Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1651091

Epidemiologic consequences of preclinical transmission of foot-and mouth disease virus in cattle

Provisionally accepted
Stormy  ScharzenbergerStormy Scharzenberger1John  HumphreysJohn Humphreys1*Columb  RigneyColumb Rigney2Alexis  FreifeldAlexis Freifeld2Carolina  StenfeldtCarolina Stenfeldt1Jonathan  ArztJonathan Arzt1
  • 1USDA ARS National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Manhattan, United States
  • 2USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) can be transmitted during the incubation phase, before clinical detection, but the epidemiological consequences of this preclinical infectious period have not been fully assessed in cattle. Using experimental data derived from transmission studies performed in vivo, we parameterized a state-transition model and simulated FMDV outbreaks across three U.S. regions under varying durations of preclinical infectiousness. We evaluated multiple epidemiologic outcomes under both optimal (1 day after clinical onset) and suboptimal (4 days after clinical onset) detection scenarios. The modeled output demonstrated that even a single day of preclinical transmission significantly increased outbreak magnitude, spatial extent, and duration. These effects were magnified under suboptimal detection and when simulating low-virulence virus strains with prolonged preclinical phases. Optimal response consistently reduced outbreak severity, with greater mitigation observed in the Eastern and Central U.S. as the preclinical phase lengthened. Our findings demonstrate that omission of preclinical transmission from FMD models results in systematic underestimation of outbreak impacts. Incorporating incubation phase transmission is essential for realistic epidemic forecasting, effective preparedness planning, and region-specific response prioritization.

Keywords: Foot-and-Mouth Disease, fmd, simulation modeling, Cattle, preclinical transmission, Transboundary diseases, Epidemiology

Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Scharzenberger, Humphreys, Rigney, Freifeld, Stenfeldt and Arzt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: John Humphreys, USDA ARS National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Manhattan, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.