Colorectal cancer surgery remains a vital area of research due to its prevalence and the critical role of surgery as a curative treatment. Recent advancements in minimally invasive techniques, particularly laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery, have enhanced patient outcomes by minimizing postoperative pain, reducing hospital stays, and accelerating recovery. However, significant debates persist regarding the optimal surgical methods and perioperative management strategies. The advent of robotic surgery has revolutionized colorectal procedures, offering increased dexterity, precision, and ergonomics with advanced robotic platforms. Despite these developments, comparative analysis of clinical benefits, oncological outcomes, and cost-effectiveness among laparoscopic and robotic systems remains inconclusive. Furthermore, technical aspects like the best anastomotic technique and postoperative management, such as transanal drainage, offer conflicting evidence affecting surgical outcomes.
This Research Topic aims to critically evaluate and advance the understanding of surgical techniques and perioperative management strategies in colorectal cancer treatment. By analyzing the comparative benefits of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches, including third- and fourth-generation robotic platforms, this research seeks to evaluate their precision, impact on oncological outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. The topic also targets key technical debates, such as selecting the optimal anastomotic approach for rectal cancer surgeries and assessing the necessity of transanal drainage in postoperative care. Through a multidisciplinary lens, the research aspires to elucidate perioperative strategies that enhance recovery, reduce complications, and improve patient experiences and outcomes.
To gather further insights in optimizing colorectal cancer surgery practices, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes: •Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer, including the latest generation robotic systems •Impact of anastomotic techniques (end-to-end versus end-to-side) on postoperative recovery and complication rates •Efficacy of routine transanal drainage post-rectal cancer surgery •Strategies for fluid management, analgesia, and enhanced recovery after colorectal cancer surgery •Long-term survival, recurrence, and quality-of-life assessments following varied surgical and perioperative practices
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Clinical Trial
Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
