Christiane Lutonsky1*
Christian Peham2
Marion Mucha1
Bianca Reicher1
Rita Gaspar1
Alexander Tichy3
Barbara Bockstahler1- 1Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Clinic for Small Animals, Small Animal Surgery, Section of Physical Therapy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
- 2Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Clinic for Horses, Movement Science Group, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
- 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Platform, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
A Corrigendum on
External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs
by Lutonsky, C., Peham, C., Mucha, M., Reicher, B., Gaspar, R., Tichy, A., and Bockstahler, B. (2023). Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1249951. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1249951
In the published article, there was an error in form of a distortion of words concerning the results of one comparison (COP-MedLat vs. COP-CranCaud). While the tables (Table 4 and Table 5), discussion and conclusion offer the right findings, the abstract and conclusion state the opposing.
A correction has been made to Abstract, page 1.
This sentence previously stated:
“The mediolateral COP displacement was significantly greater than the craniocaudal COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The craniocaudal COP displacement was significantly greater than the mediolateral COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
A correction has been made to Results, 3.3 Center of pressure, page 6, paragraph 6.
This sentence previously stated:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-MedLat than in COP-CranCaud during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-CranCaud than COP-MedLat during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: canine balance, center of pressure, postural stability, posturography, veterinary rehabilitation, external mechanical perturbations
Citation: Lutonsky C, Peham C, Mucha M, Reicher B, Gaspar R, Tichy A and Bockstahler B (2025) Corrigendum: External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1630608. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1630608
Received: 18 May 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025;
Published: 10 June 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: Ali Mobasheri, University of Oulu, Finland
Copyright © 2025 Lutonsky, Peham, Mucha, Reicher, Gaspar, Tichy and Bockstahler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christiane Lutonsky, Q2hyaXN0aWFuZS5sdXRvbnNreUB2ZXRtZWR1bmkuYWMuYXQ=