Valeria Conti
Giovanni Luciano
Giovanni Pecoraro2
Amelia Filippelli- 1Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
- 2Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona”, University Hospital, Salerno, Italy
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the implantation of an embryo outside the endometrial cavity of the uterus. Signs and symptoms of EP may arise between the 6th and the 8th week of gestation and include vaginal bleeding, lower abdominal and pelvic pain. Frequently EPs implant in the fallopian tubes. A rare EP is the interstitial pregnancy, a life-threatening condition being responsible for nearly 20% of all deaths caused by EPs. Because of its unique location, the diagnosis is difficult and based on signs and specific criteria together with measuring of serum β-hCG. Usually, EP is treated by surgical approach, which is associated with increased morbidity, decreased fertility and increased likelihood of hysterectomy and uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy. Early diagnosis is crucial to life saving and allowing alternative therapeutic interventions such as pharmacological treatments. Methotrexate (MTX) represents the mainstay therapy. There is no standard care for the interstitial pregnancy for what concerns either surgical or pharmacological approaches. We reported a case of a 36-year-old woman admitted to the Hospital of Salerno-Italy with a value of serum β-hCG of 35,993 IU/L. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed an empty uterine cavity and a mass of 35.7 mm in diameter characterized by a hypoechoic central area. The patient was in stable haemodynamic condition and no haematologic, renal and hepatic impairments were recorded. Despite the high serum β-hCG levels, a pharmacological approach was preferred to a surgical one. The patient was treated with intramuscular administration of MTX in daily dose of 1 mg/Kg alternated with 0.1 mg/kg folinic acid for 5 days. The patient remained hospitalized for 20 days and no side effects were reported. The decrease of the serum β-hCG was monitored and more than 15% reduction was detected between the 4th and the 7th day after the beginning of the treatment. The serum β-hCG became undetectable 35 days after. A multidosing intramuscular administration of MTX was effective and safe even in the presence of very high serum β-hCG levels. Together with similar cases reported in literature, the present results can contribute to improve the decision making in the treatment of the interstitial pregnancy.
Introduction
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the implantation of a gestational sac outside the endometrial cavity of the uterus that accounts for approximately 2% of all pregnancies (1). Risk factors for EP include a history of previous EP or pelvic inflammatory disease, the use of assisted reproductive technology and tubal surgery (2). Signs and symptoms of EP may arise between the 6th and the 8th week of gestation and include vaginal bleeding, sudden lower abdominal pain, pelvic pain, tender cervix, adnexal mass or adnexal tenderness (1).
More than 95% of EPs implant in the fallopian tube and this localization is followed by those in the fimbria (11%) and the isthmus (12%) (3).
A rare EP is the interstitial pregnancy, which occurs with a low frequency (1–6%) but it is a life-threatening condition being responsible for nearly 20% of all deaths caused by EPs (4). In the interstitial pregnancy the embryo localizes in the interstitium, the most proximal part of the fallopian tubes surrounded by the myometrium (3).
Besides the aforementioned risk factors, the ipsilateral salpingectomy predisposes to the interstitial pregnancy (5).
Because of its unique location, the interstitial pregnancy can be difficult to diagnose. The diagnosis is based on several signs checked on ultrasonography according to specific criteria together with measuring of serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) (6).
Despite there is no general agreement about the most appropriate surgical approach, EP has been normally treated with hysterectomy or cornual resection by means of laparotomy or laparoscopy (7).
Importantly, surgery is associated with increased morbidity, decreased fertility and increased likelihood of hysterectomy and uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy (8). Moreover, surgical approach suffers from risks associated to anesthetic and complications such as severe blood loss, potentially requiring transfusion.
No doubt, however, early diagnosis is crucial to life saving and may decrease the number of surgical procedures allowing alternative therapeutic interventions, such as pharmacological treatments.
Among the authorized drugs, methotrexate (MTX) represents the mainstay drug therapy. MTX is a folic acid antagonist, which inhibits the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, thereby interfering with DNA synthesis in rapidly dividing the cells forming the trophoblast (9, 10).
It is necessary to consider also the MTX toxicity. However, the life threatening complications following MTX administered for the treatment of EPs are reported rarely (11–14). For instance, Dasari et al. described a case of a 25-year-old woman who was decided to treat by “expectant therapy” but, because of misinterpretation, received medical therapy with multidose MTX (13). The woman developed toxicity with severe bone marrow depression leading to septicemia. Among the factors possibly responsible for such MTX toxicity, the authors suggested the administration of too high dosage with respect to the patient's body weight, MTX hypersensitivity, and genetic polymorphisms such as MTHFR 677TT associated to a decreased MTX clearance. Nonetheless, unexpected toxicity with MTX should be considered during either single or multiple dosing administration.
Here, we describe a case of interstitial pregnancy treated with MTX and we make a narrative review of the available data in this field.
Case Presentation
A 36-year-old Italian woman, gravida 3 para 1, was admitted to the emergency department of the University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona,” Salerno-Italy with a history of declared 5 weeks amenorrhea and lower abdominal pain.
At the age of 32, she underwent conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) positive. At hysterosalpingography, tubes were not occluded.
At admission, her serum β-hCG was 35,993 IU/L. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed an empty uterine cavity but a mass of 35.7 mm in diameter characterized by a hypoechoic central area was seen in the interstitium (Figure 1A). Both ovaries appeared normal and there was no free fluid in the Pouch of Douglas. The ectopic interstitial pregnancy localized in the left tubaric corner was confirmed by the hysteroscopy (Figure 1B).
Figure 1. Interstitial pregnancy. (A) Coronal view of the uterus on transvaginal ultrasound showing an empty cavity with a mass of 35.7 mm in diameter. (B) Hysteroscopy shows the ectopic interstitial pregnancy localized in the left tubaric corner.
After careful evaluation of the available literature data on the management of EP, a pharmacological approach was preferred to a surgical one. The decision was made taking into account the pros and cons of the surgical approach and in consideration of the ACOG (15) and RCOG (16) guidelines justifying the use of the medical therapy with MTX instead of the surgery.
The administration of MTX was legitimated by the patient's stable haemodynamic condition, and the absence of haematologic, renal and hepatic impairments.
As the patient showed very high serum β-hCG levels that have been associated to the risk of treatment failure or the need for supplemental MTX dosage, a multiple-dose intramuscular administration of MTX in a daily dose of 1 mg/Kg alternated with 0.1 mg/kg folinic acid for 5 days was preferred to a single dose regimen. The patient provided her written informed consent. The therapeutic scheme was shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Treatment scheme consists in IM MTX 1 mg/kg alternated with 0.1 mg/kg folinic acid for 5 days.
The patient remained hospitalized for 20 days after the first MTX injection. A progressive decrease of the β-hCG serum levels was monitored during hospitalization. Notably, more than β-hCG 15% reduction was detected between the 4th (30,831 IU/L) and the 7th (21,844 IU/L) day after the beginning of the treatment (Figure 3). The serum β-hCG became undetectable 35 days after the first MTX injection.
Figure 3. Serum level of β-hCG during hospitalization. A progressive decrease of serum β-hCG was monitored until reduced to zero 35 days after the first MTX injection.
Discussion and Literature Review
Surgery is mandatory for ruptured EPs but in the cases of unruptured EPs, it is possible to opt for a pharmacological approach, especially in the presence of early diagnosis (17).
Pharmacological approach enables to exclude the risks associated to surgery and preserve the woman's fertility (18). Among the licensed drugs, MTX represents the first choice for treatment of all EPs, including interstitial pregnancy.
In the absence of contraindications, the therapy with MTX is authorized in a single intramuscular injection at a dosage of 1 mg/kg or 50 mg/m2. Before treatment, laboratory analysis must include the serum β-hCG evaluation, complete blood count, and kidney and liver function tests. The β-hCG evaluation must be repeated on the 4th day. Then, measuring of the serum β-hCG, blood count and kidney and liver functions must be evaluated on the 7th day again. After that, it is necessary to check the serum β-hCG every week until it becomes undetectable. More than 15% decrease between the 4th and the 7th day represents a favorable prognostic marker (19).
A protocol based on a single intramuscular injection of MTX at 50 mg/m2 possesses the best risk/benefit ratio (20). However, several reports in literature have described the use of MTX in EPs at different dosages and treatment schemes, differentiated in dependence on time of diagnosis, localization and size of the implanted embryo and presence of signs and symptoms. MTX treatment schemes encompass parenteral injection (either single or multidosing administration) or direct injection into the gestational sac combined with surgery.
In 2016, Marret et al. reviewed a case series representing such variety in the potential uses of MTX into clinical practice for treatment of EPs. These authors reported that the single dose MTX is effective exclusively in tubal pregnancy and the success of the treatment strongly depends on the initial β-hCG level (21, 22).
By comparing surgical treatments to MTX administration, a meta-analysis demonstrated that both single and multiple dosing MTX is less effective than laparoscopic salpingotomy for the treatment of tubal EP. Of note, MTX, either IM single dosage or IM multiple dose regimen used postoperatively, is a good alternative only in selected patients with low serum β-hCG concentrations ranging from < 1,500 IU/L to < 3,000 IU/L. This meta-analysis remarked also that MTX, mainly used in a multidosing regimen, is also less safe than surgery but the effects on the quality of life have not yet been investigated (23).
The use of MTX as an adjuvant treatment alongside a conservative surgery has also been reported with two possible approaches. One of them is the prophylactic use of MTX while the second one consists of IM MTX administered only after salpingotomy failure. In both the approaches MTX seems to reduce the occurrence of secondary tubal rupture and surgical reinterventions. However, no randomized trials have been carried out in this field (24, 25).
Marret et al. brushed up the selection criteria guiding the choice of the most appropriate therapeutic approach in EPs, underlining that it is very important to take into account the symptomatology, the localization and the size of the gestational sac, the patients' history and the β-hCG serum levels both at baseline and during the therapy. The absence of haemodynamic instability and other complications remains the most important selection criterion to guide the choice of treatment (21).
The published data on the management and treatment of interstitial or cervical pregnancy, two EPs mostly associated to morbidity and mortality, indicate MTX as the backbone pharmacological agent used either by IM or by in situ injection.
Some authors have reported clinical case of cervical pregnancy treated with local MTX injection under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. A single local MTX injection was found to be effective and safe (26). Notably, Jeng et al. described sixteen cases of EPs in the absence of hemodynamic instability with β-hCG ranging from 2,765 to 18,648 IU/L, managed through transvaginal intra-amniotic and intrachorionic injection of 50 mg MTX under ultrasound guidance (27). The authors concluded that the cervical pregnancy can be successfully managed without surgical intervention by a local injection of MTX, preserving the fertility and favoring the possibility of subsequent uneventful pregnancies (26, 27).
With regard of interstitial pregnancy, Corioni et al. recently reported a case successfully treated with a single-dose of systemic MTX. The case concerned a 36-year-old Chinese woman, who was admitted to the University Hospital in Florence-Italy at nearly 6 weeks of amenorrhea for a suspected EP. The patient did not refer any abdominal-pelvic symptom but a mild vaginal bleeding was noted. At the time of admission, serum level of β-hCG was 8,681 IU/L (28).
In the case that serum β-hCG levels are particularly high, the management of EPs becomes more complicated. In fact, in 1999 Hafner et al. had already described the case of a woman with very high β-hCG value (i.e., 41,150 IU/L) treated by single dose of IM MTX, but in that case the therapy failed and the woman underwent laparotomy and cornual resection (29).
To the best of our knowledge, only one study reported a case of a 29-year-old woman with high levels of β-hCG (i.e., 31,381 IU/L) successfully treated with a single dose IM MTX. However, in this case 94 days were necessary to reduce to zero the β-hCG levels (30), contrary to one of the most important criteria of the conservative treatment for EP that requires the raise of the undetectable β-hCG values in the least time possible (31).
Available literature data describing different managements of EPs are listed in Table 1. Such studies demonstrated that MTX could be effective both in terms of efficacy and safety for a conservative treatment of EPs.
Table 1. Case reports on Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancies between 2004 and 2016.
Focusing on the interstitial pregnancy, our case report is the first describing the effectiveness of multidosing systemic injections of MTX, achieved quickly in a woman with a very high serum level of β-hCG.
Conclusion
The administration of methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy, including the interstitial pregnancy, has been recognized as a feasible therapeutic approach. However, a unanimous consensus has not yet been reached, especially on the drug dosage and treatment schemes that should be used into clinical practice.
Besides the absence of haemodynamic instability, one of the most important criteria is that the β-hCG levels should reduce to zero in the least time possible.
Here, we have shown that a multidosing intramuscular administration of methotrexate was effective and safe, suggesting that such medical approach is a valid alternative to surgery for the treatment of interstitial pregnancy even in the presence of very high serum β-hCG levels.
No doubt, a single case is not sufficient to claim that the medical approach is preferable to the surgical one.
However, together with similar cases already reported in literature, the present results can contribute to improve the decision making in the treatment of the interstitial pregnancy.
Ethics Statement
This is a case report with review of literature for which the patient signed the Informed Consent, providing her approval.
Author Contributions
All coauthors read and met Frontiers in Endocrinology criteria for authorship. VC and GL collect the data and wrote the manuscript, AF and MG directed the work and critically reviewed the manuscript, GP and RI were in charge of the patient and checked the final version of the paper.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the English mother tongue Jan Festa who revised the manuscript.
References
1. Marion LL, Meeks GR. Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obst Gynecol. (2012) 55:376–86. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b
2. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BWJ, Bossuyt PMM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochr Database Syst Rev (2009) 1:CD000324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2
3. Bouyer JJ, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Human Rep. (2002) 17:3224–30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3224
4. Shen L, Fu J, Huang W, Zhu H, Wang Q, Yang S, et al. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochr Database Syst Rev. (2014) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174
5. Tulandi T, Monton L. Conservative surgical management of interstitial pregnancy. Fert Steril (1990) 53:581.
6. Moawad NS, Mahajan TS, Michelle MH, Taylor SE, Hurd WW. Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obst Gynecol. (2010) 202:15–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.054
7. Linde RTW, Rock. Telindes Operative Gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (1997).
8. Thakur Y, Coker A, Morris J, Oliver R. Laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transcervical evacuation of cornual ectopic pregnancy: an alternative approach. J Obst Gynaecol. (2004) 24:809–10. doi: 10.1080/01443610400009576
9. Skubisz MM, Tong S. Of leaves and butterflies: how methotrexate came to be the savior of women. Obst Gynecol. (2011) 118:1169–73. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822fcc0d
10. Meis LD, Bolletta M, Fratto R, Sansavini S, Orsini LF. Diagnosi E Terapia Della Gravidanza Extrauterina. Riv It Ost Gin. (2010).
11. Soysal S, Ilhan G, Vural AM. B. Severe methotrexate toxicity after treatment for ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Tur J Obst Gynecol. (2016) 13:221–23. doi: 10.4274/tjod.80457
12. Gaïes E, Sassi MB, Charfi R, Lakhal M, Klouz A, Trabelsi S, et al. Fatal methotrexate toxicity in a patient treated for an ectopic pregnancy. Therapie (2016) 71:348–50. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2015.12.006
13. Dasari P, Sagili H. Life-threatening complications following multidose methotrexate for medical management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep. (2012) 2012:bcr0320126023. doi: 10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6023
14. Isaacs JD, McGehee RP, Cowan BD. Life-threatening neutropenia following methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a report of two cases. Obst Gynecol. (1996). 88 (4 Pt 2):694–96.
15. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin no. 191: tubal ectopic pregnancy. Obst Gynecol. (2018) 131:e65–77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002464
16. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: green-top guideline no. 21. BJOG (2016) 123:e15–55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14189
17. Erdem M, Erdem A, Arslan M, Oç A, Biberoglu K, Gürsoy R. Single-dose methotrexate for the treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obst. (2004) 270:201–4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0543-4
18. Grindler NM, Ng J, Tocce K. R. Considerations for management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies: two case reports. J Med Case Rep. (2016) 10:106. doi: 10.1186/s13256-016-0892-9
19. Crochet JR, Bastian LA, Chireau MV. Does this woman have an ectopic pregnancy? the rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA (2013) 309:1722–29. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3914
20. Darbhamulla A, Bhal K, Lal S. Is routine monitoring of hepatic and renal function beneficial following single-dose methotrexate treatment for ectopic pregnancy? A 4-year review of experience from a teaching hospital. J Obst Gynaecol. (2008) 28:434–35. doi: 10.1080/01443610802163773
21. Marret H, Fauconnier AG, Dubernard MH, Lagarce L, Lesavre M, Fernandez H, et al. (2016). Overview and guidelines of off-label use of methotrexate in ectopic pregnancy: report by CNGOF. Eur J Obst Gynecol Rep Biol. 205:105–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.489
22. Levin G, Saleh NA, Haj-Yahya R, Matan LS, Benshushan A. Predicting success of methotrexate treatment by pretreatment HCG level and 24-hour HCG increment. Int J Gynaecol Obst. (2017) 141:70–73. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12395
23. Mol F, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ. Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Rep Update (2008) 14:309–19. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn012
24. Graczykowski JW, Mishell DR. Methotrexate prophylaxis for persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative treatment by salpingostomy. Obst Gynecol. (1997) 89:118–22.
25. Lund CO, Nilas L, Bangsgaard N, Ottesen B. Persistent ectopic pregnancy after linear salpingotomy: a non-predictable complication to conservative surgery for tubal gestation. Acta Obst Et Gynecol Scand. (2002) 81:1053–59. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2002.811110.x
26. Yamaguchi M, Honda R, Erdenebaatar C, Monsur M, Honda T, Sakaguchi I, et al. Treatment of cervical pregnancy with ultrasound-guided local methotrexate injection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 50:673–824. doi: 10.1002/uog.17384
27. Jeng CJ, Ko ML, Shen J. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided treatment of cervical pregnancy. Obst Gynecol. (2007) 109:1076–82. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000262052.09350.52
28. Corioni S, Perelli F, Bianchi C, Cozzolino M, Maggio L, Masini G, et al. Interstitial pregnancy treated with a single-dose of systemic methotrexate: a successful management. J Res Med Sci. (2015) 20:312–16.
29. Hafner T, Aslam N, Ross JA, Zosmer N, Jurkovic D. The effectiveness of non-surgical management of early interstitial pregnancy: a report of ten cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol. (1999) 13:131–36. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020131.x
30. Jermy K, Thomas J, Doo A, Bourne T. The conservative management of interstitial pregnancy. BJOG (2004) 111:1283–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00442.x
31. Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Lammes FB. Clearance curves of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin for the diagnosis of persistent trophoblast. Human Rep. (1995) 10:683–87.
32. Lin YS, Chen CL, Yuan CC, Wang PH. Successful rescue of an early interstitial pregnancy after failed systemic methotrexate treatment: a case report. J Rep Med. (2007) 52:332–34.
33. Narang L, Kalu G. Laparoscopic salpingocentesis using methotrexate in combination with oral mifepristone for successful treatment of interstitial pregnancy: a case report. Fert Ster. (2009) 92:2038.e5–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.016
34. Horne AW, Skubisz MM, Tong S, Duncan WC, Neil P, Wallace EM, et al. Combination gefitinib and methotrexate treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a case series. Human Rep. (2014). 29:1375–79. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu091
35. Hiersch L, Krissi H, Ashwal E, From A, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Effectiveness of Medical Treatment with Methotrexate for Interstitial Pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obst Gynaecol. (2014) 54:576–80. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12251
36. Framarino-dei-Malatesta M, Piccioni MG, Derme M, Polidori NF, Tibaldi V, Iannini I, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic interstitial pregnancies. J Clin Ultrasound (2014) 42:522–26. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22185
37. Tanaka K, Baartz D, Khoo SK. Management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with intravenous methotrexate: an extended study of a standardised regimen. Aust N Z J Obst Gynaecol. (2015). 55:176–80. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12315
Keywords: ectopic pregnancy, b-hCG, interstitial preganancy, treatment scheme, conservative management
Citation: Conti V, Luciano G, Pecoraro G, Iovieno R, Filippelli A and Guida M (2018) Multidosing Intramuscular Administration of Methotrexate in Interstitial Pregnancy With Very High Levels of β-hCG: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Front. Endocrinol. 9:363. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00363
Received: 20 February 2018; Accepted: 18 June 2018;
Published: 10 July 2018.
Edited by:
Carlo Alviggi, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, ItalyReviewed by:
Roberto Marci, University of Ferrara, ItalyAmerigo Vitagliano, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Copyright © 2018 Conti, Luciano, Pecoraro, Iovieno, Filippelli and Guida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Amelia Filippelli, afilippelli@unisa.it