ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Livestock Genomics
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1619880
Detection of a Hydrogen Sulfide-Negative Salmonella Typhimurium from Cattle Feces in a Cross-Sectional Study of Cow-Calf Herds in the Southeastern U.S
Provisionally accepted- 1Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, United States
- 2Center for Food Animal Health, Food Safety and Defense, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, United States
- 3Department of Large Animal Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee , AL, United States
- 4Poultry Microbiological Safety and Processing Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, Georgia, United States
- 5School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mt. Hope, Trinidad and Tobago
- 6Department of Anatomy and Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Cattle are well-recognized reservoirs of Salmonella; however, reports of atypical hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-negative strains from bovine sources remain scarce. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial resistance profiles and epidemiology of Salmonella among rural cow-calf herds in Alabama, United States, with a particular focus on isolating emerging H2S-negative variants. Between April and May 2024, a total of 311 fecal samples were collected from cattle across 18 farm operations in six counties. Samples were cultured for Salmonella, and recovered isolates were identified using whole genome sequencing and the Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource. H2S production was assessed using Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate agar, Lysine Iron Agar, and Triple Sugar Iron agar. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed against 24 antimicrobial agents. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis.Overall, 3.5% (11/311) of animals from 27.8% (5/18) of the farms tested positive for Salmonella. Fifteen isolates representing six serovars were identified: Salmonella Thompson (5/15), Salmonella Hadar (4/15), Salmonella Braenderup (3/15), Salmonella Enteritidis (1/15), Salmonella Bareilly (1/15), and Salmonella Typhimurium (1/15). Notably, the tet(A) gene conferring tetracycline resistance was detected exclusively in the Salmonella Hadar isolates. Diarrheic animals were significantly more likely to shed Salmonella in their feces (p value = 0.0192). Importantly, the Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was identified as an H2S-negative strain, carrying an A>C missense mutation in the phsC gene and a C>T synonymous mutation in the cysI gene.To our knowledge, this is the first report of an H2S-negative Salmonella Typhimurium isolate from cattle feces. These findings also reveal a notable prevalence of Salmonella shedding among an underexplored population of rural cow-calf herds in the southeastern United States. The potential public health implications of these findings merit further investigation.
Keywords: Salmonella, antimicrobial resistance, Fecal shedding, H2S-negative, Mutation
Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bentum, Kuufire, Nyarku, Woods, Ale, McKie, Jackson, McKenzie, Adesiyun, Opoku-Agyemang, Samuel, Reddy and Abebe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Woubit Abebe, Center for Food Animal Health, Food Safety and Defense, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.