A bibliometric analysis of the application of stem cells in glaucoma research from 1999 to 2022

1 Introduction

Glaucoma is a retinal neurodegenerative disease, that is, the second leading cause of blindness after cataracts (Quigley and Broman, 2006; Cooke and Meyer, 2015). Specific pathological features of glaucoma include optic disc atrophy and depression, retinal edge and nerve fiber layer thinning, and progressive death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) (Dahlmann-Noor et al., 2010; Chang and Goldberg, 2012; Karl, 2013). These changes eventually lead to progressive and irreversible visual field defects (from the periphery to the center) (Quigley and Broman, 2006). In addition to its characteristic pathological features, glaucoma’s underlying mechanisms also include axonal transport disorders at the optic disc, oxidative stress, changes in reactive glial cells, excessive activation of immune system components, activation of apoptosis and ferroptosis, loss of synaptic connections, excitotoxicity damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and ischemia (Almasieh et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2022). The clinical manifestations of glaucoma are chronic and painless, and the associated lesions are deep within the eyeball, which poses a detection challenge during examination (McManus and Netland, 2013). Therefore, the majority of glaucoma patients are diagnosed when the disease progresses to an advanced stage with significant visual loss (Quaranta et al., 2016). Globally, over 76 million people suffer from glaucoma, approximately 8.4 million are blind, and the glaucoma prevalence is approximately 3.54% among people over 40 years (Tham and Cheng, 2015). The number of people with glaucoma is expected to reach 111.8 million by 2040 (Tham and Cheng, 2015). Glaucoma is generally classified according to the following parametersrimary or secondary, angle-open or angle-closed, and acute or chronic (Nicoara et al., 2021). Primary open-angle glaucoma is the most common type, and it is common in Europe and North America. In contrast, primary angle closure glaucoma is more common in East Asia (Kapetanakis et al., 2016).

The main risk factors for glaucoma are high intraocular pressure (IOP) and age (Quigley, 2011; Wang et al., 2020), but some glaucoma patients have IOP within normal limits (10–21 mmHg) (Almasieh et al., 2012; Li et al., 2017). Glaucoma caused by high IOP has three main treatments, drugs to reduce the generation of aqueous humor. Alternatively, surgery can be performed to introduce other outflow channels or clear obstructed areas. Thirdly, laser therapy stimulates cells to differentiate, migrate and fill damaged areas, temporarily regulating IOP (Karl, 2013; Levin, 2017). However, the above treatment is not ideal because of its limitation: for instance, it may lead to further deterioration of the disease. Treatment effects are transitory because IOP is volatile, which often necessitates repeated treatments and eye drops, which themselves are fraught with limitations, including patients’ suboptimal adherence to treatment (Tamm et al., 2013). Moreover, existing studies have found that lowering the IOP does not prevent RGC degeneration (Bull et al., 2009). Therefore, people are devoted to developing other neuroprotective strategies, especially stem cell therapy for glaucoma (Nicoara et al., 2021).

Bibliometric analysis refers to the use of quantitative techniques to analyze and visualize data pertaining to literature, which can be accomplished using software, such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Microsoft Excel, and Scimago Graphica (Chen, 2004; Chen et al., 2006; van Eck and Waltman, 2010; Liao et al., 2018; Moral-Muñoz et al., 2020). By means of VOSviewer and CiteSpace, we analyzed the contributions of countries or regions, authors, organizations, and journals, as well as the tendencies, hotspots, and knowledge networks. To our knowledge, there are no bibliometric studies about the application of stem cells in glaucoma research. In summary, we aimed to help researchers gain a comprehensive understanding of the past, present, and future of this field and address the following research questions (RQ) through our study.

RQ1 What is the publishing trend for articles reporting on stem cell treatment for glaucoma?

RQ2 Which are the most influential publications and primary contributing authors, institutions, journals, and countries/regions in this field?

RQ3 What is the cooperative relationship between authors, institutions, and countries/regions in this field?

RQ4 What are the research hotspots and frontier topics in this field?

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Purpose

The aims of this study were as follows: 1) analyze the basic situation and main contributors (authors, journals, institutions, and countries/regions) regarding the application of stem cells for glaucoma; 2) evaluate the cooperation relationship in this domain; 3) map the knowledge network, analyze the Frontier contents, and predict the future directions.

2.2 Search strategy and data collection

Web of Science (https://login.webofknowledge.com/) was used to perform the search for publications. The search and data acquisition were completed on 9 December 2022. All publications were exported in the format of “Full Record and Cited References” as plain text files. The search formula was as follows [TS= (“stem cell*” OR “progenitor stem cell*”) AND TS= (“glaucoma”)] AND DOP= [(1999-01-01/2022-12-09) AND DT= (Article OR Review)] AND LA= (English). Two investigators (YT and QZ) retrieved and screened the publications. Disagreements were discussed with a third investigator (MM) until a consensus was reached.

2.3 Inclusion criteria

1) Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)

2) Original articles and review articles

3) Written in English

2.4 Exclusion criteria

1) Meeting abstract, editorial materials, corrections, retractions, and book chapters

2) Unpublished papers

2.5 Visualized analysis

We mainly used the following software: VOSviewer (version 1.6.11, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands), CiteSpace (version 6.1. R1, Chaomei Chen, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States), Microsoft Excel (Redmond 2010, WA, United States). The data analysis using these applications were exported to a table that summarized the bibliometric parameters, including publication counts, publication years, total citations, average citations, co-citations, titles, countries, authors, journals, keywords, and references. The maps of co-occurrence and cooperation among authors, journals, institutions, and countries/regions, were made by VOSviewer. In the VOSviewer map, the side of the node corresponded with weighting. Links between nodes indicated cooperative relationships or common appearances in the same literature, and link thickness positively correlated with link strength. In the network visualization module, each color represented a different cluster. In the overlay visualization module, node color represented the average publication year. Blue represented the early research phase, yellow represented the recent period. We used CiteSpace to generate a keyword burst map and identify references. The red node highlighted highly cited references that co-occurred in multiple publications, and darker and lighter shades, respectively, indicated early and recent publications. In the burst module, the keywords and references were sorted by the beginning year of the burst.

3 Results

3.1 General data

We retrieved 572 publications from the WoSCC database, with publication dates from 1999 through 2022. Then, we limited the search results to English-language original articles and review articles. Eventually, 518 articles were brought into this analysis. There were 363 (70.08%) original articles and 155 (29.92%) review articles (Figure 1). From 1999 through 2008, the number of publications increased slowly, but there were fewer than 10 publications per year. From 2009 through 2016, the field received more attention, and the number of publications increased significantly. From 2017 through 2021, more than 50 articles in this field were published each year. Although the articles we obtained were only published before 9 December 2022, it can still be seen that the number of articles published in this field has decreased significantly in 2022. The peak publication frequency was in 2021 (n = 71) (Figure 2A). The general number of citations was 11069, with 21.37 citations for each paper. Overall 50 countries/regions, 2380 authors, 216 journals, and 712 institutions were represented. The United States, China, and England were the main contributors (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Data screening flow chart and steps of bibliometric analysis. The literature search was performed on the Web of Science Core Collection.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. The number of publications related to the application of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. (A) The number of papers published each year. (B) The top three countries/regions’ annual publications.

3.2 Top prolific authors and co-cited authors

Most of the top 10 prolific authors in this field were from the United States (Table 1), and other authors were from China and the United Kingdom. They published 104 articles, which accounted for 20.08% of all included publications. Yiqin Du, from the University of Pittsburgh, published the most articles (n = 16) followed by Keith R. Martin (n = 14) from the University of Cambridge. We also analyzed and ranked the number of co-citations between authors. Of the top 10 co-cited authors, most were from the United States. In terms of co-citations, Harry A. Quigley, Thomas V. Johnson, and Ben Mead were ranked in the top 3. It is worth noting that Johnson ranked highly in terms of citations and co-citations among the top 10 prolific authors and top 10 co-cited authors. Supplementary Figure S1 depicts the cooperative network between authors with more than five publications included in this analysis.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Top 10 prolific authors and co-cited authors about the application of stem cells in glaucoma.

3.3 Top contributing journals

We analyzed the top 10 prolific and co-cited journals separately using VOSviewer (Table 2). A total of 216 journals published relevant articles, and 24 journals published more than five articles included in the analysis. Sorted by the number of papers, the total number of publications in the top 10 productive journals was 149 (28.76%). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science was the most represented journal (n = 39; 1743 citations); Experimental Eye Research (n = 21; 483 citations) and Cornea (n = 14; 294 citations) ranked second and third, respectively. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (3690 co-citations) and Experimental Eye Research (1416 co-citations) also were the top 2 co-cited journals; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (891 co-citations) ranked third in this regard.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. Top 10 prolific journals and co-cited journals on the application of stem cells in glaucoma.

3.4 Active institutions

There were 712 organizations, of which 35 organizations published no less than five articles. We listed the top 10 prolific institutions (Figure 3A), eight of which were in the United States, and two were in China. Central South University ranked first (n = 21; 332 total citations; 15.8 average citations); University of Pittsburgh (n = 19; 413 total citations; 21.7 average citations) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Eye Institute (n = 17; 1186 total citations; 69.8 average citations) followed closely behind. We generated a cooperative relationship map (Figure 3B). The University of Pittsburgh cooperated most frequently with other institutions, and it collaborated most closely with Central South University. In the overlay map, we can view the duration (in the year) each institution has published in the field (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. The top 10 prolific institutions and cooperative relationships between institutions in work on the applications of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. (A) The numbers of publications, total citations, and average citations in the top 10 institutions. (B) The cooperative network visualization map of institutions working on applications of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. Node size indicates the number of publications, and the thickness of the link positively correlates with the cooperation strength. (C) The cooperative network overlay visualization map of institutions for the application of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. Blue represents the early research phase, and yellow represents the recent period.

3.5 The contributing countries/regions

A total of 50 countries/regions were active in this area. There were 24 countries/regions with at least five publications included in the analysis. Figure 4A shows the top 10 countries/regions in terms of the total number of included publications. The top three countries/regions were the United States (n = 251; 6323 total citations; 25.2 average citations), China (n = 116; 1520 total citations; 13.1 average citations), and England (n = 44; 1953 total citations; 44.4 average citations). The total citations among the top three were markedly higher than the others. The cooperation network of these countries/regions is shown in Figure 4B. The scope of collaboration between the United States and other countries/regions was extensive, its key partners were China, England, and Germany.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. The top 10 prolific countries/regions and cooperative networks working on the application of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. (A) The number of publications, total citations, and average citations in the top 10 countries/regions. (B) The cooperative network visualization map of countries/regions on applications of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. Node size indicates the number of publications.

3.6 Co-occurrence of keywords

High-frequency keywords can reflect some knowledge domains’ evolving research frontiers (Liao et al., 2018). We identified 1157 keywords using VOSviewer, and 47 keywords appeared no less than 5 times. After excluding one word that was not associated with the keywords, we subsequently analyzed the remaining 46 keywords. There were 8 clusters (Figure 5A). “Glaucoma”, “retinal ganglion cell”, “stem cell”, “retina”, and “neuroprotection” were the top 5 keywords sorted by frequency of occurrence. In our overlay visualization map (Figure 5B), blue represents the early research phase and yellow represents the recent period. “Transplantation”, “retinal degeneration”, “neurotrophic factor”, “gene therapy”, and “apoptosis” received more attention around 2014. “Exosomes”, “extracellular vesicles”, “growth factors”, “mitochondria”, and “oxidative stress” have become the foci in recent years. CiteSpace allowed us to identify hotspots and research frontiers over time by detecting burst keywords (Chen et al., 2006). The minimum burst duration was set to 1, the red bars in Figure 5C indicate that some words have been cited frequently, while the blue bars indicate words that have been cited infrequently. The diagram exhibits the top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts, of which “embryonic stem cells” had the longest duration. “Model” had the highest burst strength. In general, the focus gradually deepened from “stem cell” and “experimental model” of disease to “extracellular matrix”, “retina”, and “trabecular meshwork”.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Analysis of keywords related to publications on applications of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research. (A) The co-occurrence network visualization map of keywords related to the application of stem cells for glaucoma. The keywords were clustered into eight groups according to their colors. Large nodes represent keywords with high frequencies. (B) Keywords are colored according to their appearance for the average time. Blue represents the early stage, and yellow represents the late stage. (C) The top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts regarding applications of stem cells for glaucoma from 1999 through 2022. The red segment of the blue line denotes the burst duration of a keyword.

3.7 The cited publications and co-citation references

Table 3 lists the top 10 cited publications. The most cited article was written by Cuenca et al. (2014), published in Progress in Retinal and Eye Research with 259 citations, titled “Cellular responses following retinal injuries and therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative diseases”. In the article, the authors held that the injury response of retinal neurodegenerative diseases at the cellular and molecular levels is similar. Inflammatory response, oxidative stress and apoptosis may be common features of these diseases, eventually leading to cell death and retinal remodeling. In addition, the authors also summarized the molecular, anatomical and functional changes caused by damage, and the treatment were summarized. This article aimed to help researchers to establish suitable treatment methods for these pathologies (Cuenca et al., 2014). We have obtained key references with high citations in this field using CiteSpace (Figure 6A). The CiteSpace citation burst could identify references focused on by researchers during a specific period (Chen et al., 2006). There were 15 references with the strongest citation bursts when the burst duration was set to 5 years (Figure 6B). “Neuroprotective Effects of Intravitreal Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Experimental Glaucoma” by Johnson, had the highest burst strength (n = 12.58) (Johnson et al., 2010). There were four articles with citation bursts ending in 2022 that indicated they had received more attention in recent years (Ohlemacher et al., 2016; Venugopalan et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Teotia et al., 2017).

TABLE 3

TABLE 3. Top 10 most cited papers related to the application of stem cells in glaucoma.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. (A) The visual network of references to work on the applications of stem cells for glaucoma treatment and research from 1999 through 2022. (B) The top 15 references with the strongest citation bursts related to applications of stem cells for glaucoma between 1999 and 2022. The blue line represents the time from its first appearance to 2022, the red line represents the burst time.

4 Discussion

The growth or decline in the number of academic publications in a particular field is a good indicator of overall trends (Peng et al., 2020). Through the analysis of the publications in this field, we found that the research was increasing year by year, suggesting that this field will still be a focus for researchers in the future. In the past decade, the number of published papers has increased significantly; this could be due to the globally aging population and growing awareness of eye healthcare (Cheng et al., 2020a). We analyzed 518 articles published from 1999 through 2022, that met the inclusion criteria, and these publications cover 50 countries/regions, 712 institutions, and 2380 authors, which means that the application of stem cells for glaucoma treatment has attracted the attention of researchers worldwide. The contribution of the United States in this field is particularly prominent, which may be related to the fact that patients with primary open-angle glaucoma are mostly located in North America (Zhang et al., 2021). Another important contributor is China, which may be related to the aging demographic pyramid in China (Wan et al., 2020). Among the top 10 prolific institutions, eight institutions are in developed countries and two institutions are in developing countries, indicating that developed countries pay more attention to eye health. The University of Pittsburgh, in the United States, cooperated most frequently with other organizations, and it cooperated most closely with Central South University in China. Yiqin Du, based in the United States, had the most publications. These results indicate that the UAS occupies a dominant position in this field. In terms of the total number of publications and citations. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (n = 39; 1743 citations) and Experimental Eye Research (n = 21; 483 citations) were the top two journals in this field. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research is the most influential of the top 10 prolific journals, with 60.08 citations per article, it is also ranked as Q1 by the Journal Citation Reports. Our analysis identifies the classical and important contents in this field, and researchers can quickly establish a knowledge architecture guided by these data.

We can determine the information that investigators emphasize from an analysis of references. CiteSpace was used to analyze references, and 25148 references were discovered. The minimum burst duration in the burstness module was set to five, and we listed the top 15 references (Figure 6B). Additionally, we analyzed the references at the red nodes (Figure 6A). By means of cluster analysis, 10 clusters are shown (Supplementary Figure S2), including “gene therapy”, “retinal ganglion cell”, “marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell”, “optic neuropathies”, “cell-derived small extracellular vesicle”, “neurotrophic factor delivery”, “patient-specific stem cell”, “trabecular meshwork cell”, “survival differentiation”, and “ocular disease therapeutics”. Development speed is still relatively slow throughout the field. The research background of this domain can be divided into four stages, according to the theme by analyzing the literature with red nodes.

4.1 Phase I: Cell differentiation and replacement

Researchers focused on the simple differentiation and replacement of cells before 2009. The types of cells emphasized during this period are also relatively complex, including various stem cells and cells with similar activity (such as Müller cells and TM cells) (Lawrence et al., 2007; Bull et al., 2008; Kelley et al., 2009). Some studies have shown that when human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) or retinal cells are transplanted into the subretinal space, they survive for some time, and a few cells could integrate into the retina where they could further differentiate into retinal cells (Banin et al., 2006; Meyer et al., 2006; Lamba et al., 2009). Conditions for inducing embryonic stem cells from mice, monkeys, and humans to differentiate into rod and cone cells have been investigated (Osakada et al., 2008). Another type of cell is bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, scholars have confirmed that by transplanting this cell, it could be differentiated and partially integrate into the RGC layer to reduce retinal damage (Yu et al., 2006; Inoue et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009). Moreover, other studies have used Müller cells and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (Lawrence et al., 2007; Bull et al., 2008; Bull et al., 2009; Kelley et al., 2009).

4.2 Phase II: Stem cell-derived neurotrophic factors

From 2009 to 2013, there was growing concern that the effects of stem cell transplantation on the retina may be related to its secretion of neurotrophic factors. Pease et al. (2009) injected an adeno-associated viral vector that contained ciliary-derived neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BNTF) directly into the vitreous body of glaucomatous rats. They found that CNTF had an obvious neuroprotective effect, emphasizing that the action of neurotrophic factors on damaged RGCs are determined by the delivery method, dose, and model of disease (Pease et al., 2009). Several studies have confirmed that bone marrow or dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells, in addition to integration, and differentiation, provide neurotrophic factors to the damaged retina (Johnson et al., 2010; Levkovitch-Verbin et al., 2010; Harper et al., 2011; Johnson and Martin, 2013; Manuguerra-Gagne et al., 2013; Mead et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2014). Cell therapy can supply more durable, low-dose, multi-factor better protection compared with direct supplementation of nutritional factors (Eiraku et al., 2011; Nakano et al., 2012). Also, the release of neurotrophic factors in cell therapy is based on the host’s retinal condition with less trauma, and it can be engineered to allow donor cells to express specific factors. Concerns have also been raised over the details of how to differentiate stem cells into RGCs (Chen et al., 2010; Meyer et al., 2011; Tucker et al., 2011). During this period, attention began to be paid to the role of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and differentiated stem cells in the trabecular meshwork in improving IOP (Kelley et al., 2009; Du et al., 2012; Du et al., 2013).

4.3 Phase III: Induction of human pluripotent stem cells

Between 2014 and 2016, the induction of human pluripotent stem cells became a research hotspot. This was seen as a way to avoid both the ethical issues caused by embryonic stem cells and the host immune rejection. Researchers induced pluripotency in cells and used them to refill damaged areas (Ding et al., 2014; Zhong et al., 2014; Abu-Hassan et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2016). They also explored the molecular details of iPSCs differentiation and identified differentiated cells (Riazifar et al., 2014; Ohlemacher et al., 2016), and then people gradually focused on targeted induction of IPSC to differentiate into cells with specific functions, such as using CRISPR technology (Sluch et al., 2015; Tanaka et al., 2015; Teotia et al., 2017). Additionally, there are still some researchers continuing to explore the different sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their secretion of nutritional factors on the role of retinal (Mead et al., 2014; Mesentier-Louro et al., 2014; Roubeix et al., 2015).

4.4 Phase IV: Cell-free therapy

There was a growing interest in a cell-free treatment approach from 2017 to 2022 (Phan et al., 2018; Rahmani et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021). Exosomes are vesicle structures containing a variety of ribonucleic acids (RNAs) and proteins with diameters of 40–100 nm (Hobor et al., 2018; Cheng et al., 2020b). Mead and Tomarev (2017) have made an outstanding contribution to stem cell therapy for glaucoma. They transported exosomes extracted from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) into the eyes, which were found to accelerate the regeneration of RGCs and their axons, and this therapeutic effect was weakened after knocking out Argonaute2, which is a kind of microRNA (miR) for the first time (Mead and Tomarev, 2017). They demonstrated for the first time that BMSC-derived exosomes may exert a protective action on RGCs through miRNAs (Mead and Tomarev, 2017). Exosomes effectively avoid a variety of complications in cell therapy, such as immune rejection, tumorigenesis, and difficulties in integrating with host tissue. Exosomes have become a potential resource for cell and gene therapy due to their small size, easy storage, and non-proliferation (Lu et al., 2019; Feng et al., 2021). Mesenchymal cells can produce more exosomes than other cells (Yeo et al., 2013; Phan et al., 2018).

Because of the remarkable advantages of cell-free therapy, may be the reason for the significant decrease in the research on stem cell therapy for glaucoma in 2022, as the shifts in a more optimized direction. Increasing attention to the use of extracellular vesicles as therapeutic agents or drug carriers (Anand et al., 2022; Sanie-Jahromi et al., 2022). The role of exosome content gradually emerges. Yu et al. (2022) found that tumor necrosis factor-α mediates the neuroprotective effect of miR-21-5p-rich exosomes in glaucoma through the maternally expressed gene 3/programmed cell death four axis. Studies have shown that miR-143-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-1260b in aqueous humor may be therapeutic intervention targets, and microRNA can be an early biomarker or therapeutic strategy by regulating its level (Martinez and Peplow, 2022). RGCs are a group of neurons located at the distal end of the eye, their axons contain large amounts of mitochondria (Anand et al., 2022). There are studies found that mitochondrial dysfunction or abnormal mitophagy is involved in glaucomatous damage and affects neurogenesis and neuronal viability (Rosignol et al., 2020; Ozgen et al., 2022). At the same time, some researchers were paying increasing attention to the genetic aspects of the field. Wei et al. (2022) discovered key genes that regulate self-renewal and differentiation of NPCs by using 5-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2-dithione-3-thione to treat mammalian NPCs to promote their differentiation into neurons and oligodendrocytes and found that mRNA and protein expression of key genes regulating NPCs self-renewal and differentiation decreased, such as β-catenin. Optineurin (E50K) mutant astrocytes caused neurodegeneration in healthy RGCs (Gomes et al., 2022). Xue et al. (2022) investigated the common genetic causes of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, retinal detachment, and myopia, they found that genes associated with common genetic sites were involved in neuronal differentiation and eye development systems. Single-cell RNA sequencing data showed that their gene expression from pluripotent progenitor cells into retinal cells increased during retinal development (Xue et al., 2022).

Notably, iPSCs still received attention in 2022 (Coulon et al., 2022). The trabecular meshwork cells can mediate the regulation of intraocular pressure by regulating aqueous humor flow (Zhu et al., 2017). Wang et al. (2022) designed a nanoparticle to label trabecular meshwork cells, and the use of nanoparticles not only facilitated long-term tracking, but also improved the transmission accuracy of transplanted cells in vivo experiments (Wang et al., 2022). It is more important that the use of magnet temporarily enhanced the effectiveness of cell-based therapy in glaucoma-related pathology, and promoted the clinical transformation of stem cell-based glaucoma therapy (Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022).

4.5 Research frontiers

A total of 47 keywords with no less than five occurrences were identified and divided into 8 clusters. The top 3 clusters are red (13 items), green (7 items), and blue (7 items) in Figure 5A. It is worth noting that some studies have focused on the neuroprotective role of mesenchymal stem cells in damaged RGCs through extracellular vesicles (exosomes, microscopic vesicles) (Mead et al., 2018; Mathew et al., 2019; Mead et al., 2020; Mathew et al., 2021), which may also involve apoptosis and glial cell-mediated inflammatory responses (Alghamdi et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2021). According to the analysis in the overlay visualization module, research on exosomes, extracellular vesicles, and oxidative stress in this field have been a hot topic in the last few years (Mathew et al., 2021; Reboussin et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2022). The following three themes may be worthy of further study in the future: 1) the neuroprotective effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in RGCs, 2) growth factors, MSCs, and iPSCs in regenerative medicine for glaucoma, and 3) oxidative stress involving in the injury mechanism of glaucoma.

4.6 Limitations

First, because the visualization software has limitations on the format of the data, we only collected text data from the WoSCC. However, as the most widely used database in the world, the WoSCC met our analytical demands (Shi et al., 2022). Second, we adopted English publications and limited their types, and we only analyzed original articles and reviews. Third, the indicators related to citations will change over time. We should integrate various indexes to analyze Journal Impact Factor, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, and SCImago Journal Rank (Deng et al., 2020). Fourth, updating the database may affect our results, but this effect should be slight.

5 Conclusion

With the improvements in quality of life and population aging transitions, followed by an increase in the number of neurodegenerative diseases, such as glaucoma (Aishwarya et al., 2022). There is an urgent need for an effective, fewer side effects treatment of glaucoma. Stem cells provide the possibility for its treatment. This field has been explored for nearly 20 years. Our research enables readers to quickly obtain the guiding information in this field through visual maps while maintaining the objectivity and accuracy of the information. This study summarized and visualized the global trends, cooperative relationships, hotspots, and Frontier topics about the application of stem cells in glaucoma treatment. In the future, researchers explore the mechanisms and clinical trials.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YT and QZ conceived the study, participated in its design, obtained data and contributed to interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. MM was involved in the study design, and helped to draft the manuscript. JH provided the theoretical frameworks and performed much of the editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1081898/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure S1 | The cooperative relationship between authors. (A) The co-authorship network visualization map of authors related to work on applications of stem cells for glaucoma. The authors were clustered into 3 groups according to their color. Large nodes represent prolific authors. (B) In the overlay visualization map between authors, the weight is the number of publications, and the color is the average publication year. Blue represents the early stage, and yellow represents the late stage.

Supplementary Figure S2 | The cluster analysis of the highly cited references.

References

Abu-Hassan, D. W., Li, X., Ryan, E. I., Acott, T. S., and Kelley, M. J. (2015). Induced pluripotent stem cells restore function in a human cell loss model of open-angle glaucoma. Stem Cells 33 (3), 751–761. doi:10.1002/stem.1885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aishwarya, L., Arun, D., and Kannan, S. (2022). Stem cells as a potential therapeutic option for treating neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 17 (7), 590–605. doi:10.2174/1574888X16666210810105136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alghamdi, A., Aldossary, W., Albahkali, S., Alotaibi, B., and Alrfaei, B. M. (2020). The loss of microglia activities facilitates glaucoma progression in association with CYP1B1 gene mutation (p.Gly61Glu). PLoS One 15 (11), e0241902. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almasieh, M., Wilson, A. M., Morquette, B., Cueva Vargas, J. L., and Di Polo, A. (2012). The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 31 (2), 152–181. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anand, S., Trounce, I. A., and Gangoda, L. (2022). Role of extracellular vesicles in mitochondrial eye diseases. IUBMB Life 74 (12), 1264–1272. doi:10.1002/iub.2687

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banin, E., Obolensky, A., Idelson, M., Hemo, I., Reinhardtz, E., Pikarsky, E., et al. (2006). Retinal incorporation and differentiation of neural precursors derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24 (2), 246–257. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bull, N. D., Irvine, K. A., Franklin, R. J. M., and Martin, K. R. (2009). Transplanted oligodendrocyte precursor cells reduce neurodegeneration in a model of glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50 (9), 4244–4253. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bull, N. D., Limb, G. A., and Martin, K. R. (2008). Human muller stem cell (MIO-M1) transplantation in a rat model of glaucoma: Survival, differentiation, and integration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49 (8), 3449–3456. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, E. E., and Goldberg, J. L. (2012). Glaucoma 2.0: neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, neuroenhancement. Ophthalmology 119 (5), 979–986. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, C., Liang, S. Y., Shih, Y. P., Chen, C. Y, Lee, Y. M., Chang, L., et al. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57 (3), 359–365. doi:10.1128/JCM.44.2.359-365.2006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning pointsrogressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 5303–5310. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, M., Chen, Q., Sun, X., Shen, W., Liu, B., Zhong, X., et al. (2010). Generation of retinal ganglion-like cells from reprogrammed mouse fibroblasts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51 (11), 5970–5978. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Meng, J., Zhu, L., and Peng, Y. (2020). Exosomal noncoding RNAs in glioma: biological functions and potential clinical applications. Mol. Cancer 19 (1), 66. doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01189-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, X., Yang, Y., Schwebel, D. C., Liu, Z., Li, L., Cheng, P., et al. (2020). Population ageing and mortality during 1990-2017: A global decomposition analysis. PLoS Med. 17 (6), e1003138. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cooke, J. A., and Meyer, J. S. (2015). Human pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal ganglion cells: Applications for the study and treatment of optic neuropathies. Curr. Ophthalmol. Rep. 3 (3), 200–206. doi:10.1007/s40135-015-0081-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coulon, S. J., Schuman, J. S., Du, Y., Bahrani Fard, M. R., Ethier, C. R., and Stamer, W. D. (2022). A novel glaucoma approach: Stem cell regeneration of the trabecular meshwork. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 90, 101063. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuenca, N., Fernandez-Sanchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., et al. (2014). Cellular responses following retinal injuries and therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative diseases. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 43, 17–75. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dahlmann-Noor, A. H., Vijay, S., Limb, G. A., and Khaw, P. T. (2010). Strategies for optic nerve rescue and regeneration in glaucoma and other optic neuropathies. Drug Discov. Today 15 (7-8), 287–299. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2010.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Z., and Wang, T. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of dendritic epidermal T cell (DETC) research from 1983 to 2019. Front. Immunol. 11, 259. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, Q. J., Zhu, W., Cook, A. C., Anfinson, K. R., Tucker, B. A., and Kuehn, M. H. (2014). Induction of trabecular meshwork cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55 (11), 7065–7072. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, Y., Roh, D. S., Mann, M. M., Funderburgh, M. L., Funderburgh, J. L., and Schuman, J. S. (2012). Multipotent stem cells from trabecular meshwork become phagocytic TM cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53 (3), 1566–1575. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-9134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, Y., Yun, H., Yang, E., and Schuman, J. S. (2013). Stem cells from trabecular meshwork home to TM tissue in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2), 1450–1459. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eiraku, M., Takata, N., Ishibashi, H., Kawada, M., Sakakura, E., Okuda, S., et al. (2011). Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472 (7341), 51–56. doi:10.1038/nature09941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, R., Yu, F., Xu, J., and Hu, X. (2021). Knowledge gaps in immune response and immunotherapy involving nanomaterials: Databases and artificial intelligence for material design. Biomaterials 266, 120469. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomes, C., VanderWall, K. B., Pan, Y., Lu, X., Lavekar, S. S., Huang, K. C., et al. (2022). Astrocytes modulate neurodegenerative phenotypes associated with glaucoma in OPTN(E50K) human stem cell-derived retinal ganglion cells. Stem Cell Rep. 17 (7), 1636–1649. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.05.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, Z., Liu, S., Pei, Y., Ding, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2021). Highly efficient magnetic labelling allows MRI tracking of the homing of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles following systemic delivery. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10 (3), e12054. doi:10.1002/jev2.12054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harper, M. M., Grozdanic, S. D., Blits, B., Kuehn, M. H., Zamzow, D., Buss, J. E., et al. (2011). Transplantation of BDNF-secreting mesenchymal stem cells provides neuroprotection in chronically hypertensive rat eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52 (7), 4506–4515. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hobor, F., Dallmann, A., Ball, N. J., Cicchini, C., Battistelli, C., Ogrodowicz, R. W., et al. (2018). A cryptic RNA-binding domain mediates Syncrip recognition and exosomal partitioning of miRNA targets. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 831. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03182-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inoue, Y., Iriyama, A., Ueno, S., Takahashi, H., Kondo, M., Tamaki, Y., et al. (2007). Subretinal transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells delays retinal degeneration in the RCS rat model of retinal degeneration. Exp. Eye Res. 85 (2), 234–241. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2007.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, T. V., Bull, N. D., Hunt, D. P., Marina, N., Tomarev, S. I., and Martin, K. R. (2010). Neuroprotective effects of intravitreal mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51 (4), 2051–2059. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, T. V., DeKorver, N. W., Levasseur, V. A., Osborne, A., Tassoni, A., Lorber, B., et al. (2014). Identification of retinal ganglion cell neuroprotection conferred by platelet-derived growth factor through analysis of the mesenchymal stem cell secretome. Brain 137, 503–519. doi:10.1093/brain/awt292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, T. V., and Martin, K. R. (2013). Cell transplantation approaches to retinal ganglion cell neuroprotection in glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 13 (1), 78–82. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2012.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kapetanakis, V. V., Chan, M. P. Y., Foster, P. J., Cook, D. G., Owen, C. G., and Rudnicka, A. R. (2016). Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 100 (1), 86–93. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karl, M. O. (2013). The potential of stem cell research for the treatment of neuronal damage in glaucoma. Cell Tissue Res. 353 (2), 311–325. doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1646-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelley, M. J., Rose, A. Y., Keller, K. E., Hessle, H., Samples, J. R., and Acott, T. S. (2009). Stem cells in the trabecular meshworkresent and future promises. Exp. Eye Res. 88 (4), 747–751. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamba, D. A., Gust, J., and Reh, T. A. (2009). Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived photoreceptors restores some visual function in Crx-deficient mice. Cell Stem Cell 4 (1), 73–79. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lawrence, J. M., Singhal, S., Bhatia, B., Keegan, D. J., Reh, T. A., Luthert, P. J., et al. (2007). MIO-M1 cells and similar muller glial cell lines derived from adult human retina exhibit neural stem cell characteristics. Stem Cells 25 (8), 2033–2043. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levin, L. A. (2017). Translational pharmacology in glaucoma neuroprotection. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 242, 209–230. doi:10.1007/164_2016_20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levkovitch-Verbin, H., Sadan, O., Vander, S., Rosner, M., Barhum, Y., Melamed, E., et al. (2010). Intravitreal injections of neurotrophic factors secreting mesenchymal stem cells are neuroprotective in rat eyes following optic nerve transection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51 (12), 6394–6400. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, N., Li, X. R., and Yuan, J. Q. (2009). Effects of bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into vitreous cavity of rat injured by ischemia/reperfusion. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 247 (4), 503–514. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-1009-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Han, Y., Lei, H., Zeng, Y., Cui, Z., Zeng, Q., et al. (2017). In vitro biomimetic platforms featuring a perfusion system and 3D spheroid culture promote the construction of tissue-engineered corneal endothelial layers. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 777. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00914-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., and Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability 10 (2), 166. doi:10.3390/su10010166

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, R., Wen, L., Wu, K., Li, Y., et al. (2019). Bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote recovery following spinal cord injury via improvement of the integrity of the blood-spinal cord barrier. Front. Neurosci. 13, 209. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manuguerra-Gagne, R., Boulos, P. R., Ammar, A., Leblond, F. A., Krosl, G., Pichette, V., et al. (2013). Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells promotes tissue regeneration in a glaucoma model through laser-induced paracrine factor secretion and progenitor cell recruitment. Stem Cells 31 (6), 1136–1148. doi:10.1002/stem.1364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinez, B., and Peplow, P. V. (2022). MicroRNAs as biomarkers in glaucoma and potential therapeutic targets. Neural Regen. Res. 17 (11), 2368–2375. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.338989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathew, B., Ravindran, S., Liu, X., Torres, L., Chennakesavalu, M., Huang, C. C., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and retinal ischemia-reperfusion. Biomaterials 197, 146–160. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathew, B., Torres, L. A., Gamboa Acha, L., Tran, S., Liu, A., Patel, R., et al. (2021). Uptake and distribution of administered bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicles in retina. Cells 10 (4), 730. doi:10.3390/cells10040730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McManus, J. R., and Netland, P. A. (2013). Screening for glaucoma: rationale and strategies. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 24 (2), 144–149. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835cf078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mead, B., Amaral, J., and Tomarev, S. (2018). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles promote neuroprotection in rodent models of glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59 (2), 702–714. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22855

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mead, B., Chamling, X., Zack, D. J., Ahmed, Z., and Tomarev, S. (2020). Tnfα-mediated priming of mesenchymal stem cells enhances their neuroprotective effect on retinal ganglion cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61 (2), 6. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.2.6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mead, B., Logan, A., Berry, M., Leadbeater, W., and Scheven, B. A. (2013). Intravitreally transplanted dental pulp stem cells promote neuroprotection and axon regeneration of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve injury. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (12), 7544–7556. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mead, B., Logan, A., Berry, M., Leadbeater, W., and Scheven, B. A. (2014). Paracrine-mediated neuroprotection and neuritogenesis of axotomised retinal ganglion cells by human dental pulp stem cells: Comparison with human bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 9 (10), e109305. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mead, B., and Tomarev, S. (2017). Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes promote survival of retinal ganglion cells through miRNA-dependent mechanisms. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6 (4), 1273–1285. doi:10.1002/sctm.16-0428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mesentier-Louro, L. A., Zaverucha-do-Valle, C., da Silva-Junior, A. J., Nascimento-Dos-Santos, G., Gubert, F., de Figueiredo, A. B. P., et al. (2014). Distribution of mesenchymal stem cells and effects on neuronal survival and axon regeneration after optic nerve crush and cell therapy. PLoS One 9 (10), e110722. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, J. S., Howden, S. E., Wallace, K. A., Verhoeven, A. D., Wright, L. S., Capowski, E. E., et al. (2011). Optic vesicle-like structures derived from human pluripotent stem cells facilitate a customized approach to retinal disease treatment. Stem Cells 29 (8), 1206–1218. doi:10.1002/stem.674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, J. S., Katz, M. L., Maruniak, J. A., and Kirk, M. D. (2006). Embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors incorporate into degenerating retina and enhance survival of host photoreceptors. Stem Cells 24 (2), 274–283. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., and Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Prof. Inf. 29 (1). doi:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakano, T., Ando, S., Takata, N., Kawada, M., Muguruma, K., Sekiguchi, K., et al. (2012). Self-formation of optic cups and storable stratified neural retina from human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 10 (6), 771–785. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicoara, S. D., Brie, I., Jurj, A., and Sorițău, O. (2021). The future of stem cells and their derivates in the treatment of glaucoma. A critical point of view. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (20), 11077. doi:10.3390/ijms222011077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohlemacher, S. K., Sridhar, A., Xiao, Y., Hochstetler, A. E., Sarfarazi, M., Cummins, T. R., et al. (2016). Stepwise differentiation of retinal ganglion cells from human pluripotent stem cells enables analysis of glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Stem Cells 34 (6), 1553–1562. doi:10.1002/stem.2356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osakada, F., Ikeda, H., Mandai, M., Wataya, T., Watanabe, K., Yoshimura, N., et al. (2008). Toward the generation of rod and cone photoreceptors from mouse, monkey and human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (2), 215–224. doi:10.1038/nbt1384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ozgen, S., Krigman, J., Zhang, R., and Sun, N. (2022). Significance of mitochondrial activity in neurogenesis and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 17 (4), 741–747. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.322429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pease, M. E., Zack, D. J., Berlinicke, C., Bloom, K., Cone, F., Wang, Y., et al. (2009). Effect of CNTF on retinal ganglion cell survival in experimental glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50 (5), 2194–2200. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, C., Cutrona, S. L., Kiefe, C. I., Liu, F., and Wang, Z. (2020). Theme trends and knowledge structure on mobile Health apps: Bibliometric analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8 (7), e18212. doi:10.2196/18212

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Phan, J., Kumar, P., Hao, D., Gao, K., Farmer, D., and Wang, A. (2018). Engineering mesenchymal stem cells to improve their exosome efficacy and yield for cell-free therapy. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7 (1), 1522236. doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1522236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quaranta, L., Riva, I., Gerardi, C., Oddone, F., Floriani, I., and Konstas, A. G. P. (2016). Erratum to: Quality of life in glaucoma: A review of the literature. Adv. Ther. 33 (6), 982. doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0342-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quigley, H. A., and Broman, A. T. (2006). The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90 (3), 262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quigley, H. A. (2011). Glaucoma. Lancet 377 (9774), 1367–1377. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rahmani, A., Saleki, K., Javanmehr, N., Khodaparast, J., Saadat, P., and Nouri, H. R. (2020). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-based therapies protect against coupled degeneration of the central nervous and vascular systems in stroke. Ageing Res. Rev. 62, 101106. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reboussin, E., Buffault, J., Brignole-Baudouin, F., Reaux-Le Goazigo, A., Riancho, L., Olmiere, C., et al. (2022). Evaluation of neuroprotective and immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells in an ex vivo retinal explant model. J. Neuroinflammation 19 (1), 63. doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02418-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riazifar, H., Jia, Y., Chen, J., Lynch, G., and Huang, T. (2014). Chemically induced specification of retinal ganglion cells from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 3 (4), 424–432. doi:10.5966/sctm.2013-0147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosignol, I., Villarejo-Zori, B., Teresak, P., Sierra-Filardi, E., Pereiro, X., Rodriguez-Muela, N., et al. (2020). The mito-QC reporter for quantitative mitophagy assessment in primary retinal ganglion cells and experimental glaucoma models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (5), 1882. doi:10.3390/ijms21051882

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roubeix, C., Godefroy, D., Mias, C., Sapienza, A., Riancho, L., Degardin, J., et al. (2015). Intraocular pressure reduction and neuroprotection conferred by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in an animal model of glaucoma. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 6 (1), 177. doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0168-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanie-Jahromi, F., Mahmoudi, A., Khalili, M. R., and Nowroozzadeh, M. H. (2022). A review on the application of stem cell secretome in the protection and regeneration of retinal ganglion cells; a clinical prospect in the treatment of optic neuropathies. Curr. Eye Res. 47 (11), 1463–1471. doi:10.1080/02713683.2022.2103153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, X., Wang, S., Wu, Y., Li, Q., Zhang, T., Min, K., et al. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the innate immune DNA sensing cGAS-STING pathway from 2013 to 2021. Front. Immunol. 13, 916383. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.916383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sluch, V. M., Davis, C. h. O., Ranganathan, V., Kerr, J. M., Krick, K., Martin, R., et al. (2015). Differentiation of human ESCs to retinal ganglion cells using a CRISPR engineered reporter cell line. Sci. Rep. 5, 16595. doi:10.1038/srep16595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamm, E. R., Schmetterer, L., and Grehn, F. (2013). Status and perspectives of neuroprotective therapies in glaucoma: The European glaucoma society white paper. Cell Tissue Res. 353 (2), 347–354. doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1637-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanaka, T., Yokoi, T., Tamalu, F., Watanabe, S. I., Nishina, S., and Azuma, N. (2015). Generation of retinal ganglion cells with functional axons from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 8344. doi:10.1038/srep08344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teotia, P., Chopra, D. A., Dravid, S. M., Van Hook, M. J., Qiu, F., Morrison, J., et al. (2017). Generation of functional human retinal ganglion cells with target specificity from pluripotent stem cells by chemically defined recapitulation of developmental mechanism. Stem Cells 35 (3), 572–585. doi:10.1002/stem.2513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tham, Y. C., and Cheng, C. Y. (2015). Author reply: To PMID 24974815. Ophthalmology 122 (7), e41–e42. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tucker, B. A., Park, I. H., Qi, S. D., Klassen, H. J., Jiang, C., Yao, J., et al. (2011). Transplantation of adult mouse iPS cell-derived photoreceptor precursors restores retinal structure and function in degenerative mice. PLoS One 6 (4), e18992. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2), 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Venugopalan, P., Wang, Y., Nguyen, T., Huang, A., Muller, K. J., and Goldberg, J. L. (2016). Transplanted neurons integrate into adult retinas and respond to light. Nat. Commun. 7, 10472. doi:10.1038/ncomms10472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, Y., Yang, J., Ren, X., Yu, Z., Zhang, R., and Li, X. (2020). Evaluation of eye movements and visual performance in patients with cataract. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 9875. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66817-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Cao, Q., Wu, S., Bahrani Fard, M. R., Wang, N., Cao, J., et al. (2022). Magnetic nano-platform enhanced iPSC-derived trabecular meshwork delivery and tracking efficiency. Int. J. Nanomedicine 17, 1285–1307. doi:10.2147/IJN.S346141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Lou, N., Eberhardt, A., Yang, Y., Kusk, P., Xu, Q., et al. (2020). An ocular glymphatic clearance system removes beta-amyloid from the rodent eye. Sci. Transl. Med. 12 (536), eaaw3210. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw3210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, S. W., Zou, M. M., Huan, J., Li, D., Zhang, P. F., Lu, M. H., et al. (2022). Role of the hydrogen sulfide-releasing donor ADT-OH in the regulation of mammal neural precursor cells. J. Cell Physiol. 237 (7), 2877–2887. doi:10.1002/jcp.30726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, Z., Yuan, J., Chen, F., Yao, Y., Xing, S., Yu, X., et al. (2022). Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 88, 250 individuals highlights pleiotropic mechanisms of five ocular diseases in UK Biobank. EBioMedicine 82, 104161. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, F., Peng, J., Zhang, E., Ji, D., Gao, Z., Tang, Y., et al. (2022). Pathologically high intraocular pressure disturbs normal iron homeostasis and leads to retinal ganglion cell ferroptosis in glaucoma. Cell Death Differ. doi:10.1038/s41418-022-01046-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeo, R. W., Lai, R. C., Zhang, B., Tan, S. S., Yin, Y., Teh, B. J., et al. (2013). Mesenchymal stem cell: an efficient mass producer of exosomes for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65 (3), 336–341. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H., Wang, Q., Wu, W., Zeng, W., and Feng, Y. (2021). Therapeutic effects of melatonin on ocular diseases: Knowledge map and perspective. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 721869. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.721869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, S., Tanabe, T., Dezawa, M., Ishikawa, H., and Yoshimura, N. (2006). Effects of bone marrow stromal cell injection in an experimental glaucoma model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 344 (4), 1071–1079. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Wen, Y., Jiang, N., Li, Z., Guan, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). TNF-alpha stimulation enhances the neuroprotective effects of gingival MSCs derived exosomes in retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury via the MEG3/miR-21a-5p axis. Biomaterials 284, 121484. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, N., Wang, J., Li, Y., and Jiang, B. (2021). Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 13762. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, X., Gutierrez, C., Xue, T., Hampton, C., Vergara, M. N., Cao, L. H., et al. (2014). Generation of three-dimensional retinal tissue with functional photoreceptors from human iPSCs. Nat. Commun. 5, 4047. doi:10.1038/ncomms5047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, W., Gramlich, O. W., Laboissonniere, L., Jain, A., Sheffield, V. C., Trimarchi, J. M., et al. (2016). Transplantation of iPSC-derived TM cells rescues glaucoma phenotypes in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (25), E3492–E3500. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604153113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, W., Jain, A., Gramlich, O. W., Tucker, B. A., Sheffield, V. C., and Kuehn, M. H. (2017). Restoration of aqueous humor outflow following transplantation of iPSC-derived trabecular meshwork cells in a transgenic mouse model of glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58 (4), 2054–2062. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-20672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar