Skip to main content

Emerging Cellulosic Materials: Characterization of Structure and Properties

54kviews
Editorial01 March 2022
Editorial: Emerging Cellulosic Materials: Characterization of Structure and Properties

This special issue of Frontiers in Chemical Engineering presents research inspired by factors that have become increasingly important during the last decades. Firstly, there is an urgent demand for new and ecologically viable materials that are not based only on non-renewable resources. Secondly, the sustainable utilization of biobased renewables must be fully vindicated and in this, novel value added products play a key role. Both factors have resulted in research on and development of a plethora of new materials based on three of the most abundant polymers produced by nature and available in forest biomass: cellulose, lignins and hemicelluloses, for use in a wide variety of applications. So far, most materials have been prepared only in the laboratory, but many are already produced in pilot plant scale or are even manufactured commercially.

The majority of the methods of preparation and intended applications of these materials involve the assembly of particles of nano- and micro scale with vast specific surfaces. Among these, the material of predominant importance is nanocellulose, i.e., cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and bacterial nanocellulose (BC). The contributions in this special issue highlight the wide variety of possible uses of nanocellulose in new materials: formation of networks with other biopolymers (Lohtander et al. Bioactive films from willow bark extract and nanocellulose double network hydrogels; Wang et al. Rheological and printability assessments on biomaterial Inks of nanocellulose/photo-crosslinkable biopolymer in light-aided 3D Printing), stabilization of emulsions and foams (Gestranius et al. Creaming layers of nanocellulose stabilized water-based polystyrene: High-solids emulsions for 3D printing; Nypelö et al., N2O-assisted siphon foaming of modified galactoglucomannas with cellulose nanofibers). The contributions also stress the importance of extending from using routine methods to characterize nanocellulose for use in materials formed by nanoscale particles by, for example, adequate and reliable determination of specific surface (Kondor et al. On the BET surface area of nanocellulose determined using volumetric, gravimetric and chromatographic adsorption methods), film thickness and structure (Spirk et al. Current opportunities and challenges in biopolymer thin film analysis - Determination of film thickness).

The following is a summary of significant results and advances in each contribution.

Nanocellulose is an excellent network former. Lohtander et al. in the contribution Bioactive films from willow bark extract and nanocellulose double network hydrogels report on the combination of a nanocellulose network with a biobased polyphenolic compound to form material comprising of a double network. The contribution advances the field of functionalization of nanocellulose materials but also to use nontoxic biobased components to do so, which is of great importance to advance the utilization and intrinsic benefits of renewable raw materials. The emerging materials are likely to be used for packaging and in pharmaceuticals.

The ability of nanocellulose to form networks with photo-crosslinkable biopolymers is highlighted in the contribution of Wang et al. Rheological and printability assessments on biomaterial Inks of nanocellulose/photo-crosslinkable biopolymer in light-aided 3D Printing. The biopolymer networks were targeted for 3D printing, which is an emerging use of field of natural polymers, among them, nanocellulose. It requires a meticulous analytical approach to assess printability, where it is essential to quantify injectability and rheological properties such as thixotropy.

Nanocelluloses are excellent stabilizers of oil-in-water emulsions. In their contribution Creaming layers of nanocellulose stabilized water-based polystyrene: High-solids emulsions for 3D printing, Gestranius et al. show how the ability of nanocellulose to stabilize interfaces can be extended. Combining Pickering type of stabilization, network formation and co-emulsifier, enables preparation of polymer droplets. The encapsulation of the polymer results in creaming that is used for removal of water and hence generation of high solid dope. Also here, the emerging use of nanocellulose in 3D printing is in focus. Indeed, the mastering of the colloidal and interfacial phenomena leads to a 3D printable material that can further be dried while retaining the shape.

Nanocelluloses are also able to stabilize aqueous foams, providing that another amphiphilic component is present to assist the foam formation. The synergistic action of nanocellulose and amphiphilic polymer with a Pickering-type stabilization mechanism described in Gestranius et al. is also presented in the contribution by Nypelö et al., N2O-assisted siphon foaming of modified galactoglucomannas with cellulose nanofibers. The approach involves nanocellulose and etherified GGM - both wood-sourced raw materials – and results in a self-standing foam structure. This opens application space for preparing green and lightweight composites. This systematic work clearly demonstrates how the control over interfacial activity is a prerequisite of the formation of desired structures.

The procedures to prepare representative samples and their characterization are equally important aspects when considering the efficient utilization of nanocellulose in novel application fields. Especially, the surface area determination of nanocellulose is far from being trivial. Kondor et al. critically discuss the results achieved using bacterial cellulose in their contribution On the BET surface area of nanocellulose determined using volumetric, gravimetric and chromatographic adsorption methods. Their conclusions are based on comprehensive theoretical considerations, resulting in an appropriate perception of the surface area data interpretation. In particular, they address surface area assessment as a tool to rank different nanocelluloses provided the measurements are carried out under comparable conditions (temperature, pressure, similar sample preparation).

Spirk et al. follow the same lines of non-trivial characterization of nanocellulose materials. They address the characterization of a nanocellulose-based 2D material family - futuristic nanoarchitectures from renewables for optics and electronics. The paper Current opportunities and challenges in biopolymer thin film analysis - Determination of film thickness reviews the commonly employed surface sensitive techniques, simultaneously considering the well-established but demanding features of biobased materials, i.e., heterogeneity and humidity-induced structural changes. The authors adequately emphasize the necessity to exploit complementing methods, such as AFM, along with indirect methods to accurately assess sub-micron film thickness.

1,414 views

Biomaterials inks based on cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and photo cross-linkable biopolymers have great potential as a high-performance ink system in light-aided, hydrogel extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. However, the colloidal stability of surface charged nanofibrils is susceptible to mono-cations in physiological buffers, which complexes the application scenarios of these systems in formulating cell-laden bioinks. In this study, biomaterial inks formulated by neutral and negatively surface charged CNFs (GrowInk-N and GrowInk-T) and photo cross-linkable biopolymers (gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and methacrylated galactoglucomannan (GGMMA)) were prepared with Milli-Q water or PBS buffer. Quantitative rheological measurements were performed on the ink formulations to characterise their shear-flow-recovery behaviours and to understand the intermolecular interactions between the CNFs of different kinds with GGMMA or GelMA. Meanwhile, printability assessments, including filament extrudability and shape fidelity of the printed scaffold under varying printing conditions, were carried out to optimise the printing process. Our study provides extensive supporting information for further developing these nanocellulose-based systems into photo-cross-linkable bioinks in service of cell-laden 3D bioprinting.

10,287 views

36 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
14 September 2021
On the BET Surface Area of Nanocellulose Determined Using Volumetric, Gravimetric and Chromatographic Adsorption Methods
Anett Kondor, 4 more and Koon-Yang Lee
On the BET Surface Area of Nanocellulose Determined Using Volumetric, Gravimetric and Chromatographic Adsorption Methods
Volumetric N2 adsorption at –196 °C is generally accepted as “gold standard” for estimating the Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface area of nanocellulose. It is unclear however, whether the BET surface area of nanocellulose obtained at such low temperatures and pressures is meaningful at an absolute sense, as nanocellulose is used at ambient temperature and pressure. In this work, a systematic evaluation of the BET surface area of nanocellulose using a highly crystalline bacterial cellulose (BC) as model nanocellulose was undertaken to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the limitations of BET method for nanocellulose. BET surface area obtained using volumetric N2 adsorption at –196 °C was compared with the BET surface area acquired from gravimetric experiments using n-octane adsorption measured using dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) and n-octane adsorption determined by inverse gas chromatography (iGC), both at 25 °C. It was found that the BET surface area calculated from volumetric N2 adsorption data was 25% lower than that of n-octane adsorption at 25 °C obtained using DVS and iGC adsorption methods. These results supported the hypothesis that the BET surface area of nanocellulose is both a molecular scale (N2 vs n-octane, molecular cross section of 0.162 nm2 vs 0.646 nm2) and temperature (–196 °C vs 25 °C) dependent property. This study also demonstrates the importance of selecting appropriate BET pressure range based on established criteria and would suggest that the room temperature gravimetric measurement is more relevant for many nanocellulose applications.

13,842 views

54 citations