ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Staphylococcus aureus on Sinus Culture Is Associated With Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
- 1Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 2Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 3Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- 4Department of Surgery, Cambridge Memorial Hospital, Cambridge, ON, Canada
- 5Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Objectives: Identify whether identification of S. aureus on conventional culture is a predictor of success or failure after ESS followed by budesonide nasal irrigations (BUD) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients at high risk of recurrence.
Methodology: Prospective clinical trial including 116 patients from a tertiary care center at high-risk of disease recurrence following ESS+BUD. Blood samples, microbial swabs, and SNSS/SNOT-22 were taken on the day of surgery (Visit-1) and 4 months postoperatively (Visit-2). Outcomes were evaluated using symptoms and mucosal status as assessed by the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score.
Results: Seventy-five patients (69.4%) attained SNOT-22 MCID or higher. (Mean = 33.4, range 9–75). Objective documentation of recurrence of disease, as defined by combined endoscopic/symptomatic criteria, was noted in 58/116 patients (50%). Revision surgery was associated with a significantly higher rate of disease recurrence (60.0 vs. 28.0%; p < 0.001). Culture for Staphylococcus aureus was associated with disease recurrence, preoperatively and at 4 months post-surgery (p = 0.020; p < 0.001). This was restricted to post-operative cultures in the revision group (10.0 vs. 48.8%; p < 0.001). Other factors associated with poor outcome included intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (p = 0.036). Significantly higher Lund-Kennedy scores in the recurrence groups despite similar symptom intensity, emphasizing the importance of considering objective outcome in addition to patient-reported ones.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing revision ESS are at high risk of disease recurrence, even when budesonide irrigations are used post operatively. Presence of S. aureus on culture pre-operatively or at 4 months post-ESS is associated with a negative outcome. This suggests that S. aureus negatively influences outcome, possibly via a number of mechanisms, including interactions with the (i) immune system, (ii) regeneration and repair of the sinus epithelium, or (iii) via interference with the sinus microbiome. This suggests that S. aureus may be a simple and inexpensive biomarker for disease severity and indicates a clear need to better appreciate S. aureus on how it contributes mechanistically to disease development and persistence in order to develop targeted therapeutic strategies.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized as a chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses and is considered to be one of the most frequent chronic inflammatory diseases with approximately 10% of the population currently affected (Chen et al., 2003; Hastan et al., 2011). Surgical therapy is common with more than 400,000 sinus surgeries performed per year in the United States alone (Anand, 2004). Unfortunately, up to one in three (DeConde and Soler, 2016) patients with CRS will fail endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and post-operative medical therapy, rendering them refractory to maximal medico-surgical treatment. Patients with refractory disease present with reduced quality of life, poor sleep, fatigue, and acute exacerbations of their CRS, resulting in significant increases in the economic burden of the disease (Rudmik et al., 2014), presently estimated at $10,000 annually per refractory patient, or 12.8 billion overall in the United-States alone.
Unfortunately, despite the high costs of CRS, its pathogenesis remains elusive, which stalls the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Authors have reported various factors associated with ESS failure, whether it be anatomical anomalies or associated medical comorbidities, amongst several other reported etiologies (Mendelsohn et al., 2011). Furthermore, our group and others have described disease parameters which may render a patient at a higher risk of revision ESS with maximal medical therapy failure, such as having had prior ESS for CRS, elevated serum IgE (≥150 kIU/L) and/or eosinophil levels (≥500 cells/mm), a young age (≤38) (Nader et al., 2010).
One of the principal issues is that little is known about the early events leading to the development of CRS. Monitoring patients prospectively following ESS may represent a means of improving our understanding. While in other respiratory diseases such as asthma and allergic disorders, birth cohorts which track a population from an early age have helped identify factors influencing development of disease (Jackson et al., 2017) we unfortunately do not yet have “birth cohorts” for CRS. However, monitoring sinus cavities after ESS may represent an opportunity. CRS is different from asthma and other atopic disorders as surgical therapy is available which can clear disease. Despite the fact that this post-ESS control may only be temporary, monitoring patients after ESS can almost be considered as a birth cohort since following surgery, we can profile changes in molecular mechanisms and microbiome as the healing cavity regenerates epithelium and repopulates its microbiome. These early post-ESS changes appear important to disease recurrence, as outcome appears relatively stable following the 6 month post-ESS time point (Rudmik et al., 2014). This setting may thus offer a privileged environment to identify factors associated with disease remission or recurrence.
We hypothesized that patients with prior sinus interventions and highly virulent pathogens such as Gram negative bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus would be associated with a poorer outcome post-ESS. In order to prospectively evaluate this hypothesis and further identify factors influencing disease development, we performed a clinical trial evaluating the post-ESS disease evolution of a group of CRS patients at high risk of recurrence following ESS, assessing epidemiological, clinical, biochemical and microbial outcomes following ESS for CRS.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Patient Population
A prospective study was undertaken between November 2014 and December 2016 in our tertiary medical center to monitor post-ESS evolution in a cohort of CRS (with or without nasal polyposis) patients older than 18 years of age at a high-risk of disease recurrence. All surgeries were performed by the senior author (M.D.), who performed all of the post-operative management and assessments. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the University of Montreal Health Center (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal) CHUM-14.140.
All patients were recruited and informed written consent was obtained prior to the surgery. Recruitment was performed by a member of the research group not involved in the patient's care on the day of surgery on consecutive patients between the study dates who met inclusion criteria. Patients were included if they had at least one of the criteria used to qualify a patient at a “high-risk” of recurrence previously listed. Exclusion criteria included patients who had received topical or systemic antibiotic up to 4 weeks prior to the surgical intervention. In addition, patients with cystic fibrosis, inverted papilloma, osteoma, cystic masses, mucoceles, skull base lesions, or any other sinonasal tumors were excluded from the study.
All patients were managed with mucosal- and middle-turbinate sparing ESS as required for disease clearance, which usually involved complete sphenoethmoidectomy and frontal sinusotomy. Septoplasty was performed as required for access, usually using a targeted endoscopic technique. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics and an oral prednisone taper for 14 days following surgery. Patients were seen for cavity cleaning at 14 days (± 3 days), at which point post-operative once-daily nasal irrigations with 1.0 mg budesonide ampules (BUD) (Pulmicort Respules, AstraZeneca, Mississauga, ON, Canada) was initiated and continued throughout the rest of the 4-month observation period.
Assessments were performed on the day of surgery (Visit 1) and repeated at 4 months postoperatively (Visit 2).
All patients had the following laboratory tests at recruitement and at 4 month follow-up: total IgE, High Specificity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) and complete blood count (CBC). Serum was also retrieved and preserved for future analyses at every visit. Patient-centered outcomes were assessed using the Sino-Nasal Symptom Score (SNSS) as well as the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) (Piccirillo et al., 2002) questionnaires. Endoscopic evaluation of the sinonasal cavities was performed at Visit 2 and scored using the modified Lund-Kennedy scoring system (Psaltis et al., 2014).
Definition of Disease Recurrence vs. Remission
In order to minimize variability of assessment due to varied patient perceptions of disease, we used a rigorous definition using endoscopic assessment of mucosal disease. We based this concept on the criteria used for diagnosis of CRS, where symptoms alone cannot be relied upon and objective evidence of disease must be present. We thus defined “disease remission” as absence of mucosal disease on endoscopy. Absence of disease was defined endoscopically as oedema ≤1 on the modified Lund-Kennedy mucosal grading scale. Any evidence of recurrence of polyposis was deemed to have recurrent disease.
Swab culture sampling was performed at the beginning of every ESS and at Visit 2 at the level of the ethmoid bulla using a thin aluminum wire swab with a mini-tip swab (BBL Cultureswab PLUS—BD Diagnostics Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ) under direct rigid endoscopy. Care was taken to avoid contaminating the swab by touching the nasal vestibule or cavity wall. Samples were processed by the hospital laboratory where they were plated and streaked for aerobic bacteria isolation on a mannitol salt agar, a chocolate Haemophilus agar, and a MacConkey agar (Oxoid Inc, Nepean, ON). Anaerobic bacteria isolation was performed on a Brucella Agar with 5% Sheep blood and in a Schaedler Anaerobe Broth (Oxoid Inc, Nepean, ON).
All data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel and all statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13.1 (STATACorp LP, College Station, TX). Quantitative variables are presented to describe patient medical and surgical history as well as associated pathologies. A two-tailed Pearson Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the prevalence and proportion of demographic variables and specific bacterial strains between patients. SNSS and SNOT-22 scores as well as laboratory values amongst patients before and after ESS were evaluated using a two-sample Student T-test with unequal variances. A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate any clinically significant correlation between continuous variables. The differential relative abundance of any bacterial species between culture types was measured using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For all statistical analyses, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Between November 2014 and December 2016, a total of 116 high-risk patients meeting our inclusion criteria, interested in participating and available for follow-up underwent ESS for CRSwNP or CRSsNP. Demographics are found in Table 1. Overall, patients responded well to ESS with a clinically and statistically significant mean decrease in twelve-point SNSS and SNOT-22 scores of 3.4 and 21.3, respectively. SNSS and SNOT-22 questionnaires demonstrated a strong correlation between each other, both at Visit 1 (r = 0.762; p < 0.001) and Visit 2 (r = 0.761; p < 0.001). Using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the SNOT-22 of 9.5 (Browne et al., 2007), 75 patients (69.4%) attained SNOT-22 MCID or higher at 4 months (Mean = 33.4, range 9–75). Preoperative SNSS and SNOT-22 scores demonstrated a moderate correlation with postoperative Visit 2 SNSS and SNOT-22 scores (r = 0.385; p < 0.001 and r = 0.395; p < 0.001, respectively). Visit 2 SNOT-22 had a small correlation with Lund-Kennedy total scores (r = 0.236; p = 0.014), while Visit 1 SNSS and SNOT-22, and Visit 2 SNSS scores had no correlation with Lund-Kennedy Visit 2 scores.
Disease Remission vs. Recurrence
Using our strict criteria for disease, recurrence post ESS+BUD was significantly associated with patients undergoing revision ESS (p = 0.001), or with an allergy/intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (p = 0.036) (Table 2). While there was a trend toward higher failure rates in patients with asthma (p = 0.080) or CRS without polyposis (p = 0.061), this did not attain significance. No laboratory values were significantly different between patients having disease remission or recurrence post-ESS. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the “remission” and “recurrence” groups with regard to the SNSS and SNOT-22 scores at Visit 2 (p = 0.306 and p = 0.098, respectively).
Bacterial swabs demonstrated a statistically significant association between the presence of S. aureus preoperatively and disease recurrence following ESS+BUD at 4 months postoperatively. The presence of S. aureus at Visit 2 was also significantly associated with disease recurrence. In the group with disease recurrence, 14 patients had S. aureus preoperatively, of which 3 (21%) had a S. aureus-free microbial swab postoperatively, while there were 9 (64%) who were not able to clear it and an additional 15 neo-colonizations.
Revision ESS Patients: Disease Remission vs. Recurrence
A subgroup analysis was performed looking at only patients undergoing revision ESS for CRS (n = 80) (Table 3). Of these, 35 (43.8%) had had more than one ESS for CRS prior to their recruitment to this study (range 2–5). Sixty percent (n = 48) showed endoscopic signs of disease recurrence at Visit 2. Again, the presence of S. aureus postoperatively was significantly associated with failure. Having seasonal allergies was a minor statistically significant protective factor in this subgroup of patients. There were no significantly differences in the various laboratory values evaluated.
Refractory CRS unresponsive to maximal medical and surgical therapy remains an important and growing burden and may even be underestimated in certain subgroups. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of primary or revision ESS followed by 4 months of budesonide nasal irrigations (BUD) in a subgroup of patients deemed at a high risk of disease recurrence after ESS. In previous retrospective reports from our group, we had reported a recurrence rate slightly over 30% (Maniakas and Desrosiers, 2014). In this prospective trial, using well-documented rigorous endoscopic assessment of mucosal disease, failure rates are seen to be higher, attaining 50% in this high risk patient population.
Patients with previous ESS were at the highest risk of treatment failure. This is of particular interest as more than 80% of patients who failed ESS+BUD had had at least one ESS prior to enrollment. This remains in line with the current literature that revision ESS is a poor prognostic factor (Lee et al., 2008; Philpott et al., 2015). The burden of revision ESS is also depicted in the frequency of procedures one patient may undergo in an attempt to control the disease. In this study, of the 80 patients having had prior ESS, close to 45% had undergone more than 1 and as many as 5 procedures. This rate is comparable to some recent studies which demonstrate a similar problematic (Philpott et al., 2015). Patients are therefore put at risk to the various intra and postoperative complications associated with ESS, which are far from negligible and are known to significantly increase in frequency in previously operated sinonasal cavities. What remains certain is the need for additional clinically relevant therapeutic options that can offer a long-term alternate solution to revision ESS.
The most interesting finding in our prospective study was the contribution of microbes to early disease recurrence. Colonisation with S. aureus was present in nearly half of all patients having failed ESS+BUD at 4 months, compared to only 13% of patients with disease remission. This finding is in line with the current literature where a positive culture for S. aureus is described as a poor prognostic factor post-ESS (Jervis-Bardy et al., 2011). Interestingly, when present preoperatively, S. aureus was cleared in 75% of patients with disease remission, but only 21% cleared it in the group with disease recurrence.
A role for S. aureus in disease development or persistence has been long suspected. In an earlier publication, we showed that recovery of S aureus is higher in diseased post-ESS cavities than in healthy ones (Al-Shemari et al., 2007). This may represent isolate-specific behavior in S. aureus. Our group has previously demonstrated that biofilm-forming capacity by S. aureus was associated with worse outcome (Bendouah et al., 2006), and Tan et al. have demonstrated that the presence of intraepithelial forms of small-colony variant S. aureus was associated with a negative outcome (Tan et al., 2014), possibly via reduction of immunity (Ou et al., 2016).
While the mechanisms for this have been postulated to include (i) modulation of the immune system via enterotoxin-mediated super antigen activation of the immune system and (ii) bacterial biofilm formation by S. aureus, recent evidence suggest that S. aureus may also employ other strategies, rendering it a realistic marker of disease development and a target for therapy. In addition to already described virulence strategies for S. aureus, our group has recently suggested two novel ones: (i) An immunomodulatory effect, modulated via induction of excessively high levels of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine (Chau et al., 2009; Schwartz et al., 2017), and (ii) a deleterious effect on in-vitro models of epithelial regeneration and wound repair, particularly in cell cultures raised form CRS patients (Valera et al., in press).
What remains to be determined, and where research groups are focusing significant time, is the origin of the mucosal appearance of this pathogen, either through neo-colonization from the external environment or the nasal vestibule introduced into the ethmoid cavities at the time of surgery or via planktonic dissemination following surgical disruption of an existing S. aureus biofilm (Jervis-Bardy et al., 2011). This does not appear to be influenced by the use of post-operative antibiotics: in a prospective trial comparing post-operative use of Chinese herbal medicine, amoxicillin, and placebo following ESS, colonization with S. aureus was present to an equal level in all three groups, with approximately one-half of all post-ESS patients showing evidence of neo-colonization with S. aureus (Liang et al., 2011). Additionally, the question of whether some individuals are genetically predisposed to be susceptible to S. aureus colonization. A previous pooling-based genome wide association scan (pGWAS) (Cormier et al., 2014) has suggested that variations in candidate genes implicated in bacterial engulfment and destruction as well those impacting epithelial barrier function are associated with S. aureus carriage in CRS patients, suggesting a potential genetically-determined basis to susceptibility.
Asthma with nasal polyposis and intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, also known as aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), was also a significant association to ESS+BUD failure. Of 17 patients with this diagnosis, 13 (76.5%) had disease recurrence. These findings are concordant with the current literature on this disease and complement the findings of Mendelsohn et al. (Nader et al., 2010) that demonstrated increased rates of disease recurrence and revision ESS.
Interestingly, although more elevated in the group with disease recurrence, SNSS and SNOT-22 scores were not statistically significantly different between the two groups at either time-point. Our findings did demonstrate a strong correlation between the two scores and further strengthened the comparability of the SNSS to the SNOT-22 score in evaluating active disease. However, SNOT-22 scores showed only a small correlation, although significant, to a poor Lund-Kennedy score. This discrepancy is possibly due to the self-reporting bias on subjective measures. The significantly higher Lund-Kennedy scores observed in the disease-recurrence groups despite similar symptom intensity, emphasizing the importance of considering objective outcome in addition to patient-reported ones.
A potential limitation of our study can be argued to that 4 months may be considered as a short follow up period after ESS. However, several authors have previously shown that endoscopic signs of recurrence are seen as early as 4 months (Stjärne et al., 2009; Amali et al., 2015) and that these appear stable over an additional 12 month follow up period (DeConde and Soler, 2016). Furthermore, data on SNSS and SNOT-22 are self-reported and patients may either not accurately recollect the severity or prevalence of their symptoms leading to a recollection bias, it can also lead to a response bias due to personal perceptive influences on one's symptomatology. It is for these exact reasons that studies using subjective questionnaires require an objective measurable value, such as the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score.
Patients undergoing revision ESS are at high risk of disease recurrence, even when budesonide irrigations are used postoperatively. Presence of S. aureus on culture pre-operatively or at 4 months post-ESS is associated with a negative outcome. This suggests that S. aureus negatively influences outcome, possibly via a number of potential interactions with the (i) immune system, (ii) regeneration and repair of the sinus epithelium, or (iii) via interference with the sinus microbiome. This suggests that S. aureus may be a simple and inexpensive biomarker for disease severity and indicates a clear need to better appreciate S. aureus' mechanistic contribution to disease development and persistence in order to develop targeted therapeutic strategies. Additional studies on microbiome and sinus mucosal gene expression will help in the understanding of several persisting pathophysiologic queries.
AM: study design; data collection and analysis; manuscript drafting, reviewing, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work; M-HA: data collection and analysis; manuscript reviewing, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work; AR and SA: data collection; manuscript reviewing, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work; SN: data collection; manuscript reviewing; final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work; LM: data collection and analysis; manuscript drafting; final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work; MD: study design; data analysis; manuscript writing, reviewing, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work.
This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (AM), a Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) grant (AM) and an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Canada (AM).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Al-Shemari, H., Abou-Hamad, W., Libman, M., and Desrosiers, M. (2007). Bacteriology of the sinus cavities of asymptomatic individuals after endoscopic sinus surgery. J. Otolaryngol. 36, 43–48. doi: 10.2310/7070.2006.0019
Amali, A., Saedi, B., Rahavi-Ezabadi, S., Ghazavi, H., and Hassanpoor, N. (2015). Long-term postoperative azithromycin in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 29, 421–424. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4244
Bendouah, Z., Barbeau, J., Hamad, W., and Desrosiers, M. (2006). Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with an unfavourable evolution after surgery for chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 134, 991–996. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.001
Browne, J. P., Hopkins, C., Slack, R., and Cano, S. J. (2007). The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): can we make it more clinically meaningful? Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 136, 736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.024
Chau, T. A., McCully, M. L., Brintnell, W., et al. (2009). Toll-like receptor 2 ligands on the staphylococcal cell wall downregulate superantigen-induced T cell activation and prevent toxic shock syndrome. Nat. Med. 15, 641–648. doi: 10.1038/nm.1965
Cormier, C., Mfuna Endam, L., Filali-Mouhim, A., Boisvert, P., Boulet, L. P., Boulay, M. E., et al. (2014). A pooling-based genomewide association study identifies genetic variants associated with Staphylococcus aureus colonization in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 4, 207–215. doi: 10.1002/alr.21276
Hastan, D., Fokkens, W. J., Bachert, C., Newson, R. B., Bislimovska, J., Bockelbrink, A., et al. (2011). Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe–an underestimated disease. A GA(2)LEN study. Allergy 66, 1216–1223. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02646.x
Jackson, D. J., Gern, J. E., and Lemanske, R. F. Jr. (2017). Lessons learned from birth cohort studies conducted in diverse environments. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 139, 379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.941
Jervis-Bardy, J., Foreman, A., Boase, S., Valentine, R., and Wormald, P.-J. (2011). What is the origin of Staphylococcus aureus in the early postoperative sinonasal cavity? Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 1, 308–312. doi: 10.1002/alr.20050
Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. W., and Lee, J. D. (2008). Comparison of the surgical outcome between primary and revision endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 29, 379–384. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.11.005
Psaltis, A. J., Li, G., Vaezeafshar, R., Cho, K. S., and Hwang, P. H. (2014). Modification of the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoring system improves its reliability and correlation with patient-reported outcome measures. Laryngoscope 124, 2216–2223. doi: 10.1002/lary.24654
Liang, K. L., Su, Y. C., Tsai, C. C., Lin, J. S., Jiang, R. S., and Su, M. C. (2011). Postoperative care with Chinese herbal medicine or amoxicillin after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 25, 170–175. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3610
Maniakas, A., and Desrosiers, M. (2014). Azithromycin add-on therapy in high-risk postendoscopic sinus surgery patients failing corticosteroid irrigations: a clinical practice audit. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 28, 151–155. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.4017
Mendelsohn, D., Jeremic, G., Wright, E. D., and Rotenberg, B. W. (2011). Revision rates after endoscopic sinus surgery: a recurrence analysis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 120, 162–166. doi: 10.1177/000348941112000304
Nader, M.-E., Abou-Jaoude, P., Cabaluna, M., and Desrosiers, M. (2010). Using response to a standardized treatment to identify phenotypes for genetic studies of chronic rhinosinusitis. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 39, 69–75.
Ou, J. J., Drilling, A. J., Cooksley, C., et al. (2016). Reduced innate immune response to a Staphylococcus aureus small colony variant compared to its wild-type parent strain. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6:187. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00187
Philpott, C., Hopkins, C., Erskine, S., Kumar, N., Robertson, A., Farboud, A., et al. (2015). The burden of revision sinonasal surgery in the UK-data from the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 5:e006680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006680
Piccirillo, J. F., Merritt, M. G. Jr., and Richards, M. L. (2002). Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126, 41–47. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.121022
Rudmik, L., Smith, T. L., Schlosser, R. J., Hwang, P. H., Mace, J. C., and Soler, Z. M. (2014). Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 124, 2007–2012. doi: 10.1002/lary.24630
Schwartz, J. S., Al-Mot, S., Endam, M. F., Alromaih, S., Madrenas, J., and Desrosiers, M. (2017). Bacterial immune evasion via an IL-10 mediated host response, a novel pathophysiologic mechanism for chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 155, 227–233. doi: 10.4193/Rhin16.199
Stjärne, P., Olsson, P., and Alenius, M. (2009). Use of mometasone furoate to prevent polyp relapse after endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 135, 296–302. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.2
Tan, N. C., Cooksley, C. M., Roscioli, E., Drilling, A. J., Douglas, R., Wormald, P. J., et al. (2014). Small-colony variants and phenotype switching of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergy 69, 1364–1371. doi: 10.1111/all.12457
Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis, Staphylococcus aureus, revision surgery, endoscopic sinus surgery, budesonide nasal irrigation
Citation: Maniakas A, Asmar M-H, Renteria Flores AE, Nayan S, Alromaih S, Mfuna Endam L and Desrosiers MY (2018) Staphylococcus aureus on Sinus Culture Is Associated With Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8:150. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00150
Received: 30 November 2017; Accepted: 20 April 2018;
Published: 15 May 2018.
Edited by:Alkis James Psaltis, University of Adelaide, Australia
Reviewed by:Anders Ulf Cervin, The University of Queensland, Australia
Balaji Veeraraghavan, Christian Medical College & Hospital, India
Copyright © 2018 Maniakas, Asmar, Renteria Flores, Nayan, Alromaih, Mfuna Endam and Desrosiers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Martin Y. Desrosiers, email@example.com