ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1570915

When is the best time to test paratuberculosis positivity? Observations from a follow-up study in Hungarian dairy herds

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
  • 2Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 3Eurofins Vet-Controll Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
  • 4University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The objective of the present study was to find the most practical combination of diagnostic procedures and time points during lactation to identify MAP-infected animals. Four Hungarian dairy farms with a 4-5% apparent MAP positivity were enrolled in the study. Of these herds, 52 non-lactating, known MAP-positive pregnant dairy cows (13 animals from each farm) were chosen for the study three weeks before their expected calving. We collected individual feces, blood, and milk samples from these focal cows six times, at 1-5, 10-14, 40-60, 90-120, 180-200, and 280-300 days in milk (DIM). The optimal time for sampling using serum ELISA was between DIM 40-60.Regarding fecal qPCR, the best sampling time was between DIM 10-14 or DIM 40-60, according to the results of the present study. Among the methods, qPCR proved the most reliable testing method during the study. ELISA S/P values correlated with the fecal qPCR Ct values, with serum ELISA slightly more sensitive than milk ELISA. We found the most suitable period for this to be 40-60 days after calving, before insemination, which can later be the basis for a culling decision.Animals later developing clinical symptoms showed distinctively different test positivity and biomarker patterns from the onset of lactation, compared to animals not developing clinical symptoms in the observation period.

Keywords: Dairy cow, Paratuberculosis, ELISA, qPCR, sampling time

Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Vass-Bognár, Bakony, Fornyos, Baumgartner, Khol and Jurkovich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mikolt Bakony, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.