ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Comparative and Clinical Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1662553
This article is part of the Research TopicTranslational Research in Veterinary Medicine: Comparative Insights and ApplicationsView all articles
First steps in the development of an ovine proximal phalanx fracture and bone defect model: a study of animal welfare and bone healing
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark
- 2Hvidovre Hospital Ortopadkirurgisk Afdeling, Hvidovre, Denmark
- 3Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 4Herlev/Gentofte University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 5University of Murcia, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Murcia, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
There is a need for large-animal fracture models focusing on small tubular bones, as existing models typically involve major weight-bearing bones and often rely on restrictive suspension systems that raise significant animal welfare concerns. This study presents a novel in vivo sheep model targeting the proximal phalanx, designed to enable natural movement and social housing while supporting the investigation of fracture fixation and bone healing. Eleven skeletally mature Texel sheep were included; four underwent bilateral ostectomies with 3 mm or 6 mm defects, and seven received an osteotomy. A hoof block was used to offload the affected digit, enabling the sheep to move freely and to be housed in pairs. Bone healing was assessed using standardized radiographic scoring based on images obtained intraoperatively, at week 1 and 2, and hereafter every second week. Hard callus thickness was assessed at the end of the study period by a computed tomography-based method. Animal welfare was monitored through repeated clinical evaluations, two pain scoring systems (a validated sheep facial pain expression scale and a novel composite behavioral pain score), and biomarkers of inflammation, including serum amyloid A and haptoglobin. The ostectomy group This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article showed frequent implant failure and limited healing, particularly in the 6 mm ostectomies, while the osteotomy group demonstrated relatively better stability and more consistent healing. Pain scores peaked shortly after surgery and again following withdrawal of analgesia but remained generally low. This study presents a novel, welfare-consciousness bilateral ovine proximal phalanx fracture model that challenges osteosynthesis stability. The integrated multimodal welfare assessment highlights the importance of objective pain and stress monitoring and advocates for the routine inclusion of quantitative welfare parameters alongside bone healing outcomes in translational orthopedic research.
Keywords: biomarkers, bone healing, large animal model, Pain scores, Sheep, Small tubular bones
Received: 09 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nikolaisen, Colding-Rasmussen, Horstmann, Müller, Ceron, Petersen, Tierp-Wong and Jacobsen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nanett Kvist Nikolaisen, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.