Local Administration of Ginkgolide B Using a Hyaluronan-Based Hydrogel Improves Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice

Introduction

The healing process (i.e., hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and maturation) generally proceeds efficiently within the injured site (Gurtner et al., 2008). However, certain pathological conditions (e.g., diabetes) may cause the delayed and incomplete wound healing (Eming et al., 2014). The chronic (non-healing) wound is one common complication of diabetes, and causes life-threatening infections for patients (Baltzis et al., 2014). Current treatments often fail, mainly due to the complex biological processes within the wound area (Greenhalgh, 2003), such as chronic inflammation, impaired angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation), and incomplete collagen remodeling. Recent strategies based on growth factors, cytokines and stem cells are designed and applied for diabetic wound healing (Zarei et al., 2018). However, these strategies usually target one single stage of healing process (Barrientos et al., 2014) (Teng et al., 2014) and lack appropriate delivery systems (Saghazadeh et al., 2018) (Oliva and Almquist, 2020). Therefore, the therapeutic efficacy is far from ideal, and emerging treatment alternatives are urgently required.

Ginkgolide B (GB) is a terpenoid compound of the Ginkgo biloba L. leaf extracts (Figure 1A). It is known that GB acts as a potent competitive antagonist of the platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor, and has demonstrated neuroprotective and cardioprotective activities (Lv et al., 2011) (Xie et al., 2020) (Liu et al., 2020). These are mainly attributed to the anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and proliferative effects of GB (Gao et al., 2016) (Zheng et al., 2018) (Ge et al., 2020). Therefore, it is hypothesized that GB will achieve the repair and regeneration of diabetic wounds via targeting different stages of healing process. Here, the role of GB in facilitating the healing process was investigated using the in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments. As a consequence, GB significantly resulted in the anti-inflammatory effect in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM), the proliferative activity in mouse fibroblasts (L929), and the pro-angiogenic efficacy in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). Previously, a hydrogel was produced in our laboratories by crosslinking a high molecular weight hyaluronan (also known as hyaluronic acid) (HA; Mw = 1,800 to 2,200 kDa) via adipic dihydrazide (Yang et al., 2021a). In this study, this hydrogel was utilized in vivo for local administration of GB to the full-thickness wounds of diabetic mice. The resulting hydrogel formulation (HA-GB) was able to profoundly speed up the wound closure, which mainly resulted from the alleviation of inflammatory mediators, the enhancement of re-epithelizing and pro-angiogenic factors, and the modulation of collagens from type III to type I. This study confirms for the first time that GB can promote the wound healing in diabetic mice by targeting the inflammation, proliferation and maturation phases. In addition, HA-GB profoundly enhanced the healing outcome when compared with a commercially available wound dressing product (namely INTRASITE Gel), indicating a great therapeutic potential of our strategy for diabetic wound healing.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Ginkgolide B (GB) improves ex vivo anti-inflammatory effects. (A) GB’s chemical structure. (B) The mRNA level of three pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) in LPS and IFN-γ co-stimulated BMDM treated with GB (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. DMSO). (C) The release of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 from co-stimulated BMDM with the treatment of GB (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. DMSO).

Materials and Methods

Materials

Ginkgolide B (GB; CAS No. 15291-77-7; the chemical structure as shown in Figure 1A) was obtained from Shanghai TAUTO Company. The rest of reagents and materials were obtained in Sigma-Aldrich unless mentioned otherwise.

Animals

Male C57BL/6 mice (∼5 weeks) were obtained in the Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Company. Animals were allowed to acclimate for at least 7 days in the housing facility before the experiments, and every five mice were housed during the experiments. The experimental procedures were approved by Animal Ethics Committee of Jilin University.

Cell Culture

Following the protocol as reported in (Shields et al., 2020), the BM cells were collected from the femurs with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Corning) and passed through the cell-strainer (70 μm; BD Falcon), prior to the centrifugation at 1,150 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. Following this, the lysis buffer (Yeasen Biotech, China) was used to remove erythrocytes, which was followed by the centrifugation at 4°C for 5 min at 1,150 rpm. Subsequently, 2 × 10⁵ of cells were cultured each well inside the 24-well plates using DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S) and 10 ng/ml macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 70–72 h. Then, cells were added with fresh medium as mentioned above for 48 h. Subsequently, cells were added with fresh DMEM plus 10% FBS, 1% P/S, lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/ml) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ, 20 ng/ml) for 20–24 h, generating BMDM before the experiments as described below.

In addition, L929 and HUVEC were cultured using DMEM plus 10% FBS and 1% P/S and using RPMI-1640 plus 10% FBS and 1% P/S, respectively. In this study, all cells were grown at 37°C with 5% CO₂ and 95% relative humidity.

Ex vivo Anti-Inflammation

BMDM were cultured at a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells/well in 24-well plates for 1 day. Subsequently, GB ([c] = 10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) was added into BMDM for 20–24 h before the following experiments: 1) RT-qPCR. First-strand cDNAs were generated using TransScript^® First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech, China). RT-qPCR was performed with TransStart^® Top Green qPCR SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech) using StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific) under the conditions as previously reported (Guo et al., 2012). The information of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 primers was shown in Supplementary Table S1. 2) ELISA. The release of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in the culture supernatant was detected using the ELISA kits (LanpaiBIO, China) as previously reported (Guo et al., 2021) (Yu et al., 2020).

In vitro Proliferation

L929 and HUVEC were cultured within 96-well plates (3,000 cells per well), respectively. Following 20–24 h, GB ([c] = 10, 20, 50, 100, and 300 μmol/L) was added into cells. After 1 day, cells were added by 200 μL of fresh medium and 20 μL of MTT solution (the stock concentration = 5 mg/ml in PBS) at 37°C for 4 h. The purple product was dissolved using DMSO prior to the measurement at 570 nm.

L929 and HUVEC were cultured in 6-well plates (4 × 10⁵ cells per well), respectively. Following 20–24 h, cells were incubated with GB ([c] = 10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) for 1 day before RT-qPCR (performed as above mentioned), in order to measure the expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In addition, the release of TGF-β and VEGF in the culture supernatant was detected using the ELISA kits (LanpaiBIO, China).

The scratch experiment was performed as previously described (Sun, 2021). Briefly, L929 and HUVEC at a density of 4 × 10⁵ cells/well were cultured within 6-well plates, respectively. When ∼95–100% of confluence were reached, cells was washed with PBS and made for the “scratch.” Cells were incubated within serum free growth medium containing 40 μmol/L of GB. Following 1 day, the empty places before and after the incubation of GB were examined under the microscope (Olympus BX53).

In vivo Healing Effects

A chemically induced diabetic mouse model was experimentally established as previously described, which may mimic type 1 diabetes and has been used for diabetic wound healing experiments (Yang et al., 2021a) (Chen et al., 2018) (Gan et al., 2019) (An et al., 2020). Briefly, animals were intraperitoneally injected with 55 mg/kg of streptozocin (STZ; 20% W/V) for 5 days, and the concentration of blood glucose in mice was measured using the blood glucose meter. Mice with >14 mmol/L blood glucose were considered diabetic (Gan et al., 2019) (Izumi et al., 2015). Subsequently, two full-thickness wounds (∼0.3 cm²) were made for each mouse using the disinfected surgical scissor into the dermis without disturbing the subdermal vasculature on the dorsal surface (Day 0). Mice were randomly grouped for the following experiments, and the blood glucose concentration was measured during the experiments to confirm >14 mmol/L in mice (Supplementary Figure S1).

The hydrogel was prepared by crosslinking sodium hyaluronate (Mw = 1,800 to 2,200 kDa) via adipic dihydrazide as previously described in our laboratory (Yang et al., 2021a). To form the GB-loaded formulation (HA-GB), 1 ml of GB solution ([c] = 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 μmol/L in PBS with 1% propylene glycol) was loaded with 0.08 g of freeze-dried hydrogel (this achieved 8% hydrogel, and GB was fully loaded at this concentration). In addition, at Day 0, 2, and 4, the wounds were topically treated with/without 100 μl of blank hydrogel, 100 μl of INTRASITE Gel or 100 μl of HA-GB, and subsequently were covered by the 3M dressing. The dressing was removed at Day 6. The healing rate = (1-Sn/S0) × 100%, in which Sn is the surface area on chosen days, S0 is the surface area on Day 0. The wounds were dissected (no healthy tissue was part of the resected area) for:

1) H&E staining assay. The samples were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded using the paraffin, and sectioned for the hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stain experiment (Qin et al., 2018). The infiltration of inflammatory cells, induction of epidermal hyperplasia and formation of blood vessels were evaluated within the H&E-stained sections (5 μm) and quantified as described previously (Yang et al., 2021a) (Gao et al., 2019). Briefly, the number (N) of positive cells and the area 1) were detected using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics). The inflammatory cell infiltration of treated groups was determined as N/a corrected to the untreated group. Moreover, the mean of epidermal thickness was calculated based on three areas in the epidermis layer using Image-Pro Plus 6.0. The epidermal hyperplasia of treated groups was determined as the mean of epidermal thickness corrected to the untreated group. Furthermore, the blood vessel formation was determined based on the mean of new blood vessels. These were performed by two professional pathologists separately. 2) Masson’s trichrome staining assay. The sections (5 μm) were used for the Masson’s trichrome stain experiment (Gao et al., 2019). The collagen deposition was determined within the Masson’s trichrome-stained sections as previously described (Yang et al., 2021a) (Gao et al., 2019). 3) RT-PCR and ELISA assays. The samples were homogenized and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 25–30 min at 4°C. The RT-qPCR and ELISA experiments for inflammatory and growth factors were performed as described above. 4) Western blotting assay. The concentration of proteins (collected above) was measured by the BCA kit (TransGen Biotech), and a sample containing ∼40 μg of proteins was used in SDS-PAGE (90 V for 2 h). The proteins were subsequently transferred to the PVDF membrane (Millipore) at 180 mA for 2 h. The membrane was added with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, and was subsequently added with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h (see the information of antibodies in Supplementary Table S2). The enhanced chemiluminescence solution (GE Healthcare) was applied to identify the proteins.

Statistical Analysis

Data was shown as a mean ± standard deviation. The unpaired Student’s t-test was applied to analyze the significance of two groups. The significance of three or more groups was analyzed using the one-way ANOVA under the Bonferroni’s Post-Hoc test. In this study, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Ginkgolide B Improves Anti-Inflammatory Effects

The healing process proceeds orderly and efficiently inside the wound site at the onset of injuries (Gurtner et al., 2008). However, the healing is often “stalled” in the inflammation phase, which is mainly caused by an elevated production of pro-inflammatory mediators within the diabetic wounds (Salazar et al., 2016). GB (Figure 1A), a natural product extracted from the leaves of Ginkgo biloba L., exerts the anti-inflammatory activity in protecting against inflammation-associated disorders (e.g., stroke and cardiomyopathy) (Shu et al., 2016) (Li et al., 2021a). In this study, the anti-inflammatory effects of GB were assessed ex vivo using LPS and IFN-γ co-stimulated BMDM (Figures 1B,C). Results of Figure 1B show that the mRNA level of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 (three pro-inflammatory cytokines critically responsible for the inflammation phase) in co-stimulated BMDM was significantly (p < 0.05 and 0.01) alleviated by GB in a concentration-dependent manner. When the concentration of GB was reached to 50 μmol/L, the mRNA level of these cytokines in the co-stimulated BMDM was similar to that recorded in the non-stimulated BM cells (Figure 1B). Accordingly, the release of these cytokines was also significantly (p < 0.05 and 0.01) decreased by GB (Figure 1C). The co-stimulated BMDM can highly mimic M1 macrophages, which are a prominent pro-inflammatory cell type during the inflammation phase in diabetic wound (Kim and Nair, 2019). Therefore, the results of Figures 1B,C demonstrate that GB can potentially ameliorate the chronic inflammation for protecting against diabetic wounds.

Ginkgolide B Promotes Proliferative Activities

When the healing process moves forwards, the proliferation phase proceeds with the closure of injured surface (re-epithelialization), the formation of blood vasculature (angiogenesis), and the development of granulation tissue (Martin and Nunan, 2015). However, diabetic wounds are usually evident with the failure in these steps (Guo and Dipietro, 2010).

The re-epithelialization is highly relied on the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) components (e.g., collagens, glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans) (Xue and Jackson, 2015). The ECM components are mainly produced by fibroblasts (one of the most abundant cells in the wound area (Bainbridge, 2013)), and the fibroblasts can be activated by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) (Barrientos et al., 2008). Results in Figures 2A,B show that GB significantly (p < 0.05) elevated the expression of TGF-β mRNA and protein in L929 (a mouse fibroblastic cell line) in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, no significant cytotoxicity in L929 was caused by GB under the concentrations tested (10–300 μmol/L), while the cell growth was slightly enhanced by GB at > 20 μmol/L (Figure 2C). Moreover, GB was able to significantly (p < 0.01) facilitate the migration of L929 (Figure 2D). Therefore, these results suggest that GB is able to improve the activity of TGF-β in fibroblasts for accelerating the wound closure.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. GB promotes in vitro proliferative activity of fibroblasts. (A) The level of TGF-β mRNA in L929 following GB treatment (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05). (B) The release of TGF-β protein in the culture supernatant of L929 following GB treatment (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05). (C) Cytotoxicity of L929 after the treatment of GB (10, 20, 50, 100, and 300 μmol/L; 0 = DMSO alone). (D) The empty places before and after treatment of GB (50 μmol/L) were measured for the fold of migration (the magnification = ×10) (n = 3; **p < 0.01).

The development of new blood vessels is closely regulated by growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) that stimulate endothelial cells of the existing vessels (Barrientos et al., 2008). The activated endothelial cells migrate towards and grow inside the injured area, resulting in the formation of vascular network (Guo and Dipietro, 2010). Results of Figures 3A,B show that GB significantly (p < 0.05) increased the expression of VEGF mRNA and protein in HUVEC (a human umbilical vein endothelial cell line) in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, GB caused no significant cytotoxicity of HUVEC under the concentrations tested (10–300 μmol/L), but slightly enhanced the cell growth when the concentration was >20 μmol/L (Figure 3C). Moreover, GB was able to significantly (p < 0.01) facilitate the migration of HUVEC (Figure 3D). These results imply that GB can promote the activity of VEGF in endothelial cells for exerting the new blood vessel formation.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. GB promotes in vitro proliferative activity of endothelial cells. (A) The level of VEGF mRNA in HUVEC following GB treatment (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05). (B) The release of VEGF protein in the culture supernatant of HUVEC following GB treatment (10, 20, and 50 μmol/L) (n = 3; *p < 0.05). (C) Cytotoxicity of HUVEC after the treatment of GB (10, 20, 50, 100, and 300 μmol/L). (D) The empty places before and after treatment of GB (50 μmol/L) were measured for the fold of migration (n = 3; **p < 0.01).

The formation of granulation tissue (a type of connective tissue) is closely concomitant with the development of ECM and new blood vessels (Sorg et al., 2017). Results of Figures 2, 3 confirm the capacity of GB for the development of ECM and angiogenesis by the production of growth factors and by the stimulation of fibroblasts and endothelial cells. These demonstrate the potential of GB for the formation of granulation tissue. Taken together, GB can potentially fulfill the proliferation phase of diabetic wounds.

Ginkgolide B Achieves Diabetic Wound Healing

The capacity of GB for improving diabetic wound healing was further confirmed in diabetic mice with full-thickness wounds. The diabetes in mice is chemically induced due to the ablation of β-cells by STZ (a nitrosourea analogue, one of the most potent diabetogenic chemicals) (Al-Awar et al., 2016), and such a diabetic mouse model has been substantially used in the field of diabetes research (Pandey and Dvorakova, 2020). Recently, a variety of drug delivery systems have been designed and applied for delivery of therapeutic agents in wound repair and regeneration (Manconi et al., 2018) (Orsu et al., 2021) (Li et al., 2021b) (Rathinavel et al., 2021). Previously, a hydrogel was produced in our laboratory by crosslinking a HA polymer (Mw = 1,800–2,200 kDa) (Yang et al., 2021a). This hydrogel possesses favorable physicochemical characteristics in terms of porous 3D structure, enzymatic hydrolysis resistance, and sustained release (Yang et al., 2021a). In this study, this hydrogel was used in vivo for topical application of GB to the full-thickness wounds of diabetic mice (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure S1). The resultant formulation (HA-GB) demonstrated the full loading and sustained release of GB (Supplementary Figure S2). The healing rate of HA-GB (containing 250, 500, 1,000 and 2,000 μmol/L of GB) was assessed to investigate the in vivo dose of GB (Supplementary Figure S3). Results of Supplementary Figure S3 indicate that HA-GB at 1,000 μmol/L of GB significantly accelerated the wound healing (p < 0.05); therefore, 1,000 μmol/L of GB were chosen for the in vivo experiments.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. HA-GB facilitates in vivo diabetic wound healing. (A) Treatment, sample and analysis schematic. (B) The wound images following treatment of HA-GB (1,000 μmol/L). Healing rate (%) (n = 8; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01).

The diabetic wounds were topically administrated with various treatments at Day 0, 2 and 4 (Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B, INTRASITE Gel remarkably speeded up the closure of injured site as compared with blank hydrogel (p < 0.05, Day 3), while HA-GB could further promote the healing outcome as compared with INTRASITE Gel (p < 0.01, Day 3, 7, and 14) (Figure 4B). As a result, HA-GB significantly (p < 0.05) achieved the reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration (indicated by green arrow), the amelioration of epidermal hyperplasia (indicated by blue arrow) and the enhancement of angiogenesis (indicated by red arrow) as compared with the other groups (Day 7) (Figures 5A,B). Furthermore, the deposition of collagens was also significantly (p < 0.05) achieved by HA-GB as compared with the other groups (Day 14) (Figures 5C,D). Therefore, results of Figures 4, 5 demonstrate that HA-GB was able to accelerate the diabetic wound healing, which was mainly due to the capacity of GB for suppressing the inflammatory cell infiltration, alleviating the epidermal hyperplasia, improving the angiogenesis, and facilitating collagen deposition.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. The histological analysis. (A) In the H&E images on Day 7 (scale = 20 μm), the inflammatory cells, epidermal hyperplasia and new blood vessels were indicated by the green, blue and red arrows, respectively. (B) The quantification of Figure 5A (n = 6; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01). (C) The Masson’s trichrome images on Day 14 (scale = 20 μm) (red area = keratin, muscle fibers and cytoplasm; blue area = collagens). (D) The quantification of Figure 5C (n = 6; *p < 0.05).

It has been reported that the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathway is continuously activated within non-healing wounds; consequently, the overexpression of inflammation cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) causes the wounds trapped in the chronic inflammatory state (Zhao et al., 2016). In this study, the activity (phosphorylation) of p65 (a key component in the NF-κB transcription factor complex) was significantly suppressed by HA-GB in diabetic wounds relative to blank hydrogel and INTRASITE Gel (p < 0.05, Figure 6A). Accordingly, HA-GB was capable of significantly (p < 0.05) decreasing the level of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA when compared to the controls (Figure 6B). HA-GB also profoundly inhibited the production of these pro-inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.05, Figure 6C). These results indicate the in vivo function of GB in the downregulation of pro-inflammatory NF-κB pathway for promoting the inflammation phase of diabetic wounds, which was also confirmed by the inhibition of the inflammatory cell infiltration (Figures 5A,B).

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. In vivo anti-inflammatory effects of HA-GB. (A) The phosphorylation of p65 in diabetic wounds and the quantification of protein expression following HA-GB treatment (1,000 μmol/L) (n = 4; **p < 0.01). (B) The mRNA level of three pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment (n = 4; **p < 0.01). (C) The release of three pro-inflammatory cytokines in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment (n = 4; **p < 0.01).

As mentioned above, the re-epithelization, angiogenesis and collagen remodeling in the proliferation and maturation stages are closely regulated by growth factors such as TGF-β and VEGF (Yang et al., 2021b). In this study, HA-GB was capable of significantly increasing the level of TGF-β mRNA within diabetic wounds on Day 7 and 14 (p < 0.05) (Figure 7A); accordingly, the release of TGF-β protein could also be dramatically upregulated by HA-GB (p < 0.05, Figure 7A). These resulted in the amelioration of epidermal hyperplasia (a key indicator for re-epithelization efficacy) (Figures 5A,B). Moreover, the mRNA and protein levels of VEGF were also significantly increased by HA-GB (Figure 7B), facilitating the development of new blood vessels (Figures 5A,B). It has been reported that the transition of collagens from type III (Col-III) to type I (Col-I) is a hallmark during the granulation tissue formation, and the failure of collagen remodeling may cause an excessive scar (Tracy et al., 2016). As shown in Figure 7C, after the HA-GB treatment, the expression of Col-I and Col-III was significantly improved (p < 0.05), which was also confirmed by the deposition of collagens as evident in Figures 5C,D. More importantly, the ratio of Col-I to Col-III was significantly increased with the treatment of HA-GB (p < 0.05) (Figure 7D), demonstrating the successful transition of collagens from type III to type I. Taken together, results of Figure 7 confirm that HA-GB can promote the wound healing in diabetic mice due to the capacity of GB for fully targeting the inflammation, proliferation and maturation phases.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. In vivo pro-healing effects of HA-GB. (A) The mRNA and protein levels of TGF-β in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment (1,000 μmol/L) at Day 7 and 14 (n = 4; *p < 0.05). (B) The mRNA and protein levels of VEGF in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment at Day 7 and 14 (n = 4; *p < 0.05). (C) The mRNA level of Col-I and Col-III in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment (n = 4; *p < 0.05). (D) The protein expression of Col-I and Col-III in diabetic wounds following HA-GB treatment (n = 3; *p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Increasing understanding in cellular and molecular mechanisms for the chronic wounds has significantly revolutionized the development of wound healing strategies (Guo and Dipietro, 2010) (Sun et al., 2014). Emerging growth factor, cytokine and stem cell therapies have been designed for the application of chronic wound healing (Zarei et al., 2018). Despite these promises, therapeutic outcome is still low, mainly due to the fact that these therapies generally target one single phase of healing process (Barrientos et al., 2014) (Teng et al., 2014) and lack appropriate delivery systems (Saghazadeh et al., 2018) (Oliva and Almquist, 2020). In this study, Ginkgolide B (GB), a natural product extracted from the leaves of Ginkgo biloba L., achieved in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo anti-inflammatory, re-epithelializing, pro-angiogenic, and collagen-remodeling effects (Figure 8), confirming the capacity of GB for satisfying the inflammatory, proliferative and maturation phases of healing process. Recent developments of drug delivery systems have significantly advanced the administration of therapeutic agents for chronic wounds (Voss et al., 2018; Hsu et al., 2019; Morey and Pandit, 2018; Chin et al., 2019). In this study, a crosslinked hyaluronan-based hydrogel was used in vivo for topical application of GB, and the resultant hydrogel formulation (HA-GB) profoundly speeded up the closure of diabetic full-thickness wounds (Figure 8). More importantly, HA-GB significantly improved the healing outcome relative to INTRASITE Gel, confirming the great promise of our strategy in the clinical application for diabetic wound repair and regeneration.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8. Local administration of Ginkgolide B using a hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel improves wound healing in diabetic mice.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by The Animal Ethics Committee of Jilin University.

Author Contributions

LW: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing-Original Draft and KX: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing-Original Draft. LH: Project Administration, Writing–Review and Editing. MZ and JF: Resources, Writing–Review and Editing. LS and AL: Validation. WW: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–Review and Editing. JG: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing–Review and Editing.

Funding

We acknowledge the financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China, and the Health Commission of Jilin Province, China (2020Q012; 2020G009).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.898231/full#supplementary-material

References

Al-Awar, A., Kupai, K., Veszelka, M., Szűcs, G., Attieh, Z., Murlasits, Z., et al. (2016). Experimental Diabetes Mellitus in Different Animal Models. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 9051426. doi:10.1155/2016/9051426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

An, R., Zhang, Y., Qiao, Y., Song, L., Wang, H., and Dong, X. (2020). Adipose Stem Cells Isolated from Diabetic Mice Improve Cutaneous Wound Healing in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 11 (1), 120. doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01621-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bainbridge, P. (2013). Wound Healing and the Role of Fibroblasts. J. Wound Care 22 (8), 407410–407812. doi:10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baltzis, D., Eleftheriadou, I., and Veves, A. (2014). Pathogenesis and Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing in Diabetes Mellitus: New Insights. Adv. Ther. 31 (8), 817–836. doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0140-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrientos, S., Brem, H., Stojadinovic, O., and Tomic-Canic, M. (2014). Clinical Application of Growth Factors and Cytokines in Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 22 (5), 569–578. doi:10.1111/wrr.12205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrientos, S., Stojadinovic, O., Golinko, M. S., Brem, H., and Tomic-Canic, M. (2008). PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: Growth Factors and Cytokines in Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 16 (5), 585–601. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2008.00410.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, C.-Y., Rao, S.-S., Ren, L., Hu, X.-K., Tan, Y.-J., Hu, Y., et al. (2018). Exosomal DMBT1 from Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Facilitates Diabetic Wound Repair by Promoting Angiogenesis. Theranostics 8 (6), 1607–1623. doi:10.7150/thno.22958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chin, J. S., Madden, L., Chew, S. Y., and Becker, D. L. (2019). Drug Therapies and Delivery Mechanisms to Treat Perturbed Skin Wound Healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 149-150, 2–18. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eming, S. A., Martin, P., and Tomic-Canic, M. (2014). Wound Repair and Regeneration: Mechanisms, Signaling, and Translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 6 (265), 265sr6. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gan, J., Liu, C., Li, H., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Kang, Z., et al. (2019). Accelerated Wound Healing in Diabetes by Reprogramming the Macrophages with Particle-Induced Clustering of the Mannose Receptors. Biomaterials 219, 119340. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, J., Chen, T., Zhao, D., Zheng, J., and Liu, Z. (2016). Ginkgolide B Exerts Cardioprotective Properties against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species, Akt and Calcium Signaling Pathways In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS One 11 (12), e0168219. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Sun, Y., Yang, H., Qiu, P., Cong, Z., Zou, Y., et al. (2019). A Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Derivative Accelerates Excisional Wound Healing by Modulating Pro-inflammation, Promoting Epithelialization and Neovascularization, and Remodeling Collagen. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (15). doi:10.3390/ijms20153722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, L., and Liu, M. (2020). Ginkgolide B Attenuates Myocardial Infarction-Induced Depression-Like Behaviors via Repressing IL-1β in Central Nervous System. Int. Immunopharmacol. 85, 106652. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, D. G. (2003). Wound Healing and Diabetes Mellitus. Clin. Plastic Surg. 30 (1), 37–45. doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(02)00066-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Ogier, J. R., Desgranges, S., Darcy, R., and O′Driscoll, C. (2012). Anisamide-Targeted Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for siRNA Delivery to Prostate Tumours in Mice. Biomaterials 33 (31), 7775–7784. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Yu, Z., Sun, D., Zou, Y., Liu, Y., and Huang, L. (2021). Two Nanoformulations Induce Reactive Oxygen Species and Immunogenetic Cell Death for Synergistic Chemo-Immunotherapy Eradicating Colorectal Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 20 (1), 10. doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01297-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, S., and Dipietro, L. A. (2010). Factors Affecting Wound Healing. J. Dent. Res. 89 (3), 219–229. doi:10.1177/0022034509359125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., and Longaker, M. T. (2008). Wound Repair and Regeneration. Nature 453 (7193), 314–321. doi:10.1038/nature07039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, Y.-Y., Liu, K.-L., Yeh, H.-H., Lin, H.-R., Wu, H.-L., and Tsai, J.-C. (2019). Sustained Release of Recombinant Thrombomodulin from Cross-Linked Gelatin/Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels Potentiate Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 135, 61–71. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Izumi, K., Mine, K., Inoue, Y., Teshima, M., Ogawa, S., Kai, Y., et al. (2015). Reduced Tyk2 Gene Expression in β-Cells Due to Natural Mutation Determines Susceptibility to Virus-Induced Diabetes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6748. doi:10.1038/ncomms7748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S. Y., and Nair, M. G. (2019). Macrophages in Wound Healing: Activation and Plasticity. Immunol. Cell. Biol. 97 (3), 258–267. doi:10.1111/imcb.12236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Du, R., Bian, Q., Zhang, D., Gao, S., Yuan, A., et al. (2021). Topical Application of HA-G-TEMPO Accelerates the Acute Wound Healing via Reducing Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Promoting Angiogenesis. Int. J. Pharm. 597, 120328. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Xu, C., Wang, H., Liu, X., Jiang, L., Liang, S., et al. (2021). Systems Pharmacology Reveals the Multi-Level Synergetic Mechanism of Action of Ginkgo Biloba L Leaves for Cardiomyopathy Treatment. J. Ethnopharmacol. 264, 113279. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2020.113279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Liu, W., Xiong, S., Luo, J., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2020). Highly Stabilized Nanocrystals Delivering Ginkgolide B in Protecting Against the Parkinson's Disease. Int. J. Pharm. 577, 119053. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, P., Fang, W., Geng, X., Yang, Q., Li, Y., and Sha, L. (2011). Therapeutic Neuroprotective Effects of Ginkgolide B on Cortex and Basal Ganglia in a Rat Model of Transient Focal Ischemia. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 44 (3), 235–240. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2011.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manconi, M., Manca, M. L., Caddeo, C., Cencetti, C., di Meo, C., Zoratto, N., et al. (2018). Preparation of Gellan-Cholesterol Nanohydrogels Embedding Baicalin and Evaluation of Their Wound Healing Activity. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 127, 244–249. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, P., and Nunan, R. (2015). Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Repair in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing. Br. J. Dermatol. 173 (2), 370–378. doi:10.1111/bjd.13954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morey, M., and Pandit, A. (2018). Responsive Triggering Systems for Delivery in Chronic Wound Healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 129, 169–193. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliva, N., and Almquist, B. D. (2020). Spatiotemporal Delivery of Bioactive Molecules for Wound Healing Using Stimuli-Responsive Biomaterials. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 161-162, 22–41. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orsu, P., Haider, H. Y., and Koyyada, A. (2021). Bioengineering for Curcumin Loaded Carboxymethyl Guargum/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for Chronic Wound Healing Applications. Int. J. Pharm. 606, 120928. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pandey, S., and Dvorakova, M. C. (2020). Future Perspective of Diabetic Animal Models. Emiddt 20 (1), 25–38. doi:10.2174/1871530319666190626143832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, X., Qiao, W., Wang, Y., Li, T., Li, X., Gong, T., et al. (2018). An Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Hydrogel for Full Thickness Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice. Macromol. Biosci. 18 (7), e1800047. doi:10.1002/mabi.201800047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rathinavel, S., Korrapati, P. S., Kalaiselvi, P., and Dharmalingam, S. (2021). Mesoporous Silica Incorporated PCL/Curcumin Nanofiber for Wound Healing Application. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 167, 106021. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saghazadeh, S., Rinoldi, C., Schot, M., Kashaf, S. S., Sharifi, F., Jalilian, E., et al. (2018). Drug Delivery Systems and Materials for Wound Healing Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 127, 138–166. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salazar, J. J., Ennis, W. J., and Koh, T. J. (2016). Diabetes Medications: Impact on Inflammation and Wound Healing. J. Diabetes Its Complicat. 30 (4), 746–752. doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.12.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shields, C. W., Evans, M. A., Wang, L. L., Baugh, N., Iyer, S., Wu, D., et al. (2020). Cellular Backpacks for Macrophage Immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 6 (18), eaaz6579. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz6579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, Z.-M., Shu, X.-D., Li, H.-Q., Sun, Y., Shan, H., Sun, X.-Y., et al. (2016). Ginkgolide B Protects Against Ischemic Stroke via Modulating Microglia Polarization in Mice. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 22 (9), 729–739. doi:10.1111/cns.12577

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sorg, H., Tilkorn, D. J., Hager, S., Hauser, J., and Mirastschijski, U. (2017). Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts. Eur. Surg. Res. 58 (1-2), 81–94. doi:10.1159/000454919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, B. K., Siprashvili, Z., and Khavari, P. A. (2014). Advances in Skin Grafting and Treatment of Cutaneous Wounds. Science 346 (6212), 941–945. doi:10.1126/science.1253836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, D. (2021). A Cyclodextrin-Based Nanoformulation Achieves Co-Delivery of Ginsenoside Rg3 and Quercetin for Chemo-Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 378–393. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teng, M., Huang, Y., and Zhang, H. (2014). Application of Stems Cells in Wound Healing-An Update. Wound Repair Regen. 22 (2), 151–160. doi:10.1111/wrr.12152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tracy, L. E., Minasian, R. A., and Caterson, E. J. (2016). Extracellular Matrix and Dermal Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound. Adv. Wound Care 5 (3), 119–136. doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Voss, G. T., Gularte, M. S., Vogt, A. G., Giongo, J. L., Vaucher, R. A., Echenique, J. V. Z., et al. (2018). Polysaccharide-Based Film Loaded with Vitamin C and Propolis: A Promising Device to Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing. Int. J. Pharm. 552 (1-2), 340–351. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, C., Jiang, J., Liu, J., Yuan, G., and Zhao, Z. (2020). Ginkgolide B Attenuates Collagen-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis and Regulates Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes-Mediated Apoptosis and Inflammation. Ann. Transl. Med. 8 (22), 1497. doi:10.21037/atm-20-6420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, M., and Jackson, C. J. (2015). Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and its Impact on Abnormal Scarring. Adv. Wound Care 4 (3), 119–136. doi:10.1089/wound.2013.0485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Song, L., Sun, B., Chu, D., Yang, L., Li, M., et al. (2021). Modulation of Macrophages by a Paeoniflorin-Loaded Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Promotes Diabetic Wound Healing. Mater. Today Bio 12, 100139. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Song, L., Zou, Y., Sun, D., Wang, L., Yu, Z., et al. (2021). Role of Hyaluronic Acids and Potential as Regenerative Biomaterials in Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Bio Mat. 4, 311–324. doi:10.1021/acsabm.0c01364

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Guo, J., Hu, M., Gao, Y., and Huang, L. (2020). Icaritin Exacerbates Mitophagy and Synergizes with Doxorubicin to Induce Immunogenic Cell Death in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ACS Nano 14 (4), 4816–4828. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c00708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zarei, F., Negahdari, B., and Eatemadi, A. (2018). Diabetic Ulcer Regeneration: Stem Cells, Biomaterials, Growth Factors. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 46 (1), 26–32. doi:10.1080/21691401.2017.1304407

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, R., Liang, H., Clarke, E., Jackson, C., and Xue, M. (2016). Inflammation in Chronic Wounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (12). doi:10.3390/ijms17122085

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, J.-S., Zheng, P.-D., Mungur, R., Zhou, H.-J., Hassan, M., and Jiang, S.-N. (2018). Ginkgolide B Promotes the Proliferation and Differentiation of Neural Stem Cells Following Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Both In Vivo and In Vitro. Neural Regen. Res. 13 (7), 1204–1211. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.232476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar