REVIEW article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Oncology in Veterinary Medicine
This article is part of the Research TopicAnimal Cancer EpidemiologyView all 4 articles
Neoplasia in the Dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius): A review
Provisionally accepted- 1Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 2Sultan Qaboos University College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Muscat, Oman
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The dromedary camels are source of milk, meat, wool and income in poor societies and of importance in social events. Tumors have devastated effects on the dromedary health, production, reproduction and marketing value. Reviews on neoplasia in dromedaries are scarce, making it pertinent to present this comprehensive study. Aim: The review provides insights into the epidemiology, pathology, future diagnosis and treatment of camel tumors. Methods: Literature of tumors in the dromedary are reviewed with focus on tumor types in different body systems, epidemilogy, risk factors, future diagnosis and treatment. The epidemiological data were collected from different sources, analyzed and presented according to body systems. The relative frequencies of malignant and benign tumors were displayed. Results: The relative frequencies of skin (54.8%), reproductive (23.0%), lymphomic (6.9%) and gastrointestinal (6.3%) tumors were the mostly encountered in camels. The common malignant and benign tumors relative frequencies were on the following order: carcinomas (35.5%), fibromas (11.2%), teratoma (7.8%), lymphomas and leukemia (7.4%), papilloma (6.2%), and adenoma (6.2%). Recent rise of tumor cases was observed. The possible risk factors included contamination of feed with fungal toxins, the grazing areas, water and soil with pesticides, herbicides, hydrocarbons and heavy metals from petroleum industry and gold mining. Other tumor risk factors included environmental changes/famine, some veterinary drugs and hormones, plant carcinogens, ultraviolet light, familial and old age. Contraction of bovine papilloma viruses etc., during movement to new areas with denser animal population is very likely. Conclusion: Different tumor types were reported in different body systems of the dromedary with carcinomas, fibromas, teratomas, lymphomas/leukemia and papillomas' being the most common. More tumor reports in camels are expected due to the recent advancements in camel farming systems, specialized breeding centers, improvement of veterinary services, and disease surveillance. Some skin tumors such as papilloma/fibropapilloma depicted koilocytosis, possibly caused by different PV strains, may warrant further investigation. The abattoir tumor surveys might show bias as dromedaries presented for slaughter were either barren females or young males. Different diagnostic methods were discussed and future advanced technology for tumor diagnosis and treatment in camels including targeted therapy and precision medicine were suggested.
Keywords: Dromedary camels, tumors types and body location, tumor relative frequency, Risk factors, current and future tumor diagnosis, future tumor treatment
Received: 13 Jul 2025; Accepted: 05 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Abu Damir, Tageldin, Ali and Adem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Abdu Adem, abdu.adem@ku.ac.ae
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
