ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Livestock Genomics
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1616426
Differential A1/A2 β-casein (CSN2) Gene-derived Allelic and Genotypic Frequencies Across Ecuadorian Exotic Dairy Cattle Breeds
Provisionally accepted- 1Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabí Manuel Félix López (ESPAM-MFL), Calceta 130602, Ecuador, Calceta, Ecuador
- 2Asociación Holstein Friesian del Ecuador (AHFE), Quito, Ecuador
- 3Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi (UTC), Latacunga, 050150, Ecuador, Latacunga, Cotopaxi, Ecuador
- 4Laboratorio de Biotecnología Animal, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción (UdeC), 3780000 Chillán, Chile, Chillan, Chile
- 5National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Oeiras, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the A1/A2 β-casein (CSN2) gene-derived allelic and genotypic frequencies in five Ecuadorian dairy cattle breeds to determine the genetic diversity of the A1/A2 βcasein locus. Genomic Deoxyribonucleic Acid (gDNA) was extracted from hair samples collected from different dairy cattle breeds, namely Holstein Friesian (HF), Brown Swiss (BS), Jersey (J), Gyr (G), and crossbreds (CB) raised commonly in seven different regions to identify A1 and A2 variants. Genomic determination of the β-casein (CSN2) gene variants was carried out evaluating the Exon 7 region in order to identify and confirm the accuracy of the A1/A2 β-casein (CSN2) genederived polymorphisms related to the genotypes and the allelic profiling. A2 allele frequencies were determined as 0.628, 0.643, 0.727, and 0.644 in HF, BS, J, and CB, respectively. In contrast, the lowest A1 allele frequency (0.145) as well as the greatest A2 allele frequency (0.855) were detected in G. No significant differences for allelic frequency were observed among breeds (p> 0.05). Homozygous A1 genotype frequency in HF, BS, J, and CB was 0.140, 0.110, 0.050 and 0.150, respectively. Interestingly, the A1A1 genotype was absent in G (p< 0.05). A1A2 genotypes were 0.490, 0.450, 0.290, and 0.420 in HF, BS, J, G, and CB, respectively. Finally, the A2A2 genotype was 0.400, 0.400, 0.500, and 0.460 in HF, BS, J, and CB, respectively. However, the greatest A2A2 genotype frequency was observed in G (0.710). No deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was found in any breed in terms of β-casein gene (p> 0.05). A geographically related distribution of A1/A2 allele and genotype frequencies of βcasein (CSN2) gene. In terms of genetic diversity a differential distribution of heterozygosity was observed among breeds being average Ho, He, uHe, and F values determined as 0.429, 0.438, 0.439, and 0.022, respectively. In conclusion, the A1/A2 allele and genotype frequencies varied depending on the breed and the geographic region which may be conditioned by different breeding selection programmes. A2 allele and A2A2 genotype frequency were particularly greater in Gyr cattle which have a great potential for A2 milk production without compromising genetic diversity.
Keywords: CSN2 gene, beta-casein, A1/A2, genetic diversity, Geographic location, dairy cattle
Received: 22 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cartuche-Macas, Navarrete-Mera, Gutiérrez Reinoso and Garcia-Herreros. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Luis Cartuche-Macas, Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabí Manuel Félix López (ESPAM-MFL), Calceta 130602, Ecuador, Calceta, Ecuador
Manuel Garcia-Herreros, National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Oeiras, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.