SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Byron's bear and dwarf rabbits in the classroom: A review of animals against academic stress
Provisionally accepted- University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Coping strategies for academic stress at different stages of human development are important. We address the hypothesis that human-animal interactions (HAI) in both non-therapy and therapy situations can help adults, adolescents and children cope with academic stress in universities and schools. We point to Lord Byron's "pet" bear in the 19th century and to media reports of pets on the high-pressure academic campuses of Oxford and Cambridge as historical and current examples. Methods: We review scientific literature concerning HAI and stress in university settings (exemplified via narrative information) and in the pre-university school environment (explored via systematic information). Media reports from Oxbridge underline the popularity of HAI. Results: A pilot search returned n=4 recent reviews and meta-analyses of studies from university settings that covered mental, cognitive, and physiological health outcomes. The synthesis of these studies suggests that HAI may have benefits for stress and anxiety with the optimal duration and frequency of HAI remaining open. Studies from pre-university settings also suggest a possible benefit in terms of reducing anxiety and salivary cortisol as an indicator of stress, but there are only a few studies on this topic (n=3). Conclusion: There is potential for improved mental health outcomes through HAI in academic environments, but more research is needed to establish best practices.
Keywords: Support Animals, Pets, human-animal interactions (HAI), School, University, Academia, Academic stress
Received: 29 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Erren, Glenewinkel, Wild, Wallraff and Lewis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ursula Wild, ursula.wild@uk-koeln.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
