ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Anesthesiology and Animal Pain Management
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1562425
Tricaine, eugenol and etomidate for repetitive procedural anesthesia in adult zebrafish, Danio rerio: effect on stress and behavior
Provisionally accepted- 1Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland
- 2University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
- 3Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
- 4Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
- 5Abdominal Center, Nephrology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Zebrafish has emerged as a popular animal model in biomedical research. Numerous procedures and interventions require occasionally repetitive anesthesia. Tricaine is the most frequently used anesthetic for zebrafish and its efficacy is well established. However, the safety and efficacy of other anesthetics used for zebrafish require further examination, especially regarding repetitive anesthesia. Hence, we compare three anesthetics: tricaine (150 mg/l), eugenol (55 mg/l) and etomidate (4 mg/l) in wildtype adult zebrafish with and without interventions in the form of intraperitoneal injections. Groups of fish receiving the injections are named as (+ injection). We quantify anesthesia induction and recovery times as well as swimming behavior and cortisol levels as indicators of stress. Swimming behavior is quantified with the novel tank method as tank preference and number of turnings. Adult zebrafish are randomly divided into seven groups; tricaine (n=15), tricaine (+injection) (n=15), eugenol (n=15), eugenol (+injection) (n=14), etomidate (n=15), etomidate (+injection) (n=15) and sham (n=10), and anesthetized until they reach stage 4 anesthesia, daily for 10 days. Following anesthesia induction, injection groups are given daily intraperitoneal injections with 0.9 % saline (4 ml/kg) before transfer to a recovery tank to study the effect of a painful procedure (the intraperitoneal injection) during anesthesia on stress. The novel tank method is used for analyzing behavior at day 2 (beginning), day 5/6 (middle) and day 10 (end). Chronic stress is evaluated by whole-body cortisol measurement at the end of the 10-day experiment. Additionally, acute stress is evaluated by whole-body cortisol measurement 30 minutes after single anesthesia in five groups: tricaine (n=5), eugenol (n=5), etomidate (n=5), sham (n=5), and untreated controls (n=5). We find that fish anesthetized with tricaine recover fast (~ 1.5 min) and show normal swimming behavior. Fish anesthetized with eugenol show recovery time (~ 2.5 min) and swimming behavior similar to that of fish receiving tricaine. Fish anesthetized with etomidate have the longest recovery time (~ 5.5 min) and exhibit stressed swimming behavior. Cortisol levels remain at similar levels. Our study supports the use of tricaine as the anesthetic-of-choice for repetitive anesthesia of short duration in zebrafish, followed by eugenol.
Keywords: Zebrafish, health and welfare, procedure, Anesthesia, stress
Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Narumanchi, Perttunen, Laine, Kosonen, Lakkisto, Laine, Tikkanen and Paavola. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jere Paavola, Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.