ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1543836
This article is part of the Research TopicEpilepsy in Veterinary Science - Volume IIView all 7 articles
Scalp Electrode Placement Accuracy for the Canine Electroencephalography Array
Provisionally accepted- 1Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- 2ACCESS Specialty Animal Hospital, Royal Palm Beach, FL, United States
- 3School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Guelph, 5 Guelph, Ontario, Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- 4Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 5Département des Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Despite the common occurrence of idiopathic epilepsy amongst neurological conditions in dogs, electroencephalography (EEG), the gold standard for seizure detection, is relatively neglected. The use of EEG in veterinary medicine is rudimentary compared to that in human medicine, particularly with respect to the quantification of EEG electrode placement error, i.e., the accuracy of electrode placement relative to the diverse canine cortical topography. Therefore, we quantified the intraobserver EEG electrode placement error using a single canine EEG electrode placement array, on virtual models of head and brain created from archived computed tomographic scans of Brachycephalic (n=5), Mesocephalic (n=15) and Dolichocephalic (n=5) dogs from breeds with archetypal skull conformation. For the Mesocephalic cohort, a stereotactic brain atlas was incorporated into the brain models to quantify electrode placement error via a universal coordinate system. As this was not possible for the Brachycephalic and Dolichocephalic cohort, instead electrode placement was described in relation to cortical landmarks. Gaps in cortical coverage between cohorts were identified, such as poor coverage of the olfactory and frontal regions in the brachycephalic cohort and the parietal region in the Mesocephalic and Dolichocephalic cohorts. Quantitative analysis of electrode placement in the Mesocephalic cohort showed the minimum variance of electrode localization for the x coordinate of the F8 electrode (0.8 mm) and the greatest variance for the y coordinate of the Cz electrode (35.2 mm). This is the first study to highlight the knowledge gaps regarding the accuracy of canine EEG electrode localization, differences in the array coverage across the diverse canine skull conformations, and the urgent need for a stereotactic brain atlas for specific canine skull conformations.
Keywords: Dogs, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Seizures, Standardised electrode placement, 10-20 system
Received: 11 Dec 2024; Accepted: 29 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Everest, St-Denis, Dony, Gaitero, Zur Linden, Cortez, Parmentier and James. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Stephen James Everest, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Fiona May Keir James, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.