Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1628161

This article is part of the Research TopicOccupational Health of Working DogsView all articles

Breeding Values and Index Creation for Health and Behavior Traits in Labrador Retriever Guide Dogs

Provisionally accepted
Joseph  A. ThorsrudJoseph A. Thorsrud1Katy  M. EvansKaty M. Evans2C.  Kyle QuigleyC. Kyle Quigley2Krishnamoorthy  SrikanthKrishnamoorthy Srikanth1Antonio  ReverterAntonio Reverter3Laercio  R Porto-NetoLaercio R Porto-Neto3Heather  J. HusonHeather J. Huson1*
  • 1Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
  • 2The Seeing Eye, Morristown, NJ, United States
  • 3Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organization, Brisbane, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Genomic breeding values and multi-trait selection indices have significantly advanced genetic improvement in livestock but remain underutilized in guide dog breeding. This study developed a genomically informed selection framework for a population of Labrador Retrievers by integrating health (e.g., dental, ocular, and dermatological conditions) and behavioral (e.g., trainability, distraction level, pace) traits into a "Behavior Score", "Health Score", and "Total Score" index by applying Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) to estimate breeding values. Phenotypic and genotypic data were collected from 844 dogs over 26 years at The Seeing Eye guide dog school. Predictive performance was evaluated via five-fold cross-validation and correlation-based metrics. Results showed that some dentition related health traits exhibited moderate to high Area Under Receiving Operating Characteristic (AUROC) values (0.79–0.87), indicating potential for immediate use for genetic improvement. In contrast, most other health traits demonstrated weak to moderate predictive accuracy. Behavioral traits exhibited lower predictive accuracy but showed a stronger association with training success. Models were commonly unable to correctly classify individuals for binary or ordinal traits yet performed well in ranking individuals, likely due to lower heritability or strong environmental influences of traits or limitations of the dataset itself. The behavior-focused Total Score (AUROC ~0.72) outperformed health-based indices as a fixed effect in predicting breeding success despite the weaker predictive ability of individual behavioral traits. Incorporating parental scores as fixed effects modestly improved breeding values for success, indicating the importance of integrating additional data sources where available. While these findings underscore the utility of genomic selection for guide dog breeding, they also highlight constraints stemming from small, genetically homogeneous populations and variable phenotyping. Ultimately, we provide the first usable individual and multi-trait genomic approaches to enhance both health and performance outcomes in working dog programs and a foundation to expand upon the reference population and behavioral trait assessment to improve prediction accuracy in the future.

Keywords: Labrador Retrievers1, Breeding Values2, Guide Dog3, GBLUP4, Selection Index5

Received: 13 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Thorsrud, Evans, Quigley, Srikanth, Reverter, Porto-Neto and Huson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Heather J. Huson, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.