Original Research ARTICLE
Vibrio parahaemolyticus strengthens their virulence through modulation of cellular reactive oxygen species in vitro
- 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- 2College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- 3Testing Center, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Vp) is one of the emergent food-borne pathogens that are commensally associated with various shellfish species throughout the world. It is strictly environmental and many strains are pathogenic to humans. The virulent strains cause distinct diseases, including wound infections, septicemia, and most commonly, acute gastroenteritis, which is acquired through the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood, especially shellfish. Vp has two type three secretion systems (T3SSs), which triggering its cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity via their effectors. To better understand the pathogenesis of Vp, we established a cell infection model in vitro using a non-phagocytic cell line. Caco-2 cells were infected with different strains of Vp (pandemic and non-pandemic strains) and several parameters of cytotoxicity were measured together with adhesion and invasion indices, which reflect the pathogen's virulence. Our results show that Vp adheres to cell monolayers and can invade non-phagocytic cells. It also survives and persists in non-phagocytic cells by modulating reactive oxygen species (ROS), allowing its replication, and resulting in complete cellular destruction. We conclude that the pathogenicity of Vp is based on its capacities for adhesion and invasion. Surprisingly's; enhanced of ROS resistance period could promote the survival of Vp inside the intestinal tract, facilitating tissue infection by repressing the host's oxidative stress response.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Vp) is a good example of emergent food pathogens. It is a Gram-negative halophilic bacterium found in estuarine, marine, and coastal environments. It occupies a variety of niches, and can exist in a free-swimming state using a single polar flagellum or with sessile attachment to inert or animate surfaces, such as suspended particulate matter, zooplankton, fish, and shellfish (McCarter, 1999). Since its discovery in the middle of the last century (Fujino et al., 1953), it has become renowned as a leading cause of seafood-derived food poisoning throughout the world. Where the virulent strains are transmitted by the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood, it is a common cause of acute gastroenteritis (Newton et al., 2012). Although, the diarrhea it causes is self-limiting, it can also cause septicemia, which can be life threatening to patients with pre existing medical conditions (Su and Liu, 2007). In Japan, Vp is responsible for 20–30% of all cases of food poisoning (Alam et al., 2002) and is considered a common cause of seafood-borne illnesses in many Asian countries (Yu et al., 2013). In the United States, it has also become the leading agent of human gastroenteritis associated with seafood consumption (Newton et al., 2012).
Vp is a natural resident of estuarine and marine environments, and only some strains have proven to be pathogenic (Oliver and Kaper, 2007). Even when they lack the thermostable hemolysins of Vp, some strains remain pathogenic, indicating the existence of other virulence factors (Xu et al., 1994). In this context, Kanagawa phenomenon (KP)-negative clinical strains of Vp have shown the ability to produce a second hemolysin, TDH-related hemolysin (TRH) (Honda et al., 1988). Differences observed among the O3:K6 strains led to the definition of non-pandemic O3:K6 as those strains isolated in 1980–1990 in several Asian countries, including India, China, Japan, Thailand, and Bangladesh (Okuda et al., 1997; Matsumoto et al., 2000; Osawa et al., 2002; Wong et al., 2005).
The contribution of T3SSs to these activities is still unclear under conditions in which Thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) is produced together with adherence factors, including the outer membrane, pili, lateral flagella, and cell-associated hemagglutinin (HA) (Nagayama et al., 1995). Since the discovery of Vp in Japan in 1950 and its global occurrence as a leading cause of seafood-derived food poisoning, there has been extensive research to understand the virulence of this pathogen and its effects on human as accidental host.
The lack of clarity about the pathogenic mechanism of Vp is one of the main problems facing researchers. The links between strains isolated from the environment, from seafood, and from human clinical isolates are poorly understood, in contrast to the other food-borne infections. Vp infections are not related to socioeconomic status, meteorological changes, quality of the water supply, or general sanitation conditions. Thus, the overall mechanism of the enteropathogenesis of Vp has not been fully clarified.
The Caco-2 cell line, derived from a moderately differentiated human colonic adenocarcinoma (Pinto et al., 1983), has been useful in evaluating the adherence and invasion of bacterial pathogens (Knutton et al., 1989).
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the early responses of host innate immunity which produced in reaction to microbial invaders. Free oxygen radicals (ROS) are highly toxic to pathogens and so utilized as a tool to prevent microorganisms' colonization in tissues (Circu and Aw, 2010), the importance of ROS for immune function could be exploited by “potential pathogens” which lead to host responses reduction and enhance survival and colonization of pathogens in their target host cells.
In this study, we undertook to establish a cell infection model to determine the cytotoxic effects of pandemic and non-pandemic clinical isolates of Vp to clarify its pathogenetic mechanisms in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Cell Line
The Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains investigated were RIMD2210633 (KP positive, serotype O3:K6) (Nasu et al., 2000), Vp024 and Vp038 (pandemic isolates), and Vp005 and Vp029 (non-pandemic isolates). All strains kept in the Laboratory of Zoonoses and Immunology, Yangzhou University, China, were recovered from −70°C on TCBS medium, then maintained in MLB medium, and genotyped with specific primers. Caco-2 cells were used as the mammalian cell model for the experiment and were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco®, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco®, Grand Island, NY, USA) plus 1% antibiotic Pen strep (Gibco®, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C under 5% CO2 until fully confluent. All bacterial strains and the cell line used in this study are listed in Table 1. And the primers used in all PCRs are listed in Table 2.
The adhesion assay was performed as described previously (Edwards and Massey, 2011). Briefly, bacteria were cultured for 12 h in MLB at 37°C with shaking at 100 rpm. Washed bacteria (10 μL at approximately 2 × 107cfu mL−1; multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 100:1) were added to wells containing a washed coverslip and to wells without a coverslip. Each well contained a confluent layer of Caco-2 cells in 490 μL of DMEM containing 10% FBS without antibiotics. The cells were incubated for 30, 60, 120, and 180 min at 37°C under 5% CO2.
After each specific infection, the medium was discarded from the 24-well plates containing glass coverslips, and the wells were washed by the addition of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco®, Grand Island, NY, USA), followed by 500 μL of 100% Methanol for 1 min. The supernatant was removed, and Giemsa staining solution was added for 30 min and then discarded. The cells were washed three times with sterile distilled water and left to dry in air, before they were examined under a 100× oil immersion lens.
Twenty-four-well plates without glass coverslips were used to measure the total number of bacteria associated with the cells (adherent and internalized), washed by adding PBS, after that added 500 μL 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS to each well for 5 min, until cells were fully lysed. The bacteria were counted by plating the liquid suspension, or a diluted suspension if necessary, on LB agar plates containing 3% NaCl using the drop-plate method. Duplicate assays were repeated three times. The results are presented as indices calculated with the formula:
Number of colony-forming units (cfu) of bacterial isolates, adherent and/or internalized in Caco-2 cells/Number of bacteria in the original inoculum (according to the [MOI]) (Benjamin et al., 1995).
This assay was the same as the adhesion assay, except that after the bacteria were incubated with cell for different periods, the culture supernatant was removed from each well and replaced with 500 μL of DMEM + 10% FBS supplemented with 100 μg mL−1 kanamycin. The plates were incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 60 min to kill all extracellular bacteria. The cells were then washed with PBS, stained, lysed, and counted by plating them on LB agar containing 3%NaCl, as described above for the adhesion assay.
The cytotoxicity assay was performed as described previously (Kodama et al., 2007). Briefly, Caco-2 cells were infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains at [MOI] = 100:1. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the medium was quantified after 1, 2, 3, and 4 h, with a CytoTox96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The LDH release (percentage cytotoxicity) was calculated with the following equation: (optical density at 490 nm [OD490] after experimental release–[OD490] after spontaneous release/[OD490] after maximum release—[OD490] after spontaneous release) × 100. Spontaneous release is the amount of LDH released from the cytoplasm of uninfected Caco-2 cells, and the maximum release is the amount of LDH released by the total lysis of uninfected Caco-2 cells.
Apoptosis and Dead Cell Detection
Apoptotic cells were detected with the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 24-well plates, infected with bacteria at [MOI] = 100:1, and incubated for 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after infection. Approximately 1 × 105 cells were harvested with a cell collector, centrifuged (250 × g for 5 min), washed twice with PBS, and stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fluorescence was detected by a flow cytometer with FACSAria flow cytometer using the FACSDiva software (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry System, BDIS, San Jose, CA, USA) (Pan et al., 2013).
Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Assay
Intracellular ROS levels were determined using the fluorescent marker 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; S0033; Beyotime, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 24-well plates and infected with bacteria at [MOI] = 100:1, incubated for 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after infection, harvested with a cell collector, centrifuged (250 × g for 5 min), washed twice with PBS, and incubated with 10 μM DCFH-DA for 20 min at 37°C. Fluorescence intensity was analyzed with a FACSAria flow cytometer using FACSDiva software (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry System) (Itoh et al., 2010).
Analysis of Intracellular Ca2+ Concentrations, Nitric Oxide (NO), Intracellular pH, and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP)
Briefly, cells were seeded in 24-well plates, infected with bacteria at [MOI] = 100:1, and incubated for 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after treatment the cells were harvested with a cell collector, centrifuged (250 × g for 5 min), and washed twice with PBS.
To measure the intracellular concentrations of calcium ions (Ca2+), cells were incubated with 5 μM Fluo-3 AM (S1056; Beyotime, China) for 15 min at 37°C. To determine the intracellular production of NO, cells were incubated with 5 μM DAF-FM DA (S0019; Beyotime, China) for 20 min at 37°C. The collected cells were incubated with 5 μM BCECF AM (S1006; Beyotime, China) for 30 min at 37°C to determine the intracellular pH (Chow and Hedley, 2001), or with 10 μM JC-1 (C2006; Beyotime, China) for 20 min at 37°C in the dark to determine MMP (Pan et al., 2013). Fluorescence intensity was analyzed with a FACSAria flow cytometer using the FACSDiva software (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry System).
Microstructural Changes in Infected Cells
Caco-2 cells were incubated with bacteria at [MOI] = 100:1 for 1 and 3 h, and then prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, as described previously (Zhang et al., 2012). The samples were examined with a Philips Tecnai™ transmission electron microscope.
All statistical analyses were performed using (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA).
Adhesion of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus to Cell Monolayers
Our results indicate that the bacterial adherence was high a short time (30 min) after infection (Figures 1A–C). There were no significant differences between the strains after 30, 120, and 180 min after infection, but there were significant differences between RIMD and both Vp005 and Vp024 only 60 min after infection (Figure 1D) and (Table 3).
Figure 1. Adhesion index of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains at [MOI] = 100:1. The reported values are the means ± SEM of three independent experiments (n = 6). (A) Uninfected Caco-2 cells were used as the control. (B,C) Caco-2 cells infected with RIMD [MOI] = 100:1 at 30 and 60 min, respectively (100×, oil immersion). (D) Means adhesion indices differed statistically significantly from one another on Two-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (*P < 0.05).
Invasion and Replication of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Inside Host Cells
No bacteria were recovered from the RIMD-treated cells at 30, 60, or 120 min after infection, but bacteria were recovered at 180 min (Figures 2A–E). The same observation was made of all cells infected with Vp005, Vp029, or Vp038 after 30 min, but no bacteria were recovered from Vp029-treated cells at 60 min. There were no significant differences between any of the strains after 180 min, but the significant differences were observed between RIMD and Vp024 at two time points (60 and 120 min) and between RIMD and Vp029, and between RIMD and Vp038 at 120 min. There were also significant differences between Vp005 and Vp024, Vp005 and Vp029, and Vp005 and Vp038 at the same time (120 min), and a significant difference between Vp024 and Vp029 at 60 min after infection (Figure 2F) and (Table 3).
Figure 2. Invasion index of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains. The reported values are the means ± SEM of three independent experiments (n = 6). (A) Uninfected Caco-2 cells were used as the control. (B–E) Caco-2 cells infected with RIMD [MOI] = 100:1 at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, respectively (100X, oil immersion). (F) Means invasion indices differed statistically significantly from one another on Two-Way ANOVA (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Surprisingly, Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains were able to replicate inside the non-phagocytic cells (host cells), as observed after 1 h, which was confirmed by TEM examination of the bacterially infected cells (Figures 3A–F).
Figure 3. TEM analysis of Caco-2 cells infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Caco-2 cells were infected with strain (RIMD, Vp005, Vp024, Vp029, or Vp038) at [MOI] = 100:1 and incubated for 1 or 3 h. The cells were collected for TEM examination. (A–E) Cells infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD, Vp005, Vp024, Vp029, and Vp038, respectively and incubated for 1 h; appear as bacteria surrounded by cell membrane. (F) Arrow indicates replicating bacterium inside a Caco-2 cell. (G–K) Cells infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD, Vp005, Vp024, Vp029, and Vp038, respectively and incubated for 3 h; destruction of cells and changes in their character, and the appearance of bacteria. Scale bar = 2 μm.
Furthermore, surprisingly, the intracellular ROS levels in Caco-2 cells infected with the Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains for different times (1, 2, 3, or 4 h after infection) were lower than those in the uninfected (control) cells (Figure 4). Therefore, several parameters related to ROS, including NO, Ca2+, pH, and MMP, were examined.
Figure 4. ROS levels in Caco-2 cells. ROS levels were determined in Caco-2 cells by staining with DCFH-DA, and flow cytometric analysis. (A) ROS levels in uninfected cells (control) and in cells infected with all strains at each specific time points. (B) ROS levels in uninfected cells and cells infected with RIMD, a pandemic strain (Vp024), or a non-pandemic strain (Vp029) at different time points. (C) Chart showing the percentages of ROS levels. The reported values are the means ± SEM of three independent experiments.
All strains clearly increased Ca2+ levels in the cells after infection. In contrast, cellular NO production decreased in the cells after infection by all the strains investigated (Figure 5). The intracellular pH of the cells infected with each strain was slightly lower than that of the control group and decreased slightly with the increase in time after infection. MMP of the infected cells increased, but then decreased 3 h after infection with each strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. This was clearly observed in the cells infected with Vp029 or Vp038, whereas MMP decreased only slightly in cells infected with Vp005 or Vp0024. However, MMP was stable in cells infected with RIMD (Table 4).
Figure 5. Intracellular NO and Ca2+ levels in the infected Caco-2 cells. Detection of NO and Ca2+ in Caco-2 cells, stained with DAF-FM DA and Fluo-3 AM, respectively and analyzed with flow cytometry (A) NO levels in uninfected cells and cells infected with RIMD, a pandemic strain (Vp024) or a non-pandemic strain (Vp029) at different time points. (B) NO levels in uninfected cells (control) and in cells infected with each strains at each specific time point. (C) Ca2+ levels in uninfected cells and cells infected with RIMD, a pandemic strain (Vp024), and a non-pandemic strain (Vp029) at different time points. (D) Ca2+ levels in uninfected cells (control) and in cells infected with each strain at each specific time point.
Cell Damage Caused by Vibrio Parahaemolyticus
Initial infection at [MOI] = 100:1 and the cytotoxicity assay demonstrated that all the Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains caused cellular morphological changes, followed by cell lysis approximately 4 h after infection, as shown with Giemsa staining (Figures 2D,E) and comfirmed with TEM (Figures 3G–K) at 3 h after infection, the number of bacteria increased, accompanied by a dramatic reduction in cell numbers, coincident with cell lysis.
Vibrio Parahaemolyticus is Cytotoxic to Host Cells
We analyzed the cellular contents released during infection by measuring the levels of cytoplasmic LDH released into the media during the infection of Caco-2 with different strains. This release indicates the degree to which the integrity of the host-cell membrane is compromised at different times. The levels of LDH release caused by strains Vp024 and Vp029, followed by strain Vp005, were higher than that caused by RIMD over the entire time course of the experiment. After 3 h, the levels of LDH release stimulated by Vp024 and Vp029 decreased slightly, in contrast to the continuous increase in the cytotoxicity of the other strains (Figure 6B).
Figure 6. Cytotoxic effects of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus [MOI] = 100:1, the supernatants were collected at specific time points, and the amounts of LDH released were measured. The percentage of dead cells and the type of death (proportion of apoptotic cells) were determined using annexin V–FITC and flow cytometry (A,C); and (B) LDH release was measured with the CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega). Percentage cytotoxicity was calculated using the formula: (test LDH release—spontaneous release)/maximal release. Test LDH release is the LDH released after infection with different Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains; spontaneous release is the baseline cell LDH release, with no bacterial infection; and maximal LDH release is the release of LDH when cells are lysed with lysis solution. The data are the means of three independent experiments ± SEM, and statistically significant differences between the mean values were detected with Two-Way ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
The percentages of apoptotic and dead cells detected 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after infection, showed that almost a third of the cells had died when infected at [MOI] = 100:1. The percentages of dead cells after infection by Vp024 and Vp029, followed by Vp005, were higher than the percentage after RIMD infection, and this result is consistent with the LDH findings. Most of the cells had died by 4 h after infection (Figures 6A,B).
The lowest percentage of apoptotic cells was observed after RIMD infection over the whole time course of the experiment. One hour after infection, the percentage of apoptotic cells among RIMD-infected cells differed significantly from the percentage of apoptotic cells in cells infected with either Vp024 or Vp038. At 2 and 3 h after infection, the percentage of apoptotic RIMD-infected cells differed significantly from those infected with all other strains. The percentage of apoptotic cells induced by RIMD infection differed significantly from the percentages induced by Vp005, Vp029, or Vp038 after 4 h (Figure 6C). The highest percentage of apoptotic cells was observed 3 h after Vp029 infection.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains encode a number of different virulence factors, including adhesions, TDH, TRH, and two T3SSs (T3SS1 and T3SS2) (Makino et al., 2003). All strains encode T3SS1, which facilitates their survival in the environment, although the natural host(s) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is unknown (Makino et al., 2003; Meador et al., 2007; Paranjpye et al., 2012). These strains also express a number of virulence factors that cause the efficient lysis of the infected host cells and allow the release of valuable nutrients (Burdette et al., 2008). The other (non-T3SS1) virulence factors are found in various combinations in clinical isolates (Meador et al., 2007).
Humans are considered an incidental host of this pathogen, therefore they have played no significant role in the evolution of the virulence factors Vibrio parahaemolyticus. However, the animal hosts driving the evolution and persistence of these factors are unknown, although the targets of these toxins and their effectors are evolutionarily conserved (Dean, 2011). Since its discovery in the 1950s, this bacterium has been considered an extracellular pathogen, but recent studies have shown that T3SS2 effectors mediate the bacterial invasion of host cells. Therefore, the roles of T3SS2 in the intracellular lifestyle and pathogenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus are now being reconsidered (Zhang et al., 2012). Reports of invasive infections in Asian (Hsu et al., 1993) and American (Hally et al., 1995) have also appeared in the literatures. Many studies have focused on how these systems are regulated and how the bacteria maintain strict specificity in the secretion of only designated effectors. Such research will extend our understanding of both this pathogen and other bacterial pathogens.
The present study contributes novel information about the cytotoxic actions of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the intestine, using Caco-2 cell monolayers, which are a functionally faithful and widely accepted in vitro model of the human intestinal epithelium. The study suggests a hypothesis about the role of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in human disease.
We have shown that Vibrio parahaemolyticus is an invasive pathogen and can invade an intestinal cell line, survive, and replicate inside it. There is growing evidence that Vibrio parahaemolyticus acts as a persistent microbe and alters ROS production in the host cell to maintain its long-term persistence. It also disrupts the production of NO inside infected cells. Our observations of the direct effects of this pathogen on the cellular physiology, mediated by ROS, and other parameters, together with morphological evidence, indicate that Vibrio parahaemolyticus a clear cytotoxic effect on cell monolayer after infection at an [MOI] of 100:1.
Our data suggest that many factors contribute to the invasiveness of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. This possibility was first suggested by Akeda and his group (Akeda et al., 2002), who also used Caco-2 cells to show that Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains express a cytotoxic factor that acts on cell the cytoskeleton in a calcium-independent fashion.
Our results support the hypothesis that the virulence factors of Vibrio parahaemolyticus mediate the mechanisms of its invasion, intracellular replication, and lysis of the infected cells. This is consistent with early observation of the few invasive pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains (Akeda et al., 1997). Although T3SS2 is a shared by all clinical isolates of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and is responsible for their enterotoxicity, it was shown that T3SS2 of Vibrio spp. also mediates the invasion of host cell, vacuole formation and the replication of intracellular bacteria (Zhang et al., 2012).
Pathogens manipulate host cell death to facilitate their ability to cause infections (Labbe and Saleh, 2008; Lamkanfi and Dixit, 2010) and this manipulation is achieved with different mechanisms, including apoptosis (a non-inflammatory type of cell death) and necrosis (pro-inflammatory type of cell death) (Festjens et al., 2006). Here, we have demonstrated a mechanism used by Vibrio parahaemolyticus to methodically and efficiently induce cell death, and our findings indicate that the cell death caused by this pathogen is independent of the classical apoptotic machinery. This is consistent with the findings that Vibrio parahaemolyticus causes non-apoptotic and caspase-independent cell death during infection and that the cell death induced by Vibrio parahaemolyticus is associated with autophagy (Burdette et al., 2008).
We observed many different changes in the infected host cells, reflecting the multiple, albeit temporarily orchestrated, mechanisms that culminated in the efficient death of the cells within 4 h of infection. The complete and dramatic changes in the cell structure and its ultimate destruction were undoubtedly caused by changes in the cytoskeleton of the infected host cell. In contrast, other researchers have concluded that TDH exerts its cytotoxic effects both outside and inside the cells and kills the cells via apoptosis (Naim et al., 2001). Finally, we expected that Vibrio parahaemolyticus would induce LDH release by causing the death of the non-phagocytic host cells after their invasion, bacterial replication, and cellular nutrients release. The cell death induced by Vibrio parahaemolyticus has been investigated in detail, and those earlier studies showed that T3SS1 induces rapid cell death, initiated by acute autophagy in a caspase-independent manner (Burdette et al., 2008).
Generally, to ensure successful micro-organismal infection of host cells (mainly non-phagocytic cells), especially by Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and to exert their pathogenic effects, bacteria must protect themselves against host cell oxidative stresses. We found that the intracellular ROS levels of Caco-2 cells were reduced after infection, although elevated ROS is characteristic of the early host innate immune response during the interaction between cells and microbial invaders. Free oxygen radicals are highly toxic to pathogens and are used by the host as a tool to prevent the colonization of tissues by microorganisms (Circu and Aw, 2010). There is direct evidence that a wide variety of micro organisms can limit ROS production in host cells and thus increase the potential for persistent infection by promoting microbial survival within the host cell environment. The strategy used by microorganisms primarily modulates mitochondrially derived ROS (Cirillo et al., 2009). The inhibition of oxygen radicals could facilitate and enhance bacterial colonization by reducing the ROS-mediated host responses to infection. Vp2118 is one of the principal superoxide dismutase- related bacterial proteins (SODs) and is vital in the bacterial anti-oxidative stress responses (Le et al., 2012).
Our results not only extend our knowledge of the cytotoxic effects and enterotoxic properties of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. They will also allow us to design further experiments to confirm the proposed mode of the action of its virulence effectors and their role in the pathogenesis of the human gastroenteritis that is associated with the consumption of Vibrio parahaemolyticus—contaminated seafood.
In this study, an in vitro cell culture model was established to better understand the pathogenicity of different Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains. Our findings demonstrate that all Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains have the capacity to adhere to and invade non-phagocytic cells, which are the main targets of this bacterium in the human body. This is especially true of intestinal cells, in which Vibrio parahaemolyticus modulates the ROS-based host resistance, promoting its own survival inside the intestinal tract. In this way, it facilitates tissue infection by disrupting the anti-oxidative stress response of the host.
Shimaa S. El-Malah collection and assembly of the data, manuscript writing, and data analysis; Zhenquan Yang and Qiuchun Li discussion, manuscript revision; Maozhi Hu data analysis and discussion; Zhiming Pan and Xinan Jiao concept and design, data analysis, manuscript revision, and final approval of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA101601-6), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (2009KJA230001), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Akeda, Y., Kodama, T., Kashimoto, T., Cantarelli, V., Horiguchi, Y., Nagayama, K., et al. (2002). Dominant-negative Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 facilitate the invasion process of Vibrio parahaemolyticus into Caco-2 cells. Infect. Immun. 70, 970–973. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.970-973.2002
Alam, M. J., Tomochika, K. I., Miyoshi, S. I., and Shinoda, S. (2002). Environmental investigation of potentially pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Seto-Inland Sea, Japan. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 208, 83–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11064.x
Bej, A. K., Patterson, D. P., Brasher, C. W., Vickery, M. C., Jones, D. D., and Kaysner, C. A. (1999). Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh. J. Microbiol. Methods 36, 215–225. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00037-8
Burdette, D. L., Yarbrough, M. L., Orvedahl, A., Gilpin, C. J., and Orth, K. (2008). Vibrio parahaemolyticus orchestrates a multifaceted host cell infection by induction of autophagy, cell rounding, and then cell lysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 12497–12502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802773105
Chao, G., Jiao, X., Zhou, X., Yang, Z., Huang, J., Pan, Z., et al. (2009). Serodiversity, pandemic O3:K6 clone, molecular typing, and antibiotic susceptibility of foodborne and clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates in Jiangsu, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6, 1021–1028. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0295
Cirillo, S. L., Subbian, S., Chen, B., Weisbrod, T. R., Jacobs, W. R. Jr., and Cirillo, J. D. (2009). Protection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from reactive oxygen species conferred by the mel2 locus impacts persistence and dissemination. Infect. Immun. 77, 2557–2567. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01481-08
Festjens, N., Vanden Berghe, T., and Vandenabeele, P. (2006). Necrosis, a well-orchestrated form of cell demise: signalling cascades, important mediators and concomitant immune response. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 1371–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014
Hally, R. J., Rubin, R. A., Fraimow, H. S., and Hoffman-Terry, M. L. (1995). Fatal Vibrio parahemolyticus septicemia in a patient with cirrhosis. A case report and review of the literature. Dig. Dis. Sci. 40, 1257–1260. doi: 10.1007/BF02065534
Honda, T., Ni, Y. X., and Miwatani, T. (1988). Purification and characterization of a hemolysin produced by a clinical isolate of Kanagawa phenomenon-negative Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related to the thermostable direct hemolysin. Infect. Immun. 56, 961–965.
Itoh, S., Taketomi, A., Harimoto, N., Tsujita, E., Rikimaru, T., Shirabe, K., et al. (2010). Antineoplastic effects of gamma linolenic Acid on hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 47, 81–90. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.10-24
Knutton, S., Baldwin, T., Williams, P. H., and McNeish, A. A. S. (1989). Actin accumulation sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 57, 1290–1298.
Kodama, T., Rokuda, M., Park, K. S., Cantarelli, V. V., Matsuda, S., Iida, T., et al. (2007). Identification and characterization of VopT, a novel ADP-ribosyltransferase effector protein secreted via the Vibrio parahaemolyticus type III secretion system 2. Cell. Microbiol. 9, 2598–2609. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00980.x
Le, T. T., Mawatari, K., Maetani, M., Yamamoto, T., Hayashida, S., Iba, H., et al. (2012). VP2118 has major roles in Vibrio parahaemolyticus response to oxidative stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 1686–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.06.019
Makino, K., Oshima, K., Kurokawa, K., Yokoyama, K., Uda, T., Tagomori, K., et al. (2003). Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V cholerae. Lancet 361, 743–749. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12659-1
Matsumoto, C., Okuda, J., Ishibashi, M., Iwanaga, M., Garg, P., Rammamurthy, T., et al. (2000). Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 578–585.
Meador, C. E., Parsons, M. M., Bopp, C. A., Gerner-Smidt, P., Painter, J. A., and Vora, G. J. (2007). Virulence gene- and pandemic group-specific marker profiling of clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 1133–1139. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00042-07
Naim, R., Yanagihara, I., Iida, T., and Honda, T. (2001). Vibrio parahaemolyticus thermostable direct hemolysin can induce an apoptotic cell death in Rat-1 cells from inside and outside of the cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 195, 237–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10527.x
Nasu, H., Iida, T., Sugahara, T., Yamaichi, Y., Park, K. S., Yokoyama, K., et al. (2000). A filamentous phage associated with recent pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 2156–2161.
Newton, A., Kendall, M., Vugia, D. J., Henao, O. L., and Mahon, B. E. (2012). Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996-2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54(Suppl. 5), S391–S395. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis243
Okuda, J., Ishibashi, M., Hayakawa, E., Nishino, T., Takeda, Y., Mukhopadhyay, A. K., et al. (1997). Emergence of a unique O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Calcutta, India, and isolation of strains from the same clonal group from Southeast Asian travelers arriving in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 3150–3155.
Okura, M., Osawa, R., Iguchi, A., Arakawa, E., Terajima, J., and Watanabe, H. (2003). Genotypic analyses of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and development of a pandemic group-specific multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 4676–4682. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4676-4682.2003
Osawa, R., Iguchi, A., Arakawa, E., and Watanabe, H. (2002). Genotyping of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 still open to question. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 2708–2709. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2708-2709.2002
Pan, X., Zhang, X., Sun, H., Zhang, J., Yan, M., and Zhang, H. (2013). Autophagy inhibition promotes 5-fluorouraci-induced apoptosis by stimulating ROS formation in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells. PLoS ONE 8:e56679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056679
Paranjpye, R., Hamel, O. S., Stojanovski, A., and Liermann, M. (2012). Genetic diversity of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains from the Pacific Northwest. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 8631–8638. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01531-12
Pinto, M., Robine-Leon, S., Appay, M. D., Kedinger, M., Triadou, N., Dussaulx, E., et al. (1983). Enterocyte like differentiation and polarization of the human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 in culture. Biol. Cell. 47, 323–330.
Wong, H. C., Chen, C. H., Chung, Y. J., Liu, S. H., Wang, T. K., Lee, C. L., et al. (2005). Characterization of new O3:K6 strains and phylogenetically related strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated in Taiwan and other countries. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98, 572–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02478.x
Xu, M., Yamamoto, K., Honda, T., and Ming, X. (1994). Construction and characterization of an isogenic mutant of Vibrio parahaemolyticus having a deletion in the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh). J. Bacteriol. 176, 4757–4760.
Yu, W. T., Jong, K. J., Lin, Y. R., Tsai, S. E., Tey, Y. H., and Wong, H. C. (2013). Prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oyster and clam culturing environments in Taiwan. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 160, 185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.11.002
Keywords: vibrio parahaemolyticus, caco-2, ros, in vitro, infection, modulation
Citation: El-Malah ShS, Yang Z, Hu M, Li Q, Pan Z and Jiao X (2014) Vibrio parahaemolyticus strengthens their virulence through modulation of cellular reactive oxygen species in vitro. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:168. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00168
Received: 25 September 2014; Accepted: 14 November 2014;
Published online: 17 December 2014.
Edited by:Brice Rotureau, Institut Pasteur, France
Copyright © 2014 El-Malah, Yang, Hu, Li, Pan and Jiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinan Jiao, Yangzhou University, 88 South Daxue Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org