Abstract
We hypothesized that the hoof trimming in sheep in dorsal recumbency implicates a short but intensive stress situation and that the sedation with xylazine causes a decrease in the stress response in this situation. Ten healthy female merino meat sheep were randomly divided into two groups receiving either xylazine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg body mass (BM) applied intramuscularly) or a placebo treatment with 0.9% NaCl. Routine hoof trimming was performed in a tilt table and vital signs (rectal temperature (RT), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR)), 33 different behavioral traits and blood cortisol concentrations were recorded throughout the experiment at six different time points (total of 55 min). The procedure itself elicited a clear stress response (increase in the RR, RT, defensive movements, lip twitching, swallowing, and flight behavior). Parallelly, the blood cortisol concentrations were increased, reaching their maximum with 81.5 ng/ml in the control group when the sheep were tilted back into a standing position. In the sedated sheep, no increase in the RR and RT and a decrease in the HR were observed. In addition, the behavioral signs showed a decrease in flight, defensive, and general stress behavior (decrease in licking, movement of head and legs, and sitting on knees), complemented by the serum cortisol concentrations showing 2.28 times reduced concentration at the end of the procedure, compared to the control sheep. The results confirm our hypothesis and support the conduction of future trials investigating the feasibility and benefit of a sedation of sheep prior to routine hoof trimming under practical circumstances.
Introduction
It is widely recognized that stressors can support and increase the risk of developing infectious diseases and of prolongation of illness episodes (Kelley, 1980; Steplewski et al., 1985; Cooper, 1999). Therefore, aside from important and well-acknowledged animal welfare concerns, different zootechnical procedures in animal production, inflicting short-term stress due to handling and restraint, may have an influence on animal productivity (Johnson and Vanjonack, 1976; Miranda-de la Lama et al., 2011, 2012; Marco-Ramell et al., 2016; Grandin, 2021). For these reasons, different protocols to reduce pain and stress in the animal have been developed since studies have shown not only a benefit in this respect, but also in the later animal health status (Ting et al., 2003; Kretschmann et al., 2020).
Hoof trimming is an essential part of cattle, sheep, and goat farm management (Shearer and van Amstel, 2001; Winter, 2008; Anzuino et al., 2010). Most trimming chutes include the fixation of the sheep with a headgate and the subsequent tilting. Hoof trimming, therefore, implicates a short but intensive stress situation due to the transportation, handling, and fixation (Fazio and Ferlazzo, 2003; Rizk et al., 2012a; Janßen et al., 2016; Heinrich et al., 2020). Studies describing the stress response in sheep during routine hoof trimming in dorsal recumbency are however lacking.
Hitherto, stress-reducing methods during hoof-trimming in sheep only include aspects of facility and chute design (Hutson, 2000), but no sedation protocols. In practice, the α2-adrenergic agonist xylazine is widely used as a sedative in wild, production, and domestic animals due to its convenient way of application and cost-effectiveness (Greene and Thurmon, 1988). Earlier studies have shown blood cortisol decreasing effect for xylazine, indicating it decreases the stress response and thereby exerts a positive effect on animal welfare (Brearley et al., 1992; Sanhouri et al., 1992; Cattet et al., 2004; Rizk et al., 2012a).
It is therefore hypothesized that (1) the fixation of sheep in dorsal recumbency for the routine hoof treatment represents a severe stress situation mirrored in behavioral, vital sign, and hormonal stress responses and (2) the sedation with xylazine causes a decrease of this stress response.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was approved by the State Administration Office (Landesverwaltungsamt, Referat Verbraucherschutz, Veterinärangelegenheiten Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany) documented with the register 42502-3-734.
Study Animals
Ten healthy female Merino meat sheep between 1- and 2 years of age, in need of routine hoof trimming, without any pathologies or lameness present, and less than 100 days pregnant were selected randomly from a commercial sheep herd. All sheep in this study had not experienced hoof trimming in a tilt table before. The sheep were allocated to the Clinic for Cattle and Swine in Leipzig (Germany) and housed in a group in outdoor stables. The 10 sheep were randomly assigned to two groups: control [CON, n = 5, Body Condition Score (BCS): 2.50 (median, Min.: 2.25, Max.: 2.75), BM: 60.3 ± 4.4 kg (mean ± SD)] and xylazine [XYL, n = 5, BCS: 2.50 (median, Min.: 2.25, Max.: 2.75), BM: 56.2 ± 4.0 kg (mean ± SD); BCS according to Russel (1984)].
Study Design and Procedures
A similar study setup as in Fieseler et al. (2018, 2019) and Heinrich et al. (2020) was chosen (Figure 1). On day –2, a permanent residing catheter was inserted in the jugular vein in a priorly shaved, alcohol and iodine disinfected, and anesthetized [2–3 ml 2% Isocaine subcutaneous (s.c.)] location in the middle third of the lateral side of the neck. To facilitate the insertion, the skin was pre-punctured using a Strauss needle (Dispomed Witt e.K, Gelnhausen, Germany), and to ensure solid fixation, the catheters were thereafter fixed with two sutures using non-absorbable suture material (Catgut GmbH Markneukirchen, Germany). Thereafter, the catheters were covered with a gauze, which was attached to the skin using a commercial polyvinylester-based glue. During this procedure, the sheep were fixed by a trained animal keeper. The sheep, the surrounding of the catheters, and the jugular vein were clinically examined, and the catheters were flushed daily with 20 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution (B. Braun SE, Melsungen, Germany) throughout the experimental period and removed at day 0 at the end of the experiment without any complications observed.
Figure 1

Trial timeline. Ten Merino meat sheep were divided in two groups (n = 5), receiving either a sedation with xylazine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg BM) or a placebo treatment (0.9% NaCl) prior to hoof trimming in dorsal recumbency. The experimental day is highlighted in green.
A day prior to the experiment (day –1), blood samples for baseline values were collected. On the experimental day (day 0), the sheep were not withheld from feed and water. The treatment included a duration of 55 min in six positions (first position 5 min, other positions 10 min). Five minutes prior to the tilting into dorsal recumbency (position 1, time point: −15 min), 0.1 mg/kg BM of xylazine hydrochloride (Serumwerk Bernburg AG, Bernburg, Germany) were applied intramuscular (i.m.; right triceps brachii muscle) to the sheep of the XYL group, whereas the CON sheep received a placebo treatment with 0.9% NaCl (treatments were blinded). At time point −10 min, the sheep were tilted into dorsal recumbency (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Tilt table and positioning in dorsal recumbency of sheep during the trial.
Within the first 2 min of each position, a blood sample was collected from the catheter and vital signs (heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and rectal temperature (RT)) were recorded (always in this sequence). The behavioral responses were continuously observed and recorded every minute using a 0 (no occurrence) and 1 (occurrence) scoring system according to Fieseler et al. (2018) including the traits depicted in Table 1.
Table 1
| Abbreviation | Description |
|---|---|
| Backst | Back step, moves or tries to move backward |
| Chew | Chewing |
| Def | Defecation |
| Earmov | Ear movement |
| Eat | Eating |
| Ext1leg, Ext2leg, Ext3leg, Extallleg | Extending 1, 2, 3, or all legs |
| Fleh | Flehming, pulling and curling-up of the upper lip with open mouth and lifting of the head |
| Frontst | Front step, moves or tries to move forward |
| Flex1leg, Flex2leg, Flex3leg, Flexallleg | Flexing 1, 2, 3, or all legs |
| Groan | Groaning, long lingering soft growling/call |
| HeadDev | Head deviation sideways to the flank region |
| HeadLow | Head lowering |
| HeadMov | Head movement toward the noise |
| Integ | Integration, directed movement to join other sheep in the pen |
| Lacr | Lacrimation |
| Lay | Laying |
| Lick | Licking its lips |
| Liptwitch | Lips twitching |
| LegMovFour | Movement of one or more of the unaffected legs or all four legs |
| LegMovOne | Movement of the affected limb |
| MuscleMov | Muscle twitching, tremor of different muscle groups |
| Regur | Regurgitation |
| Restlene | Restlessness |
| Earrising | Rising of the ears |
| Rum | Rumination |
| Saliv | Salivation |
| KneeSit | Sitting on knees, resting on both carpi by flexion of carpal joints |
| Swalo | Swallowing |
| TailMov | Tail movement |
| TeethGrn | Teeth grinding |
| Trysca | Trying to escape |
| Urin | Urination |
| Vocal | Vocalization |
Recorded behavioral traits.
After the hoof trimming, the sheep were tilted back into the standing position (position 4, time point: 10 min), resided in the chute (position 5, time point: 20 min), and re-located to their pen thereafter. The sheep arrived in their stable (position 6) at a time point 30 min after the hoof trimming. All sheep were considered healthy and relocated to their farm after the experiment.
Blood Sampling and Cortisol Measurement
Blood samples (8–10 ml each) for cortisol analysis were collected in serum tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and stored on ice for 1 h (during the sample collection of one sheep) and thereafter in a fridge at 8°C (until samples of all sheep were collected) during 1–4 h before centrifugation (2,000 g, 10 min, room temperature) and aliquotation. The samples were stored at −80°C until analysis. Detection of cortisol concentrations was performed by using a solid-phase, competitive chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (IMMULITE 1000 systems, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics GmbH, Eschborn, Germany), previously validated for sheep. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.6% by analyzing 20 samples within one test routine and the lowest detection limit was <2.0 ng/ml.
Statistical Analysis
Blood Cortisol Concentrations and Vital Signs (HR, RR, and RT)
The trend analysis of cortisol and RR showed a quadratic dependence on the test minutes (positions). Therefore, the dependence of these traits from the positions was described with the help of second-degree polynomials. The regression coefficients are considered to be specific to the two groups. In contrast, for HR and RT no suitable regression function could be derived from the trend analysis. For this reason, the factor treatments and positions and their interactions were represented by fixed effects in the models of these traits.
The repeated measurements within an animal were taken into account by using random animal effects and (or) by the variance-covariance structure of the residual effects. The following competing structures were tested: compound symmetry (CS), heterogeneous compound symmetry (CSH), first order autoregressive (AR (1)), heterogeneous first order autoregressive (ARH (1)), unstructured (UN), toeplitz with two, four, six bands resp (TOEP (2), TOEP (4), and TOEP (6)). The final structure was chosen according to the lowest value of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). To obtain the required estimates, we used the SAS procedure MIXED. This procedure provides the Least Square Means and statistical inference of their differences (t-test, Tukey-test respectively).
The studentized residuals of the evaluation models were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For cortisol, a normal distribution was attained after logarithmic transformation.
Behavioral Responses
For every five animals in two treatments and six positions, different ethological traits are recorded within position over a period of 5 min (position “In tilt table”) or 10 min (other positions). The recording was carried out according to a 0, 1 scheme (0: ethological trait does not occur, 1: ethological trait occurs) every minute.
Let yijk be a random variable whose realizations represent the numbers of occurrences of an ethological trait on the k-th animal, from the i-th treatment in the j-th position. Designate Nijk the number of measurements on the k-th animal from the i-th treatment in the j-th position. Then yijk is assumed to be binomially distributed with the number of measurements Nijk and probability of occurrence pijk. The relationship between the probabilities, given the random animal effect , and the influencing factors are modeled using the logit link function:
In the formula above, αij are the fixed effects of combination treatment*position.
Marginal probabilities, i.e., the probabilities averaged over the animals, can be calculated approximately in the following way:
with a = 1/ und
Derived from pij we are able to calculate a mean probability per treatment (pi) and per position (pj).
The estimation of the model parameters was carried out with the maximum likelihood method implemented in the SAS procedure NLMIXED.
The estimated values express the probability with which the relevant ethological trait can be expected per minute in the classification unit (treatment, position, treatment*position).
The results are presented in the form of estimated probabilities, their CIs, and the statistical tests of the respective differences (t-test, Tukey-test, respectively).
In both groups of traits, results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and a trend was declared at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10.
Results
Vital Signs
The HR decreased in the XYL group between being tilted over in dorsal recumbency (position 2) and hoof trimming (position 3) and stayed lower thereafter, whereas it remained unaltered in the CON group (Table 2). A difference between the groups was observed at position 5 (p = 0.017).
Table 2
| Heart rate (beats per minute) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | LSMXYL | 95% CI | LSMCON | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| 1. In tilt table | 95.0ab | 75.7 | 114.3 | 102.4a | 81.2 | 123.6 | 0.579 |
| 2. Dorsal recumbency | 98.4a | 79.1 | 117.7 | 104.8a | 83.6 | 126.0 | 0.631 |
| 3. Hoof trimming | 82.4bc | 63.1 | 101.7 | 95.2a | 74.0 | 116.4 | 0.343 |
| 4. Tilting back | 76.0c | 56.7 | 95.3 | 93.6a | 72.4 | 114.8 | 0.199 |
| 5. Standing | 73.6c | 54.3 | 92.9 | 108.8a | 87.6 | 130.0 | 0.017 |
| 6. In box | 78.4bc | 59.1 | 97.7 | 96.0a | 74.8 | 117.2 | 0.199 |
Treatment (CON, XYL) comparison at different positions for the heart rate.
Least Square Means (LSM) with 95% CI with P-values (t-test) of the estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5 per treatment).
a−cLSM within a column with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05; Tukey-test).
All P-values that are significant or show a trend (P ≤ 0.10) are bold.
The RR remained unaltered in the XYL group and increased in the CON group between positions 2 and 3 and decreased again between standing in the chute and being back in their box (positions 4 and 5), with differences between groups at positions 2–5 (p < 0.02; Table 3 and Figure 3).
Table 3
| Respiratory rate (breaths per minute) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | LSMXYL | 95% CI | LSMCON | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| 1. In tilt table | 33.0a | 27.4 | 38.7 | 33.0d | 27.3 | 38.6 | 0.982 |
| 2. Dorsal recumbency | 32.8a | 26.6 | 39.1 | 44.1bc | 37.9 | 50.3 | 0.016 |
| 3. Hoof trimming | 31.8a | 23.4 | 40.1 | 52.7a | 44.5 | 61.0 | 0.002 |
| 4. Tilting back | 29.6a | 20.3 | 38.9 | 54.9a | 45.7 | 64.2 | 0.001 |
| 5. Standing | 26.3a | 16.7 | 36.0 | 49.3ab | 39.7 | 59.0 | 0.002 |
| 6. In box | 22.0a | 8.7 | 35.3 | 35.9cd | 22.2 | 49.5 | 0.140 |
Treatment (CON, XYL) comparison at different positions for the respiratory rate.
Least Square Means (LSM) with 95% CI with P-values (t-test) of the estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5 per treatment).
a−dLSM within a column with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05; Tukey-test).
All P-values that are significant or show a trend (P ≤ 0.10) are bold.
Figure 3

Least Square Means (LSM) curves (polynomial regression) with 95% CI of the groups (XYL, CON) for the respiratory rate estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5 per treatment). The sheep were placed in the chute and the XYL group was injected with 0.1 mg/kg body mass xylazine hydrochloride (−15 min), brought into dorsal recumbency (−10 min), hoof trimmed (0 min), tilted back (10 min), left to stand in the chute (20 min), and brought back to their box (30 min).
For the RT, a greater value was observed in the CON group after the hoof trimming procedure at position 5 (p = 0.044; Table 4).
Table 4
| Rectal temperature (°C) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | LSMXYL | 95% CI | LSMCON | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| 1. In tilt table | 39.36 | 38.80 | 39.92 | 39.64 | 39.08 | 40.20 | 0.457 |
| 2. Dorsal recumbency | 39.40 | 38.84 | 39.96 | 39.78 | 39.22 | 40.34 | 0.317 |
| 3. Hoof trimming | 39.42 | 38.86 | 39.98 | 40.02 | 39.46 | 40.58 | 0.125 |
| 4. Tilting back | 39.42 | 38.86 | 39.98 | 39.94 | 39.38 | 40.50 | 0.179 |
| 5. Standing | 39.40 | 38.84 | 39.96 | 40.22 | 39.66 | 40.78 | 0.044 |
| 6. In box | 39.54 | 38.98 | 40.10 | 39.88 | 39.32 | 40.44 | 0.369 |
Treatment (CON, XYL) comparison at different positions for the rectal temperature.
Least Square Means (LSM) with 95% CI with P-values (t-test) of the estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5 per treatment).
All P-values that are significant or show a trend (P ≤ 0.10) are bold.
Behavioral Responses
Regardless of factors for treatment and period, the overview of the traits under investigation shows a very differentiated variability. Whereas certain traits exhibited frequently the behavioral score 1 (e.g., Lick, Eat, Earrising, and Earmov) and other traits show with very low-frequency score 1 and therefore could not be evaluated (e.g., Teethgrn, Tailmov, Fleh, and Lacr). It was therefore decided to exclude the following traits with only little variability from the further statistical analysis: Frontst, Chew, TeethGrn, Def, Saliv, Lacr, Fleh, Tail Mov, Integ, Restlene, Rum, Ext1leg, Ext2leg, Ext3leg, Extallleg, Flex1leg, Flex2leg, Flex3leg, and Flexallleg.
Probabilities per Treatment
A difference between treatments was observed on the traits HeadMov, Lick, KneeSit, and Liptwitch (p < 0.03). In addition, the traits LegMovFour and Groan exhibited a trend (p = 0.059 and p = 0.074; Table 5). With the probability of observance increasing in the traits Liptwitch and Groan and decreasing in HeadMov, Lick, KneeSit, and LegMovFour by the treatment XYL, regardless of the positions.
Table 5
| Traita | b | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backst | 0.125 (0.063; 0.188) | 0.070 (0.024; 0.115) | 0.136 |
| Earmov | 0.307 (0.223; 0.391) | 0.395 (0.289; 0.501) | 0.176 |
| Earrising | 0.206 (0.132; 0.279) | 0.197 (0.123; 0.270) | 0.850 |
| Eat | 0.074 (0.016; 0.131) | 0.037 (0.000; 0.080) | 0.277 |
| Groan | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.044 (0.000; 0.093) | 0.074 |
| HeadDev | 0.062 (0.018; 0.106) | 0.057 (0.013; 0.101) | 0.865 |
| HeadMov | 0.087 (0.052; 0.121) | 0.003 (0.000; 0.011) | 0.001 |
| KneeSit | 0.027 (0.004; 0.050) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.029 |
| Lay | 0.083 (0.005; 0.156) | 0.016 (0.000; 0.045) | 0.104 |
| LegMovFour | 0.059 (0.019; 0.100) | 0.017 (0.000; 0.036) | 0.059 |
| LegMovOne | 0.037 (0.016; 0.057) | 0.023 (0.006; 0.040) | 0.319 |
| Lick | 0.155 (0.081; 0.230) | 0.006 (0.000; 0.024) | 0.002 |
| Liptwitch | 0.044 (0.009; 0.079) | 0.215 (0.122; 0.308) | 0.004 |
| MusclMov | 0.074 (0.000; 0.156) | 0.028 (0.000; 0.067) | 0.273 |
| Regur | 0.059 (0.013; 0.104) | 0.042 (0.006; 0.077) | 0.521 |
| Swalo | 0.112 (0.053; 0.170) | 0.088 (0.040; 0.136) | 0.495 |
| Trysca | 0.029 (0.000; 0.080) | 0.049 (0.000; 0.118) | 0.600 |
| Urin | 0.023 (0.004; 0.043) | 0.007 (0.000; 0.017) | 0.121 |
| Vocal | 0.084 (0.000; 0.202) | 0.045 (0.000; 0.122 | 0.532 |
Estimated probabilities of occurrence of behavioral traits for the treatments (CON, XYL), their 95% CI, and significance test of differences between treatments (P-value, t-test).
Trait's abbreviations explained in the “Material and methods” section.
CI in brackets, lower interval limits <0 were set to 0.
All P-values that are significant or show a trend (P ≤ 0.10) are bold.
Probabilities per Positions
For the traits HeadMov, LegMovOne, Earrising, Earmov, Liptwitch, Swalo, and Backst, an influence of the position, regardless of the treatment, was observed (p < 0.05; Table 6). The probability of occurrence of HeadMov and LegMoveOne increased when the sheep were in dorsal recumbency and decreased thereafter again, whereas Earrising and Earmov exhibited a vice-versa development. Liptwitch and Swalo increased at positions 2 and 3, respectively, to reach their maximum at position 5 (standing in the chute after tilting back) and decreased again when the sheep were back in their box, whereas the probability of occurrence of Backst was increased when the sheep were inside the chute and after exposing to dorsal recumbency and hoof trimming.
Table 6
| Traita | b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. In tilt table | 2. Dorsal recumbency | 3. Hoof trimming | 4. Tilting back | 5. Standing | 6. In box | |
| Backst | 0.158 (0.036; 0.280)ab | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)b | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)b | 0.219 (0.113; 0.324)a | 0.207 (0.103; 0.313)a | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)b |
| Earmov | 0.461 (0.292; 0.630)abc | 0.279 (0.167; 0.391)bde | 0.179 (0.088; 0.270)ce | 0.460 (0.331; 0.588)abd | 0.570 (0.444; 0.696)a | 0.159 (0.072; 0.246)e |
| Earrising | 0.279 (0.134; 0.424)abc | 0.120 (0.043; 0.196)bde | 0.070 (0.011; 0.129)ce | 0.279 (0.170; 0.388)abd | 0.339 (0.220; 9,458)a | 0.120 (0.043; 0.196)bde |
| Eat | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.334 (0.118; 0.550) |
| Groan | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.066 (0.000; 0.147) | 0.066 (0.000; 0.147) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| HeadDev | 0.119 (0.001; 0.227) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.119 (0.037; 0.021) | 0.119 (0.037; 0.200) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| HeadMov | 0.000 (0.000; 0.002)a | 0.150 (0.077; 0.223)b | 0.010 (0.000; 0.032)a | 0.030 (0.000; 0.007)ab | 0.010 (0.000; 0.032)a | 0.070 (0.014; 0.125)ab |
| KneeSit | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.025 (0.003; 0.116) | 0.020 (0.000; 0.005) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| Lay | 0.208 (0.032; 0.383) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.025 (0.000; 0.069) | 0.065 (0.000; 0.148) |
| LegMovFour | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.129 (0.042; 0.216) | 0.089 (0.018; 0.161) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.011 (0.000; 0.034) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| LegMovOne | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)a | 0.140 (0.070; 0.209)b | 0.020 (0.000; 0.048)a | 0.020 (0.000; 0.048)a | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)a | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001)a |
| Lick | 0.040 (0.000; 0.102) | 0.119 (0.040; 0.199) | 0.060 (0.070; 0.248) | 0.159 (0.070; 0.247) | 0.079 (0.014; 0.144) | 0.041 (0.000; 0.086) |
| Liptwitch | 0.041 (0.000; 0.104)bc | 0.149 (0.058; 0.239)abc | 0.169 (0.074; 0.264)ab | 0.139 (0.051; 0.226)abc | 0.259 (0.144; 0.373)a | 0.020 (0.000; 0.053)c |
| MusclMov | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.134 (0.005; 0.264) | 0.154 (0.011; 0.296) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.015 (0.000; 0.051) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| Regur | 0.041 (0.000; 0.105) | 0.011 (0.000; 0.036) | 0.021 (0.000; 0.056) | 0.108 (0.028; 0.188) | 0.119 (0.035; 0.203) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) |
| Swalo | 0.022 (0.000; 0.067)b | 0.061 (0.004; 0.118)b | 0.130 (0.047; 0.212)ab | 0.109 (0.033; 0.184)ab | 0.248 (0.135; 0.361)a | 0.029 (0.000; 0.067)b |
| Tryesca | 0.000 (0.000; 0.012) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.010) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.009) | 0.091 (0.000; 0.215) | 0.142 (0.000; 0.317) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.010) |
| Urin | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.040.(0.000; 0.083) | 0.020 (0.000; 0.052) | 0.030 (0.000; 0.068) |
| Vocal | 0.080 (0.000; 0.198) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.000 (0.000; 0.001) | 0.119 (0.000; 0.026) | 0.165 (0.000; 0.339) | 0.022 (0.000; 0.073) |
Estimated probabilities of occurrence of behavioral traits in the j-th position (j = 1,…,6), their 95% CI and significance test of differences between positions (Tukey-test).
a−−e, different letters indicate significant difference between positions within respective behavioral trait with p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey-test).
Probabilities of Treatment Within Positions
For the traits HeadMov and Lick, a difference between the treatment groups was observed at one of the positions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.025). The traits Regur and Liptwitch exhibited a trend at one and two different positions, respectively (Regur: p = 0.090; Liptwitch: p = 0.082 and p = 0.052; Table 7). The traits HeadMov, Regur, and Lick exhibited a 30, 2, and 32% greater probability to be observed in the untreated sheep in positions 2 (dorsal recumbency), 2 and 4 (tilting back), respectively. The trait Liptwitch was observed more prominent in xylazine-treated sheep with a chance for observance of ~30% during dorsal recumbency and hoof trimming.
Table 7
| Traita | Estimated probabilities | 1. In tilt table | 2. Dorsal recumbency | 3. Hoof trimming | 4. Tilting back | 5. Standing | 6. In box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backst | CON | 0.197 | 0 | 0 | 0.318 | 0.237 | 0 |
| XYL | 0.119 | 0 | 0 | 0.120 | 0.179 | 0 | |
| Earmov | CON | 0.400 | 0.221 | 0.062 | 0.460 | 0.639 | 0.062 |
| XYL | 0.520 | 0.337 | 0.297 | 0.459 | 0.500 | 0.256 | |
| Earrising | CON | 0.159 | 0.178 | 0.060 | 0.378 | 0.358 | 0.099 |
| XYL | 0.399 | 0.061 | 0.080 | 0.180 | 0.319 | 0.140 | |
| Eat | CON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.444 |
| XYL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.224 | |
| Groan | CON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.132 | 0.132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| HeadDev | CON | 0.079 | 0 | 0 | 0.136 | 0.156 | 0 |
| XYL | 0.160 | 0 | 0 | 0.101 | 0.081 | 0 | |
| HeadMov | CON | 0 | 0.300a | 0.020 | 0.040 | 0.020 | 0.140 |
| XYL | 0 | 0b | 0 | 0.020 | 0 | 0 | |
| KneeSit | CON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.119 | 0.041 | 0.000 |
| XYL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lay | CON | 0.365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.130 |
| XYL | 0.050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.050 | 0 | |
| LegMovFour | CON | 0 | 0.216 | 0.118 | 0 | 0.021 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.041 | 0.060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| LegMovOne | CON | 0 | 0.160 | 0.040 | 0.020 | 0 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.120 | 0 | 0.020 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lick | CON | 0.080 | 0.218 | 0.119 | 0.318a | 0.158 | 0.041 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.021 | 0 | 0b | 0 | 0.041 | |
| Liptwitch | CON | 0.041 | 0.021B | 0.021B | 0.061 | 0.119 | 0 |
| XYL | 0.041 | 0.277A | 0.317A | 0.217 | 0.398 | 0.040 | |
| MusclMov | CON | 0 | 0.170 | 0.241 | 0 | 0.031 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.099 | 0.067 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Regur | CON | 0.043 | 0.022A | 0.043 | 0.083 | 0.161 | 0 |
| XYL | 0.039 | 0B | 0 | 0.134 | 0.077 | 0 | |
| Swalo | CON | 0.042 | 0.102 | 0.182 | 0.102 | 0.241 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.020 | 0.077 | 0.116 | 0.255 | 0.058 | |
| Tryesca | CON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.124 | 0.051 | 0 |
| XYL | 0 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.059 | 0.234 | 0.001 | |
| Urin | CON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.080 | 0.020 | 0.040 |
| XYL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 0.020 | |
| Vocal | CON | 0.065 | 0 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.236 | 0.044 |
| XYL | 0.095 | 0 | 0 | 0.080 | 0.095 | 0 |
Estimated probabilities of occurrence of behavioral traits for the treatments (CON, XYL) within the j-th position (j=1,…,6 and significance test of differences between treatments within positions (Tukey-test; for reasons of clarity, the CI of the estimates are not given here).
Trait's abbreviations explained in the “Material and methods” section.
Different letters indicate significant difference between treatments within position with p ≤ 0.05 (small letters) and 0.5 < p ≤ 0.10 (big letters, Tukey-test).
Blood Cortisol Concentrations
The average cortisol concentration at day 1 was 22.5 ng/ml (mean, Min: 2.5, Max: 41.4). On an experimental day, the cortisol concentrations increased continuously throughout the experimental procedure, with the greatest values time point 10 min (4. tilting back) in the CON group and at time point 0 min (3. hoof trimming) in the XYL group and decreased thereafter (Table 8 and Figure 4). A difference between groups was observed at time point 30 min, when the sheep were back in their box, with the CON group exhibited 2.28 times greater serum cortisol concentrations than the XYL group (p = 0.042).
Table 8
| Serum cortisol concentrations (ng/ml) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | LSMXYL | 95% CI | LSMCON | 95% CI | P-value (t-test) | ||
| 1. In tilt table | 49.5bd | 37.2 | 65.8 | 50.9bf | 38.3 | 76.7 | 0.873 |
| 2. Dorsal recumbency | 56.8ac | 41.2 | 78.3 | 61.3cd | 44.5 | 84.6 | 0.710 |
| 3. Hoof trimming | 63.2ab | 42.4 | 94.2 | 77.4ae | 51.9 | 115.5 | 0.449 |
| 4. Tilting back | 56.3abe | 35.5 | 89.2 | 81.5abd | 51.4 | 129.1 | 0.242 |
| 5. Standing | 40.2cd | 24.4 | 66.2 | 71.4abc | 43.3 | 117.8 | 0.103 |
| 6. In box | 22.9e | 13.2 | 40.0 | 52.1def | 29.9 | 90.8 | 0.042 |
Treatment (CON, XYL) comparison at different positions for the blood cortisol concentrations.
Least Square Means (LSM) with 95% CI with P-values of the estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5 per treatment).
a−fDifferent letters indicate significant difference between treatments within position with p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey-test).
All P-values that are significant or show a trend (P ≤ 0.10) are bold.
Figure 4

Least Square Means (LSM) curves (polynomial regression) with 95% CI of the groups (XYL, CON) for the blood cortisol concentrations estimated with observations on 10 sheep (n = 5). The sheep were placed in the chute and the XYL group was injected with 0.1 mg/kg body mass xylazine hydrochloride (−15 min), brought into dorsal recumbency (−10 min), hoof trimmed (0 min), tilted back (10 min), left to stand in the chute (20 min), and brought back to their box (30 min).
Discussion
Position Effect
Our analysis of the effects attributable to the trimming procedure itself clearly illustrates that hoof trimming in a tilt table induces a stress response in sheep, thereby confirming our first hypothesis. On the level of the vital signs, we observed an increase in the RR, being highest at the end of the period in dorsal recumbency. These results are in line with a study by Meyer et al. (2010) investigating cardiopulmonary effects of dorsal recumbency in calves, with or without high-volume caudal epidural anesthesia. The authors suggest that the tachypnoea is a direct stress response due to the unphysiological positioning or a compensatory increase for reduced tidal volume caused by the formation of atelectasis. Parallelly, we observed an increase in RT, being in line with different studies showing an interrelation between psychological stress and hyperthermia in different species (Kündig et al., 1996; Pedernera-Romano et al., 2010; Oka, 2018; Scherf et al., 2020). We furthermore suggest that the tachypnoea observed in dorsal recumbency might be induced by an increase in internal body temperature (Hayashi et al., 2006). Similar to Rizk et al. (2012a), investigating the effect of lateral recumbency on stress traits in dairy cows, and Meyer et al. (2010), we did not observe any alteration in the HR. Meyer et al. (2010) furthermore observed a concurrent decrease in the cardiac index (=cardiac output/BM) and suggest that this can be ascribed to a decreased venous pre-load caused by the compression of the caudal vena cava by the abdominal viscera (mainly fore-stomachs).
The behavioral traits complement the observations made in the vital signs, by the observation of defensive movements of head and legs (increase in HeadMov and LegMoveOne), increased facial expression (Liptwitch and Swalo) when the sheep were lying on their back, and flight behavior when standing back on their legs (an increase of Backst; Henry, 1992; Dodd et al., 2012). We furthermore suggest that the observed decrease in ear movement (Earrising and Earmov) can be attributed to the decrease in optical and acoustic stimuli in this position and the inverted gravity on these extremities. The serum cortisol concentrations confirm the observations made in the other traits, showing a continuous increase between the beginning of the procedure until the sheep are tilted back in a standing position. Several studies, showing a strong interrelation between the degree of severity of a stimulus and the blood cortisol concentration, have established the measurement of blood cortisol as reference for the amount of stress sheep are exposed to Fell et al. (1985) and Hargreaves and Hutson (1990a,b). Other studies have shown a lag of ~20–30 min until the peak level of blood cortisol is reached after exposure to stress (Lay et al., 1992; Wagner et al., 2021), which is in agreement with our results.
The control group in our study exhibited similar maximum blood cortisol concentrations of 70–80 ng/ml to the sheep in the studies of Hargreaves and Hutson (1990b) during shearing (however using a different assay for analysis). Notable is that at position 1, the blood cortisol concentrations were double the concentrations measured on day 1 in the box. This illustrates that the short transport to the location of the tilt table comprises a stressful situation for the sheep.
Extrapolating from a peripheral measurement of glucocorticoids to the stress level of an animal is difficult when it is determined as a stand-alone trait. It is not possible to determine what stimulus exactly activated the paraventricular nucleus, since blood cortisol levels can increase due to positive and negative conditions (e.g., fear, reward, and hypoglycemia; Ralph and Tilbrook, 2016). By combining three different levels of stress assessment (vital signs, behavior, and serum cortisol concentrations), we were able to illustrate that the hormonal response observed in these sheep was most likely due to fear and distress.
In summary, these results therefore show that our procedure, recorded traits, and analysis methods are an adequate model for stress and to investigate possible stress-reducing methods during routine hoof trimming in sheep.
Treatment Effect
In several studies with different species, it was shown that a sedation with xylazine causes a cardio-respiratory depression, characterized by a reduction of the HR and RR (St Jean et al., 1990; Sanhouri et al., 1992; Meyer et al., 2010; Rizk et al., 2012a). In our study likewise, a decrease in HR and no increase in the RR was observed. Furthermore, in the current study, the RT was not altered in the sheep that received xylazine, whereas it increased in the control sheep. Rizk et al. (2012a) reported a decrease in RT in cattle treated with xylazine in lateral recumbency, with the control group exhibiting no alterations. Different other studies across several species show similar results (Ponder and Clarke, 1980; Rector et al., 1996) or no influence of xylazine on RT (Livingston et al., 1984; Rector et al., 1996; Ullah et al., 2017).
Besides its cardio-vascular effects, xylazine influences the consciousness and behavior of the animal (Rizk et al., 2012a; Flecknell et al., 2015). We interpret the decrease in the behavioral traits HeadMov, Lick, KneeSit, and LegMovFour as an expression of decrease in consciousness and defensive and flight behavior (the difference in probability of 2% between treatment groups in the case of Regur was considered not significant from a biological standpoint). In line with this, England et al. (1992) reported head lowering in horses under the influence of a xylazine sedation and Vickers et al. (2005) noticed that xylazine prevents the appearance of head rubbing or shaking after dehorning in calves. In the study of Fieseler et al. (2019) the moving of the head appeared to be primarily stress-related in association with dorsal recumbency. Furthermore, Sanhouri et al. (1992) describe a decrease in flighting behavior during the transportation of male goats under the influence of xylazine. An increase in vocalization under xylazine sedation is well-known in practice and described in a study by Stilwell et al. (2010), investigating the influence of a xylazine sedation on the stress response during disbudding in calves, as “long lingering call.” In addition in our study, an increase in the probability of observance of twitching with the lips and groaning was observed, which can most likely be ascribed to the compounds central nervous interference (Ruiz-Colón et al., 2014) and might also be interpreted as a vocal expression of mood and emotion (Manteuffel et al., 2004).
Our recordings of the serum cortisol concentrations furthermore confirm the stress-reducing effect of a sedation with xylazine, with a 2.28 times lower concentration in the treated (position 6: back in a box, 22.9 ng/ml) compared to the untreated sheep (52.1 ng/ml). These concentrations were lower than the initial level measured at position 1 (standing in tilt table prior to tilting, 49.5 ng/ml) and similar to the levels measured on day 1 in rest (22.5 ng/ml). Our results are in line with a study by Sanhouri et al. (1992) investigating the possible application of xylazine to reduce stress during transport in goats and of Stafford et al. (2003) and Stafford and Mellor (2005) and Lepková et al. (2007) showing a positive effect during the dehorning of calves and confirm our initial hypothesis.
Implications and Limitations
Stress is defined as a state in which the body homeostasis is disturbed over a short- to long-termed period and needs to be reinstated by adaptive responses [reviewed in Turner et al. (2012) and Ralph and Tilbrook (2016)]. Different studies have illustrated that even acute or short-termed stress responses can have impacts on animal health and welfare, if occurring during a critical time [reviewed in Ralph and Tilbrook (2016)]. Ralph and Tilbrook (2016) summarize several studies in this context describing a negative impact on ewe reproduction on the level of the production of the luteinizing hormone required for ovulation (Pierce et al., 2009; Wagenmaker et al., 2009) and sexual behavior (Pierce et al., 2008; Papargiris et al., 2011). They furthermore state that there is also evidence from human medicine that an acute stress response may result in a detrimental effect on essential body functions (e.g., ischemic heart injury and failure; Sapolsky, 2000). Professional and stress-free animal handling is therefore a central aspect in the husbandry of livestock and in the interest of every farmer. It is granted by the construction of a facility that allows gentle and calm handling of the animals (Grandin, 2021), training personnel in adequate handling methods (allowing habituation), and the development and application of suitable treatment protocols when indicated.
Our results show that a sedation with xylazine prior to hoof trimming decreases the stress response on behavioral and physiological levels. It can therefore be considered beneficial for animal health and welfare. Our results support its consideration for practical application, especially in very stressful situations (e.g., hoof treatment), due to its effectiveness, convenient way of administration, and low costs. The sedation furthermore allows a more feasible handling of the animal by decreasing defensive and flight behavior and thereby reduces the risk for injury of the sheep, and the handling person. However, careful handling of the animals is still a prerequisite since it is well-known in practice that the effect of xylazine is much dependent on the initial stress level of the animal (Clarke and England, 1989; Sanhouri et al., 1992; Lamont et al., 2001). Further studies are needed to investigate the feasibility and benefit of our sedation protocol under practical circumstances, and the possible positive effects of such a routine application on health and production traits, e.g., meat and wool quality, fertility, susceptibility for different diseases, life span and lifetime production, and take into account different fixation methods (see Introduction).
Xylazine hydrochloride is registered in the European Union (EU) and other countries for application in food-producing animals, but is however not available for livestock in many other parts of the world (e.g., United States; Coetzee, 2013; Smith, 2013). Our study adds to other publications that clearly show the beneficial effect of a sedation during stressful procedures (Sanhouri et al., 1992; Rizk et al., 2012a,b), thereby strongly recommending the legalization of this substance in livestock in the respective countries.
Furthermore, a focus should be laid on the development of improved sedation protocols with other and/or more modern compounds (e.g., romifidine, medetomidine, detomidine, and acepromazine) and possible emergency protocols in case of life-threatening side effects. Thompson et al. (1991) have for example shown the positive effect of atipamezole in calves suffering from xylazine-induced sedation, bradycardia, and ruminal atony. Atipamezole and yohimbine are two antidotes for α2-agonists that are widely used in veterinary medicine for non-food-producing animals (Kim et al., 2004; Mees et al., 2018). Their usage is however forbidden in food-producing animals in the EU and other countries, not due to direct evidence of the danger of these substances for consumers, but since the procedure of approval is too expensive for pharmaceutical companies in respect to the small sales market (Richter et al., 2014).
Conclusion
It was confirmed that the fixation of sheep in dorsal recumbency for routine hoof treatment represents a severe stress situation. The results show that a sedation with xylazine prior to hoof trimming decreases the behavioral and physiological stress response. Further studies are needed to investigate the feasibility and benefit under practical circumstances.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by State Administration Office (Landesverwaltungsamt, Referat Verbraucherschutz, Veterinärangelegenheiten Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany). Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
AS contributed to project acquisition. AS, RW, HF, SA, and AR contributed to trial and project design. SA, RW, and HF contributed to trial implementation and sample collection. MS contributed to sample analysis. JS, NM, SA, and MS-B contributed to data analysis and data interpretation. SA and MS-B contributed to writing of manuscript. WB, AS, RW, HF, AR, MS, JS, and NM contributed to revision of manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from the Leipzig University for Open Access Publishing. The authors thank Dirk Papendiek for his support and for entrusting us his sheep. The help of the colleagues at the Clinic for Ruminants and Swine in Leipzig during the execution of the study is acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- HR
Heart Rate
- RR
Respiratory Rate
- RT
Rectal Temperature
- CON
Control Group
- XYL
Xylazine Group.
Abbreviations
References
1
AnzuinoK.BellN. J.BazeleyK. J.NicolC. J. (2010). Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms based on direct observations. Vet. Rec. 167, 774–780. 10.1136/vr.c5892
2
BrearleyJ. C.DobsonH.JonesR. S. (1992). The stress responses involved in general anaesthesia in cattle. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 19, 18–23. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.1992.tb00080.x
3
CattetM. R. L.CaulkettN. A.WilsonC.VandenbrinkT.BrookR. K. (2004). Intranasal administration of xylazine to reduce stress in elk captured by net gun. J. Wildl. Dis.40, 562–565. 10.7589/0090-3558-40.3.562
4
ClarkeW. G.EnglandG. (1989). Medetomidine, a new sedative-analgesic for use in the dog and its reversal with atipamezole. J. Small Anim. Pract. 30, 343–348. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1989.tb01575.x
5
CoetzeeJ. F. (2013). A review of analgesic compounds used in food animals in the United States. Vet. Clin.: Food Anim. Pract. 29, 11–28. 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.008
6
CooperC. L. (1999). Stress, Immune Function and Health: The Connection, Bruce S. Rabin.New York, NY: Wiley Liss, 341. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199910)15:4<260::AID-SMI841>3.0.CO;2-Q
7
DoddC. L.PitchfordW. S.Hocking EdwardsJ. E.HazelS. J. (2012). Measures of behavioural reactivity and their relationships with production traits in sheep: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 140, 1–15. 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.03.018
8
EnglandG.ClarkeW. G.GoossenL. (1992). A comparison of the sedative effects of three α 2 -adrenoceptor agonists (romifidine, detomidine and xylazine) in the horse. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 15, 194–201. 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1992.tb01007.x
9
FazioE.FerlazzoA. (2003). Evaluation of stress during transport. Vet. Res. Commun. 27, 519–524. 10.1023/B:VERC.0000014211.87613.d9
10
FellL. R.ShuttD. A.BentleyC. J. (1985). Development of a salivary cortisol method for detecting changes in plasma “free” cortisol arising from acute stress in sheep. Aust. Vet. J. 62, 403–406. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1985.tb14120.x
11
FieselerH.WeckR.KaiserM.MüllerH.SpilkeJ.MielenzN.et al. (2018). Erfassung und Bewertung von akutem und chronischem Schmerz anhand ethologischer Merkmale bei weiblichen Merinofleischschafen. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere Nutztiere46, 229–240. 10.15653/TPG-180029
12
FieselerH.WeckR.KaiserM.MüllerH.SpilkeJ.MielenzN.et al. (2019). Bewertung verschiedener Methoden des Schmerzmanagements während der Behandlung von Klauenlederhaut-Läsionen bei weiblichen Merinofleischschafen. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere Nutztiere47, 213–222. 10.1055/a-0947-8428
13
FlecknellP.LofgrenJ.DysonM. C.MariniR. R.Michael SwindleM.WilsonR. P. (2015). Preanesthesia, anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia. Lab. Anim. Med. 9, 1135–1200. 10.1016/B978-0-12-409527-4.00024-9
14
GrandinT. (2021). The visual, auditory, and physical environment of livestock handling facilities and its effect on ease of movement of cattle, pigs, and sheep. Front. Anim. Sci.2:744207. 10.3389/fanim.2021.744207
15
GreeneS. A.ThurmonJ. C. (1988). Xylazine - a review of its pharmacology and use in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther.11, 295–313. 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1988.tb00189.x
16
HargreavesA. L.HutsonG. D. (1990a). The stress response in sheep during routine handling procedures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26, 83–90. 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90089-V
17
HargreavesA. L.HutsonG. D. (1990b). Changes in heart rate, plasma cortisol and haematocrit of sheep during a shearing procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26, 91–101. 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90090-Z
18
HayashiK.HondaY.OgawaT.KondoN.NishiyasuT. (2006). Relationship between ventilatory response and body temperature during prolonged submaximal exercise. J. Appl. Physiol.100, 414–420. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00541.2005
19
HeinrichM.MüllerH.FieselerH.SteinerA.GottschalkJ.EinspanierA.et al. (2020). Cortisol concentration before, during and after sham foot trimming in German Holstein cows-the suitability of different matrices. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 48, 291–300. 10.1055/a-1261-6583
20
HenryJ. P. (1992). Biological basis of the stress response. Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci.27, 66–83. 10.1007/BF02691093
21
HutsonG. D. (2000). Livestock Handling and Transport. Behavioural Principles of Sheep Handling.Glasgow: Bell and Bain Ltd. 10.1079/9780851994093.0175
22
JanßenS.WunderlichC.HeppelmannM.PalmeR.StarkeA.KehlerW.et al. (2016). Short communication: pilot study on hormonal, metabolic, and behavioral stress response to treatment of claw horn lesions in acutely lame dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 7481–7488. 10.3168/jds.2015-10703
23
JohnsonH. D.VanjonackW. J. (1976). Effects of environmental and other stressors on blood hormone patterns in lactating animals. J. Dairy Sci. 59, 1603–1617. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84413-X
24
KelleyK. W. (1980). Stress and immune function: a bibliographic review. Ann. Rech. Vet. 11, 445–478.
25
KimM. S.JeongS. M.ParkJ. H.NamT. C.SeoK. M. (2004). Reversal of medetomidine-ketamine combination anesthesia in rabbits by atipamezole. Exp. Anim. 53:423–428. 10.1538/expanim.53.423
26
KretschmannJ.ScherfL.FischerM. L.KaiserM.MüllerH.SpilkeJ.et al. (2020). Einfluss der thermischen Enthornung mit unterschiedlichem Schmerzmanagement auf die Gesundheit von Kälbern. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere Nutztiere48, 318–326. 10.1055/a-1229-8393
27
KündigH.KaufmannC.BinderH. (1996). Messung von Stressparametern bei Nutztieren mittels aktiver Telemetrie. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 1996, 234–240.
28
LamontL. A.BulmerB. J.GrimmK. A.TranquilliW. J.SissonD. D. (2001). Cardiopulmonary evaluation of the use of medetomidine hydrochloride in cats. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62, 1745–1749. 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1745
29
LayD. C.FriendT. H.BowersC. L.GrissomK. K.JenkinsO. C. (1992). A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and hot-iron branding using dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci.70, 1121–1125. 10.2527/1992.7041121x
30
LepkováR.StercJ.VecerekV.DoubekJ.KruzíkováK.BedánováI. (2007). Stress responses in adult cattle due to surgical dehorning using three different types of anaesthesia. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 120, 465–469.
31
LivingstonA.LowJ.MorrisB. (1984). Effects of clonidine and xylazine on body temperature in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 81, 189–193. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb10760.x
32
ManteuffelG.PuppeB.SchonP. C. (2004). Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 88, 163–182. 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.012
33
Marco-RamellA.AlmeidaA. M.de CristobalS.RodriguesP.RoncadaP.BassolsA. (2016). Proteomics and the search for welfare and stress biomarkers in animal production in the one-health context. Mol. Biosyst. 12, 2024–2035. 10.1039/C5MB00788G
34
MeesL.FidlerJ.KreuzerM.FuJ.PardueM. T.GarcíaP. S. (2018). Faster emergence behavior from ketamine/xylazine anesthesia with atipamezole versus yohimbine. PLoS ONE13:e0199087. 10.1371/journal.pone.0199087
35
MeyerH.KästnerS. R.BeyerbachM.RehageJ. (2010). Cardiopulmonary effects of dorsal recumbency and high-volume caudal epidural anaesthesia with lidocaine or xylazine in calves. Vet. J. 186, 316–322. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.020
36
Miranda-de la LamaG. C.MongeP.VillarroelM.OlletaJ. L.García-BelenguerS.MaríaG. (2011). Effects of road type during transport on lamb welfare and meat quality in dry hot climates. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43, 915–922. 10.1007/s11250-011-9783-7
37
Miranda-de la LamaG. C.VillarroelM.CampoM. M.OlletaJ. L.SañudoC.MaríaG. (2012). Effects of double transport and season on sensorial aspects of lamb's meat quality in dry climates. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44, 21–27. 10.1007/s11250-011-0004-1
38
OkaT. (2018). Stress-induced hyperthermia and hypothermia. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 157, 599–621. 10.1016/B978-0-444-64074-1.00035-5
39
PapargirisM. M.RivallandE. T. A.HemsworthP. H.MorrisseyA. D.TilbrookA. J. (2011). Acute and chronic stress-like levels of cortisol inhibit the oestradiol stimulus to induce sexual receptivity but have no effect on sexual attractivity or proceptivity in female sheep. Hormon. Behav.60, 336–345. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.06.008
40
Pedernera-RomanoC.La Ruiz de TorreJ. L.BadiellaL.MantecaX. (2010). Effect of perphenazine enanthate on open-field test behaviour and stress-induced hyperthermia in domestic sheep. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 94, 329–332. 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.09.013
41
PierceB. N.ClarkeI. J.TurnerA. I.RivallandE. T. A.TilbrookA. J. (2009). Cortisol disrupts the ability of estradiol-17β to induce the LH surge in ovariectomized ewes. Domest. Anim. Endocrin. 36, 202–208. 10.1016/j.domaniend.2008.11.003
42
PierceB. N.HemsworthP. H.RivallandE. T. A.WagenmakerE. R.MorrisseyA. D.PapargirisM. M.et al. (2008). Psychosocial stress suppresses attractivity, proceptivity and pulsatile LH secretion in the ewe. Horm. Behav. 54, 424–434. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.04.005
43
PonderS. W.ClarkeW. G. (1980). Prolonged depression of thermoregulation after xylazine administration to cats. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 3, 203–207. 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1980.tb00483.x
44
RalphC. R.TilbrookA. J. (2016). Invited review: the usefulness of measuring glucocorticoids for assessing animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. 94, 457–470. 10.2527/jas.2015-9645
45
RectorE.OttoK.KietzmannM.NolteI.LehmacherW. (1996). Pharmakokinetik und Wirkungen von Xylazin (Rompun) beim Hund. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 109, 18–22.
46
RichterA.EmmerichI. U.KlugeK.UngemachF. R. (2014). Therapienotstand und Therapielücken der arzneilichen Versorgung von Tieren und Sonderregelungen für Pferde. Pharmakotherapie bei Haus- und Nutztieren9, 698–706. 10.1055/b-0035-119144
47
RizkA.HerdtweckS.MeyerH.OffingerJ.ZaghloulA.RehageJ. (2012a). Effects of xylazine hydrochloride on hormonal, metabolic, and cardiorespiratory stress responses to lateral recumbency and claw trimming in dairy cows. J. Am. Vet. M. Ass. 240, 1223–1230. 10.2460/javma.240.10.1223
48
RizkA.HerdtweckS.OffingerJ.MeyerH.ZaghloulA.RehageJ. (2012b). The use of xylazine hydrochloride in an analgesic protocol for claw treatment of lame dairy cows in lateral recumbency on a surgical tipping table. Vet. J.192, 193–198. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.022
49
Ruiz-ColónK.Chavez-AriasC.Díaz-AlcaláJ. E.MartínezM. (2014). Xylazine intoxication in humans and its importance as an emerging adulterant in abused drugs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Forensic Sci. Int. 240, 1–8. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.015
50
RusselA. (1984). Body condition scoring of sheep. Pract. 6, 91–93. 10.1136/inpract.6.3.91
51
SanhouriA. A.JonesR. S.DobsonH. (1992). Effects of xylazine on the stress response to transport in male goats. Br. Vet. J. 148, 119–128. 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90103-8
52
SapolskyR. M. (2000). Stress hormones: good and bad. Neurobiol. Dis.7, 540–542. 10.1006/nbdi.2000.0350
53
ScherfL. J.KretschmannM. L.FischerN.MielenzG.MöbiusS.GettoM.et al. (2020). Einsatz der Thermographie zum Monitoring der operationsbedingten Hitzeentwicklung während der thermischen Enthornung von Kälbern. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2020, 174–184. 10.17236/sat00251
54
ShearerJ. K.van AmstelS. R. (2001). Functional and corrective claw trimming. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 17, 53–72. 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30054-2
55
SmithG. (2013). Extralabel use of anesthetic and analgesic compounds in cattle. Vet. Clin.: Food Anim. Pract. 29, 29–45. 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.003
56
St JeanG.SkardaR. T.MuirW. W.HoffsisG. F. (1990). Caudal epidural analgesia induced by xylazine administration in cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 51, 1232–1236.
57
StaffordK. J.MellorD. J. (2005). Dehorning and disbudding distress and its alleviation in calves. Vet. J. 169, 337–349. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.02.005
58
StaffordK. J.MellorD. J.ToddS. E.WardR. N.McMeekanC. M. (2003). The effect of different combinations of lignocaine, ketoprofen, xylazine and tolazoline on the acute cortisol response to dehorning in calves. N. Z. Vet. J. 51, 219–226. 10.1080/00480169.2003.36370
59
SteplewskiZ.VogelW.EhyaH.PoropatichG.McDonaldSmithJ. (1985). Effects of restraint stress on inoculated tumor growth and immune response in rats. Cancer Res. 45, 5128–5133.
60
StilwellG.CarvalhoR. C.CarolinoN.LimaM. S.BroomD. M. (2010). Effect of hot-iron disbudding on behaviour and plasma cortisol of calves sedated with xylazine. Res. Vet. Sci. 88, 188–193. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.06.012
61
ThompsonJ. R.KerstingK. W.HsuW. H. (1991). Antagonistic effect of atipamezole on xylazine-induced sedation, bradycardia, and ruminal atony in calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 52, 1265–1268.
62
TingS. T. L.EarleyB.HughesJ. M. L.CroweM. A. (2003). Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth, and behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 1281–1293. 10.2527/2003.8151281x
63
TurnerA. I.KeatingC. L.TilbrookA. J. (2012). Sex differences and the role of sex steroids in sympatho-adrenal medullary system and hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis responses to stress, in Sex steroids. Rijeka: InTech Publisher, 115–136.
64
UllahS.AliM.ShuaibM.HussainS.AbbassZ.khanN. (2017). Effect of xylazine and ketamine on pulse rate, respiratory rate and body temperature in dog. Int. J. Avian Wildl. Biol. 2, 137–139. 10.15406/ijawb.2017.02.00030
65
VickersK. J.NielL.KiehlbauchL. M.WearyD. M. (2005). Calf response to caustic paste and hot-iron dehorning using sedation with and without local anesthetic. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 1454–1459. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72813-7
66
WagenmakerE. R.BreenK. M.OakleyA. E.PierceB. N.TilbrookA. J.TurnerA. I.et al. (2009). Cortisol interferes with the estradiol-induced surge of luteinizing hormone in the ewe. Biol. Rep., 80, 458–463. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074252
67
WagnerR.FieselerH.KaiserM.MüllerH.MielenzN.SpilkeJ.et al. (2021). Cortisol concentrations in sheep before, during and after sham foot trimming on a tilt table – the suitability of different matrices. Schweiz Arch. Tierheilkd.163, 753–766. 10.17236/sat00325
68
WinterA. C. (2008). Lameness in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 76, 149–153. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.12.008
Summary
Keywords
stress, dorsal recumbency, animal husbandry, animal welfare, cortisol, vital signs assessment, behavior, claw trimming
Citation
Amin S, Wagner R, Fieseler H, Rizk A, Schmicke M, Spilke J, Mielenz N, Baumgartner W, Schären-Bannert M and Starke A (2022) Sedation With Xylazine Hydrochloride Decreases the Stress Response in Merino Meat Sheep During Routine Hoof Trimming in a Tilt Table. Front. Anim. Sci. 2:795543. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.795543
Received
15 October 2021
Accepted
23 December 2021
Published
28 January 2022
Volume
2 - 2021
Edited by
Janice Swanson, Michigan State University, United States
Reviewed by
Temple Grandin, Colorado State University, United States; Nicole C. Burdick Sanchez, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Amin, Wagner, Fieseler, Rizk, Schmicke, Spilke, Mielenz, Baumgartner, Schären-Bannert and Starke.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Melanie Schären-Bannert melanie.schaeren@uni-leipzig.de
This article was submitted to Animal Welfare and Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Animal Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.