ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1602027
Identifying Stakeholders and Analyzing Their Concerns About African Swine Fever Control in Wild Boar
Provisionally accepted- 1Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 2Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
- 3Cantonal Veterinarian, Office for Consumer Protection and Veterinary Service, Aargau, Switzerland
- 4Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
African Swine Fever (ASF) is approaching Switzerland as it continues to spread across Europe. This viral disease affects porcine species, leading to severe economic losses when reaching the domestic pig sector. Controlling ASF in wild boar populations is complex and requires coordination among diverse stakeholders with varying roles and interests. We used a participatory approach in data generation (including desk research, qualitative interviews, focus group discussions, and workshops) and applied reflexive thematic analysis to systematically identify relevant actors and assess their concerns, guided by the Mendelow Power-Interest Grid for stakeholder mapping. Results reveal a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including federal and cantonal-level authorities, the private industry sector, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private individuals, as well as academic and diagnostic institutions. Stakeholder mapping underscores the central role of federal and cantonal authorities in ASF control and demonstrates the hunting sector's dual position as both being impacted by and being actively involved in control efforts. Stakeholders' concerns fall into five key areas: economic risk, material shortages, legal frameworks and bureaucratic obstacles, challenges in communication and coordination, and animal welfare and environmental issues. Findings emphasize the need for improved governance, clearer guidelines, and stronger coordination among federal and cantonal authorities. The research demonstrates the value of participatory approaches for disease management by enhancing collaboration, identifying critical gaps, and strengthening preparedness and response efforts, on the example of ASF in Switzerland.
Keywords: ASF, Wild boar management, Stakeholder analysis, Participatory Research, Veterinary Public Health, Wildlife disease control, crisis management
Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Miesch, Schulz, Thür, Schulz, Frahsa and Dürr. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Janine Miesch, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.