ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1579164

Seroprevalence and risk factors for Ssheep pox and gGoat pox among small ruminant herds from Nakapiripirit and Sembabule districts, Uganda Authors

Provisionally accepted
Gerald  NizeyimanaGerald Nizeyimana1Joseph  ErumeJoseph Erume2*Dennis  MuhanguziDennis Muhanguzi2Chrisostom  AyebazibweChrisostom Ayebazibwe3Savino  BiryomumaishoSavino Biryomumaisho4Vudriko  PatrickVudriko Patrick4Robert  TweyongyereRobert Tweyongyere4Franklin  MayanjaFranklin Mayanja3
  • 1Departement of Pharmacy and Clinical Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 22. Department of Biotechnical and Diagnostic sciences, School of Biosecurity, Biotechnology and Laboratory Sciences,, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 33. National Animal Disease Diagnostics and Epidemiology Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda., Entebbe, Uganda
  • 4Department of Pharmacy and Clinical studies, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Sheep pox and goat pox diseases [SP&GP] caused by sheep poxvirus and goat poxvirus, respectively are transboundary, World Organization for Animal Health class A-notifiable viral diseases. In Uganda, despite the inevitable national underreporting, suspected sheep pox and goat pox outbreaks have been reported from passive surveillance. There are limited sheep pox and goat pox serological data in small ruminants in Uganda. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sembabule and Nakapiripirit Districts, largely representing semi-intensive and communal/pastoral small ruminant production systems, respectively, between May and September 2023 to i) determine the seroprevalence of sheep pox and goat pox virus antibodies in goats and sheep and ii) identify the risk factors for the spread and transmission of SP&GP SGP in small ruminant herds. A total of 1515 serum samples were Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri) collected from 63 farms/clusters in Sembabule [N=703] and Nakapiripirit [N=812] samples) districts and analyzed using Double Capri pox multispecies antigen ELISA test to detect SP&GPSGPV antibodies. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses for animal and farm/cluster level factors were performed for significance using chi square and Fisher's exact tests respectively. Results: Of the total samples tested, [n=137, 10%] [CI, 8.5-13.1%] were positive for S&GP antibodies. Seropositivity was greater in Nakapiripirit [n=93, 12%] than in Sembabule districts [n= 44,6%]. Although low in proportion, overall, from both districts, seropositivity among sheep [N=296, n=32,12%] was higher than goats [N=1219, n=105,10%]. Age, sex, type of epidemiologic unit, gifting of animals and species (p<0.05) were associated with S&GP seropositivity. However, at multivariable level, only age [OR [95% CI], P-value: 0.43 [0.21-0.87], 0.019], and sex [OR [95% CI], P-value, 2.14 [1.31-3.5], 0.003] were independently associated with S&GP seropositivity. This study confirmed exposure to SP&GPV in goats and sheep to varying degrees in the studied districts studied. We recommend, based on evidence , an extended nationwide evaluation of antibody seroprevalence in goats and sheep to inform national-level SP&GP S&GP control efforts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented, systematic study to evaluate the seroprevalence of S&GPV antibodies in sheep and goats in the two districts

Keywords: Cross-sectional, sheep pox and goat pox, Seropositivity, Risk factors, Antibobies

Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nizeyimana, Erume, Muhanguzi, Ayebazibwe, Biryomumaisho, Patrick, Tweyongyere and Mayanja. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Joseph Erume, 2. Department of Biotechnical and Diagnostic sciences, School of Biosecurity, Biotechnology and Laboratory Sciences,, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.