REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1568164

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews and Recent Advancements in Animal Welfare, Volume IIView all 6 articles

A scoping review on pair housing dairy calves: health and performance outcomes and tactics to reduce cross-sucking behavior

Provisionally accepted
  • The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Calves raised in pairs or triplets often experience better growth performance outcomes when compared to their individually housed peers. However, veterinarians may be concerned that pair housing compromises calf health, and producers are concerned about abnormal oral behavior (e.g., cross-sucking). In this literature review, we evaluated the effect of pair or triplet housing vs. individual housing practices on calf health outcomes and performance since 2016. We also evaluated the literature on mitigation strategies to ameliorate cross-sucking in socially housed calves. We found that when researchers used pair housing practices, there was a lack of association between housing practice and risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) status in all studies (100%, 7/7). Only one study lacking healthy control calves found a negative effect on calf diarrhea in week 3 (1/8 studies). However, a moderate number of researchers (57%, 4/7) did not use a validated clinical scoring system to diagnose calves with BRD status. Half of the researchers (50%, 4/8) also did not report their diagnostic criteria for diagnosing diarrhea in their calves, and we suggest this is needed for future work. All researchers who fed calves at least 7 L/d of milk and recorded calf starter intakes found that pair-housed calves consumed more calf starter either preweaning or post-weaning (100% 6/6). However, growth benefits were only observed in 4 studies, in which 75% fed calves at least 7 L/d of milk. Cross-sucking is mitigated by providing socially housed calves with an outlet for oral behavior, such as a teat for milk feeding, offering at least 7 L/d of milk, offering a teat with starter, and forage. We recommend that future studies investigating social housing utilize validated clinical scoring systems for calf health monitoring, report disease diagnostic criteria, and feed ≥ 7 L/d of milk to promote performance benefits in pair-housed calves. More research is needed to understand how cross-sucking develops as a habit in socially housed calves.

Keywords: social housing1, calf2, diarrhea3, animal welfare4, validated clinical scoring5, bovine respiratory disease6

Received: 28 Jan 2025; Accepted: 15 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Plaugher and Cantor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melissa Cantor, The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.