Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

OPINION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 24 September 2025

Sec. Veterinary Regenerative Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1622717

Can spheroid formation enhance mesenchymal stem cell homing in veterinary medicine? Insights and evidence gaps

  • 1Laboratory of Physiopharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 2Center of Excellence Infla-Med, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 3Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from adipose tissue have emerged as a promising tool in regenerative therapies across both human and veterinary medicine. A critical determinant of therapeutic success is the MSCs' ability to home to damaged or inflamed tissues. In human clinical and preclinical models, spheroid culture has been shown to augment the homing efficacy of MSCs by upregulating key chemokine receptors and enhancing cell survival (1, 27). Recent studies investigating MSC spheroids in canine models have begun to explore these effects in veterinary contexts (2, 3). A recent review presents the MSC homing cascade as a tightly regulated multistep process comprising tethering, rolling, activation, arrest, transmigration, and migration (4). While these mechanisms are well-characterized in human mesenchymal stem cells, they remain insufficiently studied in veterinary models. Additional insights from the literature highlight that optimizing microenvironmental cues within spheroid cultures can significantly enhance MSC functionality in regenerative applications (5, 6).

Mechanisms of enhanced homing via spheroid culture

The formation of MSC spheroids recapitulates a physiologically relevant three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment, which has been shown to upregulate key molecular mediators involved in cell trafficking and homing. Notably, 3D spheroid architecture enhances the expression of C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), integrins, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9 and MMP-13), molecules that play pivotal roles in transendothelial migration and extracellular matrix remodeling (79, 28).

These molecules converge functionally within the SDF-1/CXCR4 chemotactic axis, a canonical pathway directing MSC homing to sites of tissue injury. Spheroid culture also induces localized hypoxia due to limited oxygen diffusion, which in turn stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α). This transcription factor has been shown to transcriptionally activate genes such as CXCR4 and other adhesion receptors, thereby enhancing MSC migratory capacity and responsiveness to chemokine gradients (1, 10, 11).

Experimental evidence supports that MSCs cultured as spheroids exhibit improved transmigration across endothelial monolayers and greater directional migration toward SDF-1 gradients (1). In a canine study, Lee et al. (12) reported significant upregulation of HIF-1α in 3D-cultured adipose-derived MSCs. Although their investigation focused on immunomodulatory properties, the observed induction of HIF-1α is mechanistically relevant to homing, given its role in enhancing CXCR4 expression. This suggests that the hypoxic microenvironment within spheroids may potentiate MSC chemotaxis, although direct migration assays were not conducted in that study.

Parallel insights from murine hind limb ischemia models show that modifying MSCs to overexpress proangiogenic factors such as GM-CSF significantly enhances their contribution to neovascularization, increasing both capillary density and arteriogenesis (25). These findings support the broader notion that preconditioning or modification strategies, including spheroid formation, can potentiate MSC homing and functional integration into ischemic tissues.

In addition to receptor-mediated mechanisms, emerging hypotheses suggest that MSC spheroids may secrete bioactive vesicles and paracrine factors that contribute to homing efficiency. Specifically, spheroid culture has been associated with elevated exosome release, potentially driven by cytoskeletal tension and hypoxia. While these vesicles have been implicated in immunomodulation and tissue repair, their direct role in facilitating MSC homing via chemokine gradient formation remains to be experimentally validated (13). Furthermore, these processes remain poorly characterized in veterinary studies. Thus, while spheroid culture clearly enhances several homing-related molecular pathways, further in vivo tracking studies in companion animals are necessary to delineate the specific contributions of hypoxia-induced signaling, surface receptor modulation, and secretome-derived factors to MSC homing in a species-specific context.

Application in canine studies

Current evidence on the use of 3D spheroid MSCs in veterinary medicine remains limited but promising. Among the few original studies available, Lee et al. (12) demonstrated that 3D-cultured canine adipose tissue-derived MSCs (cAT-MSCs) exhibit enhanced immunomodulatory activity compared to their 2D counterparts. Specifically, spheroid-conditioned media significantly downregulated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and promoted M2 macrophage polarization in canine macrophages (DH82 cell line). Additionally, the same study reported upregulation of HIF-1α, TGF-β1, and COX-2, further supporting the notion that spheroid formation creates a functionally distinct secretome.

While these in vitro findings suggest that 3D spheroid architecture enhances therapeutic potential in canine MSCs, there is a lack of direct in vivo validation in veterinary disease models. Notably, many studies reporting improved outcomes using cAT-MSCs in canine osteoarthritis, spinal cord injury, or cancer [e.g., (1416)] have employed conventional 2D-expanded cells rather than 3D spheroids. Thus, although extrapolation from human and rodent studies provides valuable insight, application of spheroid-based MSC therapy in canine clinical settings remains largely unexplored, representing a critical gap in translational research.

Given that adipose-derived MSCs represent the predominant and most clinically feasible stem cell source in veterinary practice, it is important to examine their unique significance and the growing body of evidence for their homing potential.

Significance of adipose-derived MSCs in veterinary applications

Adipose tissue has become the most widely used and practical source of mesenchymal stem cells in veterinary regenerative medicine. Compared to bone marrow, adipose-derived MSCs (cAT-MSCs) offer the advantages of minimally invasive harvest, higher cell yield, and consistent proliferative and immunomodulatory potential, which have made them the predominant stem cell product in companion animal clinical trials. Their relevance extends beyond accessibility, as accumulating evidence indicates that cAT-MSCs possess robust therapeutic efficacy in conditions such as osteoarthritis, spinal cord injury, and cancer, where migratory and homing behavior is critical for tissue repair and modulation of local immune responses.

Several in vivo studies provide support for the therapeutic contribution of cAT-MSC homing. In canine spinal cord injury, repeated allogeneic transplantation of cAT-MSCs promoted long-term functional recovery, suggesting effective engraftment and migration to lesion sites (16). Earlier reports of cell delivery in acute disk disease also demonstrated clinical improvements consistent with tissue integration of transplanted cAT-MSCs (15). Similarly, in canine cancer studies, adipose-derived MSCs modified for therapeutic gene delivery have shown the capacity to localize within tumor microenvironments (14), reinforcing the concept that adipose-derived MSCs can actively home to inflammatory and pathological tissues in vivo.

Emerging mechanistic insights from 3D spheroid cultures of cAT-MSCs further highlight their potential to enhance homing. Lee et al. (12) reported that canine spheroid-cultured MSCs exhibited upregulation of HIF-1α, TGF-β1, and COX-2, pathways closely linked with chemotaxis and immunomodulation. The hypoxia-driven induction of HIF-1α is particularly relevant, as it stabilizes CXCR4 expression, a central receptor in the SDF-1/CXCR4 chemotactic axis, and thereby primes cAT-MSCs for directional migration toward sites of injury. Complementary findings by Ichikawa et al. (3), who co-cultured canine adipose-derived MSCs with hepatocytes and endothelial cells, demonstrated spheroid-based cross-talk that supported vascularization and tissue integration, underscoring the translational value of 3D culture in shaping homing-relevant signaling networks.

Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of adipose-derived MSCs as a clinically feasible and biologically potent cell source in veterinary medicine. They also indicate that while homing-related pathways have been indirectly evidenced in canine cancer studies, direct biodistribution and migration tracking studies of cAT-MSCs remain sparse. Addressing this gap with in vivo imaging and standardized homing assays will be essential to fully validate the therapeutic advantage of spheroid-based cAT-MSC preparations in veterinary clinical settings.

These findings, when interpreted alongside advances in human MSC research, highlight the value of reverse translational approaches to refine spheroid-based protocols in veterinary systems. These mechanistic advantages, translational opportunities, and remaining evidence gaps are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating 3D spheroid configuration in veterinary applications. It highlights benefits like increased engraftment and anti-inflammatory effects for conditions such as osteoarthritis, spinal cord injury, and cancer. Reverse translational challenges include limited in vivo biodistribution data and lack of standardization. Solutions suggest advanced imaging and companion-animal-specific tools. A central silhouette of a dog with a medical infusion represents the concept.

Figure 1. Mechanisms, advantages, and translational gaps of cAT-MSC spheroids in veterinary regenerative medicine. Three-dimensional culture of cAT-MSCs enhances homing via receptor activation, hypoxia-driven signaling, and secretome modulation. These mechanisms translate into improved outcomes in canine regenerative applications, particularly for inflammatory, orthopedic and neuro-regenerative disorders. However, challenges in standardization, in vivo tracking, and cross-species validation highlight the need for expanded reverse translational research. cMSC, canine mesenchymal stem cells; hMSC, human mesenchymal stem cells; cMSC-Sph, canine mesenchymal stem cell spheroids; hMSC-Sph, human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids. Created with BioRender.

Reverse translational implications

The application of MSC spheroids in veterinary regenerative medicine is supported by a robust body of evidence derived from human preclinical and clinical studies. When cultured from human sources, MSCs cultured as 3D spheroids have consistently demonstrated enhanced therapeutic performance compared to monolayer-expanded cells. These enhancements include increased engraftment efficiency, prolonged in vivo survival, and amplified secretion of bioactive factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), all of which contribute to improved angiogenesis, immune modulation, and tissue repair (11, 17). The superior functionality of 3D spheroid MSCs is largely attributed to preserved cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions, hypoxia-induced signaling, and cytoskeletal reorganization within the spheroid microenvironment. These mechanistic insights offer a valuable framework for reverse translational application in veterinary medicine.

Despite this potential, several challenges limit the direct transfer of human protocols to veterinary practice. These include the lack of standardized methods for spheroid formation, size optimization, and preconditioning in animal systems, as well as limited in vivo data on biodistribution, persistence, and efficacy of spheroid MSC products in companion species (18). Moreover, inconsistencies in experimental design and outcome reporting across veterinary trials hinder cross-study comparisons and the establishment of best practices (19).

Lee et al. (12) underscore the importance of reproducible spheroid production methods and tailored delivery routes to maximize therapeutic efficacy in dogs. However, translating human protocols to veterinary settings is complicated by interspecies differences in MSC behavior, including distinct immunomodulatory pathways, receptor expression profiles, and secretome composition (20, 21). These discrepancies reinforce the need for species-specific investigations to validate spheroid-based therapies in non-human systems.

Rodent studies have also revealed that MSC therapeutic efficacy varies with the donor background, as demonstrated by differences between Balb/c- and C57BL/6-derived MSCs in hind limb ischemia studies (26). This variability underscores that intrinsic MSC properties, including tissue of origin, genetic background, and culture conditions, strongly influence their homing and therapeutic behavior. Extrapolating directly from human or murine systems to canine systems is therefore limited, reinforcing the need for species-specific validation in veterinary regenerative medicine.

To address the current limitations in understanding MSC homing and biodistribution in veterinary applications, in vivo imaging studies are critically needed. These studies can provide real-time insights into MSC migration dynamics, tissue-specific engraftment efficiency, and potential off-target effects following local or systemic administration. Advanced imaging technologies such as bioluminescence imaging (BLI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and nanoparticle-based labeling have greatly improved the capacity to track MSCs post-transplantation in human research (2224). However, the application of these modalities in veterinary medicine is hindered by anatomical diversity, limited genetic labeling techniques, and a scarcity of species-specific molecular probes. Additionally, ethical considerations, resource constraints, and equipment accessibility further impede widespread implementation.

Establishing standardized protocols for spheroid generation, MSC labeling, administration, and post-delivery tracking will be essential to overcome these translational barriers. By adapting proven human methodologies to veterinary systems, it will be possible to achieve a more accurate characterization of MSC behavior in vivo and advance the clinical deployment of spheroid-based therapies in companion animals.

Conclusion

The spheroid-based delivery of cAT-MSCs represents a promising strategy to enhance homing efficacy and therapeutic potency in regenerative veterinary medicine. Lessons drawn from human MSC research underscore the potential of applying 3D culture innovations in animal systems. Multiple studies have collectively emphasized the critical role of optimizing spheroid culture systems to improve mesenchymal stem cell retention, immunomodulatory potential, and functional integration within host tissues. However, translating these advantages into consistent veterinary outcomes necessitates further mechanistic investigations, especially into the stepwise homing cascade and its regulatory cues in non-human physiology. Bridging this knowledge gap will be essential for the successful clinical deployment of MSC spheroids in veterinary regenerative therapies.

Author contributions

LM: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Investigation. GD: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. LM and GM received funding from The Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO) under the umbrella of the Partnership Fostering a European Research Area for Health (ERA4Health-CARDINNOV; GA N° 101095426 of the EU Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme) and Special University Research Fund, BOF, Seal of Excellence grants, University of Antwerpen, Flemish Government (BE) to LM.

Acknowledgments

We apologize to the many scientists whose valuable contributions to the investigation of mesenchymal stem cell applications and spheroid-based strategies could not be acknowledged due to space limitations.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

MSC, Mesenchymal Stem Cell; cAT-MSC, Canine Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell; hAT-MSC, Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell; 3D, Three-Dimensional; CXCR4, C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 4; SDF-1, Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1; HIF-1α, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha; VEGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; TGF-β, Transforming Growth Factor Beta; IL-10, Interleukin 10; COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2; PGE2, Prostaglandin E2; HGF, Hepatocyte Growth Factor; M2, M2 Macrophage Subtype; BLI, Bioluminescence Imaging; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; PET, Positron Emission Tomography.

References

1. Potapova IA, Gaudette GR, Brink PR, Robinson RB, Rosen MR, Cohen IS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells support migration and proliferation of endothelial cells. Circ Res. (2008) 103:130–8. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ivanovska A, Wang M, Arshaghi TE, Shaw G, Alves J, Byrne A, et al. Manufacturing mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis in canine patients: challenges and recommendations. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:897150. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.897150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ichikawa A, Neo S, Nukui R, Yamada Y, Nitta S, Iwaki H, et al. Establishment of large canine hepatocyte spheroids by mixing vascular endothelial cells and canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Ther. (2022) 19:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.11.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Shan Y, Zhang M, Tao E, Wang J, Wei N, Lu Y, et al. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells in translational challenges. Sig Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:242. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01936-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Griffin KH, Fok SW, Kent Leach, J. Strategies to capitalize on cell spheroid therapeutic potential for tissue repair and disease modeling. NPJ Regen Med. (2022) 7:70. doi: 10.1038/s41536-022-00266-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sajjad U, Ahmed M, Iqbal MZ, Riaz M, Mustafa M, Biedermann T, et al. Exploring mesenchymal stem cells homing mechanisms and improvement strategies. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2024) 13:1161–77. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szae045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Choi JK, Chung H, Oh SJ, Kim JW, Kim SH. Functionally enhanced cell spheroids for stem cell therapy: role of TIMP1 in the survival and therapeutic effectiveness of stem cell spheroids. Acta Biomater. (2023) 166:454–69. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.05.033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sato T, Anada T, Hamai R, Shiwaku Y, Tsuchiya K, Sakai S, et al. Culture of hybrid spheroids composed of calcium phosphate materials and mesenchymal stem cells on an oxygen-permeable culture device to predict in vivo bone forming capability. Acta Biomater. (2019) 88:477–90. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schmitz C, Potekhina E, Irianto T, Belousov VV, Lavrentieva A. Hypoxia onset in mesenchymal stem cell spheroids: monitoring with hypoxia reporter cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2021) 9:611837. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.611837

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Liu H, Xue W, Ge G, Luo X, Li Y, Xiang H, et al. Hypoxic preconditioning advances CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression by activating HIF-1α in MSCs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2010) 401:509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Song YC, Park GT, Moon HJ, Choi EB, Lim MJ, Yoon JW, et al. Hybrid spheroids containing mesenchymal stem cells promote therapeutic angiogenesis by increasing engraftment of co-transplanted endothelial colony-forming cells in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2023) 14:193. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03435-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lee E, Lim GH, An JH, Ryu MO, Seo KW, Youn HY. Enhanced immunomodulatory effects of canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in 3D culture. Front Vet Sci. (2025) 12:1500267. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1500267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kim M, Yun HW, Park DY, Choi BH, Min BH. Three-dimensional spheroid culture increases exosome secretion from mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med. (2018) 15:427–36. doi: 10.1007/s13770-018-0139-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ahn Jo, Lee Hw, Seo Kw, Kang Sk, Ra Jc, Youn Hy. Anti-tumor effect of adipose tissue derived-mesenchymal stem cells expressing interferon-β and treatment with cisplatin in a xenograft mouse model for canine melanoma. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:74897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074897

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bach FS, Rebelatto CLK, Fracaro L, Senegaglia AC, Fragoso FYI, Daga DR, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of surgical decompression alone and combined with canine adipose tissue-derived stem cell transplantation in dogs with acute thoracolumbar disk disease and spinal cord injury. Front Vet Sci. (2019) 6:383. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00383

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chen CC, Yang SF, Wang IK, Hsieh SY, Yu JX, Wu TL, et al. The long-term efficacy study of multiple allogeneic canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantations combined with surgery in four dogs with lumbosacral spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant. (2022) 31:9636897221081487. doi: 10.1177/09636897221081487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ylöstalo JH, Bartosh TJ, Coble K, Prockop DJ. Human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells cultured as spheroids are self-activated to produce prostaglandin E2 that directs stimulated macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Stem Cells. (2012) 30:2283–96. doi: 10.1002/stem.1191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kouroupis D, Correa D. Increased mesenchymal stem cell functionalization in three-dimensional manufacturing settings for enhanced therapeutic applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2021) 9:621748. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.621748

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Sargeant JM, Plishka M, Ruple A, Selmic LE, Totton SC, Vriezen ER. Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: an update. J Vet Intern Med. (2021) 35:1957–71. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Burdzinska A, Szopa IM, Majchrzak-Kuligowska K, Roszczyk A, Zielniok K, Zep P, et al. The comparison of immunomodulatory properties of canine and human wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:8926. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168926

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ren G, Su J, Zhang L, Zhao X, Ling W, L'huillie A, et al. Species variation in the mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression. Stem Cells. (2009) 27:1954–62. doi: 10.1002/stem.118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jasmin, de Souza GT, Louzada RA, Rosado-de-Castro PH, Mendez-Otero R, Campos de Carvalho AC. Tracking stem cells with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: perspectives and considerations. Int J Nanomed. (2017) 12:779–93. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S126530

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yun WS, Cho H, Jeon SI, Lim DK, Kim K. Fluorescence-based mono- and multimodal imaging for in vivo tracking of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomolecules. (2023) 13:1787. doi: 10.3390/biom13121787

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Rosenkrans ZT, Thickens AS, Kink JA, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Engle JW, Hematti P, et al. Investigating the in vivo biodistribution of extracellular vesicles isolated from various human cell sources using positron emission tomography. Mol Pharm. (2024) 21:4324–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Cunha FF, Martins L, Martin PK, Stilhano RS, Paredes Gamero EJ, Han SW. Comparison of treatments of peripheral arterial disease with mesenchymal stromal cells and mesenchymal stromal cells modified with granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Cytotherapy. (2013) 15:820–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.02.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cunha FF, Martins L, Martin PK, Stilhano RS, Han SW. A comparison of the reparative and angiogenic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from the bone marrow of BALB/c and C57/BL6 mice in a model of limb ischemia. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2013) 4:86. doi: 10.1186/scrt245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Cheng NC, Wang S, Young TH. The influence of spheroid formation of human adipose-derived stem cells on chitosan films on stemness and differentiation capabilities. Biomaterials. (2012) 33:1748–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Cheng NC, Chen SY, Li JR, Young TH. Short-term spheroid formation enhances the regenerative capacity of adipose-derived stem cells by promoting stemness, angiogenesis, and chemotaxis. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2013) 2:584–94. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mesenchymal stem cell, 3D culture, spheroid, stem cell homing, reverse translational research

Citation: Martin L and De Meyer GRY (2025) Can spheroid formation enhance mesenchymal stem cell homing in veterinary medicine? Insights and evidence gaps. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1622717. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1622717

Received: 04 May 2025; Accepted: 03 September 2025;
Published: 24 September 2025.

Edited by:

Hussein M. El-Husseiny, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan

Reviewed by:

Pratheesh Mankuzhy, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

Copyright © 2025 Martin and De Meyer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Leonardo Martin, bGVvbmFyZG8ubWFydGluQHVhbnR3ZXJwZW4uYmU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.