Intersectoral action against AMR: bridging global implementation gaps by advancing integrated solutions and strengthening innovation and equity

  • 641

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Summary Submission Deadline 17 February 2026 | Manuscript Submission Deadline 7 June 2026

  2. This Research Topic is currently accepting articles.

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an evolving and pervasive challenge threatening health, agriculture, and environmental sustainability worldwide. Despite decades of scientific advances, recent studies repeatedly underscore the silent yet accelerating nature of the AMR crisis, with projections warning of significant public health and economic losses if decisive action is not taken. Although the World Health Organization’s Global Action Plan and various National Action Plans now frame global and local responses, substantial gaps persist—particularly in coordinating intersectoral activity and translating surveillance data into actionable, multisectoral policies. Current efforts often focus on tracking the scale of the problem, while critical interventions to address identified risks, particularly from animal and environmental sources, remain insufficient or unevenly implemented.

Recent investigations reveal persistent underrepresentation of the animal sector in antimicrobial surveillance, even though it is accountable for a majority of global antimicrobial consumption. The environmental role as a resistance reservoir is still poorly mapped, largely due to limited integration of the environmental sector’s expertise and inequitable participation. Although intersectoral strategies are recognized as essential, systematic barriers hinder harmonized actions across policy, monitoring, and mitigation, especially in low-resource settings. Ongoing debates highlight the necessity for innovation in alternative therapies, policy design, behavioral and institutional change, and better approaches to AMR communication and stakeholder engagement. The One Health approach is increasingly advocated, but practical guidance for cross-sector collaboration and equitable integration is lacking.

This Research Topic aims to catalyze progress towards curbing AMR by fostering rigorous, solution-focused research and dialogue on bridging knowledge and implementation gaps across sectors. We seek to unite experts working on epidemiological surveillance, novel treatment options, policy integration, and the science-policy interface, highlighting proven and emerging strategies that address the diversity of AMR drivers. Contributions should critically evaluate existing activities and propose concrete actions to strengthen multisectoral collaboration, implementation, and accountability in AMR response. Emphasis will be placed on insights that advance the One Health paradigm and integrate equity, environmental/climate, and alternative treatment option considerations.

To gather further insights in AMR containment through intersectoral and One Health approaches, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:

- Monitoring studies (not restricted to bacteria) coupled with practical multisectoral solutions
- Innovative or alternative treatment options, specifically on antimicrobial peptides
- Lessons learned from policy design and cross-sectoral integration
- Communication strategies, information system integration, and stakeholder engagement for AMR mitigation
- Drivers of AMR and targeted intervention strategies
- Environmental dimensions, reservoirs, and interventions for AMR
- Incorporating gender and equity considerations into AMR response activities
- Intersections between climate change and AMR emergence/spread
- Integration and advancement of One Health Antimicrobial Use/AMR surveillance systems

Research Topic Research topic image

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Classification
  • Clinical Trial
  • Community Case Study
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • FAIR² Data

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: One Health, animal health, health equity, Antimicrobial resistance, AMR surveillance, Intersectoral collaboration, Policy integration, Antimicrobial stewardship, Alternative therapeutics, Environmental reservoirs, Public health policy, AMR drivers, Climate change and AMR, Stakeholder engagement, Surveillance systems

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 641Topic views
View impact