ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1617072

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Nexus: Diet and Microbiome Dynamics Across Gut, Oral, and Skin of Companion AnimalsView all 8 articles

Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-122264 on the Fecal Characteristics and Microbiota of Healthy Adult Dogs Subjected to an Abrupt Diet Change

Provisionally accepted
Patrícia  Massae ObaPatrícia Massae Oba1Olivia  R SwansonOlivia R Swanson1Yifei  KangYifei Kang1Julio  C MiotoJulio C Mioto1John  F MentonJohn F Menton2Elena  VinayElena Vinay2Mathieu  MilletteMathieu Millette3Melissa  R KellyMelissa R Kelly4Kelly  S. SwansonKelly S. Swanson1*
  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
  • 2Kerry Group, Beloit, United States
  • 3Kerry, Laval, Canada
  • 4Science Made Simple, Winston Salem, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abrupt dietary transitions are common in pets, but can lead to digestive disturbances, altered gut microbiota composition, and impaired intestinal integrity. The consumption of live microorganisms may have potential to mitigate these effects by stabilizing the gut microbiota and enhancing intestinal functionality. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-122264 supplementation on fecal characteristics, microbiota composition, and dysbiosis index of dogs undergoing an abrupt dietary change. Twelve healthy adult spayed female beagle dogs (6.0 ± 1.14 yr; 8.7 ± 0.91 kg body weight) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. In each experimental period, dogs were allotted to one of three treatments and fed a highfiber kibble diet for 28 d: 1) 250 mg/d of maltodextrin (control), 2) 1 × 10 9 colony-forming units (CFU)/d of B. subtilis, or 3) 5 × 10 9 CFU/d of B. subtilis. All dogs were then abruptly transitioned to a high-protein, high-fat canned diet and fed for 14 d. Fresh fecal samples were collected before (d 0) and 2, 6, 10, and 14 d after the diet change for fecal scoring, pH, dry matter (DM) content, and microbiota analysis. Data were statistically analyzed to identify differences due to treatment, time, and treatment*time interactions, with P<0.05 accepted as being significant. Diet change did not impact fecal pH or scores but reduced fecal DM percentage and bacterial alpha diversity measures. Bacterial beta diversity analysis revealed a distinct shift in the microbial community following the diet transition. Diet change reduced (P<0.05) the abundances of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria and increased (P<0.05) the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria, resulting in an elevated (P<0.05) dysbiosis index. B. subtilis supplementation did not attenuate the microbial shifts caused by the diet transition. These findings confirm that an abrupt diet change significantly impacts some stool characteristics and fecal microbiota populations of dogs. Further investigation of Bacillus spp. strains and dosages is required to determine the potential benefits that they may provide during dietary transition.

Keywords: canine microbiota, canine nutrition, Dietary transition, probiotic, Biotics

Received: 23 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Oba, Swanson, Kang, Mioto, Menton, Vinay, Millette, Kelly and Swanson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kelly S. Swanson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.