ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. One Health
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1553468
This article is part of the Research TopicA One Health Approach to Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial ResistanceView all articles
Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm forming ability of Escherichia coli in milk, animal handlers and herd slurry samples from dairy herds of Punjab, India
Provisionally accepted- 1Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kalpetta, India
- 2Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli serves as an indicator for monitoring the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the human, animal, and environmental interface. The present study employs a 'One Health' framework to determine the prevalence, phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the AMR profile and biofilm forming ability of E. coli isolates from milk, hand swabs and herd slurry samples of 405 dairy herds in Punjab, India. An overall prevalence of E. coli was 34.3% (139/405) (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.39) from pooled milk samples, 9.1% (37/405) (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.12) from the hand swabs of animal handlers and 64.4% (261/405) (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.69) in the slurry samples. Multidrug resistance (resistance to 3 or more classes of antimicrobials) was exhibited by 24.4% (34/139) of E. coli isolates from milk, 40.5% (15/37) from hand swabs, 60.5% (158/261) from slurry samples. Moreover, of the E. coli isolates, 11.51% (16/139) from milk, 24.32 % (09/37) from hand swabs and 31.42 % (82/261) from slurry samples were resistant to 5 or more antimicrobial classes. On molecular characterisation, 19.4% (27/139) of E. coli isolates from milk, 37.8% (14/37) from hand swabs, and 33.3% (87/261) from slurry samples harboured various genes.Principal component analysis and Shannon-Wiener diversity indices highlighted varying βlactamase (ESBL/AmpC β-lactamase) gene distributions across samples, with milk exhibiting the highest diversity. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant protective effect of milk hygiene scores against E. coli occurrence (OR=0.18; 95% CI: 0.13-0.26, p<0.001), while linear regression demonstrated a significant negative association between milk hygiene scores and the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) index (p=0.02). Biofilm assays revealed that 19.2% of isolates were strong biofilm formers, with a strong association (p<0.01) between biofilm formation potential and MAR index. The multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were predominantly moderate biofilm producers, with 23.5% (milk), 20% (hand swabs), and 24.1% (slurry) classified as strong biofilm formers. The study findings underscore the need for One Health-integrated strategies to holistically address AMR challenges at the dairy-environment interface.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance genes, Biofilms, Dairy, E. coli, India, Milk
Received: 30 Dec 2024; Accepted: 20 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vijay, Bedi, Dhaka, Singh, Singh, Arora and Gill. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Deepthi Vijay, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kalpetta, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.