ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1572875
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Nexus: Diet and Microbiome Dynamics Across Gut, Oral, and Skin of Companion AnimalsView all 7 articles
Effects of diet type on the core fecal bacterial taxa and the dysbiosis index of healthy adult dogs
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
- 2Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
There is great interest in studying the canine gastrointestinal microbiome. In healthy dogs versus those with acute and chronic enteropathies, specific bacterial taxa have been identified that are consistently associated with shifts in the microbiome. A qPCR-based dysbiosis index (DI) that assesses microbiome shifts was developed based on a subset of these taxa. Because most dogs consume kibble diets, published data on core bacteria and the DI were largely derived from dogs consuming that diet form. Because dietary composition impacts the microbiome, it was unknown whether data from dogs consuming other diet types would adhere to reported core taxa abundance and DI guidelines. The study's aim was to determine the fecal abundance of core bacteria and DI of dogs fed commercially available kibble vs. mildly-cooked human-grade (fresh) diets. Fecal samples collected from adult dogs across four experiments were used (4 kibble diets, n=10-12/treatment; 4 fresh diets, n=10-24/treatment). Moderate correlations were observed between total dietary fiber (TDF) and Fusobacterium (positive correlation), Lactobacillus (negative), and DI (negative). Dietary protein was correlated with fecal Ruminococcus gnavus (negative), while dietary fat was correlated with fecal Bacteroides and C. perfringens abundance (both positive). Dogs fed fresh diets exhibited higher (P<0.01) abundances of Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens, while those fed kibble diets had higher (P<0.05) abundances of Fusobacterium, Clostridium hiranonis, and Bacteroides. Dogs fed fresh diets had a greater (P<0.0001) DI, but the majority of scores remained within the normal range. Dogs fed animal protein-based kibble diets had higher (P<0.05) fecal Faecalibacterium and Fusobacterium, while dogs fed animal protein-based fresh diets had higher (P<0.05) Streptococcus, E. coli, and C. perfringens. Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides were more abundant (P<0.01) in dogs fed animal protein-based kibble and plant protein-based fresh diets. Dogs fed animal protein-based fresh diets had a greater (P<0.0001) DI. Even though microbiota populations were statistically different among diets, all mean DI were <0, with only a few individual dogs consuming fresh diets having DI > 0 (5 dogs > 0; 1 dog > 2). Overall, these data demonstrate the utility of the DI across different diet types in healthy dogs.
Keywords: canine microbiome, canine nutrition, diet format, Core microbiome, Gastrointestinal microbiome
Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 22 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Oba, Roberts, Geary, Suchodolski and Swanson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kelly S. Swanson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.