CASE REPORT article

Front. Vet. Sci., 20 May 2025

Sec. Comparative and Clinical Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1570221

Case Report: Clinical and histopathological findings of porcelain gallbladder in a dog

  • 1Jukjeon Animal Medical Center, Dalgubeol-daero, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

Porcelain Gallbladder (PGB) is a condition marked by extensive calcification and thickening of the gallbladder wall. PGB is extremely rare in dogs. The exact mechanism of PGB remains unclear. However, chronic cholecystitis and factors such as biliary hyperplasia, mucin hypersecretion, and cystic duct obstruction can lead to fibrosis and calcification of the gallbladder wall, potentially resulting in PGB. A 13-year-old spayed female Shih Tzu presented with anorexia, lethargy, vomiting, and weight loss. Physical exams showed mild epigastric pain. Blood tests indicated mild alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, significant alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increases. Hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, and elevated canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) were also noted. Diagnostic imaging revealed extensive gallbladder wall calcification and thickening, choleliths, mild bile duct dilation, pancreatitis, and duodenitis. Cholecystectomy was performed, and symptomatic treatment for pancreatitis and duodenitis was administered. Histopathological examination is essential for confirming PGB by identifying calcification of the gallbladder wall. Histopathological examination of the gallbladder revealed severe papillary hyperplasia, mucin hypersecretion, multiple ulcers, diffuse calcification, and fibrotic changes. These findings confirmed the diagnoses of gallbladder mucocele and PGB. Postoperatively, biochemical markers normalized or significantly decreased, with clinical improvement observed. This study presents the rare occurrence of PGB in dogs and emphasizes the importance of appropriate veterinary intervention for improving clinical outcomes.

1 Introduction

Porcelain Gallbladder (PGB) is defined as calcification of the gallbladder wall, characterized by extensive calcification and thickening (1, 2). There are various hypotheses on the mechanism that causes PGB; however, its etiology remains unknown (311). Some authors maintain that it is an unusual manifestation of chronic cholecystitis (3, 12, 13). Chronic cholecystitis, a long-standing inflammation of the gallbladder, often leads to fibrotic changes and calcification of the gallbladder wall, culminating in the development of a PGB (4). Importantly, this condition can result from various underlying etiologies, including biliary hyperplasia, mucin hypersecretion, and obstruction (46, 14). Such pathological changes in the gallbladder may also be associated with other systemic conditions, including pancreatitis, hyperlipidemia, and duodenitis, which can complicate the clinical presentation and management of affected dogs.

PGB is an extremely rare condition in dogs and has been primarily studied in human medicine. To the authors' knowledge, only two cases of PGB have been reported in dogs (15, 16). One was associated with biliary adenocarcinoma at the gallbladder neck, cholelithiasis, biliary obstruction, and lymphoplasmacytic cholecystitis (15), while the other showed no evidence of neoplasia, cholelithiasis, or hepatobiliary inflammation (16). In the present case, although no neoplastic changes were identified, the dog presented with concurrent cholelithiasis and a severe gallbladder mucocele without significant inflammation. Unlike previous reports, this case suggests that chronic gallbladder wall injury due to bile stasis and mucocele formation may contribute to the development or progression of PGB. It also indicates that PGB can occur in the absence of biliary neoplasia or active inflammation. PGB is extremely rare in dogs, and this case study presents an unusual report of a Shih Tzu diagnosed with PGB.

2 Case description

A 13-year-old spayed female Shih Tzu presented with anorexia accompanied by vomiting, progressive weight loss, and lethargy. On physical examination, mild tenderness was noted upon palpation of the upper abdomen, with no other significant abnormalities observed.

Laboratory analysis revealed elevations in hepatic enzymes, including a slight increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, as well as marked elevations in alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT). Hyperlipidemia with concurrent hypercholesterolemia was noted. Additionally, elevated levels of canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) were identified. Total leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were within reference ranges, as were total bilirubin and serum calcium concentrations (Table 1). Moreover, endocrine testing, including a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and a thyroid panel (tT4, fT4, and canine thyroid-stimulating hormone [cTSH]) test, was performed to evaluate potential underlying hyperadrenocorticism or hypothyroidism. The only abnormal finding was an elevated cTSH level (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of blood test results on presentation.

3 Diagnostic assessment, therapeutic intervention, follow-up, and outcomes

Abdominal radiographs revealed clear calcification of the gallbladder wall, identified as a nearly spherical structure with linear and floccular mineralization located in the upper right quadrant (Figures 1A, B). Abdominal ultrasonography revealed the gallbladder wall as an irregular, hyperechoic mass with posterior acoustic shadowing, obscuring the gallbladder lumen (Figures 1C, D). Computed tomography (CT) imaging confirmed increased gallbladder wall thickness (4.14 mm) with extensive calcification and the presence of gallstones (Figure 1E). Mild dilation of the common bile duct (5.56 mm) and intrahepatic bile ducts was observed (Figures 1F, G). Pancreatic changes included altered parenchymal volume, cystic lesions, and mild pancreatic duct dilation (1.44 mm), suggestive of pancreatitis, and duodenitis indicated by increased duodenal wall thickness and luminal dilation due to retained fluid. No significant hepatic lymph node abnormalities were observed.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Radiograph images of this dog revealed a nearly spherical calcified structure with irregular margins, suggestive of a calcified gallbladder (arrows). The gallbladder shows both linear and floccular calcifications. (A) Right lateral view. (B) Ventrodorsal view. Abdominal ultrasound confirmed the presence of a calcified gallbladder wall characterized by posterior acoustic shadowing in this dog. (C) A biconvex curved echo structure with variable acoustic shadows shows a curvilinear hyperechoic area along the anterior wall (arrow). In contrast, the posterior wall (arrowhead) is mostly obscured by the posterior acoustic shadowing, with only a part being visible. (D) Areas of non-shadowing calcium (arrow) and part of the gallbladder interior are observed. Computed tomography of the dog. (E) An increase in the gallbladder wall thickness (arrow) and extensive wall calcification were observed. Cholelithiasis (arrowhead) was noted within the gallbladder. (F, G) Mild dilation of the common bile duct (arrow), along with dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts (arrowhead), was observed.

A cholecystectomy was performed. Intraoperatively, the gallbladder was found embedded within the liver, with the wall appearing firm and rigid due to extensive calcification, which was diffused throughout the wall, rendering it brittle and difficult to manipulate during surgery. The gallbladder was severely adhered to the surrounding omentum and liver, likely due to prolonged inflammation (Figures 2A, B). Adequate traction of the densely indurated gallbladder wall was difficult, making surgical exposure challenging. The gallbladder was carefully elevated and dissected from the gallbladder neck, while separating the surrounding adhesions. A portion of the hepatic tissue was resected together with the gallbladder due to severe adhesion to the gallbladder wall, which made separation unfeasible. Liver biopsy was also performed for histopathological examination. A gross examination of the resected gallbladder showed slight enlargement (5 × 2.8 cm) with a hard, rough, and irregular surface due to calcification. The overall color was bluish-gray, with areas of red indicating inflammation (Figure 2C). Upon sectioning, the gallbladder wall showed significant thickening and calcification, and the lumen was filled with dark green, gelatinous material indicative of a mucocele (Figure 2D).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Gross specimen of the gallbladder during and after surgery. (A, B) Aspect of calcified gallbladder at operation. The surrounding omentum was severely adhered to the gallbladder, and the gallbladder was firmly attached to the liver. (C) The surface of the calcified gallbladder was generally hard, rough, and irregular. Its color ranged from bluish-purple to grayish-white, with certain areas appearing red due to inflammatory changes. (D) The interior of the gallbladder exhibited mucoid degeneration and was filled with a dark greenish-black, degenerated jelly-like substance.

Furthermore, histopathology of the liver revealed no neoplastic or significant inflammatory changes. Multifocal vacuolar changes in hepatocytes were observed, likely due to excessive glycogen deposition (Figures 3A, B). Histopathological examination of the gallbladder wall showed severe changes, with extensive necrosis and ulceration (Figure 3C). The preserved mucosal epithelium exhibited severe papillary hyperplasia and increased mucus secretion (Figure 3D), with the gallbladder lumen containing yellowish or dark greenish-black amorphous materials indicative of a gallbladder mucocele (Figure 3E). Most of the mucosal epithelium was ulcerated or necrotic, hindering detailed observation. The entire gallbladder wall exhibited severe alterations, obliterating the distinction between lamina propria, muscularis propria, and perimuscular connective tissue. Additionally, the muscular layer lacked normal fiber bundle organization (Figure 3C), and the serosal layer included adherent liver tissue. Small basophilic amorphous materials were identified on the mucosal surface, with suspected ossification or mineral deposition beneath (Figures 3DG). Von Kossa staining revealed multifocal mineralization foci on the mucosal surface of the gallbladder with multiple ulcers (Figures 3I, J), confirming a diagnosis of PGB. Masson's Trichrome staining showed a dense collagen matrix replacing most of the gallbladder wall with no clear muscle fiber bundles. The fibrous connective tissue stained blue, and regions that did not stain well indicated calcium deposition. Notably, extensive fibrosis was evident throughout the gallbladder wall (Figures 3K, L). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed few plasma cells and inflammatory cells in the remaining lamina propria (Figure 3H). Immunohistochemical analysis showed weak CD3 (cluster of differentiation 3) staining, indicating few T lymphocytes, and PAX5 (paired box 5) staining revealed few B lymphocytes in preserved mucosal areas, not suggestive of a significant inflammatory response (Figures 3MP). Transmural necrosis was widespread, and the lesion appeared chronic, with no active cholecystitis observed. Aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures of the bile revealed no significant pathogens.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Histopathology of this case obtained from hepatic tissue [Hematoxyl and eosin (H&E) stain, ×200 (A), ×400 (B)]. No neoplastic or inflammatory changes originating from hepatocytes or biliary epithelial cells were observed. Vacuolar changes in hepatocytes were distributed multifocally. Mild cholestasis was partially observed. The histopathology of this case obtained from the lesion of the gallbladder wall [H&E stain, ×100 (C, F), ×200 (D), ×400 (E, G, H), Von Kossa stain, ×100 (I), ×200 (J), Masson's trichrome stain, ×100 (K), ×200 (L), Immunohistochemistry stain; Paired Box 5 (PAX5), ×200 (M), ×400 (N), Cluster of Differentiation 3 (CD3), ×200 (O), ×400 (P)]. (C) Most of the mucosal epithelium was difficult to observe clearly due to ulcerative changes and necrosis, resulting in exfoliation. The entire thickness of the gallbladder wall exhibited severe degeneration, making it impossible to distinguish individual layers. (D) Some remaining mucosal epithelium exhibited mild diffuse papillary or irregular proliferation into the lumen, with many epithelial cells in the crypts undergoing mucinous hyperplasia. (E) The lumen of the gallbladder contained yellowish or dark greenish-black amorphous materials. Small basophilic amorphous materials, presumed to be minerals or calcium mixed with mucus, are observed on the mucosal surface. (D, F, G) Localized areas of ossification or mineral deposits were identified below the mucosal surface. (H) Few plasma cells and lymphocytes are observed in the superficial layer of the remaining mucosal propria. (I, J) Granular multifocal black- mineralization foci were primarily observed on the gallbladder mucosal surface. (K, L) The dense collagen matrix constitutes the majority of the gallbladder wall. The fibrotic connective tissue stained blue, and extensive fibrosis and calcification of the gallbladder wall were observed. Areas of the wall that did not exhibit the blue staining well may indicate calcium deposits or necrotic lesions of the fibrous tissue. The expression of immunohistochemistry stain was very limited, making an inflammatory response unlikely. (M) PAX5 positive B lymphocytes were not clearly seen, but (N) a few B cells were observed in the preserved mucosal areas. (O) CD3 positive T lymphocytes were rarely identified, and (P) no T cells were observed in the preserved mucosal areas.

Combining imaging findings, gross evaluation, and histopathological results, PGB due to chronic wall damage, necrosis, ulceration, fibrosis, and calcification, along with a severe mucocele, was diagnosed.

Postoperatively, the patient received symptomatic treatment with Lactated Ringer's solution for fluid therapy. For liver protection and function improvement, the patient was treated with ursodeoxycholic acid at 7.5 mg/kg bid, silymarin at 10 mg/kg bid, and S-adenosyl methionine at 100 mg/head sid. Gastrointestinal symptoms were managed with antiemetic and gastric acid suppression therapy using maropitant at 1 mg/kg sid and omeprazole at 0.5 mg/kg bid. Furthermore, ALKP and GGT levels gradually decreased, while ALT and AST levels initially raised post-surgery but then decreased to normal ranges. CRP levels increased post-surgery but quickly normalized, likely due to tissue damage and inflammatory response from the surgery. Mild dilation of the common bile duct was noted on follow-up ultrasound, which is considered an adaptive change. The patient recovered without postoperative complications and remained well-recovered for more than 2 months without clinical symptoms or elevated liver enzyme levels after symptomatic treatment discontinuation.

4 Discussion

This case study discusses a rare instance of PGB in a dog, marked by severe calcification of the gallbladder wall, chronic fibrosis, and extensive gallbladder mucocele. Diagnostic imaging and histopathology were essential for diagnosis and comprehension of the condition. Cholecystectomy resolved symptoms and normalized liver enzymes. Although gallbladder cancer (GBC) incidence in PGB cases is low, the evident link to gallbladder cancer warrants consideration of prophylactic cholecystectomy.

The term PGB is used to emphasize the bluish discoloration and brittle consistency of the gallbladder wall observed during surgery (1, 5, 7, 17). Its diagnosis is primarily achieved through imaging studies, which reveal the characteristic calcification and thickening of the gallbladder wall (2, 14, 18, 19). Additional diagnostic evaluations, including blood tests and histopathological examinations, are essential to assess the extent of hepatic and pancreatic involvement and to rule out neoplastic changes (7, 18).

In veterinary medicine, PGB is extremely rare. The first reported case of PGB in dogs involved a 9-year-old spayed female Poodle with chronic proliferative lymphoplasmacytic cholecystitis, calcification, and a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma at the gallbladder neck (15). The second reported case occurred in an 11-year-old neutered male Border terrier, in which no evidence of neoplasia, cholelithiasis, or hepatobiliary inflammation was observed. The dog was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis, pancreatitis, and peritonitis. The clinical condition of the patient deteriorated rapidly within 24 h of diagnosis, and euthanasia was elected by the owner. Based on imaging findings and postmortem examination, the PGB was considered an incidental finding (16). This report presents the first case report describing the pathological features of PGB associated with gallbladder mucocele and chronic fibrous changes in the gallbladder wall in a Shih Tzu dog, regardless of tumor presence. In human medicine, it is a rare condition, occurring in 0.06% to 0.8% of cholecystectomy specimens (12, 20). Moreover, over 95% of reported cases exhibited PGB associated with gallstones (21). Traditionally, the association between PGB and GBC has been well recognized in humans, with calcification of the gallbladder wall acting as a risk factor for GBC. The incidence of GBC in PGB has been reported to range between 12% (7) and 33% (18). However, more recent studies have reported a lower incidence between 0% (22) and 5% (23). Therefore, the relationship between GBC and PGB remains unclear. Notably, studies on the association between PGB and cancer in dogs are lacking, and no evidence of cancer was found in this case. Nevertheless, the presence of PGB indicates the need for cholecystectomy, which can help prevent potential complications. In humans, PGB is known to occur through various mechanisms, primarily related to chronic inflammation causing hemorrhage, ischemia, scarring, and hyalinization of the wall, and can be induced by factors such as gallstones, cystic duct obstruction, and calcium metabolism imbalance (3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 17, 24). This condition is generally considered a form of dystrophic calcification, characterized by the deposition of calcium and other mineral salts in necrotic or non-functional tissues, even in the presence of normal serum total calcium and ionized calcium levels (15). In both the previously reported canine case and the present case, hypercalcemia was not observed (15, 16). In the present case, cholelithiasis, severe gallbladder mucocele, and bile stasis were identified. These changes may have contributed to gallbladder wall injury and impairment of its absorptive and secretory functions, potentially leading to mineral deposition and calcium salt saturation within the bile. Saturation of bile by calcium salts is essential for the subsequent formation of calcium precipitates (25). Although the exact etiology of PGB remains unclear in previously reported cases, similar mechanisms involving dystrophic calcification of structurally compromised gallbladder walls may underlie the development of PGB in dogs.

Based on the extent, gallbladder calcification is classified as complete intramural or selective mucosal calcification (23, 26). In the complete type, the gallbladder wall undergoes total calcification and fibrosis, while in the selective type, calcification is milder and confined to the mucosal layer. In a study of 44 PGB patients, 17 and 27 exhibited complete intramural and selective mucosal calcification, respectively. None of the patients with the complete type had GBC, whereas two individuals with the selective type had GBC, suggesting a possible association between localized calcification and PGB with GBC (23). Furthermore, histopathological examination of current case revealed severe papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder mucosal epithelium and excessive mucus secretion, leading to gallbladder mucocele diagnosis. Additionally, multiple ulcers were identified on the mucosal and serosal surfaces, accompanied by calcification along the mucosal surface, diffuse fibrosis, and some calcific changes in the gallbladder wall. This reflects chronic pathological changes in the gallbladder, including cholecystitis, indicating tissue damage and regeneration processes that can impair gallbladder function (27). Among 219 gallbladders with chronic cholecystitis in dogs, mucosal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration was observed in 189 cases (86.3%). However, lymphocytes and/or plasma cells were absent in 18 cases (18/219; 8.2%). In 12 dogs, necrosis or ulceration prevented detailed mucosal examination (27). Here, of the mucosal epithelium was severely altered by ulceration and necrosis, obscuring the structure and making it difficult to distinguish the gallbladder wall's different layers. In the preserved mucosal areas, few inflammatory cells were observed. While no active cholecystitis was evident, the chronic nature of the lesions implies prior histological changes from chronic cholecystitis.

PGB diagnosis is primarily made through imaging studies and can often be an incidental finding during abdominal imaging. Simple abdominal radiographs may show a rim-like calcification of the gallbladder wall (13, 20, 28). The radiographic appearance of a calcified gallbladder varies depending on the location, extent, and degree of calcification. Less severe calcification may be difficult to identify on plain radiographs, whereas more extensive calcification appears as rounded or curvilinear patterns (28). Ultrasound and CT scans can evaluate the location and extent of gallbladder wall calcification (18, 2931). In PGB, ultrasound findings are classified into three types based on calcification characteristics. Type I, the sclerotic atrophic pattern, features a highly echogenic crescent with a complete posterior acoustic shadow. Type II displays a biconvex curved echo structure, with variable acoustic shadows that are less intense than Type I, permitting visibility of the anterior and posterior walls either fully or partially. Type III presents as an irregular echogenic mass with a posterior acoustic shadow that is similar yet less pronounced than Type I. Type I indicate complete intramural calcification, while Types II and III suggest variations of selective mucosal calcification (18). In our case, the patient primarily exhibited variations of selective mucosal calcification corresponding to Types II and III. As CT is the most sensitive method for detecting calcification, PGB is often over diagnosed on CT. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of common pitfalls in imaging evaluation and perform careful assessments (32). Here, gallbladder wall calcification was initially detected on abdominal radiographs, confirmed, and further evaluated using ultrasound and CT scans. Gallbladder wall thickening, calcification, and the presence of gallstones were observed, which are typical findings of PGB.

Further, this case demonstrates that gallbladder mucocele and PGB can occur simultaneously. Gallbladder mucocele is characterized by hyperplasia of the mucin-secreting glands in the gallbladder mucosa and abnormal accumulation of mucus within the gallbladder lumen (3336). When bile-laden mucus spreads into the cystic, hepatic, and common bile ducts, it may cause different levels of extrahepatic biliary obstruction. The gallbladder can distend from mucocele, causing pressure necrosis of its wall and risking rupture (37). Finally, obstruction in the cystic duct from mucocele can also lead to calcium salt deposits in the mucosa, possibly leading to PGB development.

PGB treatment usually involves surgical resection to prevent complications from calcification and chronic changes in the gallbladder wall. PGB is an extremely rare condition in dogs, which limits the ability to accurately assess the prognosis following cholecystectomy. Because PGB is characterized by irreversible pathological changes, delayed surgical intervention may result in serious complications such as gallbladder rupture, bile peritonitis, and sepsis. In the absence of malignancy, the surgical outcome may be comparable to that of cholecystectomy performed for other biliary disorders. However, comorbidities such as septic peritonitis, pancreatitis, hepatic failure, or renal failure may adversely affect surgical prognosis (38, 39). Although therapeutic alternatives are limited, conservative or medical management may be appropriate in asymptomatic patients or those with high surgical risk. Impaired bile flow has been shown to increase the risk of bacterial translocation across the intestinal mucosa. Therefore, in cases where hepatobiliary infection is suspected, the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy should be considered (40). Adjunctive therapies, including ursodeoxycholic acid, S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), and antioxidants, may promote bile flow, reduce bile viscosity, and offer anti-inflammatory and antioxidant benefits (4043). Given that high-fat diets may aggravate gallbladder disease, a low-fat, highly digestible diet is recommended (40). Furthermore, appropriate symptomatic management, including antiemetics and analgesics, should be implemented as needed.

This study highlights the rare association between PGB and gallbladder mucocele in dogs, with observed improvements in clinical symptoms and liver enzyme levels after cholecystectomy. These findings emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and surgical intervention. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathological mechanisms underlying PGB, gallbladder mucocele, and their potential interrelationship. Understanding these mechanisms may support earlier disease prediction and improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because this case report describes the diagnosis and treatment of a novel disease in a single patient and does not involve any experimental research interventions. As such, it did not require formal ethics approval. Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient's owner. Patient confidentiality has been maintained, and procedures were performed in accordance with accepted veterinary practice standards. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

T-YK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Y-IO: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Berk RN, Armbuster TG, Saltzstein SL. Carcinoma in the porcelain gallbladder. Radiology. (1973) 106:29–31. doi: 10.1148/106.1.29

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Morimoto M, Matsuo T, Mori N. Management of porcelain gallbladder, its risk factors, and complications: a review. Diagnostics. (2021) 11:1073. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Polk HC. Carcinoma and the calcified gall bladder. Gastroenterology. (1966) 50:582–5. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(66)80037-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Khan ZS, Livingston EH, Huerta S. Reassessing the need for prophylactic surgery in patients with porcelain gallbladder: case series and systematic review of the literature. Arch Surg. (2011) 146:1143–7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ashur H, Siegal B, Oland Y, Adam YG. Calcified ballbladder (porcelain gallbladder). Arch Surg. (1978) 113:594–6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370170056010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Park JY, Park BK, Ko JS, Bang S, Song SY, Chung JB. Bile acid analysis in biliary tract cancer. Yonsei Med J. (2006) 47:817–25. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.817

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cornell CM, Clarke R. Vicarious calcification involving the gallbladder. Ann Surg. (1959) 149:267–72. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195902000-00013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Phemister DB, Rewbridge AG, Rudisill H. Calcium carbonate gallstones and calcification of the gallbladder following cystic duct obstruction. Ann Surg. (1931) 94:493–516. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193110000-00003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Berger M, Dy B, McKenzie T, Thompson G, Wermers R, Lyden M. Rates of hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism among patients with porcelain gallbladder. Am J Surg. (2020) 220:127–31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Etalta E. Cancer de la vesicula biliar. Prensa Med Argent. (1962) 49:2283–99.

Google Scholar

11. Fowler WF. Calcareous changes of the gall-bladder wall. Ann Surg. (1923) 78:623–7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-192311000-00010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Opatrny L. Porcelain gallbladder. CMAJ. (2002) 166:933.

Google Scholar

13. Casteel HB, Williamson SL, Golladay ES, Fiedorek SC. Porcelain gallbladder in a child: a case report and review. J Pediatr Surg. (1990) 25:1302–3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(90)90540-P

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Revzin MV, Scoutt L, Smitaman E, Israel GM. The gallbladder: uncommon gallbladder conditions and unusual presentations of the common gallbladder pathological processes. Abdom Imaging. (2015) 40:385–99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0203-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Brömel C, Smeak DD, Léveillé R. Porcelain gallbladder associated with primary biliary adenocarcinoma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1998) 213:1137–9. doi: 10.2460/javma.1998.213.08.1137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Grapperon-Mathis M, Hansson K. What is your diagnosis? Porcelain gallbladder J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2014) 245:273–5. doi: 10.2460/javma.245.3.273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pei J, Liu P, Cao G, Yang D, Wang C, Dai D. Porcelain gallbladder or a special type stone? A case report about novel gallbladder disease. Ann Clin Case Rep. (2020) 5:1847. doi: 10.25107/2474-1655.1847

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kane RA, Jacobs R, Katz J, Costello P. Porcelain gallbladder: ultrasound and CT appearance. Radiology. (1984) 152:137–41. doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Crews LJ, Feeney DA, Jessen CR, Rose ND, Matise I. Clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory findings associated with gallbladder disease and rupture in dogs: 45 cases (1997–2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2009) 234:359–66. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.3.359

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Palermo M, Núñez M, Duza GE, Giménez Dixon MG, Bruno MO, Tarsitano FJ. Porcelain gallbladder: a clinical case and a review of the literature. Cir Esp. (2011) 89:213–7. doi: 10.1016/S2173-5077(11)70027-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Iqbal S, Ahmad S, Saeed U, Al-Dabbagh M. Porcelain gallbladder: often an overlooked entity. Surg J. (2017) 3:e145–7. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606546

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Towfigh S, Mcfadden DW, Cortina GR, Thompson JE Jr, Tompkins RK, Chandler C, et al. Porcelain gallbladder is not associated with gallbladder carcinoma. Am Surg. (2001) 67:7–10. doi: 10.1177/000313480106700102

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Stephen AE, Berger DL. Carcinoma in the porcelain gallbladder: a relationship revisited. Surgery. (2001) 129:699–703. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.113888

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Jensen DM. Diseases of the liver, ed 5. Arch Intern Med 5th ed. (1982) 142:1763. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1982.00340220191040

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dawes LG, Nahrwold DL, Rege RV. Increased total and free ionized calcium in a canine model of pigment gallstones. Surgery. (1988) 104:86–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Morimoto M, Mori N. A calcified gallbladder. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:e86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm2000791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mitsui I, Ohtsuki S, Uchida K. Chronic cholecystitis of dogs: clinicopathologic features and relationship with liver. Animals. (2021) 11:3324. doi: 10.3390/ani11113324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gómez-López JR, De Andrés-Asenjo B, Ortega-Loubon C, A. porcelain gallbladder and a rapid tumor dissemination. Ann Med Surg. (2014) 3:119–22. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2014.09.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Rooholamini SA, Tehrani NS, Razavi MK, Au AH, Hansen GC, Ostrzega N, et al. Imaging of gallbladder carcinoma. RadioGraphics. (1994) 14:291–306. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.2.8190955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Delpierre I, Tack D, Moisse R, Boudaka W, Delcour C. Cholecystoduodenal fistula in a porcelain gallbladder. Eur Radiol. (2002) 12:2284–6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1254-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Weiner PL, Lawson TL. The radiology corner. Porcelain Gallbladder Am J Gastroenterol. (1975) 64:224–7.

Google Scholar

32. Appel E, Dommaraju S, Siewert B, Gonzalez RS, Camacho A, Park Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with porcelain gallbladder diagnosed on CT. Acad Radiol. (2021) 28 Suppl 1:S22–8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Besso JG, Wrigley RH, Gliatto JM, Webster CR. Ultrasonographic appearance and clinical findings in 14 dogs with gallbladder mucocele. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2000) 41:261–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01489.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Newell SM, Selcer BA, Mahaffey MB, Gray ML, Jameson PH, Cornelius LM, et al. Gallbladder mucocele causing biliary obstruction in two dogs: ultrasonographic, scintigraphic, and pathological findings. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (1995) 31:467–72. doi: 10.5326/15473317-31-6-467

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kovatch RM, Hildebrandt PK, Marcus LC. Cystic mucinous hypertrophy of the mucosa of the gall bladder in the dog. Pathol Vet. (1965) 2:574–84. doi: 10.1177/030098586500200605

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Harkema JR, Mason MJ, Kusewitt DF, Pickrell JA. Cholecystotomy as treatment for obstructive jaundice in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1982) 181:815–6. doi: 10.2460/javma.1982.181.08.815

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pike FS, Berg J, King NW, Penninck DG, Webster CRL. Gallbladder mucocele in dogs: 30 cases (2000–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2004) 224:1615–22. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.224.1615

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Amsellem PM, Seim HB, MacPhail CM, Bright RM, Twedt DC, Wrigley RH, et al. Long-term survival and risk factors associated with biliary surgery in dogs: 34 cases (1994–2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2006) 229:1451–7. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.9.1451

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Mehle SJ, Mayhew PD, Drobatz KJ, Holt DE. Variables associated with outcome in dogs undergoing extrahepatic biliary surgery: 60 cases (1988–2002). Vet Surg. (2004) 33:644–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04087.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Aguirre AL, Center SA, Randolph JF, Yeager AE, Keegan AM, Harvey HJ, et al. Gallbladder disease in Shetland Sheepdogs: 38 cases (1995–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2007) 231:79–88. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.1.79

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Center SA, Randolph JF, Warner KL, et al. The effects of S-adenosylmethionine on clinical pathology and redox potential in the red blood cell, liver, and bile of clinically normal cats. J Vet Intern Med. (2005) 19:303–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2005.tb02699.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Tomida S, Abei M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Long-term ursodeoxycholic acid therapy is associated with reduced risk of biliary pain and acute cholecystitis in patients with gallbladder stones: a cohort analysis. Hepatology. (1999) 97:726–31. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Webster CR, Cooper J. Therapeutic use of cytoprotective agents in canine and feline hepatobiliary disease. Vet Clin Small Anim. (2009) 39:631–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.02.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: porcelain gallbladder, calcification, fibrosis, gallbladder mucocele, cholecystitis

Citation: Kim T-Y and Oh Y-I (2025) Case Report: Clinical and histopathological findings of porcelain gallbladder in a dog. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1570221. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1570221

Received: 03 February 2025; Accepted: 22 April 2025;
Published: 20 May 2025.

Edited by:

Remo Lobetti, Veterinary Specialists Ireland, Ireland

Reviewed by:

Musadiq Idris, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Izabela Janus-Ziółkowska, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Kim and Oh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ye-In Oh, aW15ZWluNUBrbnUuYWMua3I=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.