Original Research ARTICLE
Detection and Phylogenetic Characterization of Anaplasma capra: An Emerging Pathogen in Sheep and Goats in China
- 1College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China
- 2International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou, China
- 3Experimental Research Center, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou, China
Anaplasma capra is an emerging pathogen, which can infect ruminants and humans. This study was conducted to determine the occurrence of A. capra in the blood samples of sheep and goats in China. Using nested polymerase chain reaction (nested-PCR) targeting the gltA gene and conventional PCR targeting the heat shock protein (groEL) gene and the major surface protein4 gene (msp4), A. capra was detected in 129 (8.9%) of 1453 sheep and goat blood samples. The positive rate was higher in goats (9.4%, 89/943) than in sheep (7.8%, 40/510) (χ2 = 1.04, p > 0.05, df = 1). For sheep, A. capra was found in 17 sites from 2 provinces. The prevalence was 28.6% in sheep from Liaoning province, which was higher than in Henan Province (7.3%). For goats, A. capra was detected in 35 sites from 7 provinces. The prevalence varied from 0 to 19.4% in the goat sites examined. The prevalence rates were 19.4, 19.3, 10, 8.8, 6.8, 1.8, and 0% in goats from Guizhou province, Henan Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Shanxi Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Yunnan province, and Gansu province, respectively. Based on the analysis of the A. capra citrate synthase gene (gltA), two variants were identified. Variant I showed a high sequence similarity to the A. capra, which were previously reported in sheep, goats, Ixodes persulcatus, Haemaphysalis longicornis, Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis, and humans. Variant II was only found in Luoyang, Anyang, and Sanmengxia, of Henan province. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of this variant of A. capra in sheep and goat blood in China. Phylogenetic analysis based on groEL and msp4 genes showed that the Anaplasma sp. sequences clustered independently from A. capra and other Anaplasma species with high bootstrap values. We found A. capra DNA in sheep and goats in China, providing evidence that sheep and goats can be infected by A. capra. We also found that this zoonotic pathogen is widely distributed in China. This study provides information for assessing the public health risks for human anaplasmosis.
Anaplasma species are zoonotic pathogens with tick vectors and mammalian reservoir hosts, and are common in tropical, subtropical, and some temperate regions of the world (Geurden et al., 2008; Tay et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2018). There are seven recognized species which are known to reside within the membrane enclosed vacuoles in the cytoplasm of blood and different cell types (Yang et al., 2015). The currently recognized species include Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma platys, and Anaplasma centrale. A. marginale has been found in dairy cattle, and is the main inter-erythrocytic pathogen of bovine animals (Byaruhanga et al., 2018). A. bovis and A. ovis have been reported in both domestic and wild animals in various parts of the world (Liu et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2018). A. platys is the only classified rickettsial species known to infect platelets and cause infectious cyclic thrombocytopenia in dogs (Harvey et al., 1978; Ben Said et al., 2018; Vieira et al., 2018). A. centrale is characterized by progressive anemia associated with the presence of intra-erythrocytic inclusion bodies; it has also been used as a live vaccine against A. marginale for cattle in Australia, Africa, and South America (Rjeibi et al., 2017; Byaruhanga et al., 2018).
Anaplasma phagocytophilum, which was first recognized as a causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) in the USA in 1994, infects the neutrophils of humans and animals (Chen et al., 1994). A. phagocytophilum is now the most prevalent species of Anaplasma over broad areas where various tick species are vectors (Cao et al., 2000; Villar et al., 2015; Eisen, 2018). This species infects the neutrophils of cattle, sheep, goats, horses, dogs, hares, yaks, and 24 species of rodents (Kawahara et al., 2006; de la Fuente et al., 2016; Ochirkhuu et al., 2017; Rocchigiani et al., 2018). A. phagocytophilum has also been associated with HGA in China since 2008 (Wormser, 2016), and cases of HGA have been reported in Europe and North America (Thomas et al., 2009; Nichols Heitman et al., 2016).
Anaplasma capra was initially identified in 37 (31%) of 120 blood samples from asymptomatic goats in northern China in 2012, based on both the 16S rRNA gene (rrs) and the citrate synthase gene (gltA) (Li et al., 2015). The newly discovered Anaplasma species was then isolated from the samples during active surveillance of patients in a hospital in Heilongjiang Province, China; it was then identified in sheep and ticks in the northern and southern China (Li et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). The infection rates of ticks at the sites ranged from 0 to 78.6% (Yang et al., 2016, 2017, 2018). The disease caused by this pathogen is characterized by high hepatic aminotransferase concentrations, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia. A. capra can be cultivated in human cell lines (HL-60, THP-1), but neither morulae nor other forms of this pathogen have been observed in the peripheral blood smears; only free bacteria or a few infected endothelial cells have been found (Li et al., 2015). Also, there is currently very little information about this pathogen, and identifying the reservoir host is essential to design disease control strategies.
To investigate the occurrence and prevalence of A. capra in sheep and goats in China, we collected blood samples from different regions in China and estimated the sheep and goats' reservoir capacity based on the infection prevalence. This information better defines the epidemiological role of sheep and goats.
Materials and Methods
EDTA blood samples were collected from sheep and goats in rural areas from 52 sites in 8 provinces of China between March 2012 and October 2017. Guizhou and Yunan have a subtropical monsoon climate, with more rainfall in comparison to the temperate monsoon climate of Henan, Shanxi and Liaoning provinces. Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Gansu have a temperate continental climate, and are dry with less rain. The sampling period was chosen to encompass the entire active season for ticks. Three to four specific flocks of sheep and goats were selected for sampling in each site. A total of 1,453 blood samples were collected in 10 ml sterile EDTA tubes.
DNA was extracted from 200 μl of EDTA blood samples individually using the Blood DNA Kit (OMEGA, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity and purity of the DNA were assessed by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Only those samples with at least 20 ng/μl of DNA were subjected to PCR assays. The extracted DNA was stored at −20°C until used.
Nested PCR reactions targeting the gltA gene and conventional PCR targeting the heat shock protein (groEL) gene and the major surface protein4 gene (msp4) of A. capra were performed as previously described (Li et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). The primers and PCR conditions are described in Table 1. To prevent cross contamination, DNA extraction, amplification, and detection of PCR products were done in separate rooms. The PCR reactions were performed in an ABI 2720 thermal cycler (Life Technologies Holdings Pte Ltd., Singapore) with a total volume of 25 μl containing 2.5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+ Plus), 2.0 μl of each dNTPs at 2.5 mM, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 2 μl of DNA for primary reactions or 2 μl of the primary PCR products for nested reactions, 0.5 μl of each primer (20 pmol), and 17.25 μl of distilled water. The PCR conditions comprised initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 45 s at 94°C, annealing for 45 s at the temperatures listed in Table 1, and elongation for 45 s at 72°C.
In each amplification, the DNA extracted from sheep infected with A. capra (GenBank accession nos. MG879297, MH174929, MH174932) was used as the positive control, and sterile water was used as the negative control.
Sequencing of PCR Products and Phylogenetic Analysis
The PCR products were visualized by UV transillumination in a 1.0% agarose gel following electrophoresis and staining with ethidium bromide. PCR amplicons were purified and sequenced on a 3730 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and analyzed by the BLASTN (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) and CLUSTALW (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) programs. The nucleotide sequences were confirmed by bidirectional sequencing and also by sequencing a new PCR product if necessary.
Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the sequence distance method using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm using the MEGA 6.06 software. Confidence values for individual branches of the resulting tree were determined by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The sequences obtained in this study were aligned with reference sequences downloaded from GenBank.
Relationships between the aspects of the clinical history of each goat or sheep and the type of feeding model (grazing or household) were assessed using the Chi-square test with Yates' correction, and the differences were regarded significant when p ≤ 0.05.
Accession Numbers of Nucleotide Sequences
The representative sequences obtained in this study have been submitted and deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers as follows: gltA genes (MG879297, MG879298, MG932656, MG932657), groEL genes (MH174929, MH174931), and msp4 genes (MH174932, MH174933).
This study was conducted in accordance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Administration Act (1988) after it was reviewed and its protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Henan Agricultural University. Appropriate permission was obtained from the farmer before the collection of blood specimens from the animals.
Of the 1,453 EDTA blood samples from sheep and goats, a total of 129 samples (8.9%) were A. capra-positive by the congruent results of three PCR amplification based on gltA, groEL, msp4 locus. The positive rate was 7.8% (40/510) and 9.4% (89/943) in sheep and goats, respectively (Table 2). For sheep, A. capra was found in 17 sites from 2 provinces (Table 2). The prevalence rates were 28.6% in sheep from Liaoning province, and 7.3% in sheep from Henan Province (χ2 = 5.86, df = 1, 0.01 < p < 0.05). For goats, A. capra was detected in 35 sites from 7 provinces. The prevalence rate varied from 0 to 19.4% in the studied goats' sites, and the differences in positive rates were statistically significant (χ2 = 47.95, df = 6, p < 0.01) (Table 2).
Table 2. Prevalence distribution of A. capra isolates from sheep and goats from different provinces, China 2012–2017.
The highest prevalence rates were 19.4% in goats from Guizhou province, while the lowest prevalence rates were 0% in the Gansu province (Table 2, Figure 1A). The highest prevalence rates were found in Zhengzhou (38.1%) of Henan province, Guiyang (35.3%) of Guizhou province, and Baoji (31.5%) of Shanxi Province, followed by Sanmenxia (28.6%), and Luoyang (24.9%) of Henan province (Figures 1B,C).
Figure 1. Distribution and infection of A. capra in all the studied regions. (A) The average rate of infection in 8 provinces of China; (B) the rate of infection in 12 countries of Henan province; (C) the rate of infection in 4 countries of Shanxi province.
There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence among the gender groups in sheep (χ2 = 1.33, df = 1, p > 0.05) and goats (χ2 = 0.28, df = 1, p > 0.05) (Table 3). However, there were some differences in prevalence amongst the age groups and feeding habits. Sheep that were <3 months old had the highest prevalence for both grazing and household feeding (66.7 and 12.5%, respectively), which may be related to a weakened immune system. The second highest prevalence was in sheep in the age group of 7 months − 1 year (32.4, 4.3%), while sheep in the age group of 3 months − 6 months (21.4, 0%) had the lowest prevalence. For goats, the highest prevalence was for the age group >1 year (14.5 and 4.4% for grazing and household feeding, respectively). The next highest was the age group of 3 months − 6 months (15.9, 1.4%), and the lowest prevalence was in the age group of <3 months (6.1, 0%) (Table 3). The prevalence was higher in grazing animals (15.5%) than household feeding animals (3.0%). The reason may be due to a greater exposure to ticks.
Table 3. Prevalence distribution of A. capra by age, gender, and feeding habits in sheep and goats from China 2012–2017.
The molecular detection of A. capra isolates in sheep and goats was analyzed based on gltA, groEL, and msp4 genes. The length (594 bp) of the gltA gene sequence from different sampling sites was used to determine the identity of the Anaplasma species. ClustalW analysis showed that most of the fragments of A. capra had similarities with the corresponding sequences detected in goats and humans (GenBank accession nos. KJ700628, KM206274). However, 20 out of 139 fragments (maximum of 99.3%) from Luoyang, Anyang, and Sanmenxia, in Henan province showed relatively little difference. The phylogenetic analysis of the gltA gene sequences demonstrated that the fragments identified in this study were in the same clade as members of Anaplasma, but distinct from other known Anaplasma species (Figure 2A). Further, the phylogenetic analysis revealed that the A. capra fragments identified in this study were in the same clade with the fragments reported earlier (Li et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of A. capra identified in this study based on the gltA (A), groEL (B), and msp4 (C) genes. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method and the numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap values for the branch points. Numbers on the branches indicate percent support for each clade. Ehrlichia ruminantium was used as outgroup. The sequences from this study are underlined. The numbers of nucleotides were 594, 874, 656 bp in the final alignment of gltA, groEL, and msp4, respectively.
Further analyses of groEL and msp4 gene sequences showed 99.5% and 99.5% similarity between the Anaplasma sp. sequences (GenBank accession nos. KX987393, KR261639), respectively. The groEL sequences (GenBank accession nos. MH174929, MH174930, and MH174931) were 100, 100, and 100% identical to A. capra (GenBank accession no. KX987393). The msp4 sequences (GenBank accession nos. MH174932, MH174933) were 100% and 100% identical to A. capra (GenBank accession no. KX417357). The phylogenetic analysis based on groEL and msp4 genes showed that the Anaplasma sp. sequences clustered independently from A. capra and other Anaplasma species with high bootstrap values (Figures 2B,C), indicating potential novelty of the studied Anaplasma sp.
Anaplasma spp. are important tick-borne bacteria of veterinary importance that pose an increasing threat to the public and veterinary health (Fang et al., 2015). A. phagocytophilum and A. capra have been identified as pathogens of human anaplasmosis, from seven recognized Anaplasma species that infect various specific host cell types, such as erythrocytes, neutrophils, and platelets, depending on the host species (Troese et al., 2011; Kahlon et al., 2013; Tay et al., 2014; Baráková et al., 2017). A. capra was first recognized as asymptomatic in goats and was initially named by Li et al. (2015), who found A. capra in a human with a history of a tick bite in 2015 in Heilongjiang province, northern China (Li et al., 2015). Additional cases of human infection were identified from 622 febrile patients at the same site in 2010 (Li et al., 2012). The disease caused by A. capra was characterized by fever, headache, malaise, dizziness, and chills (Li et al., 2015). In another study, A. capra was inoculated into human cell lines (HL-60 and THP-1 cells) and morulae were observed at 24 days after inoculation, but no morulae or other blood agents were detected in any cells of peripheral blood smears on microscopic examination (Li et al., 2015).
Thus, microscopic detection of morulae in peripheral blood samples is unreliable for diagnosis of A. capra infection, unlike for A. phagocytophilum infection (Li et al., 2015). It has been proposed that A. capra might infect endothelial cells in vivo, similar to A. phagocytophilum and A. marginale (Munderloh et al., 2004). Further investigations are needed to better define A. capra's host cells in human beings and infected vertebrates, such as sheep and goats.
We detected A. capra in blood from sheep and goats in China, regardless of feeding habits (whether grazing or fed in the household). The infection rate of A. capra was slightly higher in goats (9.4%, 89/943) than in sheep (7.8%, 40/510) as compared with a higher rate in sheep (16.3%) than in goats (12.3%) as previously reported (Yang et al., 2017). Further, the prevalence was higher for grazing animals (15.6%, 106/682) than household feeding animals (3.0%, 23/771) in the case of both sheep and goats. The difference in prevalence between the two feeding habits may be the result of exposure to ticks. There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence between female (9.0%, 108/1203) and male (8.4%, 21/250) sheep or goats, in accordance with some previous studies (Yang et al., 2017). However, Belkahia et al. showed that, in dromedaries and sheep, the infection rates of Anaplasma spp. were significantly higher in females compared with males (Belkahia et al., 2015).
Our findings suggest that A. capra is widely distributed in China, and that sheep and goats can be infected by it. A. capra was also detected in Ixodes persulcatus, Haemaphysalis longicornis, and Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis in Heilongjiang province, Shandong Province, and Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Gansu, respectively (Sun et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). In addition, A. capra was detected in deer and free-living Capricornis crispus in Japan (Sato et al., 2009). Tick vector populations are expanding, and in turn increasing the risk of acquiring these Anaplasma species infections, thus this tick-borne pathogen is likely to be a growing concern for human and animal health (Chvostáč et al., 2018; Jaimes-Dueñez et al., 2018). To the best of our knowledge, to date, no other causative agent related to human anaplasmosis has been reported in China. Our study provides information for assessing the public health risks for human anaplasmosis.
Phylogenetic analysis of A. capra based on the gltA, groEL, and msp4 genes demonstrated that the isolate sequences obtained from sheep created a separate clade within the genus Anaplasma, suggesting that these A. capra strains possess the same molecular characteristics. A novel Anaplasma species, closely related to A. capra, was identified from H. qinghaiensis in northwestern China (Yang et al., 2016). The gltA gene of that isolate exhibited the highest sequence similarity with A. capra (GenBank accession numbers KJ700628, KR261626, KM206274, KX417324), isolated from a goat, H. longicornis, Homo sapiens, and a sheep, respectively. This organism has also been detected previously in Rhipicephalus microplus (Anaplasma spp. strain WHBMXZ-125, GenBank accession no. KX987362) from Wuhan, China (Lu et al., 2017). The Anaplasma species that were identified in those domestic animals, ticks, and humans should be a single species according to the criteria for classification of bacteria.
These results indicate that there are at least three variants of A. capra circulating in nature. We found that one variant (GenBank accession nos. MG879297, MG932657) was in the same clade with the isolates from sheep, H. qinghaiensis, H. longicornis, and humans (GenBank accession nos. KX417308, KJ700628, KR261628, KX987362 and KM206274) in northwest China (Liu et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017). Another variant (GenBank accession nos. MG879298, MG932658) was identical to the following strains: LY63, SMX123, AY419, et al. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of this variant of A. capra in sheep and goats in Henan, China. The last sequence (GenBank accession no. KX417336) was isolated from goat blood in Guizhou, China (Yang et al., 2017). Further phylogenetic studies involving different gene markers are needed to better characterize the two A. capra variants observed in this investigation.
This study was conducted to determine the occurrence of A. capra in blood samples of sheep and goats in China. The data showed that A. capra was widely distributed in China, especially in central China, and a high prevalence of grazing or household feeding sheep and goats can be infected by A. capra. Molecular characteristics suggest that this pathogen could be a substantial health threat to animals. Moreover, one novel variant of gltA gene which has never been reported before was found in this study. Further studies are needed to better understand the epidemiology and the pathogenicity of the A. capra circulating in China.
YP and KW carried out the experiments, including PCR, cloning, sequencing, and data analysis. YP drafted the manuscript. SZ, YY, and JJ collected samples, while HW, FJ, LZ, and CN supervised the entire work. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the Earmarked Fund for China Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (nycytx-38) and the Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Animal Husbandry, Henan Province, China. We thank Xiaoxing Wang from the Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science.
Baráková, I., Derdáková, M., Selyemová, D., Chvostác, M., Špitalská, E., Rosso, F., et al. (2017). Tick-borne pathogens and their reservoir hosts in northern Italy. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.08.012
Belkahia, H., Ben, S. M., Alberti, A., Abdi, K., Issaoui, Z., Hattab, D., et al. (2015). First molecular survey and novel genetic variants' identification of Anaplasma marginale, A. centrale and A. bovis in cattle from Tunisia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 34, 361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.017
Ben Said, M., Belkahia, H., and Messadi, L. (2018). Anaplasma spp. in North Africa: a review on molecular epidemiology, associated risk factors and genetic characteristics. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 543–555. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.003
Byaruhanga, C., Collins, N., Knobel, D., Khumalo, Z., Chaisi, M., and Oosthuizen, M. (2018). Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale amongst transhumant cattle in north-eastern Uganda. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 580–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.012
Cao, W., Zhao, Q., Zhang, P., Dumler, J., Zhang, X., Fang, L., et al. (2000). Granulocytic Ehrlichiae in Ixodes persulcatus ticks from an area in China where Lyme disease is endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 4208–4210.
Chvostáč, M., Špitalská, E., Václav, R., Vaculová, T., Minichová, L., and Derdáková, M. (2018). Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:E994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050994
de la Fuente, J., Estrada-Pena, A., Cabezas-Cruz, A., and Kocan, K. M. (2016). Anaplasma phagocytophilum uses common strategies for infection of ticks and vertebrate hosts. Trends Microbiol. 24, 173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.12.001
Fang, L. Q., Liu, K., Li, X. L., Liang, S., Yang, Y., Yao, H. W., et al. (2015). Emerging tick-borne infections in mainland China: an increasing public health threat. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 1467–1479. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00177-2
Geurden, T., Somers, R., Thanh, N. T., Vien, L. V., Nga, V. T., Giang, H. H., et al. (2008). Parasitic infections in dairy cattle around Hanoi, northern Vietnam. Vet Parasitol. 153, 384–388. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.031
Jaimes-Dueñez, J., Triana-Chávez, O., and Mejía-Jaramillo, A. M. (2018). Genetic, host and environmental factors associated with a high prevalence of Anaplasma marginale. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 1286–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.05.009
Kahlon, A., Ojogun, N., Ragland, S. A., Seidman, D., Troese, M. J., Ottens, A. K., et al. (2013). Anaplasma phagocytophilum Asp14 is an invasin that interacts with mammalian host cells via its C terminus to facilitate infection. Infect Immun. 81, 65–79. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00932-12
Kawahara, M., Rikihisa, Y., Lin, Q., Isogai, E., Tahara, K., Itagaki, A., et al. (2006). Novel genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, and a novel Ehrlichia sp. in wild deer and ticks on two major islands in Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 1102–1109. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1102-1109.2006
Lee, S., Mossaad, E., Ibrahim, A., Ismail, A., Adjou Moumouni, P., Liu, M., et al. (2018). Detection and molecular characterization of tick-borne pathogens infecting sheep and goats in Blue Nile and West Kordofan states in Sudan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.014
Li, H., Jiang, J., Liu, W., Zheng, Y., Huo, Q., Tang, K., et al. (2012). Human infection with Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, China. Emerging Infect. Dis. 18, 1636–1639. doi: 10.3201/eid1810.120594
Li, H., Zheng, Y. C., Ma, L., Jia, N., Jiang, B. G., Jiang, R. R., et al. (2015). Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: a surveillance study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 663–670. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70051-4
Liu, Z., Ma, M., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Peng, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2012). Molecular survey and genetic identification of Anaplasma species in goats from central and southern China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 464–470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06848-11
Lu, M., Tian, J., Yu, B., Guo, W., Holmes, E., and Zhang, Y. (2017). Extensive diversity of rickettsiales bacteria in ticks from Wuhan, China. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 8, 574–580. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.03.006
Munderloh, U. G., Lynch, M. J., Herron, M. J., Palmer, A. T., Kurtti, T. J., Nelson, R. D., et al. (2004). Infection of endothelial cells with Anaplasma marginale and A. phagocytophilum. Vet. Microbiol. 101, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.02.011
Nichols Heitman, K., Dahlgren, F., Drexler, N., Massung, R., and Behravesh, C. (2016). Increasing Incidence of Ehrlichiosis in the United States: a summary of national surveillance of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii Infections in the United States, 2008-2012. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 94, 52–60. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0540
Ochirkhuu, N., Konnai, S., Odbileg, R., Murata, S., and Ohashi, K. (2017). Molecular epidemiological survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma species in Mongolian livestock. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 17, 539–549. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2111
Rjeibi, M., Ayadi, O., Rekik, M., and Gharbi, M. (2017). Molecular survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma centrale, A. marginale and A. bovis in cattle from Algeria. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 65, 456–464. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12725
Rocchigiani, G., Ebani, V., Nardoni, S., Bertelloni, F., Bascherini, A., Leoni, A., et al. (2018). Molecular survey on the occurrence of arthropod-borne pathogens in wild brown hares (Lepus europaeus) from Central Italy. Infect. Genet. Evol. 59, 142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.02.005
Sato, M., Nishizawa, I., Fujihara, M., Nishimura, T., Matsubara, K., and Harasawa, R. (2009). Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of Anaplasma species detected from Japanese serows (Capricornis crispus). J. Vet. Med. Sci. 71, 1677–1679. doi: 10.1292/jvms.001677
Thomas, R., Dumler, J., and Carlyon, J. (2009). Current management of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, human monocytic ehrlichiosis and Ehrlichia ewingii ehrlichiosis. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 7, 709–722. doi: 10.1586/eri.09.44
Troese, M. J., Kahlon, A., Ragland, S. A., Ottens, A. K., Ojogun, N., Nelson, K. T., et al. (2011). Proteomic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum during infection of human myeloid cells identifies a protein that is pronouncedly upregulated on the infectious dense-cored cell. Infect Immun. 79, 4696–4707. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05658-11
Vieira, F., Acosta, I., Martins, T., Filho, J., Krawczak, F., Barbieri, A., et al. (2018). Tick-borne infections in dogs and horses in the state of Espírito Santo, Southeast Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 249, 43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.11.005
Villar, M., Ayllón, N., Alberdi, P., Moreno, A., Moreno, M., Tobes, R., et al. (2015). Integrated metabolomics, transcriptomics and proteomics identifies metabolic pathways affected by Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in tick cells. Mol. Cell Proteomics 14, 3154–3172. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.051938
Yang, J., Han, R., Niu, Q., Liu, Z., Guan, G., Liu, G., et al. (2018). Occurrence of four Anaplasma species with veterinary and public health significance in sheep, northwestern China. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.10.005
Yang, J., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Niu, Q., Ren, Q., et al. (2015). Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma spp. in sheep and cattle from Xinjiang, northwest China. Parasit. Vec. 8:108. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0727-3
Yang, J., Liu, Z., Niu, Q., Liu, J., Han, R., Guan, G., et al. (2017). A novel zoonotic Anaplasma species is prevalent in small ruminants: potential public health implications. Parasit. Vec. 10:264. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2182-9
Yang, J., Liu, Z., Niu, Q., Liu, J., Han, R., Liu, G., et al. (2016). Molecular survey and characterization of a novel Anaplasma species closely related to Anaplasma capra in ticks, northwestern China. Parasit. Vec. 9:603. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1886-6
Keywords: Anaplasma, Anaplasma capra, tick-borne diseases, sheep, goat, gltA, msp4, groEL
Citation: Peng Y, Wang K, Zhao S, Yan Y, Wang H, Jing J, Jian F, Wang R, Zhang L and Ning C (2018) Detection and Phylogenetic Characterization of Anaplasma capra: An Emerging Pathogen in Sheep and Goats in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8:283. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00283
Received: 22 April 2018; Accepted: 25 July 2018;
Published: 30 August 2018.
Edited by:Margaret E. Bauer, Indiana University Bloomington, United States
Reviewed by:Agustín Estrada-Peña, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain
Quan Liu, Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS), China
Marina Eremeeva, Georgia Southern University, United States
Kevin Bown, University of Salford, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2018 Peng, Wang, Zhao, Yan, Wang, Jing, Jian, Wang, Zhang and Ning. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Changshen Ning, firstname.lastname@example.org