ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1589125

This article is part of the Research TopicThreats and Strategies of Nutritional Metabolic Disorders and Poisoning Diseases in RuminantsView all 12 articles

The combined effects of feed-grade urea and urease inhibitor on growth performance, digestibility, blood biochemical indicator, and rumen environment of beef cattle

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Wuhan Academy of Agriculture Science, Wuhan city, China
  • 2Wuhan Sunhy Biology Co. Ltd, Wuhan City, China
  • 3Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto De Investigaciones En Ecosistemas Y Sustentabilidad, Morelia, Mexico
  • 4Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
  • 5Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Bijand, South Khorasan, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study evaluated the combined effects of feed-grade urea (FGU) and urease inhibitor (HyUrit) as a partial replacement for vegetable protein source (soybean meal, SBM) in beef cattle diets on growth performance, digestibility, blood parameters, and rumen environment. Thirty Simmental bulls [average initial body weight (IBW) 445.67 ± 26.48 kg], were used in a completely randomized design (CRD) and fed feed-grade urea (FGU) with 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% [dry matter (DM) basis] urease inhibitor (HU). There were no diet effects on IBW (p = 0.843), final body weight (FBW, p = 0.912), and average daily gain (ADG, p = 0.372). The intakes of DM (p = 0.906), OM (organic matter) (p = 0.939), CP (crude protein) (p = 0.898), NDF (neutral detergent fiber) (p = 0.565), and ADF (acid detergent fiber) (p = 0.616) were not affected between treatments. Feeding HU (at 10%, 15%, and 20%) led to higher digestibility of OM (p = 0.001), CP (p = 0.030), NDF (p = 0.001), and ADF (p = 0.001) compared to FGU group, however, digestibility of DM (p = 0.651) remained unaffected. Neither N intake (g/d, p = 0.898) nor N balance (g/d, p = 0.614) affect by FGU with different levels of urease inhibitor. Also, dietary treatment did not affect plasma concentration of Albumin (p = 0.080), and Insulin (p = 0.217) in beef cattle, however aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activity increased with the HU15 (15% HyUrit) (p = 0.002; 0.011 respectively), Total protein in plasma was lower for HU20 compared with Ctrl and HU5(5% HyUrit) (P=0.012). In vitro N-NH3 production at 0 (p = 0.0001), 0.5 (p = 0.0009), and 2 h (p = 0.0001) was higher in both FGU and HyUrit containing groups than Ctrl (SBM). Overall, the lower cost of FGU may justify its partial replacement of true protein meals in beef diets without impairing growth and health, in any case when there is an excess of FGU intake at a single dose rather than a TMR at a level of HU20 (20% HyUrit), decreasing the risk of alkalosis.

Keywords: ammonia nitrogen1, non-protein nitrogen2, rumen fermentation3, urea4, sustainability5

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Song, Fu, Robles Jimenez, Gonzalez Ronquillo and Ghavipanje. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Manuel Gonzalez Ronquillo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.