ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Evaluation of risk factors for obstruction of the intraventricular catheter after ventriculoperitoneal shunting in dogs with congenital internal hydrocephalus
Provisionally accepted- 1Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen Veterinar-Klinikum, Giessen, Germany
- 2Small Animal Clinic, Department of Radiology, Gießen, Germany
- 3Small Animal Clinic, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Gießen, Germany
- 4Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- 5Institut of Biomathematics, Gießen, Germany
- 6Small Animal Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Gießen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) is the standard treatment for congenital internal hydrocephalus in dogs, but obstruction of the ventricular catheter is a frequent and serious complication. In human medicine, several predictors of catheter obstruction have been identified, while corresponding risk factors in veterinary patients remain largely unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify potential risk factors for ventricular catheter obstruction after VPS implantation in dogs with congenital internal hydrocephalus. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 100 client-owned dogs diagnosed with congenital internal hydrocephalus and treated by VPS implantation between 2001 and 2022. Medical records and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were reviewed for age, sex, breed, body weight, ventricular size, ventricular catheter position, and preoperative medical treatments. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analyzed for cell count, red blood cell count, protein concentration, and cytology before and after surgery. Single logistic regression and chi-square tests were applied to evaluate associations with ventricular catheter obstruction. Results: Obstruction occurred in 9 of 100 dogs (9%; 95% confidence interval 3– 15%), with onset ranging from 8 to 210 days after VPS surgery (median 38 days). No significant associations were found between demographic factors, ventricle–brain ratio, ventricular catheter position, preoperative medical treatment, or CSF parameters and the occurrence of obstruction. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed marked postoperative increases in cell counts, protein concentration, and red blood cell counts, peaking within the first week after surgery and gradually returning toward reference ranges at the 3-month follow-up. Histological examination of obstructed catheters in three dogs demonstrated intraluminal blockage caused by inflammatory infiltrates, fibrin, and choroid plexus cells. Conclusion: Obstruction of the ventricular catheter remains a clinically important complication after VPS implantation in dogs with internal hydrocephalus. No definitive risk factors could be identified in this study. The observed postoperative CSF changes appear to reflect inflammatory and surgical responses rather than predictors of obstruction. Further investigations with larger case numbers and detailed immunological analyses are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms and to improve prevention strategies.
Keywords: Hydrocephalus, Obstruction, catheter, canine, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cerebrospinal Fluid
Received: 19 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Siwicka, Farke, Büttner, Moritz and Schmidt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anna Katarzyna Siwicka, anna.siwicka@vetmed.uni-giessen.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
