ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1620476
Plasma pharmacokinetics, milk residue depletion profile, and milk withdrawal interval estimation following multiple dose oral administration of meloxicam to lactating dairy goats
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
- 2Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
- 3Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
- 4Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Meloxicam is frequently administered orally to lactating dairy goats in an extra-label manner, but since FDA approved withdrawal times have not been established and raises concerns for potential drug residues in milk. This study aimed to estimate plasma pharmacokinetics, determine meloxicam residues in milk based on concentration versus time depletion profiles and calculate estimated withdrawal interval (WDI) recommendations for meloxicam following multiple oral doses administered to lactating dairy goats.Meloxicam was administered to healthy mid-lactation dairy goats (n=10) at 1 mg/kg orally every 24 hr for a total of 6 doses. Meloxicam was quantified in plasma and milk samples using high performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a non-compartmental approach and theoretical milk elimination half-life was estimated. Milk WDIs were calculated using the FDA tolerance limit method under different data simulation scenarios and compared to the standard FDA regulatory approach of 10 animals with triplicate samples. Additional assessment included the EMA maximum residue limit (MRL) method and the theoretical terminal elimination half-life method.Following the final administered dose, the geometric mean plasma estimated plasma T1/2 of 7.64 hr (range 5.61-9.47 hr), while the geometric mean milk theoretical estimated T1/2 was 6.96 hr (range 5.47-9.56 hr). WDI estimations using the FDA tolerance limit method targeting the analytical limit of detection (4 ng/mL) ranged from 70.1 to 82.8 hr, and the WDI estimated using the EMA MRL method targeting the EMA MRL (15 ng/mL) was 64.97 hr. Monte Carlo simulation of single replicate data closely approximated WDI estimates from full triplicate datasets, whereas simulating additional virtual animals introduced relatively greater variability in the estimated WDI.This study estimated plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and theoretical milk residue depletion profiles for meloxicam following multiple oral doses administered to healthy lactating dairy goats. The theoretical elimination half-life of meloxicam for milk is shorter for goats than cattle, resulting in shorter estimated WDIs for the same dosing regimen. From a food safety perspective, meloxicam cattle WDTs or estimated WDIs may be appropriately conservative for application to goats when properly adjusted for dose, route, and regulatory tolerances/MRLs.
Keywords: Meloxicam, milk withdrawal interval, Goats, pharmacokinetics, milk residues, Drug Residues
Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 24 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mercer, Zhang, Clapham, Wetzlich, Smith, Rupchis, Lin and Tell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Zhoumeng Lin, Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
Lisa Ann Tell, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.