Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1631569

Comparison of etiology and outcome of dogs of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with different confirmation: the Shepherd versus the Bulldog

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Tufts University, Medford, United States
  • 2University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 4VEG, Chapel HILL, NC, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To determine whether chest and head conformation in dogs is associated with etiology of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) and likelihood to experience sustained return of spontaneous circulation (sROSC) following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Design: Retrospective study from 2000-2023 of dogs that underwent CPR that were one of two body types, either mesocephalic (Shepherd) or brachycephalic (Bulldog).Setting: Electronic medical records from one veterinary record system and from the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) CPR Registry were reviewed.Animals: 162 dogs including 72 dogs comprising the mesocephalic group (MC), and 90 bulldogs comprising the brachycephalic group (BC).Measurements and Main Results: Data recorded included signalment, body weight, disease category, whether CPA occurred during general anesthesia, suspected cause of CPA, first identified rhythm on electrocardiogram during CPA, whether defibrillation was performed, whether open chest CPR was performed, whether ROSC was achieved and if it was sustained, and survival to discharge. The BC dogs were more likely to arrest associated with respiratory disease (p<0.001), and MC dogs were more likely to arrest associated with cavity bleeding (p=0.012), trauma (p=0.012) or gastric-dilatation-volvulus (p<0.001). The MC dogs were more frequently defibrillated (p=0.021). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 34.7% (25/72) of MC dogs and 30.0% (27/90) of BC dogs (p=0.522). Survival to discharge was similarly dismal between the two groups (p=0.434) with 2/72 (2.8%) of MC dogs and 1/90 (1.1%) of BC dogs, which reflected both re-arrest and owner decisions.. When out-of-hospital CPA cases were excluded, MC dogs were more likely to suffer from a surgical condition (p = 0.017), and experienced ventricular fibrillation more often (p = 0.032).: Dogs with different head and chest confirmations developed CPA for different reasons, with diseases like GDV and trauma more commonly affecting MC dogs and respiratory disease more commonly affecting BC dogs. Defibrillation was more common in the MC dogs. Abbreviations list: brachycephalic conformation (BC); cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA); dead on arrival (DOA); gastric dilatation and volvulus (GDV); German shepherd dogs (GSD); mesocephalic conformation (MC); pulseless electrical activity (PEA); Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER); return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained return of spontaneous circulation (sROSC).

Keywords: and the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) CPR Registry Consortium Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER), defibrillation, Mesocephalic, Brachycephalic

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 05 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ossman, Rozanski, DeStefano, GivenMandryk, Berlin, Hoehne, Silverstein and Balakrishnan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Elizabeth Anne Rozanski, Tufts University, Medford, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.