Corrigendum: External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs

Christiane Lutonsky^*Christian PehamMarion MuchaBianca ReicherRita GasparAlexander TichyBarbara Bockstahler

• University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Corrigendum on: Lutonsky C, Peham C, Mucha M, Reicher B, Gaspar R, Tichy A and Bockstahler B (2023)External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1249951. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1249951 In the published article, there was an error in form of a distortion of words concerning the results of one comparison (COP-MedLat vs. COP-CranCaud). While the tables (Table 4 andTable 5), discussion and conclusion offer the right findings, the abstract and conclusion state the opposing.(1) Abstract A correction has been made to [Abstract]. This sentence previously stated: "The mediolateral COP displacement was significantly greater than the craniocaudal COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude."The corrected sentence appears below: "The craniocaudal COP displacement was significantly greater than the mediolateral COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude."(2) Results A correction has been made to [Results], [Center of pressure], [3.3]. This sentence previously stated: "The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-MedLat than in COP-CranCaud during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5)."The corrected sentence appears below: "The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-CranCaud than COP-MedLat in during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5)."Since the word distortion does not affect the Table stating this result nor the discussion, we are confident this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in a significant way when the article is read in full. The authors apologize for this error, which unfortunately was not found by any authors or reviewers prior to or during the peer reviewing process. Further, all research that cited this article since publication date does not include this mistake and is therefore a sole problem of this publication. However, since the mistake is included in the abstract, we kindly ask to change the word distortion in the original article, as the abstract is frequently read. We provided the original publication and highlighted the changes in the document.