ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1619187
The development of a brief version of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (Brief-LAPS)
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
- 2School of Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- 3Messerli Research Institute, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 4Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
- 5School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, PA, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Several questionnaire-based instruments have been developed to measure pet owners' attachments to their pets, but they are often lengthy, which likely limits their use in studies where respondent fatigue and data collection costs are concerns. One of these is the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) which has been increasingly used in recent years. It consists of 23 items addressing owners' levels of attachment to their pets. A total attachment score (full LAPS), and 3 sub-scores on the sub-dimensions of General Attachment, People Substitution, Animal Rights/Welfare, can be calculated.We first provide an overview of existing research where the LAPS is used. Then, to develop the Brief-LAPS, we use a combination of input from experts in human-animal interaction (n=54) about the content validity of the 23 items, and analysis of measurement invariance on questionnaire data from cat and dog owners in 3 European countries (Austria, Denmark, and the UK (n=2037)). Sixteen of the 23 original items were removed, leaving a 7-item Brief-LAPS scale where items from all 3 sub-dimensions are represented. The Brief-LAPS is intended to replace the full LAPS, and it does not offer brief versions of the 3 subdimensions. The full and Brief-LAPS are highly correlated (Pearson's r=0.95). Also, patterns of associations between the full LAPS and a range of measures of interest in practical research are highly similar when running the same associational analyses with the Brief-LAPS. Scoring instructions are provided for the Brief-LAPS including a composite score (range: 0-21) . We recommend the use of the Brief-LAPS for studies in which questionnaire burden Deleted: 3 Deleted: are provided and data collection costs are a concern, but not when mean comparisons with the full LAPS are of interest, or when one or more of the LAPS sub-dimensions are of interest. Scholars should use caution when comparing the Brief-LAPS scores between countries. We recommend additional psychometric evaluations particularly in non-Western countries, to ensure that the Brief-LAPS scale is psychometrically sound beyond the three countries studied in this paper.
Keywords: Lexington Attachment to Pets, Brief-LAPS, Brief-Lexington Attachment to Pets, Companion animal attachment, Human animal interaction (HAI)
Received: 27 Apr 2025; Accepted: 07 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lund, Corr, Hirschofer, Sandøe, Serpell and Springer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Thomas Bøker Lund, Department of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 1958, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.