The cDNA obtained from each sample was used as a template for Real-Time PCR in an optimized 20 μL reaction volume in Hard-Shell® 96-Well PCR Plates (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States) using SsoAdvanced universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Each plate contained duplicates of each cDNA sample, 2X SYBR Green supermix and primers at 250 nM each. A duplicate no-template control (NTC) was included in each experiment as well as a calibrator sample. RT-qPCR was carried out in the CFX96 Opus Real-Time Detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). The standard two-step qPCR cycling conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation of 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles of denaturation of 95°C for 15 s, and an annealing/extension step at 60°C for 30 s. When the cycle threshold (Ct) values of target genes were > 37, the results were deemed negative. Melting curve analysis to confirm target-specific amplification was performed after PCR reactions according to the protocol. A control negative sample, selected as a healthy piglet from CTRL-group, was used as the calibrator sample. Quantification of the expression gene was determined with the calculation of 2−ΔΔCT. ACT-β has been included as housekeeping genes according to Caprarulo et al. (35).

2.11 Morphological analysis of duodenum and jejunum sections

After the slaughtering, 2 cm of duodenum and jejunum were collected and immediately submerged in 10% neutral buffer formalin (37). Following 24 h of fixation at room temperature, the intestinal segments were dehydrated in graded alcohols, cleared with xylene and embedded in paraffin. The paraffinic blocks were cut into 5 μm sections using a rotating microtome (MR2258, Histo-line laboratories). They were dewaxed and re-hydrated, and they were stained with hematoxylin/eosin to evaluate the morphological features using a ZEISS Axio Zoom.V16 microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) for imaging. The morphometry was quantified by measurements of the villi and crypts. A minimum of 20 well-oriented and intact villi and crypts were selected per image. The villus length was measured from the tip of the villus to the villus–crypt junction. The crypt depth was defined as the depth of the invagination between adjacent villi. The measurements were made using the ZEISS ZEN Microscopy Software.

2.12 Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism ver. 9.0. Normality of the distribution of data was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test assuming normal distribution for a p value >0.05. Zootechnical performance, challenger strain qPCR, fecal bacterial counts, and serum oxidative status results were analyzed using a mixed model which included the fixed effect of treatment, time, their interaction (treatment × time), and subject was included as random effect. Post-hoc comparisons were performed using the Sidak correction, which is well-suited for mixed models and provides a balanced approach to controlling the family-wise error rate while maintaining statistical power, since Tukey was not appropriate for the assumptions of this model. Diarrhea frequency was calculated by dividing the number of clinical manifestations by total observations performed for the considered period for each group. Statistical differences in diarrhea frequency were evaluated by transforming the fecal score values into a dichotomous variable (presence/absence; presence for a score > 1) for testing the differences between observed and expected frequencies through the chi-squared (χ2) test. Histological measurements, fecal parameters, and protein digestibility results were analyzed through one-way ANOVA, and pairwise comparisons were evaluated with Tukey’s test. Data from qRT-PCR were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing median of different groups due to the limited number of samples per group. The means or medians were considered statistically different for p ≤ 0.05. The results have been presented as means ± standard error or median and range (minimum – maximum) depending on the data distribution.

3 Results

3.1 Nutritional composition of algae and experimental diets

A. nodosum and L. calcareum meals revealed high ash contents (25.33 and 92.75% as fed basis, respectively), followed by the content of crude fiber contents (8.92 and 2.91% as fed basis, respectively), consistent with previous literature studies. The experimental diets showed a balanced composition, and seaweeds mixture supplementation did not affect the feed formula which aligned with the nutritional requirements of post-weaning pigs (Table 3) (38).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Chemical composition of seaweeds and experimental diets prepared for the experimental trial.

3.2 Zootechnical performance

All piglets showed comparable performance during the pre-challenge period with no difference in CTRL and ALGAE groups (Table 4). Even if the effect of time × treatment was significant for BW during the pre-challenge, post-hoc comparisons did not reveal any difference between experimental groups in this period. From day 13 to day 27, the four groups revealed significant differences in terms of performance (p < 0.0001). BW of CTRL+ was significantly lower at 20 days compared to ALGAE+ (p < 0.05). During the period from 13 to 20 days the average daily gain was significantly decreased in ALGAE+ and CTRL+ compared to other groups (p < 0.05). In particular, ALGAE+ revealed a lower ADG compared to CTRL+ from 13 to 17 days. From 17 to 20 days of trial CTRL+ registered a weight loss resulting in negative ADG compared to other groups, meanwhile ALGAE+ showed a significant higher growth if compared to all experimental groups. The feed intake registered a high individual variability without showing significant difference during both pre-and post-challenge periods. FCR resulted significantly higher in CTRL+ from the period from 13 to 20 days compared to CTRL−, ALGAE−, and ALGAE+ groups (p < 0.05).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Zootechnical performance during the pre-challenge (0–12 days) and post-challenge (13–27 days) periods for control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented groups divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+) groups during the post-challenge period after day 12.

During the adaptation period, the frequency of diarrhea registered was 2.08 and 2.78% of total observations in CTRL and ALGAE, respectively. From 0 to 7 days of trial, a significant increase in diarrhea frequency was observed in CTRL compared to ALGAE group (11.58% on total observations in CTRL and 5.12% of total observations in ALGAE; p < 0.05). During the period from 8 to 13 days only 4.35 and 3.33% of total feces observations showed signs of diarrhea in CTRL and ALGAE, respectively. Only one piglet was excluded from the trial due antibiotic treatment at day 6 of the trial after five consecutive days of diarrhea occurrence. From day 13 to 27 no diarrhea cases have been registered for the entire post-challenge period.

3.3 Challenger strain shedding and bacterial counts in faces

The fecal shedding plate counts in challenged groups showed 69.57% of positive feces to the challenger strain after 3 days from challenge (day 16) in ALGAE+ and CTRL+ groups, respectively. A fecal shedding positivity to E. coli > 20% lasted until day 18 of trial (5 days post-challenge).

qPCR analysis revealed significant differences in the relative abundance of F4+ E. coli DNA in fecal samples (Figure 2) (p < 0.0001). In particular, ALGAE+ showed increased presence of bacterial DNA from day 15 to 17 compared to CTRL+ (p < 0.05). On the contrary, CTRL+ registered higher abundance of F4+ E. coli after 7 days post-challenge compared to ALGAE+ (day 20; p < 0.01).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. DNA abundance of challenger strain in feces during the 7 days after challenge (days 13–20) in infected control (CTRL+) and infected algae supplemented (ALGAE+) group. Data are presented as means ± standard error of log10/g of fresh feces. *, **, ***Asterisks indicate that means are statistically different at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.

Fecal bacterial count of total, lactic acid and coliform bacteria and their index did not register any significant difference for all experimental groups during the pre-and post-challenge periods (Table 5). Even if a significant treatment effect was observed for lactic acid bacteria count during the post-challenge (p = 0.0308), post-hoc comparisons did not reveal any differences among CTRL−, ALGAE−, CTRL+, and ALGAE+ groups in this period.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Fecal bacterial count of total, lactic acid and coliform bacteria during the pre-and post-challenge period in control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented groups divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+) groups during the post-challenge period after day 12.

3.4 Protein digestibility and fecal parameters

The fecal composition in terms of DM did not show any difference in experimental groups from 0 to 27 days of trial (Table 6). The fecal concentration of CP showed a significant increase in CTRL+ compared to ALGAE+ and CTRL− (p < 0.05). Consequently, the ATTD of protein component was significantly decreased in CTRL+ compared to CTRL− and ALGAE − groups at 27 days (p < 0.05).

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Fecal parameters measured at 0 and 27 days of trial in control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented groups divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+) groups during the post-challenge period after day 12.

3.5 Relative gene expression in duodenum

mRNA transcription in duodenum samples did not reveal any significant differences in the four considered groups at 27 days of trial (Table 7).

Table 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Relative mRNA transcription of duodenum at 27 days of trial in control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+) groups.

3.6 Serum oxidative status and antioxidant barrier

The serum samples of piglets at 0, 13, and 27 days did not register any significant differences in terms of UCARR and μM HClO/mL for the oxidative and antioxidant barrier status, respectively (Table 8). Even if a significant effect of the interaction between treatment and time was registered at day 13 for dROMs test, post-hoc comparisons did not display any difference among groups.

Table 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Serum values of dROMs and Oxy Adsorbent test measured at 0, 13, and 27 days of trial in control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+) groups after day 12.

3.7 Intestinal morphology of duodenum and jejunum sections

The villus height and width showed significant differences in both duodenum and jejunum tracts at 27 days of trial (p < 0.001; Table 9; Figure 3). In particular, the villus height was significantly reduced in the duodenum of challenged (CTRL+ and ALGAE+) compared to the unchallenged (CTRL− and ALGAE−) groups (p < 0.001; Table 9). Jejunum height showed a significant decrease in CTRL+ compared to other experimental groups. Consequently, the villus height/crypt depth ratio was significantly reduced in CTRL+ compared to other groups (p < 0.05).

Table 9
www.frontiersin.org

Table 9. Intestinal morphology parameters of duodenum and jejunum sections at 27 days in control (CTRL) and algae mixture (ALGAE) supplemented divided per unchallenged (−) and challenged (+).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Representative pictures of hematoxylin and eosin staining showing duodenum and jejunum morphology of one piglet of unchallenged control (CTRL−). Scale bar = 200 μm.

4 Discussion

In piglets, ETEC E. coli cause high occurrence of PWD during the post-weaning period leading to important detrimental effects on animal heath resorting in antibiotic use strictly connected with AMR. Recently, E. coli strains are considered important vectors for antimicrobial resistance transmission (39). In our study, ETEC challenge model, using a moderate dosage, was adopted to mimic a biological stressor for evaluating the dietary response of susceptible and non-susceptible pigs under controlled experimental conditions (5). Our study explores the field of functional nutrition in order to propose a multilevel approach to increase animal health and decreasing pathology occurrence thus possibly reducing the antibiotic treatments in swine farming. Algae have demonstrated an interesting profile as nutraceuticals and functional ingredients for in-feed supplementation (21). Particularly, dietary marine algae supplementation have been recognized as source of bioactive compounds to stimulate gut health and performance in post-weaned piglets (40). This study provides valuable insights into the effects of A. nodosum and L. calcareum supplementation on the growth performance and health of F4+ E. coli challenged piglets, with important implications for antibiotic alternatives in swine farming.

Significant differences in growth performance of piglets were observed from day 13 to 27. Particularly, the CTRL+ group exhibited lower BW at day 20 compared to the ALGAE+ group, indicating a potential benefit of algae supplementation in promoting growth after the challenger strain induced stress. The observed lower ADG in CTRL+ from day 13 to 20, followed by a significant weight loss from day 17 to 20, suggested an impairment of homeostasis condition by the challenger strain. Turner et al. (41) reported that supplementation with 1% A. nodosum extract did not demonstrate a significant effect on performance over a 28-days trial. Dierick et al. (42) highlighted the inhibitory effect of A. nodosum on E. coli when tested at 10 g/kg in vitro, attributing this protective effect to the content of phlorotannins ranging from 5 to 15% of algae dry weight (43). A. nodosum is characterized by the presence of polysaccharides as alginates, fucoidan, laminarin, and polyphenols such as phlorotannins, flavonoids, and pigments (44). Among bioactive compounds of this brown alga, phlorotannins are renewed for their important antimicrobial activity through impairing the cell wall integrity (45). However, Gardiner et al. (46) observed a decrease in ADG in grower-finisher pigs supplemented with 3–9 g/kg of A. nodosum extract, suggesting that the presence of phlorotannins may impact feed intake and nitrogen retention, and the high potassium content could lead to an anion-cation imbalance depending on the extract type, while high levels of alginates might increase digesta viscosity. L. calcareum can represent a supplementation of a highly soluble source of calcium that constitutes about 35% of its composition (47) that possesses around 2-fold solubility if compared with calcitic limestone (48). This red alga is also a source of magnesium carbonate, iron, zinc, fluorine, manganese, cobalt, iodine, alginates, and vitamin C (49). In addition, L. calcareum presents a significant concentration in selenium (≈0.6 ppm) (50) which is involved in glutathione peroxidase could contribute to balance the oxidative stress (51). The observed differences in growth performance among groups could be attributed to the functional components present in A. nodosum and L. calcareum, which may play a protective role for piglets during stressful weaning conditions. However, marine algae exhibit significant variability in their content of bioactive compounds across batches and seasons. Therefore, it is crucial to characterize the specific bioactive compound profiles of each product to ensure consistency and efficacy in providing beneficial effects under varying environmental and production conditions. In our previous study, the metabolomic profile of A. nodosum and L. calcareum was determined in terms of polyphenols and tripeptides levels. They were distinguished by their abundant phloroglucinol and oxidized glutathione content, respectively (29). This characterization allowed targeted supplementation strategies for optimizing feed formulation for piglets.

The feed intake did not register significant differences, thus suggesting that the growth disparities were more likely related to nutrient utilization efficiency rather than differences in feed consumption. In addition, the supplementation of 2% of seaweed blend composed by A. nodosum and L. calcareum supplementation did not impair the feed palatability.

Feed conversion ratio was significantly increased from day 13 to 20 in the CTRL+ group compared to other experimental groups, confirming the detrimental effect of challenge on zootechnical performance during the first week post-challenge. A higher FCR in the absence of algae supplementation may indicate suboptimal nutrient utilization and metabolic stress, possibly due to stress induced by the oral administration of F4+ E. coli. In contrast, the lower FCR observed in ALGAE+ and other groups suggests maintained feed efficiency associated with algae supplementation after challenge, which could be linked to enhanced nutrient absorption, gut health, and metabolic balance also under stressful conditions. Dos Santos et al. (48) provided 0.82% of total calcium with L. calcareum without registering differences in performance during the pre-starter period. The study disclosed that piglets supplemented with L. calcareum registered a significant reduction in FCR during the starter phase. The absence of differences in performance among unchallenged groups suggests that the effects of algae supplementation on growth performance could probably be better exacerbated under challenge conditions. This protective effect was also observed in vitro on intestinal cell model stressed with hydrogen peroxide and supplemented with natural extracts (52). Animals challenged and supplemented with seaweed mixture showed similar growth compared to the unchallenged groups. Meanwhile, the CTRL+ group achieved comparable growth at the end of the trial, likely due to the moderate dosage of the challenge. It is important to highlight the potential protective effect of seaweeds that could be observed in field conditions, where the persistence of infection may be higher due to pathogen shedding and reinfections, possibly leading to more significant health implications. Further studies will be necessary to understand the long-term effects of this innovative seaweeds’ dietary supplementation beyond 28 days.

The increase of diarrhea in CTRL group during the first week of pre-challenge was mainly due to the presence of one piglet that showed diarrhea for 5 consecutive days prior to antibiotic treatment and exclusion form experimental trial. This animal contributed for an increase of 1.80% (+4 cases) of diarrhea registrations in CTRL group causing a significant difference for the chi-squared test. Removing this subject form the dataset is it possible only to observe a tendency toward significance for the diarrhea frequency during the first week pre-challenge (9.78 and 5.21% of total observations in CTRL and ALGAE, respectively, p < 0.0912). The absence of diarrhea occurrence in both challenged and unchallenged groups from day 13 to 27 is noteworthy. Specifically, the dosage of the experimental challenge was moderated in terms of CFU (5355) to induce a manageable level of stress without causing clinical diarrhea in piglets during the trial. This approach ensured that the piglets experienced a controlled stressor, while allowing them to develop and mature their immune capabilities. Notably, the challenge study was conducted when the piglets were 48 days old, a period characterized by the ongoing maturation and strengthening of their immune response (56).

The fecal shedding of the challenger strain in challenged piglets, observed as early as 2 days (8.70% of challenged pigs) and 3 days (69.57% of challenged pigs) post-challenge in the ALGAE+ and CTRL+ groups respectively, confirming the success of the oral challenge procedure and suggesting the rapid colonization of the pathogen within the gut during this period. The persistence of F4+ E. coli shedding until day 18 underscored the prolonged impact on gut health during this critical period (57). No differences were registered for the fecal count of total, lactic acid and coliform bacteria and the lactic acid/coliform index. While these parameters can be considered as important indicators of gut health, a more comprehensive analysis of the complete gut microbiota will be required to fully elucidate the effects of this innovative algae mixture supplementation. DNA abundance of challenger strain showed a significant increase in feces of ALGAE+ group compared to CTRL+ at day 2, 3, and 4 post-challenge. After 7 days post-challenge (day 20), ALGAE+ registered a significant drop in DNA presence of F4+ E. coli in feces compared to CTRL+. This trend could indicate a higher presence of E. coli in fecal samples during the first 4 days post-challenge while possibly decreasing the persistence of challenger shedding after 1 week. In particular, the adopted challenge model did not reveal an inhibitory effect in terms of shedding of the challenger strain. We hypothesize that the protection provided by seaweeds was not directly related to the pathogenic component but rather to enhancing the intestinal barrier and immune status of the host.

Generally, piglets that are more resistant to ETEC exposure may show lower shedding levels of F4+ E. coli suggesting an absence of significant interaction with the gut and possible competition with the commensal microbiota for the colonization (58). However, after 7 days of challenge the virulence factor prevalence generally decreases possibly negativizing after 10 days from E. coli infection (55). As previously reported, the use of natural additives could decrease the fecal shedding of E. coli after 2 and 3 weeks of trial (59). Even if no diarrhea was registered during the trial, we can speculate that algae may drop the persistence of challenger strain shedding after 7 days from challenge thus shortening the pathogenic spreading window.

The fecal composition analysis over the 27-day trial period revealed interesting insights into nutrient utilization and protein digestion in response to algae supplementation and experimental challenge. Analyzing the apparent digestibility based on feces is an important parameter to estimate the nutrient efficiency utilization using a minimally invasive method. Currently, there have been few studies describing the impact of seaweeds on diet digestibility. Algae can influence the digestive process in several ways, primarily due to their nutritional composition and bioactive compounds. Generally, seaweeds are known to possibly affect digestion through soluble fibers such as alginate and agar, which can slow down the digestion and absorption of nutrients (60). Seaweeds supplementation appeared to maintain stable the nitrogen utilization. In contrast, the CTRL+ group exhibited a significant increase in fecal crude protein (CP) concentration and a decrease in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of protein at 27 days post-challenge. Even if the biological importance of the current findings can be negligible, these findings could suggest that algae-derived bioactive compounds may contribute to optimizing nutrient utilization and mitigating the negative effects of F4+ E. coli challenge on protein digestibility in weaned piglets. In particular, A. nodosum is a brown alga rich in alginic acid and fucoidans that could decrease digestibility due to the high content of undigestible fibers. In line with our results, Czech et al. (60) did not register significant differences in crude protein digestibility supplementing 0.6 and 1% of A. nodosum from 18 to 64 days of age in weaned piglets. Generally, antioxidant rich algae could protect the digestive tract from oxidative damage, supporting gut health and thereby alleviating digestive discomfort (61). Protein total apparent digestibility indicated the supplementation of 2% of the combination of A. nodosum and L. calcareum did not negatively affect the nitrogen utilization by animals, one of most important nutrients for piglets’ growth efficiency.

The consistent serum oxidative and antioxidant barrier levels during the experimental period, suggest overall good health without any detrimental effect of challenge at 27 days of trial. On the contrary, Czech et al. (60) registered a significant increase of antioxidant ability of serum, particularly for the activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase and reduced glutathione supplementing 1% of A. nodosum in piglets after 46 days of supplementation. The differences detected in oxidative and antioxidant parameters may depend on the content in phytochemicals in the used A. nodosum and longer supplementation period compared to our experimental design. Based on previous in vitro results obtained by our research group (29), A. nodosum and L. calcareum combination possess the potential for an enhancing antioxidant ability compared to the singular activity of each alga. However, further studies will be necessary to elucidate the long-term effects of this innovative seaweeds’ combination.

The mRNA transcription in duodenum samples at 27 days did not show significant differences among the four considered groups. In this regard, despite our efforts to minimize variability, the response to the pathogen exhibits significant variation, as evidenced by the obtained data. The multifactorial nature of the disorder suggests that a more consistent response could potentially be observed using specific pathogen-free pigs. Nonetheless, our main goal was to assess the efficacy of seaweeds in mitigating the effects of bacterial challenge under in-field conditions. Another consideration is related to the timing of sample collection. Intestinal samples were obtained at 9 days post-challenge, recognizing that the expression of certain genes, particularly inflammatory cytokines, is predominantly modulated within the initial 24 h following pathogenic invasion (62, 63). Probably further experiments will be necessary to elucidate the effect on mRNA transcription of this innovative combination of marine algae.

The depth of the crypts and the height of the villi are important parameters of intestinal health. In fact, it is known that even a short period of fasting could lead to intestinal alterations and increase intestinal permeability (64). This decrease in barrier strength leads to negative effects on both health and performance (65, 66). In the duodenum, villus height and width were shorter in the challenged compared to unchallenged groups indicating that infection affected intestinal mucosa morphology and the supplementation of macroalgae did not protect from the morphological alterations. However, crypt depth and villus height to crypt depth ratio were not different between all the experimental groups in the duodenum.

In the duodenum, villus height and width were significantly shorter in the challenged compared to unchallenged groups indicating that ETEC E. coli affected intestinal mucosa morphology and the supplementation of macroalgae did not protect from the morphological alterations. However, crypt depth and villus height to crypt depth ratio were not different between all the experimental groups in the duodenum. In the jejunum, villus height and width were shorter in the CTRL+ than other groups suggesting that, in this intestinal tract, E. coli challenge negatively impacted the gut mucosa. However, in the challenged animals, the supplementation of seaweeds protected the mucosa from morphological alterations. In the jejunum, crypt depth was not different between all experimental groups. However, villus height, width and VH:CD were significantly higher in jejunum of the CTRL- than ALGAE- and ALGAE+ compared to CTRL+. This result indicates the beneficial effect of seaweeds to contrast the negative effect of challenge on gut health. Due to the absence of differences in the jejunum of ALGAE+ with unchallenged groups, it could be speculated that the major protective effects of bioactive compounds of A. nodosum and L. calcareum combination has been exerted in this intestinal tract. Genova et al. (67) evaluated the intestinal characteristics in piglets fed with L. calcareum concluding that this calcium source could be considered an interesting alternative source of calcium, registering improved VH:CD ratio in duodenum. Additionally, the influence of macroalgae on improving the integrity of the intestinal mucosa and increasing villus length contributes to the enhancement of small intestine digestive function and results in better nutrient absorption (60). Algae are also rich in antioxidants, including polyphenols and carotenoids, which help to protect digestive tract cells from oxidative damage, maintain gut health, and reduce inflammation, thereby alleviating digestive discomfort. Given the good health condition of piglets in the ALGAE+ group and the histological parameters observed, we can speculate that algae supported intestinal health as we did not observe inflammation signs or typical mucosal remodeling. In contrast, the CTRL+ group, although not exhibiting clinical signs of diarrhea, showed slightly disturbance of intestinal health correlated with alterations in villi morphology probably due to the challenger strain, likely reflecting ongoing efforts to restore mucosal integrity. These findings highlight the complex interplay between nutritional strategies and gut barrier integrity, emphasizing the need for further investigation into the specific mechanisms underlying these histological changes and their implications for intestinal health and disease resilience. Our data suggest a potential protective effect of this innovative seaweeds’ supplementation on intestinal health and barrier function in challenged piglets, highlighting the importance of further investigations to elucidate the exact mechanisms of action and optimize dietary strategies for promoting gut health in swine farming. Considering the interesting results obtained from the combination of these algae species on piglets health, the combined use of different functional ingredients such as algae should be considered as promising innovative dietary strategy for decreasing the occurrence of multifactorial disorders and the dependency on antibiotics, thereby promoting a more sustainable approach in the livestock industry.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, our study underlines the potential of A. nodosum and L. calcareum supplementation in supporting animal health and performance in F4+ E. coli challenged piglets, with significant implications for reducing antibiotic use in swine farming. Notably, algae supplementation demonstrated the ability to mitigate the adverse effects of E. coli challenge, as evidenced by improved growth performance and intestinal health parameters compared to the infected control group. The observed differences in growth performance and nutrient utilization among groups may be attributed to the unique functional components present in these algae species, which could contribute to support piglets during stressful weaning conditions. Additionally, the protective effects on gut barrier integrity further highlight the potential of algae-derived bioactive compounds in promoting gut health and resilience during the post-weaning. Further studies will be necessary to understand the mechanisms and long-term effects of this innovative seaweeds’ supplementation. The obtained findings could contribute to the development of functional dietary strategies to enhance animal health and reduce antibiotic use in livestock.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

All experimental procedures have been approved by the Animal Welfare Organization of University of Milan and the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n° 884/2021-PR). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

MD’A: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SF: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. SR: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. IF: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. ES: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LS: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AI: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. FR: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. NV: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RP: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. LR: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by University of Milan under the grant Seal of Excellence (SoE)-SEED 2020: “Algae-based alternatives to in-feed antibiotics in pig production-ASAP Algae-based Pig.”

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Giancarlo Selmini for the feed formulation and Giovanni Urì for the support in the animal care throughout the experimental trial. Additionally, the authors acknowledge the support of the APC central fund of the University of Milan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Tang, X, Xiong, K, Fang, R, and Li, M. Weaning stress and intestinal health of piglets: a review. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1042778. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1042778

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rymut, HE, Rund, LA, Bolt, CR, Villamil, MB, Southey, BR, Johnson, RW, et al. The combined effect of weaning stress and immune activation during pig gestation on serum cytokine and analyte concentrations. Animals. (2021) 11:2274. doi: 10.3390/ani11082274

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Faccin, JE, Tokach, MD, Allerson, MW, Woodworth, JC, Derouchey, JM, Dritz, SS, et al. Relationship between weaning age and antibiotic usage on pig growth performance and mortality. J Anim Sci. (2020) 98:skaa363. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Reggi, S, Dell’anno, M, Baldi, A, and Rossi, L. Seed-specific expression of porcine verotoxigenic Escherichia coli antigens in tobacco plants as a potential model of edible vaccines. Vet Res Commun. (2024). 48:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10318-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bosi, P, Sarli, G, Casini, L, De Filippi, S, Trevisi, P, Mazzoni, M, et al. The influence of fat protection of calcium formate on growth and intestinal defence in Escherichia coli K88-challenged weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2007) 139:170–85. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.12.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sun, Y, and Kim, S. Intestinal challenge with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in pigs, and nutritional intervention to prevent postweaning diarrhea. Anim Nutr. (2017) 3:322–30. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.10.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Caneschi, A, Bardhi, A, Barbarossa, A, and Zaghini, A. The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: a narrative review. Antibiotics. (2023) 12:487. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Regulation EU 6/2019 (2019). Regulation (Eu) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing directive 2001/82/Ec (text with Eea relevance).

Google Scholar

9. Tang, KL, Caffrey, NP, Nóbrega, DB, Cork, SC, Ronksley, PE, Barkema, HW, et al. Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet Health. (2017) 1:e316–27. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30141-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Baudoin, F, Hogeveen, H, and Wauters, E. Reducing antimicrobial use and dependence in livestock production systems: a social and economic sciences perspective on an interdisciplinary approach. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:584593. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.584593

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Noyes, NR, Slizovskiy, IB, and Singer, RS. Beyond antimicrobial use: a framework for prioritizing antimicrobial resistance interventions. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. (2021) 9:313–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-072020-080638

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. EMA, Committee for Medicinal Products For Veterinary Use and EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards Murphy, D, Ricci, A, Auce, Z, Beechinor, JG, Bergendahl, H, et al. Ema and Efsa joint scientific opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (Ronafa). EFSA J. (2017) 15:e04666

Google Scholar

13. Dhama, K, Chakraborty, S, Kapoor, S, Tiwari, R, Kumar, A, Deb, R, et al. One world, one health-veterinary perspectives. Adv Anim Vet Sci. (2013) 1:5–13.

Google Scholar

14. Celi, P, Cowieson, A, Fru-Nji, F, Steinert, R, Kluenter, A-M, and Verlhac, V. Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health: new opportunities for sustainable animal production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2017) 234:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Pluske, JR. Feed-and feed additives-related aspects of gut health and development in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2013) 4:1–7. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dell’anno, M, Hejna, M, Sotira, S, Caprarulo, V, Reggi, S, Pilu, R, et al. Evaluation of leonardite as a feed additive on lipid metabolism and growth of weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2020) 266:114519. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114519

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Makkar, HP, Tran, G, Heuzé, V, Giger-Reverdin, S, Lessire, M, Lebas, F, et al. Seaweeds for livestock diets: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2016) 212:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.018

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mavrommatis, A, Tsiplakou, E, Zerva, A, Pantiora, PD, Georgakis, ND, Tsintzou, GP, et al. Microalgae as a sustainable source of antioxidants in animal nutrition, health and livestock development. Antioxidants. (2023) 12:1882. doi: 10.3390/antiox12101882

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tullberg, RM, Nguyen, HP, and Wang, CM. Review of the status and developments in seaweed farming infrastructure. J Mar Sci Eng. (2022) 10:1447. doi: 10.3390/jmse10101447

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Pandey, AK, Kumar, P, and Saxena, M. Feed additives in animal health. In: Gupta, R, Srivastava, A, Lall, R, editors. Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. Cham: Springer (2019). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_23

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pandey, D. (2023). Marine macroalgae as an alternative, environment-friendly, and bioactive feeding resource for animals.

Google Scholar

22. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2019).

Google Scholar

23. Pereira, L, Morrison, L, Shukla, PS, and Critchley, AT. A concise review of the brown macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum (Linnaeus) Le Jolis. J Appl Phycol. (2020) 32:3561–84. doi: 10.1007/s10811-020-02246-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Combet, E, Ma, ZF, Cousins, F, Thompson, B, and Lean, ME. Low-level seaweed supplementation improves iodine status in iodine-insufficient women. Br J Nutr. (2014) 112:753–61. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001573

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Martin, S, Castets, M-D, and Clavier, J. Primary production, respiration and calcification of the temperate free-living coralline alga Lithothamnion corallioides. Aquat Bot. (2006) 85:121–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.02.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Takiya, CS, Ribeiro, VC, De Almeida, C, Bugoni, M, Vittorazzi, P Jr, Chesini, RG, et al. Feeding phytogenic ingredients combined or not with Lithothamnium calcareum and a mycotoxin binder to lactating cows: effects on performance, nutrient digestibility, physiological parameters, and nitrogen excretion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2023) 303:115718. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115718

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Costa, VV, Amaral, FA, Coelho, FM, Queiroz-Junior, CM, Malagoli, BG, Gomes, JHS, et al. Lithothamnion muelleri treatment ameliorates inflammatory and hypernociceptive responses in antigen-induced arthritis in mice. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0118356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118356

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bikker, P, Stokvis, L, Van Krimpen, M, Van Wikselaar, P, and Cone, J. Evaluation of seaweeds from marine waters in northwestern Europe for application in animal nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2020) 263:114460. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114460

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Frazzini, S, Scaglia, E, Dell’anno, M, Reggi, S, Panseri, S, Giromini, C, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of algal and cyanobacterial extracts: an in vitro study. Antioxidants. (2022) 11:992. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050992

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Frazzini, S, Torresani, MC, Hejna, M, Di Dio, M, and Rossi, L. Ascophillum nodosum and Lithothamnium calcareum and their prebiotic potential on Lactobacillus strains. J Funct Foods. (2024) 118:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2024.106257

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Council Directive Ec 120/2008 (2008). Laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (Codified version).

Google Scholar

32. Rossi, L, Turin, L, Alborali, GL, Demartini, E, Filipe, JFS, Riva, F, et al. Translational approach to induce and evaluate Verocytotoxic E. coli O138 based disease in piglets. Animals. (2021) 11:2415. doi: 10.3390/ani11082415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. He, F. E. coli genomic DNA extraction. Bioprotocol. (2011) Bio101:e97. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.97

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Dell’anno, M, Reggi, S, Caprarulo, V, Hejna, M, Sgoifo Rossi, CA, Callegari, ML, et al. Evaluation of tannin extracts, Leonardite and Tributyrin supplementation on Diarrhoea incidence and gut microbiota of weaned piglets. Animals. (2021) 11:1693. doi: 10.3390/ani11061693

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Caprarulo, V, Turin, L, Hejna, M, Reggi, S, Dell’anno, M, Riccaboni, P, et al. Protective effect of phytogenic plus short and medium-chain fatty acids-based additives in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenged piglets. Vet Res Commun. (2023) 47:217–31. doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-09945-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Riva, F, Filipe, J, Fanelli, A, Marconato, L, Inglesi, A, Scanziani, E, et al. Il-1R8 downregulation and concomitant Tlr7 and Tlr9 upregulation are related to the pathogenesis of canine diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Vet Sci. (2022) 9:209. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Verdile, N, Pasquariello, R, Scolari, M, Scirè, G, Brevini, TA, and Gandolfi, F. A detailed study of rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) intestine revealed that digestive and absorptive functions are not linearly distributed along its length. Animals. (2020) 10:745. doi: 10.3390/ani10040745

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. Washington, DC: National Research Council, The National Academies Press (2012).

Google Scholar

39. Zalewska, M, Błażejewska, A, Czapko, A, and Popowska, M (2021) Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure – Consequences of Its Application in Agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 12:610656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.610656

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. O’doherty, J, Bouwhuis, M, and Sweeney, T. Novel marine polysaccharides and maternal nutrition to stimulate gut health and performance in post-weaned pigs. Anim Prod Sci. (2017) 57:2376–85. doi: 10.1071/AN17272

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Turner, JL, Dritz, SS, Higgins, JJ, and Minton, JE. Effects of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on growth performance and immune function of young pigs challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. J Anim Sci. (2002) 80:1947–1953. doi: 10.2527/2002.8071947x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Dierick, N, Ovyn, A, and De Smet, S. In vitro assessment of the effect of intact marine brown macro-algae Ascophyllum nodosum on the gut flora of piglets. Livest Sci. (2010) 133:154–6. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.051

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Michiels, J, Skrivanova, E, Missotten, J, Ovyn, A, Mrazek, J, De Smet, S, et al. Intact brown seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) in diets of weaned piglets: effects on performance, gut bacteria and morphology and plasma oxidative status. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. (2012) 96:1101–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01227.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Maribu, I. Chemical and Enzyme-Assisted Extraction of Fucoidan From Two Species of Brown Macroalgae (Ascophyllum nodosum and Saccharina latissima). Tromsø, Norway: UiT The Arctic University of Norway (2021).

Google Scholar

45. Wang, Y, Xu, Z, Bach, S, and Mcallister, T. Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) phlorotannins and terrestrial tannins. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. (2009) 22:238–45. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2009.80213

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Gardiner, G, Campbell, A, O’doherty, J, Pierce, E, Lynch, P, Leonard, F, et al. Effect of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on growth performance, digestibility, carcass characteristics and selected intestinal microflora populations of grower–finisher pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2008) 141:259–73. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. González-Vega, J, Walk, C, and Stein, H. Effects of microbial phytase on apparent and standardized total tract digestibility of calcium in calcium supplements fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:2255–64. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8215

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Dos Santos, LBDA, Genova, JL, De Oliveira Carvalho, PL, Rupolo, PE, and Carvalho, ST. Calcitic seaweed (Lithothamnion calcareum) as an organic source of calcium in piglet feeding. Anim Prod Sci. (2021) 61:662–72. doi: 10.1071/AN20008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Imperatori, L, Giardini, D, Latini, G, Migliori, G, Blasi, C, Bunkheila, F, et al. Feasibility single-arm study of a medical device containing Desmodium adscendens and Lithothamnium calcareum combined with chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. (2018) 10:5433–8. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S165746

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Aslam, MN, Kreider, JM, Paruchuri, T, Bhagavathula, N, Dasilva, M, Zernicke, RF, et al. A mineral-rich extract from the red marine algae Lithothamnion calcareum preserves bone structure and function in female mice on a Western-style diet. Calcif Tissue Int. (2010) 86:313–24. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9340-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Sun, Z, Wu, K, Feng, C, and Lei, XG. Selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase 1 regulates transcription of elongase 3 in murine tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. (2023) 208:708–17. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.09.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Reggi, S, Giromini, C, Dell’anno, M, Baldi, A, Rebucci, R, and Rossi, L. In vitro digestion of chestnut and Quebracho tannin extracts: antimicrobial effect, antioxidant capacity and Cytomodulatory activity in swine intestinal Ipec-J2 cells. Animals. (2020) 10:195. doi: 10.3390/ani10020195

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Boeckman, JX, Sprayberry, S, Korn, AM, Suchodolski, JS, Paulk, C, Genovese, K, et al. Effect of chronic and acute enterotoxigenic E. coli challenge on growth performance, intestinal inflammation, microbiome, and metabolome of weaned piglets. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:5024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08446-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Montoya, D, D’angelo, M, Martín-Orúe, SM, Rodríguez-Sorrento, A, Saladrigas-García, M, Araujo, C, et al. Effectiveness of two plant-based in-feed additives against an Escherichia coli F4 oral challenge in weaned piglets. Animals. (2021) 11:2024. doi: 10.3390/ani11072024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Spitzer, F, Vahjen, W, Pieper, R, Martinez-Vallespin, B, and Zentek, J. A standardised challenge model with an enterotoxigenic F4+ Escherichia coli strain in piglets assessing clinical traits and faecal shedding of fae and Est-ii toxin genes. Arch Anim Nutr. (2014) 68:448–59. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2014.968701

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Vodolazska, D, Hedemann, MS, and Lauridsen, C. Impact of liquid diet supplementation while suckling and weaning age on nutritional status, intestinal health, and immunity of piglets pre-and post-weaning. J Anim Sci. (2023) 101:skad231. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad231

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Girard, M, Hu, D, Pradervand, N, Neuenschwander, S, and Bee, G. Chestnut extract but not sodium salicylate decreases the severity of diarrhea and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 shedding in artificially infected piglets. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0214267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pollock, J, Gally, DL, Glendinning, L, Tiwari, R, Hutchings, MR, and Houdijk, JG. Analysis of temporal fecal microbiota dynamics in weaner pigs with and without exposure to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci. (2018) 96:3777–90. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ahmed, S, Hossain, M, Kim, G, Hwang, J, Ji, H, and Yang, C. Effects of resveratrol and essential oils on growth performance, immunity, digestibility and fecal microbial shedding in challenged piglets. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. (2013) 26:683–90. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Czech, A, Woś, K, Muszyński, S, and Tomaszewska, E. Nutritional and Antioxidative benefits of dietary macroalgae supplementation in weaned piglets. Animals. (2024) 14:549. doi: 10.3390/ani14040549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Vignaud, J, Loiseau, C, Hérault, J, Mayer, C, Côme, M, Martin, I, et al. Microalgae produce antioxidant molecules with potential preventive effects on mitochondrial functions and skeletal muscular oxidative stress. Antioxidants. (2023) 12:1050. doi: 10.3390/antiox12051050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Daudelin, J-F, Lessard, M, Beaudoin, F, Nadeau, É, Bissonnette, N, Boutin, Y, et al. Administration of probiotics influences F4 (K88)-positive enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli attachment and intestinal cytokine expression in weaned pigs. Vet Res. (2011) 42:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-69

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Devriendt, B, Stuyven, E, Verdonck, F, Goddeeris, BM, and Cox, E. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (K88) induce proinflammatory responses in porcine intestinal epithelial cells. Dev Comp Immunol. (2010) 34:1175–82. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.06.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Lalles, J-P, Bosi, P, Smidt, H, and Stokes, CR. Nutritional management of gut health in pigs around weaning. Proc Nutr Soc. (2007) 66:260–8. doi: 10.1017/S0029665107005484

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Cai, L, Li, Y, Wei, Z, Li, X, and Jiang, X. Effects of dietary gallic acid on growth performance, diarrhea incidence, intestinal morphology, plasma antioxidant indices, and immune response in weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2020) 261:114391. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114391

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Lallès, JP, and David, J-C. Fasting and refeeding modulate the expression of stress proteins along the gastrointestinal tract of weaned pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. (2011) 95:478–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01075.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Genova, J, Oliveira, N, Scherer, C, Carvalho, P, Costa, A, Artoni, S, et al. Bone, microbiological and intestinal characteristics of piglets fed diets containing Lithothamnium calcareum. SA J Anim Sci. (2022) 52:98–110. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v52i1.12

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: seaweeds, brown algae, red algae, gut health, antioxidants, alternatives to antimicrobials, functional ingredients, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli

Citation: Dell’Anno M, Frazzini S, Reggi S, Ferri I, Scaglia E, Schiasselloni L, Inglesi A, Riva F, Verdile N, Pasquariello R and Rossi L (2024) Evaluation of dietary supplementation of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithothamnium calcareum as functional algae in F4+ Escherichia coli challenged piglets. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1430347. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1430347

Received: 09 May 2024; Accepted: 07 August 2024;
Published: 06 September 2024.

Edited by:

Elena De Felice, University of Camerino, Italy

Reviewed by:

Maria Giovanna Ciliberti, University of Foggia, Italy
Mohamad Gazali, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia

Copyright © 2024 Dell’Anno, Frazzini, Reggi, Ferri, Scaglia, Schiasselloni, Inglesi, Riva, Verdile, Pasquariello and Rossi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Luciana Rossi, bHVjaWFuYS5yb3NzaUB1bmltaS5pdA==

ORCID: Matteo Dell’Anno, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-864X
Sara Frazzini, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-0003
Serena Reggi, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-1177
Irene Ferri, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-0178
Elena Scaglia, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-5234
Linda Schiasselloni, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0874-9328
Alessia Inglesi, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-1445
Federica Riva, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-1627
Nicole Verdile, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7244-9577
Rolando Pasquariello, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-7009
Luciana Rossi, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-4683

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.