ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1460577
This article is part of the Research TopicAnimal wellbeing, conservation, research, and education: Supporting people in caring professionsView all 11 articles
Suicide prevention for the veterinary professiona preliminary investigation to explore veterinarians' perceptions of ASIST training for their profession
Provisionally accepted
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background and aims: Several studies have identified that veterinarians are at higher risk of suicide than the general population. To date there has been scant attention to preventing suicide within this profession. Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) is an evidence-based suicide prevention training program that aims to enhance trainees' capabilities to help individuals who may be vulnerable to suicidality. ASIST has been successfully delivered to industries and professions where suicide is known to be a high risk and was therefore proposed as a potentially suitable suicide prevention initiative for translation to the veterinary profession. The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary qualitative evaluation of the ASIST workshop delivered to veterinarians in Queensland, Australia. A secondary aim was to explore veterinarians' perceived needs for suicide prevention in their profession.Method: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) framework was used to explore the experiences of a sample of Queensland veterinarians, after attendance at an ASIST workshop. Participants were females (87.5%) and males (12.5%) aged 30 to 66 years (M = 45, SD = 12.37) who engaged in individual interviews. Thematic analysis identified common and important patterns of meaning within the data.Results: Three main themes and associated sub-themes were identified: Impactful workshop delivery and learning environment; Relevance of ASIST training for the veterinary profession; and Unique challenges and needs for suicide prevention in the veterinary profession. Overall, participants reported positive experiences of the workshop and its delivery. However, participants also reported feeling a level of discomfort related to some aspects of their participation and made suggestions for tailoring of the workshop to better fit the needs of their peers in future workshop delivery. Participants also suggested important targets for suicide prevention in the veterinary profession.Conclusion: This study identified key experiences of veterinarians who participated in the ASIST workshop. Important directions for future delivery of the ASIST workshop to the veterinary profession as well as directions for suicide prevention were suggested including actions for improving mental health and well-being in the workplace.
Keywords: workplace suicide prevention, veterinarian suicide, qualitative evaluation, Occupational suicide, gatekeeper training evaluation
Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 16 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Smith and Hawgood. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Judith Smith, Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.