Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Vet. Sci., 11 September 2025

Sec. Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1675111

This article is part of the Research TopicMycotoxins in Pig Feed: Health Risks, Reproductive Impacts, and Diagnostic InnovationsView all 5 articles

Editorial: Mycotoxins in pig feed: health risks, reproductive impacts, and diagnostic innovations

  • 1Clinic of Farm Animals, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 2IALTA, IHAP INRAE-ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
  • 3Clinic for Ruminants and Swine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Mycotoxins, as secondary metabolites of fungi such as Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium are detected in grains, globally and remain one of the most insidious threats in modern swine production systems. The Research Topic presented in Frontiers in Veterinary Science Journal focused on research findings of a part of the mycotoxins issue in pig production including toxicological mechanisms, reproductive outcomes, feed mitigation strategies, and diagnostic advancements. Four articles providing interesting scientific results were included in the Research Topic.

In the article by Qin et al., the positive effects of selenized-oligochitosan (SOC) were demonstrated against intestinal dysfunction induced by ingestion of significant zearalenone (ZEN) levels for 42 days in piglets. The selenized-oligochitosan administered at the highest dosage level (0.5 μg/g SOC), resulted in significant reduction of intestinal dysfunction biomarkers, as well as in improvement of the digestive enzymes activity and the intestinal barrier integrity.

Further, the report by Tassis et al. covered aspects of health and performance improvements observed after the introduction of a novel multi-component detoxifying agent (MMDA) against combined ZEN and ochratoxin A (OTA) exposure in weaned pigs. The effects of the novel detoxifying agent were highlighted at the greatest dosage level (3 g MMDA/kg feed) tested with emphasis on improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) and reduction of mycotoxins residues in tissues.

The article of Benthem de Grave et al. highlighted the effects of an algoclay-based mycotoxin decontaminant in sows and their progeny in deoxynivalenol (DON) and ZEN exposed sows. The study was performed with combined dietary exposure of ~100 or 300 μg ZEN/kg feed and 250 μg DON/kg feed in sows during the last week of gestation and the lactation period (26 days). The test substance was able to decrease the levels of ZEN and its metabolites in the serum of sows and decrease de-epoxy-DON in the serum of piglets, thus providing evidence of reduced ZEN intestinal absorption and subsequently reduced exposure of piglets.

Moreover, data on the effects of a 42-day low DON-exposure in pre-pubertal gilts on the immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptors and expression of genes encoding selected large intestine enzymes associated with various metabolic and detoxification processes, was presented by Gajecka et al.. The modulation of α and β estrogen receptors, as well as GSTP1 mRNA and CYP1A1 mRNA expression in various intestinal segments, was highlighted, whereas a probable protection offered by DON (at the dosage level and time period used in the study) against uncontrolled proliferation in the large intestine of pre-pubertal gilts was demonstrated.

Taken together the above-mentioned contributions in the Research Topic highlighted significant aspects of gene alterations, enzyme and estrogenic receptor modulation, variability of the bioavailability of particular mycotoxins after dietary exposure, either alone or in combination to pigs, as well as possible mechanisms of action against the detrimental effects of mycotoxins in vivo. The presence and effects of mycotoxins combinations has been emphasized by several contributions reporting that even low-level or subclinical exposure to mycotoxins such as DON, ZEN and OTA, can compromise pig health and performance (13). In breeding herds, the estrogenic effects of ZEN are particularly concerning (4). Field and laboratory evidence suggest persistent effects on sow fertility, placental function, and fetal development (5, 6). Together, these findings challenge traditional safety thresholds and suggest the need for regulatory frameworks that consider cumulative and synergistic mycotoxin exposures.

Among mitigation approaches, multicomponent mycotoxin detoxifying agents (MMDAs) yield special attention. Raj et al. (7) demonstrated the in vivo efficacy of a composite additive—comprising of modified zeolite, Bacillus spores, yeast cell wall, and silymarin, in reducing tissue residues of ZEN and T-2 toxin in piglets, whereas in another in vivo trial with the same multicomponent agent, its ability to improve the average daily gain and FCR, and reduce DON residues in kidneys of weaned pigs receiving contaminated feed with DON and ZEN, was reported (8). Moreover, Papatsiros et al. (9) demonstrated beneficial effects of another multi-component mycotoxin-detoxifying agent, containing clays (bentonite, sepiolite), phytogenic feed additives (curcumin, silymarin) and post-biotics (yeast cell wall, hydrolyzed yeast), with reduction of oxidative stress biomarkers and improvement of health parameters in lactating sows. Similarly, novel solutions such as the use of lithocholic acid (LCA) against DON-induced detrimental effects are also emerging (10). The latter, modulates DON-induced inflammation in intestinal epithelial cells via epigenetic mechanisms, opening the door for functional feed additives that act at the molecular level (11).

In conclusion, the editorial board extends its gratitude to all contributing authors and reviewers of the Research Topic. The comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches showcased here reinforce the urgent need for integrated solutions that safeguard swine health and performance. Articles in the present Research Topic highlight particular aspects of mycotoxins effects and present effective promising solutions which could tackle the various detrimental effects of combined mycotoxins exposure in pigs. As observed frequently, the occurrence of such combined exposure is a common pattern in pig feed worldwide (12), therefore the need for targeted research efforts on mycotoxins interactions in vivo, as well as on effective mitigation strategies against combined exposure should be a focus point for further research efforts. Therefore, future studies should focus also on the development of possible multi-mycotoxin safety limits based on additive and synergistic effects when mycotoxin mixtures are present in pig feed and the integration of regular analytical diagnostics and feed mitigation strategies at farm level through the support of field-deployable technologies.

Author contributions

PT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Thapa A, Horgan KA, White B, Walls D. Deoxynivalenol and zearalenone—synergistic or antagonistic agri-food chain co-contaminants? Toxins. (2021) 13:561. doi: 10.3390/toxins13080561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. EFSA EFSA CONTAM Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain), Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L. Risks for animal health related to the presence of ochratoxin A (OTA) in feed. EFSA J. (2023) 21:1–89. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Malczak I, Gajda A, Jedziniak P. Deoxynivalenol and pigs: review of harmful effect of Mycotoxin on swine health. Porc Health Manag. (2025) 11:27. doi: 10.1186/s40813-025-00441-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ropejko K, Twarużek M. Zearalenone and its metabolites—general overview, occurrence, and toxicity. Toxins. (2021) 13:35. doi: 10.3390/toxins13010035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Liu J, Applegate T. Zearalenone (ZEN) in livestock and poultry: dose, toxicokinetics, toxicity and estrogenicity. Toxins. (2020) 12:377. doi: 10.3390/toxins12060377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kinkade CW, Rivera-Núñez Z, Gorcyzca L, Aleksunes LM, Barrett ES. Impact of Fusarium-derived mycoestrogens on female reproduction: a systematic review. Toxins. (2021) 13:373. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Raj J, Vasiljević M, Tassis P, Farkaš H, Männer K. Efficacy of a multicomponent mycotoxin detoxifying agent on concurrent exposure to zearalenone and T-2 mycotoxin in weaned pigs. Livest Sci. (2020) 242:104295. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104295

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Raj J, Tassis P, Männer K, Farkaš H, Jakovčević Z, Vasiljević M, et al. Effects of a multicomponent mycotoxin detoxifying agent on health and performance of weaned pigs under combined dietary exposure to deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN). Toxins. (2025) 17:146. doi: 10.3390/toxins17030146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Papatsiros VG, Eliopoulos C, Voulgarakis N, Arapoglou D, Riahi I, Sadurní M, et al. Effects of a multi-component mycotoxin-detoxifying agent on oxidative stress, health and performance of sows. Toxins. (2023) 15:580. doi: 10.3390/toxins15090580

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Li Y, Zhu C, Yao J, Zhu C, Li Z, Liu HY, et al. Lithocholic acid alleviates deoxynivalenol-induced inflammation and oxidative stress via PPARγ-mediated epigenetically transcriptional reprogramming in porcine intestinal epithelial cells. J Agric Food Chem. (2024) 72:5452–62. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang S, Peng X, Zhu Q, Lu S, Hu P, Kim IH, et al. Lithocholic acid attenuates DON-induced inflammatory responses via epigenetic regulation of DUSP5 and TRAF5 in porcine intestinal epithelial cells. Front Vet Sci. (2025) 12:1493496. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1493496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gruber-Dorninger C, Jenkins T. Global mycotoxin occurrence in feed: a ten-year survey. Toxins. (2019) 11:375. doi: 10.3390/toxins11070375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mycotoxins, pig health, deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), ochratoxin A, pig reproduction, detoxification agent

Citation: Tassis P, Pierron A and Kauffold J (2025) Editorial: Mycotoxins in pig feed: health risks, reproductive impacts, and diagnostic innovations. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1675111. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1675111

Received: 28 July 2025; Accepted: 13 August 2025;
Published: 11 September 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Arturo Anadón, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

Copyright © 2025 Tassis, Pierron and Kauffold. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Panagiotis Tassis, cHRhc3Npc0B2ZXQuYXV0aC5ncg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.