REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Reproduction - Theriogenology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1588847

This article is part of the Research TopicRecent developments in Animal Reproduction: combining research with practiceView all 10 articles

Diagnostic imaging in the pregnant bitch: risks, advantages and disadvantages

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, School of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Diagnostic imaging techniques are routinely used in bitches during pregnancy. Ultrasound examination (UE) and radiographic imaging (RI) are the two most frequently employed exams, for pregnancy diagnosis, assessment of fetal vitality and parturition date prediction, and for determination of litter size, respectively. In human medicine, the effects of radiation exposure resulting from diagnostic imaging, as well as radiation thresholds above which the risk of permanent damage to the offspring is significant, are well documented. Although no such information is available in veterinary medicine, breeders are increasingly skeptical about the use of X-rays in bitches in late-stage pregnancy, both because of the potential harm caused by the stress of the exam and because of the direct effects of radiation on the dam and fetuses. Stress is known to exert an effect in the reproductive processes in many species with one of the greatest stressors being the separation of the bitch from the pups for transport to the veterinary clinic during or right after parturition. This review also demonstrates that the harm resulting from radiation exposure from a radiographic study in a bitch during late-stage pregnancy and for its fetuses, who have already completed organogenesis, is poorly researched. While breeders' hesitations may be perceived as unfounded by the veterinarians, it is crucial that they are taken into consideration and that clear communication between the breeder and veterinarian is established. Owners should be informed of the lack of studies on the subject in the domestic dog but also presented the available information for other species including the human.

Keywords: Diagnostic Imaging, x-ray, ultrasound, Pregnancy, dog, stress, Radiation

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 21 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Schrank, Pereira and Mollo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maria Pereira, Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, School of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.